Unions to Mobilize on May Day Against Racist Police Killings

[VivalaCuarta]

http://www.internationalist.org/internationalistlogo.png
April 2015




ILWU Dock Workers to Shut Port of Oakland & March on City Hall
South Carolina AFL-CIO Calls for Workers Solidarity Across U.S.




http://www.internationalist.org/flashunionstomobilize150501.jpg

http://www.internationalist.org/ilwuportstrikeh0805.jpg
ILWU Local 10 dock workers march in San Francisco on May Day 2008 in the first-ever strike action by U.S. workers against U.S. imperialist war. The work stoppage shut down all 29 West Coast ports demanding an end to the war and occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as support for immigrant rights.

Police murders of unarmed black and brown people continue without letup across the United States. Despite the national uproar this fall over the grand jury verdicts letting off the cops who chokeholded Eric Garner to death in Staten Island, New York and shot 17-year-old Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, the forces of racist “law and order” are still on a deadly rampage. On April 4 in North Charleston, South Carolina, Walter Scott, a black worker, was shot eight times in the back by a police officer in a traffic stop. The cold-blooded murder was caught in a bystander’s cellphone video that has been seen by millions.

Working people across the country are outraged. Now key unions have decided they’ve had enough, the time has come to act. In an April 16 statement, the South Carolina AFL-CIO announced it would “reach out to workers around the country to join with us on May 1st in actions to protest the continuing unjustified killings.” The labor federation added, “We want to commend ILWU Local 10 for your courageous actions of solidarity.” The reason? On May 1 the West Coast longshore local will hold a stop-work meeting, shutting down the Port of Oakland and marching on City Hall to demand “Stop Police Killings of Black and Brown People.”

This could be huge, which is why the bosses, bureaucrats and Democrats may try to block it – and why class-conscious workers and all opponents of racism should take it up and spread it. There have been numerous protests against police killings in recent months, but this is the first union appeal specifically for bringing out the power of working-class action. Organized labor together with millions of African American, Latino, poor and working people and all defenders of democratic rights are the social force that can bring the wheels of society to a stop in protest against the police murder machine. But we must use that power.

We urge workers across to country to mobilize on May 1 against racist police terror! With rallies, marches and strike action, unions and labor supporters should bring our collective strength to bear, demanding these killings must stop!

http://www.internationalist.org/walterscottmurderedbycarolinacop150404.jpg
Cold-blooded murder. Above: Cellphone video shows killer cop shooting Walter Scott in back. Below: Photo of Walter Scott with his family.

Police in the U.S. killed 1,100 people last year. So far in 2015, from January 1 to April 19, at least 350 civilians have been killed by cops. And that’s just based on published accounts. Young and not so young black men are particularly at risk: in 2012, once a day a black man was killed by cops or vigilantes. Often under-reported, black women have also been in the crosshairs of police terror. Immigrants, too, are prime targets, including Mexican workers like Antonio Zambrano Montes, killed in February by cops in Pasco, Washington. With or without papers, workers must rely on their own strength and demand full citizenship rights for all immigrants!

Union workers and their families have felt the scourge of racist police terror. In New York City, Eric Garner’s sister, mother and aunt were all transit workers, members of Transport Workers (TWU) Local 100. In South Carolina, the brother of Walter Scott, a fork-lift operator, and two other family members belong to International Longshoremen’s Association Local 1422. Anti-union terror is rampant in this Lowcountry redoubt of the Old South. Recently the International Association of Machinists (IAM) called off a vote on union representation at the Boeing aircraft plant in North Charleston after organizers were threatened at gunpoint.

And the police kill with impunity: even after massive protests, despite calls for special prosecutors and federal investigations, nothing has stopped – or even slowed – the wanton police violence. When a bystander records the cold-blooded murder on a cellphone, as Ramsey Orta did on Staten Island, it is the witness who is jailed, while the killer cops go free. It’s not a matter of a few “bad cops,” it’s a whole system of racist repression. The system is capitalism, and since the days of chattel slavery it has been based on the brutal exploitation, oppression and repression of black people.

Wanton police murder goes hand in hand with military repression of demonstrators. The U.S.’ endless “war on terror” abroad is directly linked to the unending police killing spree that is terrorizing African American, Latino and immigrant populations “at home.” Taking action on the burning question of state repression can and must also spur labor to use its muscle to unionize low-wage workers. On April 15, over 60,000 marched in union-sponsored protests demanding a $15/hour minimum wage. But even that minimal increase won’t be won by looking to Obama’s Democratic Party of imperialist war, racist repression and poverty pay.

http://www.internationalist.org/statenislandmarchforjusticea140823.jpg
Internationalist contingent calling for workers action at August 23 Staten Island march against police murder of Eric Garner, Michael Brown. (Internationalist photo)

Last summer following the choke-hold killing of Eric Garner we said that the TWU should strike to shut down the mass transit system which is vital to the world center of finance capital. After the police murder of Michael Brown we wrote, “The fight to put a stop to racist cop terror must mobilize the force that has the power to bring the capitalist system to a grinding halt: the millions-strong multiracial working class.” Calling for “Labor/Black/Immigrant Mobilization Now!” we urged: “Mobilize Across U.S. Against Racist Police Terror in Missouri” (The Internationalist, August 2014).

In the face of mass outrage, some unions did protest then. In New York City, the United Federation of Teachers, 1199 hospital workers and 32BJ janitors of SEIU, nurses, PSC university faculty and staff joined a “March for Justice” on Staten Island. Calling to “Mobilize NYC Unions’ Power Against Racist Police Terror!” and denouncing the Democratic and Republican parties of war and repression, the Internationalist Group, CUNY Internationalist Clubs and Class Struggle Education Workers organized a contingent.

Many unions have issued statements against trigger-happy police, but declarations will not stop this deadly plague. It is high time for labor action. The South Carolina AFL-CIO appeal and ILWU Local 10 action in Oakland, California point towards what needs to be done. In Portland, Oregon, Painters Local 10 and IATSE Local 28 have passed resolutions of solidarity with immigrant workers facing police repression in Pasco, Washington, and have voted to march against police killings on May 1. Class Struggle Workers Portland and the Internationalist Group urge other unions and all workers to take up this struggle.

San Francisco/Oakland dock workers of ILWU Local 10 have shown the world what labor solidarity action means. Time and again they have put into practice the union’s slogan, “An Injury to One Is an Injury to All.” They shut down the port to demand freedom for class-war prisoner Mumia Abu-Jamal. They boycotted ships to protest South African apartheid and Zionist Israel’s wars. On May Day 2008 they spearheaded the shutdown of all Pacific Coast ports to stop the U.S. war on Iraq and Afghanistan, the first strike by U.S. workers against a U.S. imperialist war. Today they’re targeting racist police terror. Their action speaks for us all!

The May 1 action by ILWU port workers should be taken up by Bay Area labor and unions across the country. The Internationalist Group calls upon workers everywhere to unite with the African American, Latino and immigrant population in a massive show of our strength. We have the power, the working-class power, to send the bosses and their hired guns packing. Now is the time to use it! Turn May Day 2015 into a clarion call for working-class action against racist police terror. Join together to stop the killer cops! Turn the watchword into reality: Asian, Latin, Black and White – Workers of the World, Unite!■


To contact the League for the Fourth International or its sections, send an e-mail to: [email protected]

[G4b3n]

Has the IWW given any word in regards to their involvement?
I have no problem supporting bourgeois unions in these regards but I would much prefer to show my support via a revolutionary union if possible.

I also live in North Florida, so I might be attending if I can arrange the situation financially.

[VivalaCuarta]

The bourgeois union of the west coast is called the Pacific Maritime Association.

So far, the IWW "revolutionary union" hasn't said anything. Nor are they in a position to do much of anything.

Meanwhile, the workers who load and unload ships in Oakland, and their union ILWU Local 10, are getting ready to do something. Others should join them. It would be a shame if a truly bizzare misunderstanding of "bourgeois" and "revolutionary" should stand in the way...

[G4b3n]

The bourgeois union of the west coast is called the Pacific Maritime Association.

So far, the IWW "revolutionary union" hasn't said anything. Nor are they in a position to do much of anything.

Meanwhile, the workers who load and unload ships in Oakland, and their union ILWU Local 10, are getting ready to do something. Others should join them. It would be a shame if a truly bizzare misunderstanding of "bourgeois" and "revolutionary" should stand in the way...

It certainly shouldn't stand in the way. If someone refuses to support this struggle because it is being waged by bourgeois unions then they are a shitty leftist who prefers to live in some abstract ideal universe as opposed to Earth, plane and simple, no other way to put it.

I do not know why you put scare quotes around the term revolutionary in regards to the IWW though. How are they are not revolutionary if that is your position? And do you not regard highly the struggles they have undertaken for workers all of the world? Especially fast food workers in America, which is happening as we speak.

[VivalaCuarta]

Confusion on top of more confusion... so "shitty leftists" draw a class line between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat, whereas good leftists have no principles and support the class enemy?

If the ILWU were a "bourgeois union" then this would be an employer lockout, and proletarian revolutionaries should oppose any claims by this "bourgeois union" to be carrying out a struggle against the murderous racism of the bourgeois state.

As for the latter-day IWW being a "revolutionary union" whatever that means: it rarely claims to be (and never does in the few instances when it is trying to actually be a union). It cannot be, precisely because as a union, it seeks to organize workers on the basis of their common exploitation rather than on the basis of a revolutionary program.

As a rallying point for radicals who consider rabid anti-Sovietism and vague pretensions to anarcho-syndicalism to be the epitome of "revolutionary," I suppose you could call the IWW "revolutionary," if you shared the delusions of those poor lost souls.

[G4b3n]

Confusion on top of more confusion... so "shitty leftists" draw a class line between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat, whereas good leftists have no principles and support the class enemy?

If the ILWU were a "bourgeois union" then this would be an employer lockout, and proletarian revolutionaries should oppose any claims by this "bourgeois union" to be carrying out a struggle against the murderous racism of the bourgeois state.

As for the latter-day IWW being a "revolutionary union" whatever that means: it rarely claims to be (and never does in the few instances when it is trying to actually be a union). It cannot be, precisely because as a union, it seeks to organize workers on the basis of their common exploitation rather than on the basis of a revolutionary program.

As a rallying point for radicals who consider rabid anti-Sovietism and vague pretensions to anarcho-syndicalism to be the epitome of "revolutionary," I suppose you could call the IWW "revolutionary," if you shared the delusions of those poor lost souls.

No, all leftists ought to recognize class lines. Shitty leftists refuse to support struggles of oppressed peoples (such as blacks) on the basis of the struggle not being waged through a revolutionary organization.

I mean the ILWU is bourgeois in the sense that it does not recognize capitalism as an inherently exploitative system that must be abolished through workers' struggle. The IWW recognizes this and their propaganda outlets repeat this concept time and time again, it is not something that has faded over the years. This is the distinction I am making between the two. Not to say that the ILWU shouldn't be supported in their struggle against state racism, because they should be supported by all leftists. But the distinction is there and ought to be recognized.

And I cannot cure your dogmatic Trotskyite view of what must necessarily constitute a revolutionary program. So I will end it there.

[Anglo-Saxon Philistine]

Unions are not the same thing as political organisations. Unions, like the IWLU, organise workers, like VL4 said, on the basis of their common exploitation, to carry out the day-to-day struggle against employers. Political organisations organise workers (and certain other strata) on the basis of a revolutionary political programme, to carry out the political struggle for the overthrow of the bourgeois state. A political organisation can't at the same time be a union, unless you consider ridiculous two-men-and-their-dog* "red unions" to be genuine unions. (You shouldn't. They're political hobbies.)

Just consider the question of membership. To exclude union members on the basis of their political opinion would be gross sectarianism, in the actual sense (not the ridiculous RL sense) of putting the interests of one's party before the class struggle. To include party members regardless of political opinion would turn the party into a social club.

And the IWLU organises workers to fight for better wages etc. - of course it organises them under a labour-bureaucratic leadership, but to claim they are "bourgeois", like a chamber of commerce, is ridiculous to an extreme degree, and here it doesn't mean anything except to disparage the IWLU, the organisation actually doing something, in favour of the (modern) IWW, an organisation that acts as a union in one or two workplaces and as a historical reenactment society everywhere else.

* I have been informed that, while this post was being typed up, the dog was thrown out for revisionism.

[VivalaCuarta]

In Portland, Oregon the Painters, Stagehands and Wobblies voted to march together on May Day under the "Labor Against Racist Police Murder" banner.

[BIXX]

In Portland, Oregon the Painters, Stagehands and Wobblies voted to march together on May Day under the "Labor Against Racist Police Murder" banner.
Who cares what unions do if they don't cause a rupture in social fabric. Last year the whole march ended up singing creepily "solidarity forever". Whoopee, great job guys.

[Rudolf]

Just consider the question of membership. To exclude union members on the basis of their political opinion would be gross sectarianism, in the actual sense (not the ridiculous RL sense) of putting the interests of one's party before the class struggle.


It doesn't follow though does it? You're equating two differing things. A union with a revolutionary programme would require members to agree to their aims and principles and this includes the revolutionary programme. This doesn't make the union sectarian because this is a basis for membership of the organisation and not involvement in struggle. You organise through workers assemblies regardless of union membership.



Anyway, as for the topic at hand it's good that unions are trying to get involved but the issue comes with what they do. Marches aren't a means themselves, they're more for us than anyone else. They're to build camradiery and a show of force but without industrial action all it can accomplish is similar to just putting out a statement.

[VivalaCuarta]

It doesn't follow though does it? You're equating two differing things. A union with a revolutionary programme would require members to agree to their aims and principles and this includes the revolutionary programme. This doesn't make the union sectarian because this is a basis for membership of the organisation and not involvement in struggle. You organise through workers assemblies regardless of union membership.

In this case your "union" is what everyone else would call a party. A voluntary association where membership depends, among other things, on agreement with some definite political principles.

And you recognize the need of workers, regardless of their present political beliefs or associations, to have some sort of "united front" to successfully carry out the struggle against the class enemy. Most people would call these things "unions," or under certain conditions, they might be soviets, etc. That's what they are called in the relevant context under discussion here, of the class struggle in the U.S. You choose to call them "assemblies." I suppose you have a right to use whatever words you fancy.


Anyway, as for the topic at hand it's good that unions are trying to get involved but the issue comes with what they do. Marches aren't a means themselves, they're more for us than anyone else. They're to build camradiery and a show of force but without industrial action all it can accomplish is similar to just putting out a statement.

Here I think we are basically in agreement. That's why I think it's particularly significant that ILWU Local 10 is shutting down the Port of Oakland for the day. It's a small example of what needs to be done.

[Rudolf]

In this case your "union" is what everyone else would call a party. A voluntary association where membership depends, among other things, on agreement with some definite political principles.

So... the CNT-AIT is a party and not a union?




Here I think we are basically in agreement. That's why I think it's particularly significant that ILWU Local 10 is shutting down the Port of Oakland for the day. It's a small example of what needs to be done.


Yup.

[VivalaCuarta]

So... the CNT-AIT is a party and not a union?

The AIT was an anarchist party that led the CNT union. The lines were blurred somewhat, between party and union, and more between union and the broader revolutionary upheaval, under the pressures of the Civil War. And I wouldn't be surprised if the AIT anarchists shared your interest in confusing the distinction between a party and a union.

There is a particular doctrinaire-syndicalist species of this party/union confusionism, but the opportunist political appetites behind it are the same as those that drive the social democrats who do the same thing with "their" unions: to blame the reformist betrayals of the party/leadership, their capitulation to the pressure of the bourgeoisie, on the backward consciousness of the masses of workers in the "broader" formation.

In any event, it is important to study what the Anarchists, POUMists, Stalinists and social democrats did in Spain, to learn how they betrayed the revolution and opened the door to Franco. The supposedly "revolutionary" character of the CNT did not stop its Anarchist leaders from joining the Popular Front.