hazard
4th February 2004, 01:31
TAC: Triggered Annoyance Condition
should be seen to work in conjunction with TIC
Now that the societal malaise to be irritating has been identified and categorized accordingly, the next step will also be explicated in as succinct a method is as possible. TAC. A simple defintion of this furthur degredation of societal, that is inter human realtional conditions, is when the TIC process is seen to have an effect.
Those that are most targeted and effected and bothered by the TIC components of a society, which is represented by the vast majority of society, become victims of this process. Typically, the victims are, as I have already asserted, more intelligent in that they do not participate in the process of the TIC. they see as the 'two step" mental trap that it is and do not partcipate because of this. It serves no purpose in and of itself. It proves only mental inferiority as opposed to any sort of advanced ability to reason. It devolves those who utilize it to the same status as any other form of irritation, and nothing else.
Rejecting the TIC is only possible to those who are capable of doing so, and, like myself speak out against it, or simply refuse to acknowledge its existance. Strangely, those who participate in the TIC also refuse to acknowledge its existence. Which lends furthur credence to their stupidity. Exactly like a child with his hand caught in the cookie jar, the TIC components of society similalry deny, as if they can get away with it, that they are being intentionally irritating. They say things like 'What do you mean?" or "Why would you think that?" in reference to being caught involved in a TIC.
This is what leads me to the TAC. As someone who values truth in language, especially when a challenge is made in regards to a TIC, I typically become exceptionally annoyed at this. For there is no shame in admitting fault. And when people, those who TIC, feel the need to LIE about such a meaningless and idiotic process such as a TIC, I tend to become more than annoyed. I become aggravated and offended. Thus the TAC. It is not like these people are lying about a grevious error, or a shameful act, or a great wrong. The sort of things that people might lie for reasonably. That is, for a reasonable reason. But, like a child caught stealing a cookie, caught in the act, then lying about the fact that their hand is actually inside the jar, one has to wonder.
Here is an example. Suppose I am slightly overweight. And I am concious of this. And so somebody, a notorious fan of the TIC, approaches me and asks " Did you see my big fat fiances last night?" and I, being courteous, say no. And they go on. "Its about this fat guy. He's sooooo fat. Like he's just so fat. And this fat guy, right, this big fat guy..." and so on. And I realize that this person is only speaking so as to irritate me, in reference to my weight. So I say " Why are you talking so much about this fat chap? " or, "I understand that you are only trying to make a comment about my weight in order to irritate me." or whatever. And, the response is, ALWAYS, 'What re you talking about? " or "You're just paranoid." or some other lie that is in itself so obvioulsy a lie that its not even worth mentioning as holding any qualitative linguistic value whatsoever.
TAC is an escalation. My response will, no matter what, will escalate the situation. Either I turn away and allow the TIC to stew under my observation, or I call the TIC what he or she is, and allow the irritating little discussion that serves no other purpose than to irritate turn into a full blown assessment of the TICs intelligence. Allow the example to continue. I say that the person is making constant reference to the word fat because I am fat. the response is that the person was not. they were, and this is the catch phrase "only talking about" the show they saw. so I make the observation that there must be more to the show than the fact that this fiances is fat. and I am then accused of being too sensitive about my weight. and I say that this is exactly my point, if I am sensitive about that, why should the TIC constantly be making reference about the fat fiances in reference to his weight. and the next comment is that this fiances is in fact fat. and I return to the point of departure, that there must be more to the show than the fiances weight, and due to the admitted sensitivity I have about my weight, the TIC should not be focusing upon the weight of this fiances. the TIC should, at this point, either admit that they were either only talking about the fat fiances in order to irritate me, or say something else that is a useless and furthur irritating example of their stupidity, such as another lie or another irritating comment. in either case, I am at a loss for a number of reasons. I am forced to listen to comments being made for the sheer purpose to irritate myself. I am forced to listen to the person making the comments lie about the reason why they made these comments. I am then forced to, which is the hallmark of the TAC, be furthur self concious of own short comings in regards to a society that is falsely lead to believe that their intelligence can be measured through their ability to irritate others.
the next ten conversations I have that day will now be prone to the TAC effect. it compounds the original TIC, and increases the level at which I am annoyed about all things. so now all of the things that make me unique are subject to the TAC effect if confronted by any additional TICs. this cycle persists, and cannot be broken as long as the TIC is seen as a way to prove any sort of a mental, that is intelligent, ability.
as a highly intelligent person, that is vastly unique in every aspect of my existence, I have often been the target of many a TIC. I am forced to live under the shadow of the TAC because of this. unfortunately, the TICs are unable to understand what they do serves no purpose. they are all similar in their stupidity, and thus immune to any counter TICing of my own. they cannot be explained that what they do serves no purpose, mostly because they are far too stupid to understand it. it being the explanation. all of society suffers as a result of the TIC. and unfortunately, there is no cure for it, or the result of it, the TAC, entirely because he vast majority of the population who TIC are JUST THAT STUPID.
should be seen to work in conjunction with TIC
Now that the societal malaise to be irritating has been identified and categorized accordingly, the next step will also be explicated in as succinct a method is as possible. TAC. A simple defintion of this furthur degredation of societal, that is inter human realtional conditions, is when the TIC process is seen to have an effect.
Those that are most targeted and effected and bothered by the TIC components of a society, which is represented by the vast majority of society, become victims of this process. Typically, the victims are, as I have already asserted, more intelligent in that they do not participate in the process of the TIC. they see as the 'two step" mental trap that it is and do not partcipate because of this. It serves no purpose in and of itself. It proves only mental inferiority as opposed to any sort of advanced ability to reason. It devolves those who utilize it to the same status as any other form of irritation, and nothing else.
Rejecting the TIC is only possible to those who are capable of doing so, and, like myself speak out against it, or simply refuse to acknowledge its existance. Strangely, those who participate in the TIC also refuse to acknowledge its existence. Which lends furthur credence to their stupidity. Exactly like a child with his hand caught in the cookie jar, the TIC components of society similalry deny, as if they can get away with it, that they are being intentionally irritating. They say things like 'What do you mean?" or "Why would you think that?" in reference to being caught involved in a TIC.
This is what leads me to the TAC. As someone who values truth in language, especially when a challenge is made in regards to a TIC, I typically become exceptionally annoyed at this. For there is no shame in admitting fault. And when people, those who TIC, feel the need to LIE about such a meaningless and idiotic process such as a TIC, I tend to become more than annoyed. I become aggravated and offended. Thus the TAC. It is not like these people are lying about a grevious error, or a shameful act, or a great wrong. The sort of things that people might lie for reasonably. That is, for a reasonable reason. But, like a child caught stealing a cookie, caught in the act, then lying about the fact that their hand is actually inside the jar, one has to wonder.
Here is an example. Suppose I am slightly overweight. And I am concious of this. And so somebody, a notorious fan of the TIC, approaches me and asks " Did you see my big fat fiances last night?" and I, being courteous, say no. And they go on. "Its about this fat guy. He's sooooo fat. Like he's just so fat. And this fat guy, right, this big fat guy..." and so on. And I realize that this person is only speaking so as to irritate me, in reference to my weight. So I say " Why are you talking so much about this fat chap? " or, "I understand that you are only trying to make a comment about my weight in order to irritate me." or whatever. And, the response is, ALWAYS, 'What re you talking about? " or "You're just paranoid." or some other lie that is in itself so obvioulsy a lie that its not even worth mentioning as holding any qualitative linguistic value whatsoever.
TAC is an escalation. My response will, no matter what, will escalate the situation. Either I turn away and allow the TIC to stew under my observation, or I call the TIC what he or she is, and allow the irritating little discussion that serves no other purpose than to irritate turn into a full blown assessment of the TICs intelligence. Allow the example to continue. I say that the person is making constant reference to the word fat because I am fat. the response is that the person was not. they were, and this is the catch phrase "only talking about" the show they saw. so I make the observation that there must be more to the show than the fact that this fiances is fat. and I am then accused of being too sensitive about my weight. and I say that this is exactly my point, if I am sensitive about that, why should the TIC constantly be making reference about the fat fiances in reference to his weight. and the next comment is that this fiances is in fact fat. and I return to the point of departure, that there must be more to the show than the fiances weight, and due to the admitted sensitivity I have about my weight, the TIC should not be focusing upon the weight of this fiances. the TIC should, at this point, either admit that they were either only talking about the fat fiances in order to irritate me, or say something else that is a useless and furthur irritating example of their stupidity, such as another lie or another irritating comment. in either case, I am at a loss for a number of reasons. I am forced to listen to comments being made for the sheer purpose to irritate myself. I am forced to listen to the person making the comments lie about the reason why they made these comments. I am then forced to, which is the hallmark of the TAC, be furthur self concious of own short comings in regards to a society that is falsely lead to believe that their intelligence can be measured through their ability to irritate others.
the next ten conversations I have that day will now be prone to the TAC effect. it compounds the original TIC, and increases the level at which I am annoyed about all things. so now all of the things that make me unique are subject to the TAC effect if confronted by any additional TICs. this cycle persists, and cannot be broken as long as the TIC is seen as a way to prove any sort of a mental, that is intelligent, ability.
as a highly intelligent person, that is vastly unique in every aspect of my existence, I have often been the target of many a TIC. I am forced to live under the shadow of the TAC because of this. unfortunately, the TICs are unable to understand what they do serves no purpose. they are all similar in their stupidity, and thus immune to any counter TICing of my own. they cannot be explained that what they do serves no purpose, mostly because they are far too stupid to understand it. it being the explanation. all of society suffers as a result of the TIC. and unfortunately, there is no cure for it, or the result of it, the TAC, entirely because he vast majority of the population who TIC are JUST THAT STUPID.