theblackmask
13th October 2015, 05:17
From Destroy Everything (http://destroy.svbtle.com)
The anarchist scene is currently in an uproar. If people arent upset about Michael Schmidts racist remarks and possible infiltration, they are gossiping about the recent feud between Aragorn and Bob Black. Anarchism has, in the span of a few weeks, been reduced to the petty gossip of tabloids. Those at the head of these events are doing nothing but spectacularizing the events. In the Michael Schmidt case, AK Press decided to prematurely announce things, then wait until they could secure a more mainstream outlet to publish on. In the other case, we have seen a barrage of social media, along with a eulogy for Mr. Black, in a written/semi-physical war which could just continue ad nauseum. Why do we care about these things, of which the majority of us have no direct involvement? Why has reality entertainment reared its ugly head in anarchism?
I believe Squee comes very close to answering this, when he talks about anarchism as an actual scene ala a movie or TV set. The scene is simply the people that are there, in the scene. While I agree with Squee on the analogy, I think he misses a vital point. Most people are not actors in the scene, but mere scenery. Maybe someone like a Michael Schmidt or a Bob Black gets to be in the scene as an actor, but the rest of us are barely present. We are beer glasses, or chairs, next to the living actors in the scene. This may be fine in other so-called scenes, but we are supposed to be anarchists who are opposed to something like the hierarchy this creates. Are you content with being a chair, and sitting there, after the set has closed, and everyone has left for the night, discussing the acting of Aragorn vs Black? Im definitely not.
A real anarchist scene would have us all be actors, but so many of us have chosen to remain propsscenery to that which goes on around us. Enough to the point that news of opposition to the system, or any news relating to the anarchistic, takes a backseat to the newest gossip. Pretty soon, well all be talking sharing updates about each kidney stone that John Zerzan passes. (sorry John!)
The worst thing about all of this is that its NOT EVEN NEWS!!! Any person who has read Schmidts rants should have called out his crypto-racism a long time ago. Any person who has read Blacks defenses of himself should have also known what a batshit turn he could take in the name of self-preservation. The things everyone has been gossiping about have been blatantly apparent this whole time. We might even have had the power to direct these scenes, yet still we remain propsa tree in the background, barely in focusabsorbing information but not acting upon it.
There is, indeed, a spectacle of society, but there is no society of the spectacle. Our society is a spectacle for each and every slave that inhabits it, precisely because he or she is a slave, because he or she is isolated and separated from the other slaves and from society as a whole, because slaves do not govern, slaves do not communicate and, therefore, slaves do not act. - Jean-Pierre Voyer
The anarchist scene is currently in an uproar. If people arent upset about Michael Schmidts racist remarks and possible infiltration, they are gossiping about the recent feud between Aragorn and Bob Black. Anarchism has, in the span of a few weeks, been reduced to the petty gossip of tabloids. Those at the head of these events are doing nothing but spectacularizing the events. In the Michael Schmidt case, AK Press decided to prematurely announce things, then wait until they could secure a more mainstream outlet to publish on. In the other case, we have seen a barrage of social media, along with a eulogy for Mr. Black, in a written/semi-physical war which could just continue ad nauseum. Why do we care about these things, of which the majority of us have no direct involvement? Why has reality entertainment reared its ugly head in anarchism?
I believe Squee comes very close to answering this, when he talks about anarchism as an actual scene ala a movie or TV set. The scene is simply the people that are there, in the scene. While I agree with Squee on the analogy, I think he misses a vital point. Most people are not actors in the scene, but mere scenery. Maybe someone like a Michael Schmidt or a Bob Black gets to be in the scene as an actor, but the rest of us are barely present. We are beer glasses, or chairs, next to the living actors in the scene. This may be fine in other so-called scenes, but we are supposed to be anarchists who are opposed to something like the hierarchy this creates. Are you content with being a chair, and sitting there, after the set has closed, and everyone has left for the night, discussing the acting of Aragorn vs Black? Im definitely not.
A real anarchist scene would have us all be actors, but so many of us have chosen to remain propsscenery to that which goes on around us. Enough to the point that news of opposition to the system, or any news relating to the anarchistic, takes a backseat to the newest gossip. Pretty soon, well all be talking sharing updates about each kidney stone that John Zerzan passes. (sorry John!)
The worst thing about all of this is that its NOT EVEN NEWS!!! Any person who has read Schmidts rants should have called out his crypto-racism a long time ago. Any person who has read Blacks defenses of himself should have also known what a batshit turn he could take in the name of self-preservation. The things everyone has been gossiping about have been blatantly apparent this whole time. We might even have had the power to direct these scenes, yet still we remain propsa tree in the background, barely in focusabsorbing information but not acting upon it.
There is, indeed, a spectacle of society, but there is no society of the spectacle. Our society is a spectacle for each and every slave that inhabits it, precisely because he or she is a slave, because he or she is isolated and separated from the other slaves and from society as a whole, because slaves do not govern, slaves do not communicate and, therefore, slaves do not act. - Jean-Pierre Voyer