Log in

View Full Version : Israeli cabinet approves legislation defining nation-state of Jewish people



Palmares
24th November 2014, 15:22
http://assets.guim.co.uk/manual-images/arrow.png Israeli cabinet approves legislation defining nation-state of Jewish people

Opponents say proposed law would reserve ‘national rights’ for Jews and not for minorities that make up 20% of population



http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2014/11/23/1416769693229/Binyamin-Netanyahu-011.jpg The Israeli PM, Binyamin Netanyahu, argues the law is needed because the notion of Israel as a Jewish homeland was being challenged. Photograph: Barcroft Media

A controversial bill that officially defines Israel as the nation-state of the Jewish people has been approved by cabinet despite warnings that the move risks undermining the country’s democratic character.
Opponents, including some cabinet ministers, said the new legislation defined reserved “national rights” for Jews only and not for its minorities, and rights groups condemned it as racist.
The bill, which is intended to become part of Israel’s basic laws, would recognise Israel’s Jewish character, institutionalise Jewish law as an inspiration for legislation and delist Arabic as a second official language.
Arab Muslims and Christians make up 20% of Israel’s population.
The cabinet passed the bill by a 14-7 majority after reports of rancorous exchanges during the meeting, including between the prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, and his justice minister, Tzipi Livni.
The bill, which still requires the Knesset’s approval to become a law, comes as tensions between Israelis and Palestinians rise sharply, and friction within Israel’s Arab minority grows.
Opponents include two of the more centrist parties in Netanyahu’s fragile coalition - which say the bill is being pushed through with forthcoming primaries in the prime minster’s rightwing Likud party in mind - and senior government officials including the attorney general.
According to many critics, the new wording would weaken the wording of Israel’s declaration of independence, which states that the new state would “be based on the principles of liberty, justice and freedom expressed by the prophets of Israel [and] affirm complete social and political equality for all its citizens, regardless of religion, race or gender”.
Among those to voice their opposition was the finance minister, Yair Lapid, who said he had spoken to the family of Zidan Saif, a Druze policeman killed in last week’s deadly attack on a Jerusalem synagogue.
“What will we tell his family? That he is a second-class citizen in the state of Israel because someone has primaries in the Likud?” he asked.
Netanyahu argued that the law was necessary because people were challenging the notion of Israel as a Jewish homeland.
“There are many who are challenging Israel’s character as the national state of the Jewish people. The Palestinians refuse to recognise this and there is also opposition from within.
“There are those, including those who deny our national rights, who would like to establish autonomy in the Galilee and the Negev.
“Neither do I understand those who are calling for two states for two peoples but who also oppose anchoring this in law. They are pleased to recognise a Palestinian national state but strongly oppose a Jewish national state.”
According to reports in the Hebrew media, the attorney general, Yehuda Weinstein, has also expressed concern, shared by some ministers, that the new law would effectively give greater emphasis to Israel’s Jewish character at the expense of its democratic nature. A number of Israeli basic laws use the term “Jewish and democratic”, giving equal weight to both. The new law would enshrine only the Jewish character of the state.
Netanyahu appeared to confirm that there would be differential rights for Israeli Jews and other minorities. He said that while all could enjoy equal civil rights, “there are national rights only for the Jewish people - a flag, anthem, the right of every Jew to immigrate to Israel and other national symbols.”
Cabinet ministers, including Netanyahu, separately proposed stripping Palestinian attackers of their residency rights in occupied East Jerusalem in response to a wave of deadly violence.
“It cannot be that those who harm Israel, those who call for the destruction of the state of Israel, will enjoy rights like social security,” Netanyahu said, adding that the measure would complement house demolitions and serve as a deterrent.
Critics, however, have condemned the measures as racist said that they could further escalate tensions.
The cabinet met as fresh reports of continuing violence emerged. In Gaza, the Palestinian health ministry said Israeli forces had shot dead a Palestinian on Sunday, the first such fatality since a 50-day Gaza war ended in August.
In the West Bank, a Palestinian home was torched on Sunday. No one was hurt in the fire, which gutted the home in the village of Khirbet Abu Falah near Ramallah, local residents said.
“The settlers came here and they hit the door, but I refused to open,” said Huda Hamaiel, who owns the house. She said they then broke a terrace window and hurled a petrol bomb inside.
“Death to Arabs” and another slogan calling for revenge were also painted on the walls of Hamaiel’s home, hallmarks of Jewish extremists’ so-called “price tag” attacks against Palestinian dwellings and mosques and Christian church property.








http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/nov/23/israeli-cabinet-approves-bill-defining-nation-state-jewish-people

:ohmy:

Ethics Gradient, Traitor For All Ages
24th November 2014, 15:29
Is there a name for the strategy where you intentionally make the wrong decision for every choice you're given?

Sasha
24th November 2014, 15:30
gross


“Neither do I understand those who are calling for two states for two peoples but who also oppose anchoring this in law. They are pleased to recognise a Palestinian national state but strongly oppose a Jewish national state.”

maybe because these people would support a Israeli state next to a palestinian state not a Jewish state next to whatever is its antagonist.

ties in interestingly with the article i posted in the religion section about the escalating conflict between the orthodox-religious and the zionists.

disgusting...

Sasha
24th November 2014, 15:31
Is there a name for the strategy where you intentionally make the wrong decision for every choice you're given?


scorched earth politics?

Tsiolkovsky on the Moon
24th November 2014, 17:05
While certainly some sort of Jewish haven was needed after the horrors of the Holocaust, I feel like Israel has ran its purpose as a homogenous society (granted it has never been "homogenous" but has always been understood to be a Jewish nation). The concept of a nation or piece of land belonging to solely one group seems silly and infantile. We see what the notion of special ownership of land has brought about with the Israel-Palestine conflicts.

Sasha
24th November 2014, 22:32
By Dahlia Scheindlin (http://972mag.com/author/dahlias/)

|Published November 25, 2014 Is the 'Jewish nation-state' bill good for anyone at all?

A law seeking to prioritize and designate Israel as the Jewish nation-state is exposing the crazies in Israel’s government. This proposed basic law would codify and demarcate the state as something that belongs only to a subset of its citizens.
The cabinet on Sunday passed a preliminary reading of a law (http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/nov/23/israeli-cabinet-approves-bill-defining-nation-state-jewish-people) — with the weight of a constitutional amendment — that would declare Israel to be the nation-state of the Jewish people. In order to pass the vote, Prime Minister Netanyahu put forward 14 principles on which the basic law’s final wording will be based. Democracy is in there as an afterthought, equality treated weakly by guaranteeing individual rights, and allowing all people to preserve their culture and language.
Here are seven of the main reasons why “Basic Law: Israel – the National State of the Jewish People” is wrong for Israel and should not be passed.


No solutions. The prime minister’s 14 articles do not deal with cost of living and they do not protect the residents of Sderot or the woman whose house was burned yesterday (http://972mag.com/palestinian-home-set-ablaze-in-overnight-attack/99122/) by violent Israeli extremists. It doesn’t lower tuition fees for students or the price of chocolate pudding, connect Negev Bedouin to the water grid or create jobs for factory workers laid off in Arad. It doesn’t address the growing chasm with the Western world and the crisis of relations with the U.S. Yet this is what the government is doing while its citizens wait, and suffer.


Freeze a flawed reality. While the proposed basic law will effect little tangible change, it will go a long way toward anchoring the current situation of de facto discrimination into law. I recently got into a big argument with a foreigner who accused Israel of being racist in its “DNA.” I was heated. “Like all human beings, people can change,” I shot back. “Bad regimes can turn to other directions.”
Now the law is making exclusivity and inequality part of Israel’s legal DNA. Yes we are changing – but not in the right direction.
Clinging to crazy. The debate over the proposed Jewish nation-state law exposes the deepening isolationism of the small clutch of extremists at the country’s helm. They long ago isolated Israel from the Western and Arab worlds. Now, just as the prime minister and his henchmen contradict their own security chiefs when the latter don’t fall into line (http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/.premium-1.627173), this bill pits its plotters against Israel’s attorney general, Yehuda Weinstein. Weinstein said the proposed Jewish nation-state law dilutes democracy, sharply criticizing the government’s intention to support it. To which Likud MK Yariv Levin, one of the bill’s sponsors, snarled back:

The attorney general’s statements are arrogant and have nothing to do with his position as attorney general or with the legal world. The question of the image of the state and its fundamental values on which it will continue to be built, are given, in a democracy, to the public and only the public through its elected representatives, and under no circumstances must it become the private realm of a group of jurists who are trying to place themselves above the Knesset. (As quoted in Haaretz (http://www.haaretz.co.il/news/politi/1.2490815) — my translation.)

It seems that Levin, and probably numerous other ministers, has lost his marbles. The attorney general has overstepped his boundaries by providing a legal opinion to the government about the imminent passage of a law with constitutional status? The character of the state is to be determined in a way that rejects checks and balances? The Hebrew term for attorney general is “legal advisor to the government,” for crying out loud.
Then there’s Levin’s imaginary cabal of jurists levitating themselves above the Knesset. In fact, there is a very real gang of supremacist thugs leading the country into an abyss.


Constitutional-coup. The bill is part of a minority imposed creeping constitution instead of a healthy participatory process. Other basic laws were passed this way too, but those were more amendments; this one involves national self-definition that reads like the body of a constitution. The kind that should be put to wider public debate or at least not by an extremist coalition as part of coalition horse-trading.
What could the law mean if passed? Theoretically, but quite realistically, it could enable the High Court of Justice to uphold a law that violates the equality of Israeli citizens, since the Jewish nation-state law would provide constitutional foundations for privileging Jews over all others.
As normal as ethno-nationalism. Some insist that it is hypocritical and maybe even anti-Semitic to protest a simple law of national self-definition, when ‘France is for the French people,’ or ‘Germany is the land of the German people.’ Can we lay this argument to rest already? In those examples citizenship overlaps with nationhood. Yes, France is for the French. But what makes someone French is not birth or ethnicity alone, but citizenship.
This proposed basic law would codify and demarcate the State of Israel as something that belongs only to a subset of its citizens. State rights will not overlap with citizenship; they privilege a subset of citizens. Non-Jewish citizens have no route to sharing in the privileged national group. Being Israeli won’t be enough to live equally in this country. In fact, the state has consistently rejected the very idea that there is an Israeli nationality.
The true comparison is simple: the law says Israel is for the Jews, just as America once said America is for whites.


Avalanche of inequality. This is a time of worsening relations between Jews and Arabs/Palestinians in Israel.
Anyone who says this law is mainly a cover for coalition and electoral politics that won’t make a difference in real life, should look at another recent example. In 2009 a politician invented a fictional concept of Arab disloyalty, to arouse nationalist jingoism and get elected. The slogan itself, “No loyalty, no citizenship,” was a political marketing ploy. Once that politician entered the halls of power, it became his legislative vision, leading to a string of nasty, exclusionary, hate-inspired bills linked to this concept. Some of them passed.
The Nakba Law rejects the history of the Arab population; the Acceptance Committee Law rejects housing integration, the amendment to the Citizenship Law rejects their presence by keeping families apart. Now the foreign minister — recently joined by the prime minister (http://www.jpost.com/Israel-News/Politics-And-Diplomacy/Netanyahu-scolds-rioting-Arabs-following-shooting-death-of-Kafr-Kana-youth-381181) — calls to strip their citizenship altogether, for no crime at all.
What will the nationality law be the beginning of?


Stoking rage. The prime minister says the law was devised to anchor Jewish identity in the face of growing challenges to the character of the state. Here is the challenge to my identity in Israel: rising strife, and the fact that a football match between Jewish and Arab teams requires one security person for every seven fans; frenzied chants of “death to Arabs” in a growing number of situations. Doesn’t the need for peaceful relations among fellow countrymen mean anything, or is the government only concerned with the phantom threats of “delegitimization,” which if it happens, is primarily due to developments like this?
This law is fearful. It is not closing the chapter on Israel’s tense relationship between Jewish identity and the State, as I once hoped possible (http://www.haaretz.com/weekend/week-s-end/the-problem-is-constitutional-1.306401); it is opening the window to acid rain.
It is creating a false god, a Judaism that is primarily political, material, imposed, devoid of humanity or humility.
Related:
Why I oppose recognizing Israel as a Jewish state (http://972mag.com/why-i-oppose-recognizing-israel-as-a-jewish-state/78751/)
WATCH: Recognizing Israel as a Jewish state, or an ‘ethnocracy?’ (http://972mag.com/watch-recognizing-israel-as-a-jewish-state-or-an-ethnocracy/91416/)
‘Religion and politics’ in Israel: The mythology of Jewish nationalism (http://972mag.com/religion-and-politics-in-israel-the-mythology-of-jewish-nationalism/77831/)


source: http://972mag.com/is-the-jewish-nation-state-bill-good-for-anyone-at-all/99192/

Creative Destruction
24th November 2014, 22:38
to be fair, this is just a logical extension and concretization of what Israel already is. not much of a surprise.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_and_democratic_state

John Nada
25th November 2014, 00:50
According to many critics, the new wording would weaken the wording of Israel’s declaration of independence, which states that the new state would “be based on the principles of liberty, justice and freedom expressed by the prophets of Israel [and] affirm complete social and political equality for all its citizens, regardless of religion, race or gender”.Oh G-d, the prophets of Israel's concept of freedom and equality.:laugh: Is the Netanyahu regime trying to be like apartheid South Africa and Saudi Arabia too?

Red Star Rising
25th November 2014, 20:02
Is there a name for the strategy where you intentionally make the wrong decision for every choice you're given?

Capitalism.

Palmares
28th November 2014, 15:27
Incase the OP wasn't enough... :mad:




Israel FM supports paying Arabs to leave

Avigdor Lieberman says he favours providing economic incentives for Arab-Israelis to leave the country.

Last updated: 28 Nov 2014 14:38


http://www.aljazeera.com/mritems/Images/2014/11/28//2014112814163402734_20.jpg
Israeli Arabs say a bill to declare Israel the homeland of Jewish people only further alienates them [Reuters]


Israel's foreign minister says he supports paying Arab citizens to leave the country.
In a manifesto of his right-wing Yisrael Beitenu party, Avigdor Lieberman said he favoured ceding Arab majority areas in northern Israel to a future Palestinian state and providing economic incentives for Arab-Israelis - about 20 percent of Israel's population - to encourage them to emigrate.
The manifesto, published on Friday, did not set out positions on the most difficult issues in the Israel-Palestinian conflict, including the status of Jerusalem and Israel's borders.
But it does acknowledge the necessity of territorial compromise in reaching a peace deal with the Palestinians, and also with moderate Arab countries.
Once a close associate of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Lieberman is now seen as harbouring prime ministerial ambitions himself.
His offer to pay Israeli Arabs to leave comes as Netanyahu pushes forward with a contentious parliamentary bill to formalise Israel's status as a Jewish state - a measure that many Arab-Israelis say will institutionalise their status as second class citizens.
The bill, which Netanyahu says is necessary to safeguard Israel's future, is opposed by a wide range of Israeli political figures, including the largely ceremonial president, but is strongly supported by right wing members of his ruling coalition, including Lieberman.
Meanwhile, Israeli security forces fired tear gas at several dozen rock-throwing demonstrators at the Qalandiya checkpoint north of Jerusalem following weekly prayers Friday.
There were no immediate reports of injuries or arrests.


http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2014/11/israel-fm-supports-paying-arabs-leave-2014112814625150832.html