Log in

View Full Version : Are these definitions necessarily true???



Segarr
9th April 2004, 16:46
Communism is the belief that all property is owned collectively by all.

Socialism is the belief that all property is owned by the government.

Discuss.

Don't Change Your Name
9th April 2004, 20:09
that depends on every individual's views and what they were taught.

I don't think there's an "accurate" definition of those terms.

perception
9th April 2004, 20:35
replace "all property" with "the means of production" and it's not far off. In communism property is essentially nonexistent, but socialism is not necessarily antithetical to private property.

Both communism and socialism are based upon public/collective ownership of the means of production, socialism (in theory) uses state ownership (as the representative of the people) as a sort of intermediary to direct collective ownership that would occur under communism.

redstar2000
11th April 2004, 00:09
What is Communism? A Brief Definition June 19, 2003 (http://www.anarchist-action.org/marxists/redstar2000/monthlytheoryarchives.php?subaction=showfull&id=1055977390&archive=1057041165&cnshow=archive&start_from=&ucat=&)

What is Socialism? An Attempt at a Definition June 19, 2003 (http://www.anarchist-action.org/marxists/redstar2000/monthlytheoryarchives.php?subaction=showfull&id=1055982770&archive=1057041165&cnshow=archive&start_from=&ucat=&)

:redstar2000:

The Redstar2000 Papers (http://www.redstar2000papers.vze.com)
A site about communist ideas