in--dependence

[rahul]

do u think this is compleate independence?ok if u think so
replyme ,y u think so!
i think the thing which we experience is psudo-independence!its not atall useful for us.,its just use ful for--US., and others.

true independence is just another form of communism!
as a student of +2[17years],i feel this independence is not true.
a country's independe lies only in independence of each and every individual in each and every activity.,--but present days independence is just restricted to rights,duties,votes and economics,independence should not be restricted to any such fields --it should be compleate and exact,.,thats the thing needed.,


lets hope such [anoter]world is possible!!!!!!

[Individual]

Quick question before I begin.

Do you consider this independence to be freedom?

[revolutionindia]

Hey rahul your name sounds indian

Are you from india?

Jai hind

[Individual]

Understanding that this "independence" is interpreted as freedom, I will assume you hope upon complete freedom.

While I agree that people should be allowed freedoms, guidelines must be enabled.

Complete freedom would result in myself, or anyone else, having the ability to murder without reprecussions.

Complete freedom would result in anyone being free to commit rape.

Complete freedom would result in anyone being permitted to steal for personal profit.

Complete freedom would allow fascism to hold it's place among society.

I think you get the point of why complete freedom is not a desired trait that should be imposed on society. I believe the people of all societies should enjoy personal freedoms, but guidelines should be drawn, and laws need to be in place.

The United States' Bill of Rights was imposed to grant these personal freedoms, yet constitutional amendments detract from these freedoms as the US culture continues to dissect itself.

Freedom sounds good in theory, but when put into practice it becomes a form in which the US has fallen into. Capitalism stems from this personal freedom, and the freedom to better one's self.


true independence is just another form of communism!

True independence is not communism, let alone true freedom.

Under a Marxist society, one would not have "true" independence, as one should be loyal to all of society. Laws would certainly be in place. Not to detract freedoms from the people, but to ensure the welfare of all people.

I am a strong advocate for independence of thought, and independence of the human mind. Whether this contradicts an understanding of Marxism or not, the human mind is in fact all that can be held. Independence of the mind however is different from an independence from constraints placed on society in which one is literally on their own.

We must all work togethor for the benefit of society as a whole if we wish to achieve living under Marxism, and being independent will not accomplish this goal.

If I have misinterpreted your view of independence, please let me know. Otherwise, I think I got it.