antigovernment
12th January 2002, 21:14
the priority concern in a revolution is not whether or not you have a gun in your hand, but whether or not you have your community organized. Because that's where revolution comes from, the community. From the people. However, as you mobilize, I believe it's definatly necessary to also be prepared to defend yourself, otherwise the state will take you down. The state naturally resists revolution, if they see a movement growing that they know has potential to knock them down, then they will eliminate it with violence. If your movement is PREPARED to defend it's self against that violence, the state is in trouble. This will lead to further class conflict, and more state repression, but it's also the downfall because it's putting every last resource it has into stopping your movement. Naturally, this will erupt into full fledged class warfare. Thus we must be prepared to handle all areas of this, we must get this down to a science. Prepare ourselves for economnic warfare. Because as the state has proven time and time again, nomatter if your peaceful or violent, they'll point a gun at you and pull the trigger.
It's not the fact that your movement has guns which make it dangerous, it's the fact that you're ideas make YOU dangerous, thus your movement is a threat to the state. The state has this organized "democracy" which consists of the police, army, navy, marines, and what have you. In order to sustain this security aperuatus, the state must seek to eliminate any potential threat to it's existance. The biggest threat is the idea of revolution. The idea for change. What I mean here is that the mind is a weapon, where the gun is only a tool.
Revolution is a science. In order to carry out a revolution, we must understand this sceience. We must understand how to sustain social equalibriums within our society, and sustain a security within our communities. This only comes about through education; as I said earily, mobilizing. Organizing the communities. This will build a counter-intelligence, which naturally leads to counter-action.
We in fact, already have a counter-intellegence, but it's apathetic, because we are passified. We are passified by the dominance of counter-production, mass marketing, and comercialization. It passifies us every day. The 9 to 5 job - the clampdown - passifies us as well. Therefor we must unpassify ourselves by organizing and taking action. Even if were small. Because all it takes is a spark to light up a bon fire. What I mean by that is there is social influence within a society when another person starts doing something. For example, in Argentina, people started marching down the streets to protest the IMF. Then naturally peopple in the sorounding community joined into the march. Then more people. And more. Then the whole city was into it. Sometimes it takes a small group of people, or even a single indivisual to ignite that spark so everyone will see it, and respond to it. Because alot of people have been indocrinated with apathy. We're pounded with the dominance of this corporate culture value system every day. They are literarly indoctrinating us so we cannot mobilize amongst ourselves. We break through this with education. But remember, education is a dangerous thing. As I said, mobilizing for revolution is a threat to the state. It goes against the interests of the upper class (who are very small, but control very much). Therefor their main concern is to silence you. And violently. There isn't a single revolution where the state hasn't reacted violently. To be serious about revolution is to be serious about self-defense. It's only intelligent (that is if you want to achieve a revolution). There are other tactics within economic warfare that can be utilized in guerrilla format to shake, break, crack, and hack the state as well. We can win. We can take them. There are more of us then there are of them. We are smarter than them, and our power - the power of the people - has lasted longer than them. It's lasted longer than any government. There power of the people has never seized. We will win.
It's not the fact that your movement has guns which make it dangerous, it's the fact that you're ideas make YOU dangerous, thus your movement is a threat to the state. The state has this organized "democracy" which consists of the police, army, navy, marines, and what have you. In order to sustain this security aperuatus, the state must seek to eliminate any potential threat to it's existance. The biggest threat is the idea of revolution. The idea for change. What I mean here is that the mind is a weapon, where the gun is only a tool.
Revolution is a science. In order to carry out a revolution, we must understand this sceience. We must understand how to sustain social equalibriums within our society, and sustain a security within our communities. This only comes about through education; as I said earily, mobilizing. Organizing the communities. This will build a counter-intelligence, which naturally leads to counter-action.
We in fact, already have a counter-intellegence, but it's apathetic, because we are passified. We are passified by the dominance of counter-production, mass marketing, and comercialization. It passifies us every day. The 9 to 5 job - the clampdown - passifies us as well. Therefor we must unpassify ourselves by organizing and taking action. Even if were small. Because all it takes is a spark to light up a bon fire. What I mean by that is there is social influence within a society when another person starts doing something. For example, in Argentina, people started marching down the streets to protest the IMF. Then naturally peopple in the sorounding community joined into the march. Then more people. And more. Then the whole city was into it. Sometimes it takes a small group of people, or even a single indivisual to ignite that spark so everyone will see it, and respond to it. Because alot of people have been indocrinated with apathy. We're pounded with the dominance of this corporate culture value system every day. They are literarly indoctrinating us so we cannot mobilize amongst ourselves. We break through this with education. But remember, education is a dangerous thing. As I said, mobilizing for revolution is a threat to the state. It goes against the interests of the upper class (who are very small, but control very much). Therefor their main concern is to silence you. And violently. There isn't a single revolution where the state hasn't reacted violently. To be serious about revolution is to be serious about self-defense. It's only intelligent (that is if you want to achieve a revolution). There are other tactics within economic warfare that can be utilized in guerrilla format to shake, break, crack, and hack the state as well. We can win. We can take them. There are more of us then there are of them. We are smarter than them, and our power - the power of the people - has lasted longer than them. It's lasted longer than any government. There power of the people has never seized. We will win.