Log in

View Full Version : Che's hand (genuine image)



toastedmonkey
15th April 2004, 22:18
Its pretty sick, but i guess some of you like that kinda thing

canikickit
15th April 2004, 22:21
Nice hand.

I edited the title, because some peopel won't want to see this.

antieverything
16th April 2004, 03:02
Looks like the man had some pretty good-sized hands!

FriedFrog
16th April 2004, 16:11
Here's some nice graffiti a friend who went to germany found.

toastedmonkey
16th April 2004, 17:25
the guy holding the hand looks pretty pleased with him self

Fredo|el_Che
17th April 2004, 07:09
Is the cut hand on the picture, the Che's hand ??? :( :blink:

toastedmonkey
17th April 2004, 12:28
yeah, both of his hands are in the picture

the guy in white is holding the other

Hate Is Art
17th April 2004, 16:37
it was disgusting cutting off his hands

Fredo|el_Che
17th April 2004, 17:48
what a band of bastards !!!!!!! :angry:

I didn't know this.
This act is inexcusable.

Ciceron, the famous roman writer, had his hands cut too, after his death. William Wallace has his hands and legs cut.

If some sons of *****es decided to cut Che's hand, it maybe because they knew that he will became a hero as William Wallace and his ideas will go through the centuries likes Ciceron's (sorry for the bad grammar)

antieverything
17th April 2004, 19:16
Actually they just did it for ID purposes. It is easier to transport hands than the entire body or just the head.

Fredo|el_Che
18th April 2004, 08:00
Are you sure ?

I'm perplexed on this point.

Hate Is Art
18th April 2004, 10:24
finger prints!

is it easier to take his prints from his hands by transporting his whole body or just the hands?

it's still a barbaric and inexcusabile act on Che.

toastedmonkey
18th April 2004, 16:19
they cut his hands off and sent them to argentina to compare them with finger prints already on record of Ernestos.

Typical of America - act first then ask questions

antieverything
18th April 2004, 18:38
Jesus...the guy was dead, it wasn't as if they cut them off while he was alive!

toastedmonkey
18th April 2004, 18:59
i think its the total lack of respect shown to him, hardly suprising though

Fredo|el_Che
18th April 2004, 20:28
Ok, I was perplexed because I din't know how the bolivians could had the Che's finger prints. Now I know.

It's ignominious.

RebeldePorLaPAZ
19th April 2004, 01:58
i thought they cut his arms off not just his hands, because they didn't have all the bones when they found his body, i think?


--Paz

SittingBull47
19th April 2004, 12:47
barbaric and unnecessary. For proof of his death, why not do something with less blatant hatred.

antieverything
19th April 2004, 14:27
barbaric and unnecessary. For proof of his death, why not do something with less blatant hatred.

...stupidity...pure stupidity. THE GUY WAS DEAD. HE DIDN'T CARE!

VukBZ2005
20th April 2004, 00:19
Originally posted by [email protected] 18 2004, 04:19 PM
they cut his hands off and sent them to argentina to compare them with finger prints already on record of Ernestos.

Typical of America - act first then ask questions
The Fact is America is just like that.

They did'nt like Che - They Feared Him. They Had no Respect for him even when he was dead.

the SovieT
20th April 2004, 17:39
i think we should all worship Che's hand and commit murders in the holly name of Che's hand!

VukBZ2005
20th April 2004, 21:51
Che would'nt want his hand to be worshiped.

DORRI
27th April 2004, 15:49
Originally posted by [email protected] 18 2004, 04:19 PM
they cut his hands off and sent them to argentina to compare them with finger prints already on record of Ernestos.

Typical of America - act first then ask questions
i'd read somewhere that they did that for some DNA tests which cuba had asked to do to ensure that the killed person is really che.
anyway, that's really disgusting...

Dune Dx
27th April 2004, 18:20
CanIkickit your new title doesnt stop people that dont want to see that picture from coming on here but anyway why couldnt they just take the finger prints where he died seems a bit excessive to cut off his hands.

Dr. Rosenpenis
27th April 2004, 19:57
HE WAS DEAD!!
How do you disrespect a piece of decaying flesh?

the SovieT
27th April 2004, 20:36
Originally posted by [email protected] 20 2004, 09:51 PM
Che would'nt want his hand to be worshiped.
thats what you think...

Alexzandra
27th April 2004, 23:38
Thanks for this post.
However sad it raises a good point.

we always find ourselves asking why?, when we stop being able to find an answer, somthing was wrong along the way.

PenguTheMightyPenguin
2nd May 2004, 06:57
Che when dead

PenguTheMightyPenguin
2nd May 2004, 07:09
Very Sad!

Wiesty
2nd May 2004, 16:21
Originally posted by Fredo|[email protected] 17 2004, 05:48 PM
William Wallace has his hands and legs cut.

If some sons of *****es decided to cut Che's hand, it maybe because they knew that he will became a hero as William Wallace and his ideas will go through the centuries likes Ciceron's (sorry for the bad grammar)
just a little error in there
William wallace was quartered so His legs his ARMS and his head were cut off. His legs and arms were sent to the 4 corners of britian. And his head put on a bridge as a warning

Midevil British Bastards

hey!
MBB
new phrase!