Log in

View Full Version : Crackdown



Individual
28th April 2004, 16:42
Another example of how far this country is going downhill.

Only this time, it is coming from the liberal side.

A democratic Louisiana representative, Derrick Shepherd, has proposed a bill to pass legislation in order to prosecute anyone wearing pants/shorts/skirts that expose their undergarments.

Violaters would be punished with a $500 fine, up to 6 months in prison, or both.

USAToday (http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2004-04-23-pants_x.htm)

Censorship continues to rise. With it, public outcries and pandomonium follow.

If this new bill passed, and in fact became law; would this then mean that I can call to have my girlfriend arrested for going out to get the mail?

Or how about this: I can call to have my plumber arrested because he bent over to fix the sink. :huh:

I have a feeling that a law that would dictate over clothing would not pass, especially with such steep penalties. However we can never be too sure, people do vote for these sort of things.

Touchstone
28th April 2004, 17:06
He must not be very liberal. It may be passed according to who it comes before. I have a feeling Bush would pass it.

IPkurd
28th April 2004, 17:51
probably stupid misguided christians pushed for this shit

cubist
28th April 2004, 18:23
LMAO,

i struggle with UK law that i can't fuck in my garden, which isn't other looked and has 6ft conifers all around, but i can fuck on my windowsill with the curtains open which can be viewed from my garden gate, makes no sense to me,

pedro san pedro
29th April 2004, 04:30
yeah saw this in the news the other day.

i hope, beyond hope itself, that the pun in the title of this thread is intentional.

:lol: :lol:

revolutionindia
29th April 2004, 10:10
i agree such laws need to be introduced

First to start of why should women wear

short skirts.

Clothes are meant to cover your body

not expose stategic parts.

Do you have any idea what semi nude
women going all around
can cause.

Whats the pupose behind exposing your underwear
other than the
fact that you are shameless

you must be happy that you will only get fines for 500$ and jail term

In islamic countries you would be beheaded for that.

pedro san pedro
29th April 2004, 10:53
Do you have any idea what semi nude
women going all around
can cause.

have to admit that i'm not entirely sure....

though i was at the beach the other day, a 17 men got into a massive fight, started a riot, burnt cars and threw stones at old ladies after a girl showed up in a bikini.

i'm just glad i got out alive

ÑóẊîöʼn
29th April 2004, 11:39
I have to say WHAT the FUCK?

Why should people be punished for showing their body? Why is the human body so offensive? If if people wish to wear clothes that show off their underpants and/or body parts, big smegging deal.


Do you have any idea what semi nude
women going all around
can cause.

No idea, but you seem to think it will lead to an increase in amorous feelings. First of all, what is wrong with amorous feelings and secondly, if one is used to naked or semi-naked bodies they tend not to be as arousing.

Those of you who have no problems with this STUPID law should get your heads screwed on properly.

cubist
29th April 2004, 12:12
revolution india, WTF, women can get there bits out if they want to, if you find it insulting close your eyes, but you look like everyone else else you wouldn't notice it

RedAnarchist
29th April 2004, 12:16
The human body is a wonderful work of art. It should not have to be bound into a cloth jail.

IPkurd
29th April 2004, 13:48
i gota admit that wearing small tiny clothes does change the way i think about the women.
most men would think the girl/women is 'easy' so they will have no respect for them, im kinda like that.
some of you people can say it's the sexist men that think that but NO most men do to an extent.

revolutionindia
29th April 2004, 14:20
Originally posted by [email protected] 29 2004, 05:09 PM
I have to say WHAT the FUCK?

Why should people be punished for showing their body? Why is the human body so offensive? If if people wish to wear clothes that show off their underpants and/or body parts, big smegging deal.

No idea, but you seem to think it will lead to an increase in amorous feelings. First of all, what is wrong with amorous feelings and secondly, if one is used to naked or semi-naked bodies they tend not to be as arousing.

Those of you who have no problems with this STUPID law should get your heads screwed on properly.
[
People should punished so that they so not repeat it again
The human body is beautiful

A beautiful woman is a fully clothed woman

As you said
underpants are called underpants because they are meant
to be worn under your pants.

They have a place which is inside your pants.

I see no reason why anyone should see it.


Amorous feelings is ok and nothing wrong with it

but when you are constantly bombarded all the time with nudity
all around you it will only result in you having only sex on your
mind.

Sex is the lower need of the self if you are
attached to your lower needs you
will never ever attain your higher needs
Which at this point of time you are neither aware of
or have any idea about.

revolutionindia
29th April 2004, 14:26
Originally posted by [email protected] 29 2004, 05:42 PM
revolution india, WTF, women can get there bits out if they want to, if you find it insulting close your eyes, but you look like everyone else else you wouldn't notice it
I worship women ,I cannot bear to see them degraded
and oogled at by men.
I respect and love women who know how to look beautiful
with their clothes on.

You cannot respect a shameless women
who likes to tiltilate unsuspecting men and
enjoys all the dirty looks and
attention.

Funky Monk
29th April 2004, 14:28
I can't understand your suprise that this is proposed by a Democrat. We all know that Southern Democrats are one step away from arch Republicans. Often that step is to be more moderate.

revolutionindia
29th April 2004, 14:29
Originally posted by [email protected] 29 2004, 05:46 PM
The human body is a wonderful work of art. It should not have to be bound into a cloth jail.
The cloth is not a jail.
Its protection from the lechorous looks of men
It lends a woman dignity and respect.

I respect women I have feelings for them
but I am not looking for cheap thrills.

ÑóẊîöʼn
29th April 2004, 14:45
but when you are constantly bombarded all the time with nudity
all around you it will only result in you having only sex on your
mind.

Hardly. As I can personally testify, even when the hormones are riding high, it's impossible to think about sex ALL the time... there are other things that catch a young male's attention, ya know...


Sex is the lower need of the self if you are
attached to your lower needs you
will never ever attain your higher needs
Which at this point of time you are neither aware of
or have any idea about.

What 'higher needs' would these be? Sex is the best form of pleasure as it costs nothing and can strengthen bonds between people.
We all seek pleasure in some form or other.


I worship women ,I cannot bear to see them degraded
and oogled at by men.
I respect and love women who know how to look beautiful
with their clothes on.

Very well, that is your personal taste and I repsect that. But you shouldn't be forcing your personal preferences on women who may actually like being looked at by men (Or other women!)
I agree that clothes, scents, situations etc. can form the basis of more platonic pleasures with women. But that doesn't have to exclude a more intimate form of pleasure.


You cannot respect a shameless women
who likes to tiltilate unsuspecting men and
enjoys all the dirty looks and
attention.

I respect a women who is brave enough to flout the conventions of her society and show herself off as much as I respect the woman who takes her time and effort to look good, ie clothes, make-up, etc.
Humility is not to the taste of all.


The cloth is not a jail.
Its protection from the lechorous looks of men
It lends a woman dignity and respect.

So you wouldn't object if a woman decided to wear a skintight leather or PVC suit then :P


but I am not looking for cheap thrills.

Neither am I, but I have no problem with those who are looking for cheap thrills.

revolutionindia
29th April 2004, 14:58
Originally posted by [email protected] 29 2004, 08:15 PM

but when you are constantly bombarded all the time with nudity
all around you it will only result in you having only sex on your
mind.

Hardly. As I can personally testify, even when the hormones are riding high, it's impossible to think about sex ALL the time... there are other things that catch a young male's attention, ya know...


Sex is the lower need of the self if you are
attached to your lower needs you
will never ever attain your higher needs
Which at this point of time you are neither aware of
or have any idea about.

What 'higher needs' would these be? Sex is the best form of pleasure as it costs nothing and can strengthen bonds between people.
We all seek pleasure in some form or other.


I worship women ,I cannot bear to see them degraded
and oogled at by men.
I respect and love women who know how to look beautiful
with their clothes on.

Very well, that is your personal taste and I repsect that. But you shouldn't be forcing your personal preferences on women who may actually like being looked at by men (Or other women!)
I agree that clothes, scents, situations etc. can form the basis of more platonic pleasures with women. But that doesn't have to exclude a more intimate form of pleasure.


You cannot respect a shameless women
who likes to tiltilate unsuspecting men and
enjoys all the dirty looks and
attention.

I respect a women who is brave enough to flout the conventions of her society and show herself off as much as I respect the woman who takes her time and effort to look good, ie clothes, make-up, etc.
Humility is not to the taste of all.


The cloth is not a jail.
Its protection from the lechorous looks of men
It lends a woman dignity and respect.

So you wouldn't object if a woman decided to wear a skintight leather or PVC suit then :P


but I am not looking for cheap thrills.

Neither am I, but I have no problem with those who are looking for cheap thrills.
So be it you build your own world where women
will be nude and anyone can wear twigs and leaves
for clothing andwomen are considered as objects of desire
that you fuck once and then throw away as soon as
you see your next woman.

I can see nothing good coming out of this.

cubist
29th April 2004, 15:44
I worship women ,I cannot bear to see them degraded
and oogled at by men.
I respect and love women who know how to look beautiful
with their clothes on. and those that look beuatiful with no clothers on have norespect my how equal you are



You cannot respect a shameless women
who likes to tiltilate unsuspecting men and
enjoys all the dirty looks and
attention.

so everywom,en that wears a short skirt is shameless, FUCK YOU, i don't oogle at women who wear short skirts in many cases i think slag, but i fail to see all of them as slags, if my girlfriend wants to show her legs let her if she doesn't let her, its called equality you should try it some time, if you don't like it then fine. but that doesn't mean it shouldn't happen, these Shameless women or slags have as much right to be slags as you and i have to label them shameless or slags,.

revolutionindia
29th April 2004, 15:49
Originally posted by [email protected] 29 2004, 09:14 PM

I worship women ,I cannot bear to see them degraded
and oogled at by men.
I respect and love women who know how to look beautiful
with their clothes on. and those that look beuatiful with no clothers on have norespect my how equal you are



You cannot respect a shameless women
who likes to tiltilate unsuspecting men and
enjoys all the dirty looks and
attention.

so everywom,en that wears a short skirt is shameless, FUCK YOU, i don't oogle at women who wear short skirts in many cases i think slag, but i fail to see all of them as slags, if my girlfriend wants to show her legs let her if she doesn't let her, its called equality you should try it some time, if you don't like it then fine. but that doesn't mean it shouldn't happen, these Shameless women or slags have as much right to be slags as you and i have to label them shameless or slags,.
Good you and your girlfriend go live in some nudist colony
where you can show legs,butt and what ever you want

While people like me try to make this world a
better and safer place for women to live in

Capitalist Imperial
29th April 2004, 16:06
1) This is a state-rights issue, not a federal one.

2) It probably won't pass anyway

3) If it passes, it will be overturned by federal court.

Don't get your panites in a bunch (Ha!)

from revolutionindia: "Do you have any idea what semi nude women going all around can cause?"

Oooooohhhhh yeah! Why, do you know where some are???

revolutionindia
29th April 2004, 16:45
Originally posted by Capitalist [email protected] 29 2004, 09:36 PM
1) This is a state-rights issue, not a federal one.

2) It probably won't pass anyway

3) If it passes, it will be overturned by federal court.

Don't get your panites in a bunch (Ha!)

from revolutionindia: "Do you have any idea what semi nude women going all around can cause?"

Oooooohhhhh yeah! Why, do you know where some are???
sorry I dont know about women
but
I know about naked guys

I believe the administrators/moderators of this website
are all gay
So they are probably having a gay orgy at
the under ground headquarters of
che-lives.com

Hampton
29th April 2004, 18:01
I believe the administrators/moderators of this website
are all gay
So they are probably having a gay orgy at
the under ground headquarters of
che-lives.com

Ahh c'mon! Who told you?

Vinny Rafarino
29th April 2004, 21:06
This "revolution" India cat is one creepy kid. I would really like to make him our undergraound lair house boy.

We could dress him up in a cute little uniform and force him to pleasure us in exchange for small amounts of scag....just enough to keep him on his knees, which is where a good house boy should be anyway.

Perhaps he can even try out TAT's new ultra-super-duper-gay brain ray on him. It's fabulous you know, it hurts so good.

elijahcraig
29th April 2004, 21:13
undergraound lair house boy.



Comic Gold. :lol:

Guest1
29th April 2004, 21:22
Ban, anyone?

I think so.

Dirty Commie
29th April 2004, 21:25
There have been worse laws proposed..this will never pass.

revolutionindia
30th April 2004, 07:05
Originally posted by [email protected] 29 2004, 11:31 PM

I believe the administrators/moderators of this website
are all gay
So they are probably having a gay orgy at
the under ground headquarters of
che-lives.com

Ahh c'mon! Who told you?
I heard someone on some thread say this.

Its just a stupid joke :D

Communists should learn to laugh a themselves

ÑóẊîöʼn
30th April 2004, 09:40
If you want to make a joke, make it more obvious, it's difficult to put inflection across in text.

cubist
30th April 2004, 15:51
While people like me try to make this world a
better and safer place for women to live in
what by putting them in prison hahaa

revolutionindia
30th April 2004, 16:40
Originally posted by [email protected] 30 2004, 09:21 PM

While people like me try to make this world a
better and safer place for women to live in
what by putting them in prison hahaa
Hey cubist I like your avatar
You can keep looking at it while the cube changes

We shall all try to make this world a better place.

You do it your way

I will do it my way.

cubist
30th April 2004, 17:23
touche would be the word that describes that statement ey!

Rasta Sapian
3rd May 2004, 07:10
u guys are hilarious :P

I love women with or without clothes!

p.s. the nude beaches of the west indies show off the beauties and the beasts of the world :)