Gun Laws

[S. Caserio]

It's easier to kill people with guns than with knifes (Statement). Sweden, where I live, there are too many law enforcements (Question/Statement)? The present USA have too few (Question/Statement)? The existing Gun Laws are built on right-wing populism (Question/Statement)? Under which permissions should the shooting range should be made accessible (Question)? Guns are being used for self-defence often (Question)? Full-automatic rifles should be allowed (Question)? Under which circumstances (Questions)? How should caps and black-powder be stored (Question)? They are being classified as explosives. How does collector's items turn into the personal property of some collector in the alternative world we strive for? Under which circumstances are these to be shot?

"Statements should never be followed by a question mark, it looks weird and makes me unreasonably annoyed." I can't express some of these questions without them not being looked at as statements.

[BIXX]

If your period key is broken you can just nor have any punctuation at the end of your sentences like so

Statements should never be followed by a question mark, it looks weird and makes me unreasonably annoyed.

[Sinister Intents]

It's easier to kill people with guns than with knifes?


If you botch a kill shot to a deer: Watching and hearing it suffer will scar you! I think this is a strange question.


Sweden, where I live, there are too many law enforcements?


ACAB: All Cops Are Bastards. Do you think we need law enforcement?


The present right-wing fasco-libertarian USA have too few?


Have too few guns? I am a communist and have a lot of guns.

Upon your edit: Gun laws were historically used to keep blacks from having weapons and gun laws specifically have more to do with controlling what the working class has. Gun laws while attempting to decrease gun violence also has the effect of allowing for its increase.


Shooting range should be made accessible under which permissions?


Shooting ranges should be available for all to use like any other facility, and proper safety should always be taken. Carelessness and ignorance kills so people should be educated on proper gun safety and use as always.


Guns are being used for self-defence often?


I have no clue. Guns can be used for any reason...........


Full-automatic rifles should be allowed? Under which circumstances?


If someone wants a gun I'm sure they'll get a hold of it regardless of regulations and laws.....


How should caps and black-powder be stored?


I would assume in a cool, dry area, somewhere secluded. I've never handled black powder weapons.


How does collector's items turn into the personal property of some collector in the alternative world we strive for? Under which circumstances are these to be shot?

I'm sure if you want a specific gun it could be produced and you could assist in it's production. If you want to collect something do so, assuming you have the money to waste on something trivial under capitalism. In communism guns will be the property of the whole community or could be a personal item in the place in which you reside and you could utilize the gun at your leisure if you've time to go to a range. As per a more explicit answer I'm not sure how to quite answer you.

Thanks for editing your post.

[S. Caserio]

"If you botch a kill shot to a deer: Watching and hearing it suffer will scar you! I think this is a strange question." With deer and humans it should work well enough with 1-3 bullets. People who kill others without having been ordered to do it don't always care too much about it at the moment it's happening.

"ACAB: All Cops Are Bastards. Do you think we need law enforcement?" I'm not sure where I got 'enforcement' from. I must have meant another word, not sure which I should use. Enforcement sure, but not in this case

"Have too few guns? I am a communist and have a lot of guns.

Upon your edit: Gun laws were historically used to keep blacks from having weapons and gun laws specifically have more to do with controlling what the working class has. Gun laws while attempting to decrease gun violence also has the effect of allowing for its increase." I meant few laws and restrictions. Also, the way regulations work today (The licenses, permissions etc), is through expensiveness. Gun laws does the opposite of increasing gun violence. It might however, increase knife violence.

"Shooting ranges should be available for all to use like any other facility, and proper safety should always be taken. Carelessness and ignorance kills so people should be educated on proper gun safety and use as always." I meant more like license for utilizing these ranges.

"I have no clue. Guns can be used for any reason..........." As much of a clue as me then.

"If someone wants a gun I'm sure they'll get a hold of it regardless of regulations and laws....." They will. It depends also on how deeply they want it. It's not going to be as easy as usual.

"I would assume in a cool, dry area, somewhere secluded. I've never handled black powder weapons." Obviously :rolleyes:Why did I even ask this? I know this, it was just about permission to store explosive-classified materials.

"I'm sure if you want a specific gun it could be produced and you could assist in it's production. If you want to collect something do so, assuming you have the money to waste on something trivial under capitalism. In communism guns will be the property of the whole community or could be a personal item in the place in which you reside and you could utilize the gun at your leisure if you've time to go to a range. As per a more explicit answer I'm not sure how to quite answer you." That's well and enough :)I haven't actually read so much classical literature about how society would be structured. Only Critics of the capitalist society, relatively much has happened since.

"Thanks for editing your post." M... Your pleasure :lol:

[ComradeAllende]

How does collector's items turn into the personal property of some collector in the alternative world we strive for? Under which circumstances are these to be shot?

Collector's items, insofar as they are used for personal enjoyment, can be considered personal property and are therefore relegated to individual ownership. A socialist society would simply prevent the buying and selling of collector's items for monetary gain, as far as I'm concerned.

[S. Caserio]

Collector's items, insofar as they are used for personal enjoyment, can be considered personal property and are therefore relegated to individual ownership. A socialist society would simply prevent the buying and selling of collector's items for monetary gain, as far as I'm concerned.

I know that. What would the trading consist of? Would it be some kind of barter? If personal property is utilized as this, could it lead to improper barter power balance? People who has offers you probably wouldn't refuse. Traders risen from the ashes of the ancient bourgeois society?

[John Nada]

I know that. What would the trading consist of? Would it be some kind of barter? If personal property is utilized as this, could it lead to improper barter power balance? People who has offers you probably wouldn't refuse. Traders risen from the ashes of the ancient bourgeois society?There would be no need for trade. Major means of production(aka what is used to make things) would be owned and used in common. Whatever that thing is, it's likely already mass produced cheaply and replaceable. If for some reason you want something, first phase of communism uses labor vouchers that don't circulate and are acquired through one's own labor, and not by exploiting others and collecting rent just because they own something.

Gifts or even barter is not a defining characteristic of capitalism, but of more primitive modes of production like feudalism or. Those "traders" are getting back the same use-value out of what they're bartering over. They're not outside of the social sphere, which would be one of mass production for use and not profit under communism. That's an insignificant act in a capitalist mode of production, let of a communist mode of production.

No one's that special where they can accumulate something so valuable that an entry factory of workers can't make it. Their fantasy of becoming bourgeoisie by bartering personal property is as laughable as putting on a crown, grabbing a sword and announcing that they're lord/lady of the realm and everyone's their serfs who must work their fief. Wishful thinking under capitalism, let alone a more advance phase like communism.

[Sewer Socialist]

I imagine most guns will be located at a gun range, where people don't need to possess their own - show up and experience the usage of firearms of the past, among comrades with similar interests. Wheellocks, flintlocks, Brown Besses, Springfield 1855, Colt Thompson, Springfield M1 Garand, STEN, AK47, Fabrique Nationale F2000, Fabrique Nationale P90, Barrett M95, phased plasma rifle in the 40 watt range, etc., etc.

Not because of a ban, or policy specific to guns, but because people wouldn't be so interested in accumulating property for strictly personal usage in a post-bourgeois world, and of course, without imperialism to extend or combat, there would be no actual need for armament.

[Luís Henrique]

If your period key is broken you can just nor have any punctuation at the end of your sentences like so

Statements should never be followed by a question mark, it looks weird and makes me unreasonably annoyed.

you are so conventional and conservative? revolution will come when we all end statements by question marks? seriously, it is the new paris commune? we abolish periods, we consequently abolish capital letters? and so capitalism comes to its end?

luís henrique?

[Guardia Rossa]

you are so conventional and conservative? revolution will come when we all end statements by question marks? seriously, it is the new paris commune? we abolish periods, we consequently abolish capital letters? and so capitalism comes to its end?

luís henrique?

Actually I would find interesting superseding the alphabet and replace it with something like scientifically-built Chinese characters. They would be global, easier to use, and each word/meaning would have a character on it's own. This would lead to some 5 thousand most-used characters and make internet conversations more interesting :lol:

(Also it helps developing the brain)

[Luís Henrique]

Actually I would find interesting superseding the alphabet and replace it with something like scientifically-built Chinese characters. They would be global, easier to use, and each word/meaning would have a character on it's own. This would lead to some 5 thousand most-used characters and make internet conversations more interesting :lol:

(Also it helps developing the brain)

as far as it outedges placenta cream, everything goes?

luís henrique?

[Hatshepsut]

A thread so bad it's almost good. Someone must be guilty. Let's have a show trial. Then we'll have a use for all those guns we're going to have in our socialist republic. :unsure: