Globalization

[Osman Ghazi]

It seems to me that all this nay-saying about globalization is stupid and what's more, counter-productive. If I'm not mistaken, we aim to lead the working class to emancipation. Well, in third world countries, the working class does not exist, or at least did not exist before the rise of globalization. So, by exporting manufacturing jobs to foreign countries, the Western bourgeoisie is simply creating a working class in all those countries. If I'm not mistaken, they are creating the tool of their own demise, just like they created the tool of their demise during the industrial revolution.

The major argument against globalization is that it fills the pockets of the rich. Well, so did the industrial revolution and i don't see anyone opposing that. The fact is that we need a working class and what is more, it needs to be an international working class. By opposing globalization, we oppose the growth of the class we aim to bring to dominance therefore, we oppose our own goals by denying the proletariet of it's numerical superiority.

[Essential Insignificance]

we aim to lead the working class to emancipation

Working class freedom is the emancipation of themselves, therefore "lead" by them in solidarity. Period.



the Western bourgeoisie is simply creating a working class in all those countries

As horrid as globalisation is, with its mass exploitation, it is indispensable for the emergence of an proletarian, the most revolutionary of all class. It is of course, historically ''necessary'' if we are to focus and scrutinize Marx’s laws of historical materialism, it in succession of feudalism.

Marx was never divergent to British imperialism in India, for he realised that is was historically necessary for India to exceed from one successive epoch to another.Regardless of the wretchedness associated with imperialism.

Without a highly developed industrialised nation, with an strong proletarian, communistic revolution, is an mere illusion.

There is know, dubious thought, that globalisation is not progressive...its grandiosely progressive!

An it will funish the communistic revolution to avowal.