n0ro
8th February 2015, 17:11
I had an interesting discussion with a close friend of mine yesterday. Long story short, he is opposed to teachers' unions, suggesting that incompetent educators receive undue protection in the form of tenure, resulting in a gross disservice to students. I'm sure many of you are familiar with the recent lawsuit in California regarding how teachers' unions were placing incompetent educators in already economically depressed areas with marginalized working-class families.
Of course, much of this overblown, and is the result of anti-union rhetoric. My question is not about how to combat these kind of arguments; instead, my question is would planning prevent the incompetent from holding posts in education? I imagine that planning would result in a value shift as much as an economic one, i.e. that education would be one of the most highly valued and respected industries, and thus emphasis would be placed on educators' competency.
Thoughts?
Of course, much of this overblown, and is the result of anti-union rhetoric. My question is not about how to combat these kind of arguments; instead, my question is would planning prevent the incompetent from holding posts in education? I imagine that planning would result in a value shift as much as an economic one, i.e. that education would be one of the most highly valued and respected industries, and thus emphasis would be placed on educators' competency.
Thoughts?