anarchist memes

[Desy]

Does anyone here know an admin from Anarchist Memes facebook page? I would like to get a hold of them about why I was banned for "Historical Revisionism". Any help would be much appreciated.

[BIXX]

I do, don't know if they're really down to chat with me or anything though.

Do you know what you said?

[Desy]

*removed* has been banned for anti-anarchist propaganda, anti-socialism, support of political repression against socialists, disinformation, historical revisionism to suit anti-anarchist aims.

-=E=-

That was my ban notice.

I said Kronstadt saliors were reactionary white army supporters. And a meme of Trotsky saying dead reactionaries at Kronstadt what's your point?

[motion denied]

who cares about the worst page in all facebook (which means A LOT)

[Red Commissar]

*removed* has been banned for anti-anarchist propaganda, anti-socialism, support of political repression against socialists, disinformation, historical revisionism to suit anti-anarchist aims.

-=E=-

That was my ban notice.

I said Kronstadt saliors were reactionary white army supporters. And a meme of Trotsky saying dead reactionaries at Kronstadt what's your point?

Yeah no that's not going to go over any better than me walking into a Star Wars convention and saying Jar Jar Binks was actually the best character ever.

[Desy]

who cares about the worst page in all facebook (which means A LOT)

Lol. I wouldn't say the worse. I'm not a fan of anarchism, but they still have the same end goal as me. I want to know if the admins of Anarchist Memes are reactionaries or not.

[Desy]

Yeah no that's not going to go over any better than me walking into a Star Wars convention and saying Jar Jar Binks was actually the best character ever.

You would be mocked not silenced, and being mocked by anarchist rhetoric is like being hit with a pillow by my little nephew.

[motion denied]

they're just obnoxious tbh

[BIXX]

Yeah suddenly with your shitty attitude and generally dismissive behavior I'm less down with helping you out.

[Desy]

Yeah suddenly with your shitty attitude and generally dismissive behavior I'm less down with helping you out.

Please explain? How is my attitude shitty and my "generally dissmisve behavoir"? If you dont want to help me thats fine, but lets make some sense.

[consuming negativity]

they probably banned you for not being an anarchist interested in anarchist memes

I don't see why anyone here should help you annoy the page admin(s) given your intentions; regardless of the fact that you come across as an entitled asshole (if not a troll)

[Jimmie Higgins]

Please explain? How is my attitude shitty and my "generally dissmisve behavoir"? If you dont want to help me thats fine, but lets make some sense.it's one thing to make an argument with someone; that can be done respectably. An argument made through meme is likely just trolling :lol:

And your attitude might come off as a little shit-like because you seem to define your politics through exclusion and mocking people with different ideas. In fact, this thread seems like trolling. I mean, really, you don't know why you might be banned from that page for that? :sneaky:

[Tim Cornelis]

Sounds like an okay ban for historical revisionism. But it's a tat contradictory to then say you're anti-socialist as you revised history to make the sailors 'whites'.

Also, anarchist memes is the worst. 'Is the clenched fist cultural appropriation because the Black Panthers started using them in the 1960s?' Also support for tribal warring groups that happen to employ women fighters against Da'esh -- why not supported Ba'athist women fighters also?

[Desy]

they probably banned you for not being an anarchist interested in anarchist memes

I don't see why anyone here should help you annoy the page admin(s) given your intentions; regardless of the fact that you come across as an entitled asshole (if not a troll)

Entitled to what? Annoy the page admin = ban? And I sound entitled? Come on.

[Desy]

Sounds like an okay ban for historical revisionism. But it's a tat contradictory to then say you're anti-socialist as you revised history to make the sailors 'whites'.

Also, anarchist memes is the worst. 'Is the clenched fist cultural appropriation because the Black Panthers started using them in the 1960s?' Also support for tribal warring groups that happen to employ women fighters against Da'esh -- why not supported Ba'athist women fighters also?

Please explain how that is historical revisionism? I also said they were supporters of the white army not they were part of the white army...

[Desy]

it's one thing to make an argument with someone; that can be done respectably. An argument made through meme is just trolling :lol:

And your attitude might come off a little shit-like because you seem to define your politics through exclusion and mocking people with different ideas. In fact, this thread seems like trolling. I mean, really, you don't know why you might be banned from that page for that? :sneaky:

I made a resectable argument that was met with just being called a "Statist". So instead of being toxic I posted a mocking meme. I dont have a problem with different ideas, but to counter what I say with an ad hominem doesn't show me any respect either and I'm not worried of being excluded from those type of people and politics.

I know I might get banned from AM, but for historical materialism and anti-left makes no sense. And on a platform where they hold communistic beliefs rubs me the wrong way and I would like to find out if they are reactionaries or if they have a sloid reason to ban me.

[Tim Cornelis]

Please explain how that is historical revisionism? I also said they were supporters of the white army not they were part of the white army...

It contradicts historical fact. The 'whiteness' of the sailors is simply a legitimising myth to justify the crushing in the eyes of potential sympathisers etc.

[Quail]

Removed your facebook name. Please don't post personal details on here.

[Desy]

It contradicts historical fact. The 'whiteness' of the sailors is simply a legitimising myth to justify the crushing in the eyes of potential sympathisers etc.

What facts? How is that an argument? Well tim cornelis you're wrong because "Historical Facts" say so does that make any sense.

Now I understand Kronstadt through Trotsky, another series "The prophet armed" and JG wright; if you wanna discuss how what i said was historical revisionism that's fine, but lets not fall into "Facts" with out providing any facts.

[Vladimir Innit Lenin]

boring troll is boring.

[Tim Cornelis]

What facts? How is that an argument? Well tim cornelis you're wrong because "Historical Facts" say so does that make any sense.

Now I understand Kronstadt through Trotsky, another series "The prophet armed" and JG wright; if you wanna discuss how what i said was historical revisionism that's fine, but lets not fall into "Facts" with out providing any facts.

I don't feel the need to prove it, in the same way I don't feel the need to prove that the Nanking massacre, Armenian genocide, and Holocaust happened.

[Desy]

What? Lol. I never asked you to prove that Kronstadt happened. Just where you're getting your "historical facts". You don't have to explain anything.... But I guess asking to back up claims is just trolling :confused:

[Desy]

Let me get this strait...

You agree that it is historical revisionism because of "facts."

I say that's not an argument here is the literature I have read to understand this situation.

And you come back at me for asking "where you got your "Facts" " as the same as Holocaust deniers? What kind of logic is this....