Log in

View Full Version : Band of Brothers



Y2A
13th April 2004, 07:48
Anyone seeing this on the History Channel? It's pretty good actually because it's my first time seeing it. And it doesn't sink to the low of advertising the soldiers as superheros but just real people doing what they have to do.

Capitalist Imperial
13th April 2004, 15:28
I have the collection on DVD. Its great on a digital surround theater, and the dialogue and story are great.

It's just a great series.

bunk
13th April 2004, 16:13
A word of advice watch UK History not the History channel if you want an unbias view of world events

Y2A
13th April 2004, 17:58
Meh the history channel isn't so bad, but out of all sources for history I do still perfer things from the UK. The BBC in my opinion does beat out the rest of the american media by alot. But band of brothers isn't really bias. I can honestly tell you that I don't see any bias in that movie.

Capitalist Imperial
13th April 2004, 18:12
Originally posted by [email protected] 13 2004, 04:13 PM
A word of advice watch UK History not the History channel if you want an unbias view of world events

A word of advice watch UK History not the History channel if you want an unbias view of world events

LOL, LOL, ROFL, LMAO

Of course, of course, American history is biased and slanted, but british history is totally objective, thats it, that's the ticket. I should have known.

A word of Advice for you, sir. History is written by the victors, is always somewhat subjective, and can never be unbias. It is not a science.


A word of advice watch UK History not the History channel if you want an unbias view of world events

LOL, LOL, FOFL, LMAO... I just had to read it again.

What a puke

Y2A
13th April 2004, 18:20
No CI he is right to a certain degree. You are right, history is written to favor your country. So when an outsider does a historical account of your country, usually there is less bias.

bunk
13th April 2004, 18:34
:lol: :lol: UK history covers world events and so does History channel just Uk history does not distort the History like History channel.
:lol: read............ :lol:

Dirty Commie
13th April 2004, 18:41
Band of Brothers is an excellent series. The acting is great, it doesn't try to make it look like that one platoon ended the war. I was crying in the one where they found the concentration camp.


Not to spoil the end, but the last episode takes place in the best possible place....

Loknar
13th April 2004, 18:42
every source is bias in some ways, just look at BBC world news.

Y2A
13th April 2004, 18:46
Since we are talking about a movie, I think the question "what is your favorite movie" should be asked.

For me, I like Schinder's List alot, great movie with great actors based on a real event. But to tell you the truth, the movie that most appeals to me is Angela's Ashes. I like the immigrant theme in it and also the fact that it is also based on a real event. The way the narrorator tells it makes it great aswell. Especially the last scene is unforgetable.

Capitalist Imperial
13th April 2004, 19:02
Dr. Strangelove

Y2A
13th April 2004, 19:05
WTF is that?

Intifada
13th April 2004, 19:11
resevoir dogs.

tarantino is a genius.

Vinny Rafarino
13th April 2004, 19:29
Originally posted by [email protected] 13 2004, 06:34 PM
:lol: :lol: UK history covers world events and so does History channel just Uk history does not distort the History like History channel.
:lol: read............ :lol:
Relax esse, it's a dramatic mini-series that aired on, I believe showtime, a couple years ago. It's not a "documentary".

The series was very good, I watched it the first time out and have begun to watch it again. Good business.



resevoir dogs.

tarantino is a genius.


WAS a genius you mean...If you have seen anything after Pulp Fiction you will understand.

The cat's a hack now. Truly pathetic.

Capitalist Imperial
13th April 2004, 19:34
Originally posted by [email protected] 13 2004, 07:05 PM
WTF is that?
A satirical comedy of the Cold War situation. Basically, a crazy and Hawkish American officer cuts off all communication with the base he is in charge of and Attacks the Soviets.

It was a Stanley Kubrick Comedy, if that makes sense. It was great.


I also liked:

Blackhawk Down

Saving Private Ryan

Windtalkers

The 30 Minuteds of Pearl Harbor Attack Footage and the Doolittle raids in Pearl Harbor (nothing else, though)

Full Metal jacket

Of course, the Star Wars Trilogy (the new ones too)

The Indiana Jones Series

Some of Tarantino's Stuff is cool (Dusk til Dawn Sucked)

The Rambo Series

Invader Zim
13th April 2004, 22:33
I remember watching that bag of bollocks on TV a while ago, I was shocked at its sheer propaganda crap. Maybe watching largley unfactual garbage where a single company of yanks single handedly slew half the German army, then fine. But thats not my cup of tea.

Capitalist Imperial
13th April 2004, 22:37
Originally posted by [email protected] 13 2004, 10:33 PM
I remember watching that bag of bollocks on TV a while ago, I was shocked at its sheer propaganda crap. Maybe watching largley unfactual garbage where a single company of yanks single handedly slew half the German army, then fine. But thats not my cup of tea.
It wasn't even like that.

Invader Zim
13th April 2004, 22:40
Originally posted by Capitalist Imperial+Apr 13 2004, 10:37 PM--> (Capitalist Imperial @ Apr 13 2004, 10:37 PM)
[email protected] 13 2004, 10:33 PM
I remember watching that bag of bollocks on TV a while ago, I was shocked at its sheer propaganda crap. Maybe watching largley unfactual garbage where a single company of yanks single handedly slew half the German army, then fine. But thats not my cup of tea.
It wasn't even like that. [/b]
What I saw very much was, I saw loads of Germans dead but comparitivly few allied dead, which is bull.

Capitalist Imperial
13th April 2004, 22:43
What you saw on the American side was basically one company.

Y2A
14th April 2004, 01:54
CI she is brainwashed. She thinks that everything is propaganda and that everything the U.S does is pure evil. Why even try explaining?

Invader Zim
14th April 2004, 16:39
Originally posted by [email protected] 14 2004, 01:54 AM
CI she is brainwashed. She thinks that everything is propaganda and that everything the U.S does is pure evil. Why even try explaining?
Who are you talking about?

Sabocat
14th April 2004, 16:44
I don't think it was any accident that the same night that Band of Brothers was on, one of the networks premiered "Patriot".

It was a full assault of propaganda. None of you could possibly doubt that that was all about making people feel all patriotic so that they'd settle down with regards to the Iraq war.

Quite a coincidence that both of these movies got aired after just about the worst week in Iraq yet for U$ troops.

Y2A
14th April 2004, 17:20
Originally posted by [email protected] 14 2004, 04:44 PM
I don't think it was any accident that the same night that Band of Brothers was on, one of the networks premiered "Patriot".

It was a full assault of propaganda. None of you could possibly doubt that that was all about making people feel all patriotic so that they'd settle down with regards to the Iraq war.

Quite a coincidence that both of these movies got aired after just about the worst week in Iraq yet for U$ troops.
Yes, indeed. "THEY" are all trying to control our brains. The bastards. You are correct and thus there is no need for you to continue on since we all recognize that this is blatent propaganda being forced on us by capitalist scum.

Alright now back to talk about your favorite movies.

Robert Edward Lee
14th April 2004, 17:34
Schindler's List.

Got it on DVD two days back. Classic film.

Y2A
14th April 2004, 18:12
Indeed. Great film, I like the last part when "Schindler's Jews" come to his grave site with Speilberg(sp?) and pay their tributes to the man.

antieverything
14th April 2004, 18:19
Uh, do you people just propose that any reference to the valor of the young American men fighting against the Nazi forces on the European front should be blotched from history's pages because any positive portrayal of any action in any way linked to the United States government is automatically propaganda?

How can Hollywood be expected to not make movies about WWII? And when they do, should they not be entertaining and inspiring?

Capitalist Imperial
14th April 2004, 18:20
Midnight Run with robert deniro and James Grodin. It was not huge at the box office, but I recommend that anyone who has not seen should it rent it.

Y2A
14th April 2004, 18:26
Angela's Ashes was still the best to me. That statue of liberty scene is great.

"The IRA is gonna get rid of those damn brits I tell ya"-Drunk Irish Dad

Capitalist Imperial
14th April 2004, 18:31
Originally posted by [email protected] 14 2004, 04:44 PM
I don't think it was any accident that the same night that Band of Brothers was on, one of the networks premiered "Patriot".

It was a full assault of propaganda. None of you could possibly doubt that that was all about making people feel all patriotic so that they'd settle down with regards to the Iraq war.

Quite a coincidence that both of these movies got aired after just about the worst week in Iraq yet for U$ troops.
I think that US forces have shown considerable restraint in the last week. However, in the near future they may not be so benevolent. US armor and artillery has ringed Najaf, and a full assault to eradicate the extremist cleric Al-Sadr will be underway soon.

The time for talk is over. Al Sadr's militia has not capitulated per U.S. demands, and now they will pay the price. They had every opportunity to disband, and they decided to continue and attempt to prevent democracy in Iraq. Termination with extreme prejudice and summary execution of any and all insurgents will be the modus operandi for US forces once the assault has started.

A democratic Iraq friendlyy to U.S. interests is inevitable, and these last few criminal holdouts will not prevent this.

Y2A
14th April 2004, 18:33
And thus this thread goes to hell and becomes another. "Evil propaganda by the heartless capitalists!" threads.

Later.

Capitalist Imperial
14th April 2004, 18:36
Originally posted by [email protected] 14 2004, 06:19 PM
Uh, do you people just propose that any reference to the valor of the young American men fighting against the Nazi forces on the European front should be blotched from history's pages because any positive portrayal of any action in any way linked to the United States government is automatically propaganda?

How can Hollywood be expected to not make movies about WWII? And when they do, should they not be entertaining and inspiring?
here here

We hardly agree on much, Antieverything, but that makes all the sense in the world.

Seriously, it seems that no media source can say or depict anything even remotely positive about the USA in any way without leftists screaming "Lies and Propoganda!"

The truth is, America's contribution to WWII was huge and imperative to a victory over the Nazis, as was the other allies'.

Y2A
14th April 2004, 18:38
Indeed. But just wait until some fag from these boards comes out and says "What about Dresden or Hiroshima you imperialist bastards!!! wah wah wah"

Y2A
14th April 2004, 18:41
But this thread has indeed gone down the crap hole. As I thought it would. Everything is propgaganda to these imbeciles. "America liberated France in the second world war" "No it didn't you capitalist evil heartless bastard".......it gets old and they don't even provide logic to their debates. Indeed, yet another case of rebellion against parents gone completely wrong!

Dirty Commie
14th April 2004, 18:41
Originally posted by [email protected] 14 2004, 01:26 PM
Angela's Ashes was still the best to me. That statue of liberty scene is great.

"The IRA is gonna get rid of those damn brits I tell ya"-Drunk Irish Dad
That movie was so sad, I loved it, being Irish it really hit home to what they had to go through.

The book was far better however, it was more detailed and included a bit more of Frank's life.

Y2A
14th April 2004, 18:44
The movie that I always wanted to see but never got the chance to was "The Killing Fields".

Sabocat
14th April 2004, 22:58
Yes, indeed. "THEY" are all trying to control our brains. The bastards. You are correct and thus there is no need for you to continue on since we all recognize that this is blatent propaganda being forced on us by capitalist scum.

Alright now back to talk about your favorite movies.


Well they've certainly controlled yours, which of course mustn't be too difficult. I didn't say "they were trying to control our brains", I was merely commenting on the obvious coincidental airing of Band of Brothers and Patriot with the recent violent uprisings in Iraq.



But this thread has indeed gone down the crap hole.

No, it didn't go down the crap hole, it was crap to start with. Like all your feckless threads.

Maybe you need to stop your hero worship of the U.S. armed forces. Another film about WWII...woohoo...wow...did it end differently this time? Did Germany and Japan win this time? How many films does there need to be about the U.S. winning the second world war on it's own?

Who gives a fuck.

Y2A
14th April 2004, 23:06
What are you complaining about? I said that your right. The evil capitalists did this to control our brains! They are bastards that deserve to die. Just like the U.$ armed forces, those fucking imperialist bastards. Me and my local communist group, located in my college campus, are going to have a party once the Iraqi heros give the imperialists their version of the Tet Offensive. We are all gonna be their, wearing our Che shirts, burning an American flag. Man it's gonna be great.

Non-Sectarian Bastard!
14th April 2004, 23:17
Originally posted by Capitalist [email protected] 13 2004, 07:34 PM
[..]I also liked:

[..]
The Rambo Series

Talking about biased [mixed emotions] :lol: :blink: :angry: :o :huh:

I serieusly have to puke if I see that film. Propagandizing for the "Freedom fighters" aka the founders of Al'Qaida, Taliban etc.

If you would stick your head out of your isolated, safe and coozy home and see what those "Freedom Fighters" aka the founders of Al'Qaida, Taliban etc. are about.

But why would you care, it's not like someone you know or care about has been brutally slaughtered and/or attacked by such groups.

Just shut up, you have no idea what you're talking about. Just stick your head back in and go shout at the tele at the "CrAzY Leftists".


*Ontopic again: American Beauty is one of my favourites.

Invader Zim
15th April 2004, 00:19
Originally posted by [email protected] 14 2004, 06:41 PM
But this thread has indeed gone down the crap hole. As I thought it would. Everything is propgaganda to these imbeciles. "America liberated France in the second world war" "No it didn't you capitalist evil heartless bastard".......it gets old and they don't even provide logic to their debates. Indeed, yet another case of rebellion against parents gone completely wrong!
America was not soley responcible for the liberation of France, they didn't have the most troops or deaths taken to achieve the victory. How you can forget every other nation involved strikes me as most foolish. It was after all a world war, it may shock you to know that the USA is not the whole world. For example the UK had almost 100,000 more deaths that the US.

Total Deaths : 61 Million
Soviet Union : 25,568,000
China : 11,324,000
Germany : 7,060,000
Poland : 6,850,000
Japan : 1,806,000
Yugoslavia : 1,700,000
Rumania : 985,000
France : 810,000
Hungary : 750,000
Austria : 525,000
Greece : 520,000
Italy : 410,000
Czechoslovakia : 400,000
Great Britain : 388,000
USA : 295,000
Holland : 250,000
Belgium : 85,000
Finland : 79,000
Canada : 42,000
India : 36,000
Australia : 29,000
Spain : 22,000
Bulgaria : 21,000
New Zealand : 12,000
South Africa : 9,000
Norway : 5,000

http://www.paralumun.com/warworldwartwodeaths.htm

Y2A
15th April 2004, 01:07
I actually do apologize for that. It was indeed a world effort but you must admit that the U.S did win the major battles and played the biggest part in that part of the liberation of France. However, one could argue that the Soviet Union played the biggest part in the war altogether.

Y2A
15th April 2004, 01:10
It just strikes me as odd when one trys to demoralize the allies during the second world war. Dresden, Hiroshima, the women raped by the Red Army, etc.... of course they were crimes of war. But the crimes committed by the Nazi's was much worse. I'm not saying you are doing so, but I've heard others on these boards do so.

Osman Ghazi
15th April 2004, 01:12
Midnight Run with robert deniro and James Grodin. It was not huge at the box office, but I recommend that anyone who has not seen should it rent it.


Holy Crap. I'm so astonished I think I nearly shat my pants. For once, CI and me are in agreement.

Invader Zim
15th April 2004, 09:47
Originally posted by [email protected] 15 2004, 01:07 AM
I actually do apologize for that. It was indeed a world effort but you must admit that the U.S did win the major battles and played the biggest part in that part of the liberation of France. However, one could argue that the Soviet Union played the biggest part in the war altogether.
No, absolutely not, how did you win the big battles? El Alamain? Win That, Stalingrad win that? Berlin, Battle of Britain. No the only truly major battle you won were in the relatively unimportant pacific theatre. D-Day, which ignorant Americans like to claim was a US victory, fail to realise that D-Day is probably the finest example of an allied victory of all time, with the possible exception of the Battle of Waterloo.

Osman Ghazi
15th April 2004, 12:47
Yeah, if D-day was the most important battle then us Canadians won a fifth of the war all on our oddy-knocky.

JonP
15th April 2004, 16:09
Originally posted by Capitalist Imperial+Apr 13 2004, 07:34 PM--> (Capitalist Imperial @ Apr 13 2004, 07:34 PM)
[email protected] 13 2004, 07:05 PM
WTF is that?
A satirical comedy of the Cold War situation. Basically, a crazy and Hawkish American officer cuts off all communication with the base he is in charge of and Attacks the Soviets.

It was a Stanley Kubrick Comedy, if that makes sense. It was great.


I also liked:

Blackhawk Down

Saving Private Ryan

Windtalkers

The 30 Minuteds of Pearl Harbor Attack Footage and the Doolittle raids in Pearl Harbor (nothing else, though)

Full Metal jacket

Of course, the Star Wars Trilogy (the new ones too)

The Indiana Jones Series

Some of Tarantino's Stuff is cool (Dusk til Dawn Sucked)

The Rambo Series[/b]
you liked windtalkers ?!

that was the worst , most unrealistic , old fashioned pile of crap i have ever seen in my life.

Capitalist Imperial
15th April 2004, 16:54
Originally posted by Enigma+Apr 15 2004, 09:47 AM--> (Enigma @ Apr 15 2004, 09:47 AM)
[email protected] 15 2004, 01:07 AM
I actually do apologize for that. It was indeed a world effort but you must admit that the U.S did win the major battles and played the biggest part in that part of the liberation of France. However, one could argue that the Soviet Union played the biggest part in the war altogether.
No, absolutely not, how did you win the big battles? El Alamain? Win That, Stalingrad win that? Berlin, Battle of Britain. No the only truly major battle you won were in the relatively unimportant pacific theatre. D-Day, which ignorant Americans like to claim was a US victory, fail to realise that D-Day is probably the finest example of an allied victory of all time, with the possible exception of the Battle of Waterloo. [/b]

No, absolutely not, how did you win the big battles? El Alamain? Win That, Stalingrad win that? Berlin, Battle of Britain. No the only truly major battle you won were in the relatively unimportant pacific theatre. D-Day, which ignorant Americans like to claim was a US victory, fail to realise that D-Day is probably the finest example of an allied victory of all time, with the possible exception of the Battle of Waterloo.

What about thew battle of the Bulge? While technically a victory for the axis, it was a pyrric victory (look it up), and the attrition taken by the germans was huge.

It was Patton's army that marched into France.

The US spearheaded the D-day invasion (with the brits)

Also, the US 8th air force was the most effective air force against nazi germany, bar none. The B-17 crews were the only ones conducting daylight raids, and they crippled the nazi industrial war machine like the brits could not.

And to say the pacific theater was unimportant is demonstrate the true extent of your ignorance. While we were fully committed to europe, where was our help in the pacific? it was almost non-existant. We had minor supplemental help, but it was not a true allied effort like europe. While the US assisted in europe, we were in the pacific pretty much on our own, and thus easily made the major contribution of the overall war.

Enigma, don't even make posts about WWII, you don't know what you are talking about.

Capitalist Imperial
15th April 2004, 16:59
Originally posted by JonP+Apr 15 2004, 04:09 PM--> (JonP @ Apr 15 2004, 04:09 PM)
Originally posted by Capitalist [email protected] 13 2004, 07:34 PM

[email protected] 13 2004, 07:05 PM
WTF is that?
A satirical comedy of the Cold War situation. Basically, a crazy and Hawkish American officer cuts off all communication with the base he is in charge of and Attacks the Soviets.

It was a Stanley Kubrick Comedy, if that makes sense. It was great.


I also liked:

Blackhawk Down

Saving Private Ryan

Windtalkers

The 30 Minuteds of Pearl Harbor Attack Footage and the Doolittle raids in Pearl Harbor (nothing else, though)

Full Metal jacket

Of course, the Star Wars Trilogy (the new ones too)

The Indiana Jones Series

Some of Tarantino's Stuff is cool (Dusk til Dawn Sucked)

The Rambo Series
you liked windtalkers ?!

that was the worst , most unrealistic , old fashioned pile of crap i have ever seen in my life. [/b]

you liked windtalkers ?!

that was the worst , most unrealistic , old fashioned pile of crap i have ever seen in my life.

I actually agree.

I just like it for the action, effects, and sound. It is good entertainment on a digital home theatre. John Woo does great with sound and effects. The explosions were endless, and when the U.S. Battleship's 16-inch guns let loose, my house shakes.

Y2A
15th April 2004, 18:57
Originally posted by Capitalist Imperial+Apr 15 2004, 04:54 PM--> (Capitalist Imperial @ Apr 15 2004, 04:54 PM)
Originally posted by [email protected] 15 2004, 09:47 AM

[email protected] 15 2004, 01:07 AM
I actually do apologize for that. It was indeed a world effort but you must admit that the U.S did win the major battles and played the biggest part in that part of the liberation of France. However, one could argue that the Soviet Union played the biggest part in the war altogether.
No, absolutely not, how did you win the big battles? El Alamain? Win That, Stalingrad win that? Berlin, Battle of Britain. No the only truly major battle you won were in the relatively unimportant pacific theatre. D-Day, which ignorant Americans like to claim was a US victory, fail to realise that D-Day is probably the finest example of an allied victory of all time, with the possible exception of the Battle of Waterloo.

No, absolutely not, how did you win the big battles? El Alamain? Win That, Stalingrad win that? Berlin, Battle of Britain. No the only truly major battle you won were in the relatively unimportant pacific theatre. D-Day, which ignorant Americans like to claim was a US victory, fail to realise that D-Day is probably the finest example of an allied victory of all time, with the possible exception of the Battle of Waterloo.

What about thew battle of the Bulge? While technically a victory for the axis, it was a pyrric victory (look it up), and the attrition taken by the germans was huge.

It was Patton's army that marched into France.

The US spearheaded the D-day invasion (with the brits)

Also, the US 8th air force was the most effective air force against nazi germany, bar none. The B-17 crews were the only ones conducting daylight raids, and they crippled the nazi industrial war machine like the brits could not.

And to say the pacific theater was unimportant is demonstrate the true extent of your ignorance. While we were fully committed to europe, where was our help in the pacific? it was almost non-existant. We had minor supplemental help, but it was not a true allied effort like europe. While the US assisted in europe, we were in the pacific pretty much on our own, and thus easily made the major contribution of the overall war.

Enigma, don't even make posts about WWII, you don't know what you are talking about. [/b]
Indeed. Saying D-day was "insignificant" is quite ludicrous. The U.S did play the biggest part in liberating France. Also the U.S role in the pacific and Patton fighting Rommels armies in Northern Africa contibuted alot to the allied effort. I will agree though, that the Soviets sacraficed the most in the war and that the battle at Stalingrad was the most important battle in the second world war.

P.S. Anyone ever see the movie footage that the Soviets made about the battle of Stalingrad? :lol: he had an actor, that played Stalin, come in there and tell the generals how to defend the city.

Capitalist Imperial
15th April 2004, 19:04
While I cocncur that the Soviets made that biggest sacrifice, and a huge contribution to WWII, any mlitary analyst or tactician will tell you that it is much, much easier to defend a set position, as the soviets were doing, than it is to root an established occupying force out of held territory, which is what the allies did in the west.

Basically, comparing the eastern and western fronts of WWII is comparing apples & oranges.

Also, one must concede that the timing of hitler's eastern campaign was poor, and the russian winter caused at least as much attrition to the germans as the soviet army did.

Y2A
15th April 2004, 19:10
Originally posted by Capitalist [email protected] 15 2004, 07:04 PM
Also, one must concede that the timing of hitler's eastern campaign was poor, and the russian winter caused at least as much attrition to the germans as the soviet army did.
Indeed. That is what happens when the politicans make the decisions for the generals. Hitler brought it on himself.

Osman Ghazi
15th April 2004, 23:44
Ha!


QUOTE
Besides, as I have said, the western front in europe was a battle of liberating occupied land, a much harder task that defending land that you already hold, as the soviets did.




Oh, Berlin was in Soviet territory and the Soviets were just defending it at the Battle of Berlin? Thanks for the geography lesson. The Soviets were pushed back almost out of European Russia. If anything, they sucked balls on the defense but kicked ass on the attack. And we are the ones trying to minimize the war effort?

Also, liberating France is a fairly easy task when:

A) The French Resistance softened them up first.
B)Americans were greeted by crowds of cheering Frenchmen rather than the Soviets who were greeted by crowds of off Germans who thought that they were the worst thing to ever see the face of the earth.

Also, Japan all by yourself? Ha! Don't make me laugh. Maybe you've never heard of a tiny little country called China and the anti-Japanese National United Front? More than half of Japan's forces were tied up in the garrisonning of China. And still, on top of that you had to resort to threatening the entire population with death to finally make them bow in submission.

It is funny how rightists will do anything they can to maximize anything America did, regardless of facts.

Yeah, I quoted myself. What are you gonna do about it?

Invader Zim
16th April 2004, 01:32
Originally posted by Capitalist Imperial+Apr 15 2004, 04:54 PM--> (Capitalist Imperial @ Apr 15 2004, 04:54 PM)
Originally posted by [email protected] 15 2004, 09:47 AM

[email protected] 15 2004, 01:07 AM
I actually do apologize for that. It was indeed a world effort but you must admit that the U.S did win the major battles and played the biggest part in that part of the liberation of France. However, one could argue that the Soviet Union played the biggest part in the war altogether.
No, absolutely not, how did you win the big battles? El Alamain? Win That, Stalingrad win that? Berlin, Battle of Britain. No the only truly major battle you won were in the relatively unimportant pacific theatre. D-Day, which ignorant Americans like to claim was a US victory, fail to realise that D-Day is probably the finest example of an allied victory of all time, with the possible exception of the Battle of Waterloo.

No, absolutely not, how did you win the big battles? El Alamain? Win That, Stalingrad win that? Berlin, Battle of Britain. No the only truly major battle you won were in the relatively unimportant pacific theatre. D-Day, which ignorant Americans like to claim was a US victory, fail to realise that D-Day is probably the finest example of an allied victory of all time, with the possible exception of the Battle of Waterloo.

What about thew battle of the Bulge? While technically a victory for the axis, it was a pyrric victory (look it up), and the attrition taken by the germans was huge.

It was Patton's army that marched into France.

The US spearheaded the D-day invasion (with the brits)

Also, the US 8th air force was the most effective air force against nazi germany, bar none. The B-17 crews were the only ones conducting daylight raids, and they crippled the nazi industrial war machine like the brits could not.

And to say the pacific theater was unimportant is demonstrate the true extent of your ignorance. While we were fully committed to europe, where was our help in the pacific? it was almost non-existant. We had minor supplemental help, but it was not a true allied effort like europe. While the US assisted in europe, we were in the pacific pretty much on our own, and thus easily made the major contribution of the overall war.

Enigma, don't even make posts about WWII, you don't know what you are talking about. [/b]
What about thew battle of the Bulge?

A battle we LOST!.

While technically a victory for the axis,

Technically? The offensive failed! It was a disaster, the only good think that came out of that whole sorry episode was that the Germans lost just under 20,000 more men than we did. Which in the grand scheam of the War was peanuts.

Also by this time the German army was clearly losing the war, this is a prime example of what gamers call "frag snatching".

It was Patton's army that marched into France.

What is your obsession with singing the praises of an imaterial campain, any historian will tell you that Germany was already beaten.

And to say the pacific theater was unimportant is demonstrate the true extent of your ignorance.

The Major axis power without a shadow of doubt was Germany, was Germany in the pacific pacific?.. no, she was not. The war was won and lost in Russia.

and thus easily made the major contribution of the overall war.

Your an idiot, sorry , but your just plain wrong, numeriacally Russia's contribution was highers, in casualties, Russias was higher, as was China's. More Germans were killed in Russia by several million. More german Troops were in Russia than anywhere else. I could go on for ever. And you call me ignorant, seriously get a fucking clue. Read a book because I own you in history.

Capitalist Imperial
16th April 2004, 23:39
You red puke, the only thing you own me in is the degree to which you are biased with regard to history (anti-american regardless of facts) and in lacking any analytical skills! You are only looking at events in isolation, and not taking into account the big picture of things.

Case in point: Without the US engaging Japan and the oil embargo that the US imposed on them, Japan would have attacked russia from the west for sure, as they had struck a deal with Hitler. They had already decimated the russian navy in the russia-Japaneze war. The eastern front was a very close battle as is. Has the US not kept Japan starved for oil, and then occupied in the pacific, then the Soviets would have been squeezed in a classic pinch, the germans from the east and the Japaneze from the west, and would have been summaruily decimated.

You see, Enigma, unlike you, I never questioned the Soviet sacrifice in WWII (and I hate the Soviets!), I've always said it was an allied effort, and I recognize everyone's contribution as imperative to an allied victory. However, you and many of the idiots here have gone out of their way to minimize America's contribution and sacrifice in WWII just because you hate America. That is ignorant and just plain wrong.

Again, the only nation to fully fight in the 2 Major theaters of WWII: the USA!!!

Chewillneverdie
17th April 2004, 15:37
the soviets would have to be some brave SOBs to run into a battle without a gun, well you must remember that the soviet officers were waiting behind them with a machine gun, cowardly in my opinion. Band of Brothers is entirely accurate, jesus Steven Spielberg is great, tho Steven Ambrose wrote the book. I cannot agree that comparing casualties and saying that makes them contribute and have done more, the US paratroopers went under ungodly training, and usually had adequate supplies, unlike the Russians. haha anyone who happens to say BOB is propaganda is just a little blind.

Dirty Commie
17th April 2004, 23:51
Can this discussion please stay about Band of Brothers.... I missed the last two episodes, what happened?

timbaly
18th April 2004, 01:37
Originally posted by [email protected] 14 2004, 07:19 PM
Total Deaths : 61 Million
Soviet Union : 25,568,000
China : 11,324,000
Germany : 7,060,000
Poland : 6,850,000
Japan : 1,806,000
Yugoslavia : 1,700,000
Rumania : 985,000
France : 810,000
Hungary : 750,000
Austria : 525,000
Greece : 520,000
Italy : 410,000
Czechoslovakia : 400,000
Great Britain : 388,000
USA : 295,000
Holland : 250,000
Belgium : 85,000
Finland : 79,000
Canada : 42,000
India : 36,000
Australia : 29,000
Spain : 22,000
Bulgaria : 21,000
New Zealand : 12,000
South Africa : 9,000
Norway : 5,000

http://www.paralumun.com/warworldwartwodeaths.htm
How did Spain lose that many troops, they weren't even officially in the war. I have heard that they sent volunteer sections of their army to aid the Axis but that number of deaths seems really high. They would have had to have a lot of troops fighting to lose that many.

Invader Zim
18th April 2004, 14:22
Originally posted by Capitalist [email protected] 16 2004, 11:39 PM
You red puke, the only thing you own me in is the degree to which you are biased with regard to history (anti-american regardless of facts) and in lacking any analytical skills! You are only looking at events in isolation, and not taking into account the big picture of things.

Case in point: Without the US engaging Japan and the oil embargo that the US imposed on them, Japan would have attacked russia from the west for sure, as they had struck a deal with Hitler. They had already decimated the russian navy in the russia-Japaneze war. The eastern front was a very close battle as is. Has the US not kept Japan starved for oil, and then occupied in the pacific, then the Soviets would have been squeezed in a classic pinch, the germans from the east and the Japaneze from the west, and would have been summaruily decimated.

You see, Enigma, unlike you, I never questioned the Soviet sacrifice in WWII (and I hate the Soviets!), I've always said it was an allied effort, and I recognize everyone's contribution as imperative to an allied victory. However, you and many of the idiots here have gone out of their way to minimize America's contribution and sacrifice in WWII just because you hate America. That is ignorant and just plain wrong.

Again, the only nation to fully fight in the 2 Major theaters of WWII: the USA!!!
You red puke

Red? That would imply I am a communist, sorry son, no go on that one, rather like the rest of your arguments really.

the only thing you own me in is the degree to which you are biased with regard to history (anti-american regardless of facts)

I have listed facts and the reality, and you have I noticed completely ignored all my points. For example you portrayed the Bulge as a massive US success, when the reality is it was anything but. And you claim to be quite the historian, quite Ironic really, considering you say I don’t know my stuff.

Without the US engaging Japan and the oil embargo that the US imposed on them, Japan would have attacked russia from the west for sure, as they had struck a deal with Hitler.

Unlikely, as Japan was having major problems economically with or without the US embargo. They would never have been able to sustain a successful strike on Russia, especially not Eastern Russia, which had both climatic and strategic hazards for an invading force, which were considerably worse than even Western Russia, which destroyed Hitler and Germanys army, which was technologically and numerically far in advance of Japan's army. Japan was having a hard enough time in attempting to keep her newly won Chinese Empire in order, never mind fight another front. When she was forced to, by the US, her empire collapsed, within a very short space of time. She was soon faced with the prospect of defending the home land rather than her Chinese conquests. Not to mention she did not have the power to actually threaten the USSR anyway. So it is doubtful that she ever would have made a significant attack on eastern USSR, and still more doubtful that it would have had any major effect anyway.

Sorry son but your chatting out your ass.

Again, the only nation to fully fight in the 2 Major theaters of WWII: the USA!!!

They didn’t engage fully in the West until the Germans were already beaten, just look at the facts, the Germans had quite literally had destroyed their army, it was a mere shadow of its former strength, the Russians had already begun a vast effort in pushing Germany back, Germanys war was nearly over. Of course D-Day did certainly quicken the end of the war, no denying, but it was a war which was already decided.

However, you and many of the idiots here have gone out of their way to minimize America's contribution and sacrifice in WWII just because you hate America. That is ignorant and just plain wrong.

I don’t go out my way at all, I give the US all the credit she deserves, in defeating Japan, and her contribution in the West. It is just not nearly as significant as you try to make out. Considering that Japan was never in a real position to threaten anyone but China, and the US waited until the German army was already defeated before making her move.

Accept it, you don’t know what you are talking about. Your only argument is that Japan may have threatened the USSR in the east, which is at best an unlikely possibility. At worst a cheap attempt to make the US look like she had a bigger impact than she did, by creating unlikely scenario’s, which didn’t occur and likely never would have.

You clearly are no historian, historians deal with facts, not pro-US fiction.

no_parsaran
22nd April 2004, 04:56
slightly off topic here...... has anyone played day of defeat 2? i find it extremely hilarious that the allies are portrayed as 100% american yet at certain battles, such as Caen, the "allied" forces were about 95% canadian and the rest british. considering that the americans hadnt even recovered from taking omaha, *coughthecandianstooktheirobjectivesonthefirstdayo fd-daycough*, they werent even in any position to help out in Caen, yet now thousands of your little cappie boys will play this game and be like "wooooow we sure kicked some ass in WW2!" yet they were never there.... it amuses me to think that you guys believe that ww2 was only a success b/c of the fact that you guys joined it

no_parsaran
22nd April 2004, 05:01
Originally posted by Capitalist [email protected] 15 2004, 04:54 PM
The US spearheaded the D-day invasion (with the brits)

yea ummmm..... spearheaded?? what does that mean? not being able to take your objectives as planned? hmmmmm then i guess you guys sure "spearheaded" that one.... the brits and the canadians, who as you might guess i believe dont get the credit they deserve for their part in the battle versus the nazis, were able to take their full objectives on june 6th, 1944 and were able to push further the next day, while the americans were still bumbling around fighting a mostly hitlerjudgen force.