Fifty Shades of Grey

[justdavidson]

Fifty Shades of Grey The peril lies in the concealing film Mr. Dim in truth and lie, light and haziness. Everything is in the title "Fifty Shades of Gray" you get it? A few things in life are tinted, not highly contrasting. At the same time for this situation, must be clear distinction in the middle of high contrast. Never get included in a relationship that incorporates passionate or physical misuse.

[1xAntifa]

Softcore porn for neo-con fascists. Pumping out BDSM as 'cool' helps train imperialist killers by letting them know that abuse is 'sexy'. You can be the torturer or the victim in this vicious game. Your choice. What a corrupt culture. Didn't the Abu Ghraib pix make these linkages clear? Propaganda is neither culture nor entertainment. Reject it.

1xantifa

[Creative Destruction]

Softcore porn for neo-con fascists. Pumping out BDSM as 'cool' helps train imperialist killers by letting them know that abuse is 'sexy'. You can be the torturer or the victim in this vicious game. Your choice. What a corrupt culture. Didn't the Abu Ghraib pix make these linkages clear? Propaganda is neither culture nor entertainment. Reject it.

1xantifa

There's nothing wrong with BDSM.

[Brandon's Impotent Rage]

There's nothing wrong with BDSM.

Exactly. We all have kinks. What people do in the bedroom or with friends is nobody's business, ESPECIALLY socialists.

[1xAntifa]

You're missing the point. I'm talking propaganda that assists in enabling the vile conduct we have witnessed in the war on terror. Dissident sexual practices are not at issue if that's your gig, heck I got my own peccadilloes. But they don't include abuse, the propagation of abuse nor the valorisation of an underground culture for the purposes of normalising torture. I'm surprised no one has ripped into this book/movie for its outright exploitation. Is it actually representative of an actual BDSM relationship based on love and trust or is it simply another money-making scam for hollywood. To me it looks like another rich **** using his [note his] power, money and influence to get his rocks off aka that pretty woman shit with dick gear. Comprende?

[Creative Destruction]

Yeah, don't be a dick, first of all. You're helping the imperialists by being so. Second, there has been a long and drawn out thread on Fifty Shades of Grey already where a lot of that has already been covered.

[1xAntifa]

Yeah, don't be a dick, first of all. You're helping the imperialists by being so. Second, there has been a long and drawn out thread on Fifty Shades of Grey already where a lot of that has already been covered.

first of all. You're helping the imperialists by being so. How?
Second, there has been a long and drawn out thread on Fifty Shades of Grey already where a lot of that has already been covered. New here but your point?
Yeah, don't be a dick= flame take your own advice,

[Creative Destruction]

New here but your point

Use the search function and don't be a dick, you imperialist swine.

[Palmares]

Calm down folks, this isn't the school yard.

[Creative Destruction]

yoar mom is so fat..

[Palmares]

That's "mum", mate. :lol:

[1xAntifa]

Use the search function and don't be a dick, you imperialist swine.

In my experience bullies are emotional fascists. so I reiterate I'm talking propaganda that assists in enabling the vile conduct we have witnessed in the war on terror. Dissident sexual practices are not at issue if that's your gig, heck I got my own peccadilloes. But they don't include abuse, the propagation of abuse nor the valorisation of an underground culture for the purposes of normalising torture. I'm surprised no one has ripped into this book/movie for its outright exploitation. Is it actually representative of an actual BDSM relationship based on love and trust or is it simply another money-making scam for hollywood. To me it looks like another rich **** using his [note his] power, money and influence to get his rocks off aka that pretty woman shit with dick gear. Comprende?

Tough if you've discussed it destruction I haven't. Ipso facto you aint a censor. Rather than flame you consider yourself ignored, you got nothing worth saying to me. Grow up/:mad:

[Ethics Gradient, Traitor For All Ages]

After talking to someone who actually read these books, they sound like they are on the level of any trashy romance novel. Not that that genre isn't filled with problematic themes, but people acting like this book or the movie is some unprecedented normalization of violence against women are a little hard to stomach after hearing the content. I feel like a lot of it has been men trying to out-feminist other men and its really old at this point.

[Trap Queen Voxxy]

Softcore porn for neo-con fascists. Pumping out BDSM as 'cool' helps train imperialist killers by letting them know that abuse is 'sexy'. You can be the torturer or the victim in this vicious game. Your choice. What a corrupt culture. Didn't the Abu Ghraib pix make these linkages clear? Propaganda is neither culture nor entertainment. Reject it.

1xantifa

I would bet 30 chickens and a donkey that you are 100% a virgin. I read the entire series in jail and omfg, was it awesome. And my name is in it come on! Lmao

Maybe getting called a dirty slut is hot in some contexts. Maybe there is nothing wrong with a little spank and tickle. Maybe a relationship dynamic like in the book is pretty ideal and really sweet minus his bajillion neuroses and what not but accepting flaws an shit whoop whoop I guess lol

Also, right of Masoch, there is strict guidelines, rules, contracts and regulations for everything and really, it's the 'sub' who holds total control via controlling the feel box, you guise obvi have not read the book

[Cliff Paul]

I would bet 30 chickens and a donkey that you are 100% a virgin

It's not cool to shame people for being into bdsm. It's also not cool to shame people for being or not being a virgin.

[Trap Queen Voxxy]

It's not cool to shame people for being into bdsm. It's also not cool to shame people for being or not being a virgin.

There is a qualitative difference between poking fun at social awkwardness and virginity and asserting that somehow bdsm and the lifestyle is part and parcel to global imperialism, cryptofascism, AIDS and the War on Terror.

[Cliff Paul]

There is a qualitative difference between poking fun at social awkwardness and virginity and asserting that somehow bdsm and the lifestyle is part and parcel to global imperialism, cryptofascism, AIDS and the War on Terror.

Lol actually I was more offended with your posts because the idea that bdsm encourages global imperialism is so absurd I can't even take it seriously.

[Sea]

I feel like a lot of it has been men trying to out-feminist other men and its really old at this point.As someone who gets a real thrill out of being kicked onto the floor, having my face hit harder and harder until I'm crying and being forced to drink piss all while having my cock locked up in chastity for the previous few months, you people are some of the worse fucking perverts that I have ever seen. How dare you read a lewd book? It's disgusting and immoral.

[1xAntifa]

Also, right of Masoch, there is strict guidelines, rules, contracts and regulations for everything and really, it's the 'sub' who holds total control via controlling the feel box,

Василиса Прекра:

thats my understanding and there is no issue about that. Nor was there any intent to shame. If that was read into the original message then pls accept my apologies. No disrespect was intended to who practice bdsm or any other pleasure between consenting adults. Your bedroom is not my area.

What I'm getting at is the normalisation of torture with-in mainstream western culture. What product are we being fed and more to the point why? It has been noted that the series 24 was the most popular tv show at Guantanamo Bay, during the 1991 Iraq imbroglio, pilots were allegedly psyched up for bombing missions with violent porn. Its the normalisation of torture per se and not bdsm that I'm questioning here. There have been black-site interrogations by police in Chicago and anti-war protestors here in oz got worked over quite badly by our security snitches in a manner similar to that inflicted on prisoners in Abu Ghraib [hooding, stripping, cuffing, physical and verbal abuse]. On Killing by Dave Grossman makes specific links between media and the desensitisation necessary for soldiers to kill. Another book I read a while ago The Abu Ghraib Effect studied the issue from the perspective of fine arts.Add Foucault and as a result I find myself critiquing the things I read, watch and listen to with a far more discerning eye. I wonder what the ultimate end is of this desensitisation and ask in a general sense do we need brutality [and not bdsm et-al] to keep us entertained, even if only at the level of comic violence. Thoughts?