Log in

View Full Version : Revolution in progress - nepal, the place to be?



MJM
16th January 2002, 05:46
From:
http://home.clear.net.nz/pages/wpnz/jan14-02nepal.htm

Nepal’s revolutionaries continue their advance

The Spark 14 January 2002

Since 1996 a revolution led by the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) has gathered mass support across the country. A third of the country is liberated and a new democratic society is being born. The old ruling class is desperately trying to hold onto power and is lashing out viciously.

On 26 November 2001 Nepal’s King declared a state of emergency and for the first time fully mobilised the Royal Nepalese Army (RNA) against the revolutionary people’s war. The RNA set about massacring unarmed peasants and launched a propaganda war claiming some of the top leadership had been killed or captured. These claims have been denied by the Maoists, who say no central or regional level leader of the Party except Com. Rabindra Shrestha, who was captured on November 25, has been captured by the enemy, nor anyone of the leadership killed, so far.

What the RNA has done is arrest hundreds of people and some party sympathisers. The fact that the reactionary army has not been able to capture any significant figures in the leadership shows that the revolutionaries enjoy the support of the masses. According to the Maoists ‘the revolutionary rank and file is in a completely upbeat mood, whereas the reactionary camp, particularly its royal army is in a crest fallen state. The way they have been seeking frantic military help, particularly from India, adequately speaks of this’. (Maoist Information Bulletin December 2001).

The People’s Liberation Army launched a massive offensive against the old state forces on 23 November, taking the enemy by surprise and carried out actions in more than 20 of the country’s 75 districts.

In a counter-offensive the government forces claimed they had great success and had killed 200 guerrillas, but this has been denied by the Maoists. Here is what they say: ‘The real truth is this: on that Salleri encounter total casualties on our side were seventeen, whereas on the side of the enemy it was thirty-three (including 27 policemen, four army men, and two bureaucrats). Similarly, on November 23, in Dang three of our PLA comrades were martyred on the spot and four more succumbed to their injuries later on, whereas on the enemy side the total casualty was 25 (including 14 army men and 11 policemen) and several dozens injured. On the same day in Syangja, 14 policemen were killed, where as there was no casualty on our side. Let independent sources verify or contradict these facts. Why should we tell lies about the number of fallen heroes on our side? ... Everybody knows we revere and honour our fallen heroes and heroines ...’(ibid).

India has sent truck loads of high-tech weapons and surveillance equipment to Nepal and supplied Cheetah helicopters. Nepal’s government has labelled the Maoists ‘terrorists’ and asked for US assistance to put down the revolution. In December an official from the US State Department met Nepalese government officials. The US official told journalists ‘I am here on behalf of the US government to express our support to the government of Nepal in its efforts against the Maoists ... We want to help Nepal in its efforts to solve the Maoist problem’. (US weekly, Revolutionary Worker, 23 December, 2001).

What is the so-called ‘Maoist problem’? It is a revolutionary movement which has developed deep roots among the masses over decades. The communist leadership has applied the strategy developed by Mao Tsetung during China’s revolution of protracted people’s war. It is suited to semi-colonial, semi-feudal countries such as Nepal, where the vast peasant population is severely impoverished and revolutionary. It entails building up revolutionary base areas in the countryside until the cities are surrounded and an insurrection is then possible. As the name suggests, it is a protracted struggle, often with ebbs and flows, but in Nepal the movement has developed quite rapidly.

Now the government is concentrating all its efforts on repression and calling for outside assistance. The revolutionaries have made it clear they oppose any attempts at imperialist interference in their affairs. This they stated in an open letter recently. They also seek – and deserve – the support of workers and progressives around the world. Their struggle is our struggle. They are playing a tremendous role in helping to weaken world imperialism and showing the world that communism is not dead. It is being revived.

GenosseM
16th January 2002, 08:21
I heared about revolution in Nepal, but I thought it was the fight of 2 or 3 Guerillas against the friendly government of a small quiet country!
Thanx for the truth!

Who would come with me if I leave Germany tomorrow to support our comrades in NEPAL???

Unlearn & Resist

revolutionary spirit
16th January 2002, 22:12
i'm not really big on peaseant revolution..workers revolution is the shit

Dreadnaht1
16th January 2002, 23:56
I'll have to stick with Comrade Lenin who tried to combine the peasantry and workers in the Russian revolution. So I think I'd assist in a revolution for either class. I'd prefer Guerilla Warfare but a revolution is a revolution and I'd be game for any other type of revolution. Too bad I' don't live in Europe.

-Dread

revolutionary spirit
17th January 2002, 18:26
against guerrilla warfare it's just a bunch of people coming from the hills into the cities and saying that this is communism,i'm for a mass workers revolution like in october u seen the result of guerrilla warfare[cuba,china]

peaccenicked
18th January 2002, 18:32
The form of warfare in a poular uprising does not determine it's results, but our experience of what people do in the name of communism leaves us room to be wary of the outcome. A beseiged pocket of nascent socialism may last through the influence of a strong leader but it wont be able to flourish into a socialist
example. The development of a resistance movement anywhere is encouraging and needs yet another Hands
Off Campaign and more resistance else where.

Dreadnaht1
18th January 2002, 22:33
Revolutionary Spirit, it's more then just people running into cities from the hills. It's strategy and alot of planning as the book Guerilla Warfare shows. And you mention China/Cuba, well Cuba is definetly the result of a full-on Guerilla War. And even in a guerilla war the proletariot play a tremendous role. Some fighting must be done in a revolution and guerilla warfare is the best way to go about it.

We must also look at guerilla warfare as a method to winning a revolution instead of looking at it as a type of revolution since Guerilla Warfare can be combined with other methods of revolutionary tactics as well.

-Dread

MJM
18th January 2002, 23:04
I think the theory of guerilla warfare can and will be expanded to include the workers in the cities.
It's a very useful form of combat that requires circumstances that can be found in a large city.

Moskitto
18th January 2002, 23:44
of course you can have guerrilla warfare expanded to the urban workers.

Where I live (although that's more suburban) is brilliant for guerilla warfare. There are thousands of places to hide and just appear and disappear to. Infact me and the rest of the commies probably have access to enough homemade weapons to capture some real weapons then hold the place for quite a long time. And that would be a real shock to America and the rest of the world because we are middle class and aren't we supposed to be the enemies of communism or something?

MJM
19th January 2002, 00:23
Here's my first attempt at urban guerilla theory.

Beneth the streets lie a vast series of tunnels used for the draining of rain water.These should be used as a base for attacks, storage of weapons, places of refuge and most importantly transportation.

What do ya reckon is it rellevent or just bullshit?

Dreadnaht1
19th January 2002, 06:32
That's actually quite good. Underground catacombs, if kept a secret, can be a valuable means of transportation, attack, base, storage, etc. There's a nice set of catacombs underneath my school that's just perfect for hiding about 20 people/ some mmunition/guns/information. Just about anything really could fit under there. And not a whole lot of people really know about them so that's even better. The only problem with those since they are maintenance tunnels is without blueprints you could easily become lost and I believe there is only one entrance/exit. So, depending on the type of catacombs, they could become very valuable assets in a Guerilla Attack.

-Dread

peaccenicked
19th January 2002, 13:02
Guerilla war is only a part of armoury of all possible tactics in a given situation. Castro placed great emphasis on the role of the general strike in the toppling of Batista.