View Full Version : U.S. Nuclear targets list made public
Redistribute the Rep
24th December 2015, 05:58
Disturbing:
http://news.nationalpost.com/news/declassified-documents-reveal-disturbing-scope-of-u-s-nuclear-target-list-in-the-1950s
Sinister Cultural Marxist
24th December 2015, 21:04
It's certainly chilling, but I wouldn't be surprised if the Soviets had a similar doctrine. That said, the USSR had fewer weapons for most of the Cold War and would have had to make a higher priority for strategic targets.
Heretek
26th December 2015, 23:00
Chilling how its mostly population centers and not necessarily military targets. Some rather obvious military locations, like in Crimea, are completely passed over. Berlin, Warsaw(?), Kiev, Moscow, Petersburg, Vladivostok, Beijing, Pyongyang.
Invader Zim
27th December 2015, 01:42
It's certainly chilling, but I wouldn't be surprised if the Soviets had a similar doctrine. That said, the USSR had fewer weapons for most of the Cold War and would have had to make a higher priority for strategic targets.
Far fewer to be sure, but at over 1,000 still more than enough to make the world uninhabitable and to wipe out every major town and city in north America and western Europe.
Synergy
1st January 2016, 04:12
I wonder what the current one looks like.
Aslan
1st January 2016, 07:09
In the event of WWIII right after the fall of Berlin. Prime Minister Churchill planned to do ''Operation Unthinkable'', where British, American, and French armies would launch a surprise attack on Soviet troops and march to Moscow. Churchill planned to overthrow the Red army by re-arming Nazi German troops in order to defeat the Soviet Union.
This plan would certainly cause WWIII, and thankfully Roosevelt had some sense in not doing this. Leaving the bastard Churchill fuming alone.
Comrade Jacob
4th January 2016, 17:55
All populous areas. And they hate on the DPRK for threatening hitting military targets.
Rudolf
4th January 2016, 18:05
It makes sense the targets were population centres though, doesn't it? The only point in dropping a nuke is genocide, nothing else.
Alet
4th January 2016, 18:54
So, they actually decided to drop a nuclear bomb right next to West Berlin? I'm not sure whether I'm surprised.
Armchair Partisan
4th January 2016, 18:56
So, they actually decided to drop a nuclear bomb right next to West Berlin? I'm not sure whether I'm surprised.
Yeah, I was wondering about that too. Though NATO did not really have a lot of love for Germany, whether West or East, so it does not surprise me they did not care enough - I'm not sure how long their mentality about Germany was "keep it down at all costs" rather than "we could use them, I guess", but I'm pretty sure that doctrine lasted until somewhere in the '50s.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2020 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.