Log in

View Full Version : “Jesus Not Coming Back By The Looks Of It” Admits Vatican



Hexen
2nd May 2014, 22:59
Jesus Not Coming Back By The Looks Of It Admits Vatican

April 18, 2014
http://waterfordwhispersnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Cards172828307-676x450.jpg (http://waterfordwhispersnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Cards172828307-676x450.jpg)
A SPOKESPERSON for the Vatican has officially announced today that the second coming of Jesus, the only son of the God, may not happen now after all, but urged followers to still continue with their faith, regardless of the news.
Cardinal Giorgio Salvadore told WWN that this years 1,981st anniversary is to be the Vaticans last in regards to waiting for the Lord to return to Earth.
We just feel Jesus is not coming back by the looks of it. he said. Its been ages like. Hes probably flat out doing other really good things for people somewhere else.
Nearly two thousand years ago, Jesus promised his disciples that he would come again in chapter John 14:1-3 of the bible: There are many homes up where my Father lives, and I am going to prepare them for your coming. When everything is ready, then I will come and get you, so that you can always be with Me where I am. If this werent so, I would tell you plainly
The Vatican defended Jesus broken promise, claiming he was probably drinking wine at the time when he made the comments.
Having the ability to turn water into wine had its ups and its downs. added Cardinal Salvadore. We all make promises we cant keep when were drunk. Jesus was no different.
The church said it will now focus attentions on rebuilding its reputation around the world, but will keep an optimistic mind for the saviors second coming.


Source: http://waterfordwhispersnews.com/2014/04/18/jesus-not-coming-back-by-the-looks-of-it-admits-vatican/

Comrade Jacob
2nd May 2014, 23:04
This is very funny but is it legit? (Probably not).

Psycho P and the Freight Train
2nd May 2014, 23:07
This is obviously from the Onion, but funny nonetheless.

Tell that to some grown adults I know who are simply convinced that the second coming is happening in our lifetime.

Prometeo liberado
2nd May 2014, 23:13
This is very funny but is it legit? (Probably not).

You're serious. .....?
Yes Comrade Jacob, your absentee landlord ain't coming back. You can add to that Robin Hood and his merry men. Never ever ever coming back again..

Comrade Jacob
2nd May 2014, 23:14
You're serious. .....?
Yes Comrade Jacob, your absentee landlord ain't coming back. You can add to that Robin Hood and his merry men. Never ever ever coming back again..

I'm not a christian m8.
I meant legit as in a legitimate news source not that Jesus is actually coming back. derp

Prometeo liberado
2nd May 2014, 23:22
I'm not a christian m8.
I meant legit as in a legitimate news source not that Jesus is actually coming back. derp

Fuck the source, they quoted a Cardinal. That should have been your first clue.:rolleyes:

ckaihatsu
2nd May 2014, 23:22
But Santa's still on for next winter, right??


= D

Zostrianos
2nd May 2014, 23:40
Spoof or not, Jesus is not coming back according to the Bible itself:
There are several passages in the gospels where Jesus says he will return in the disciples' lifetime (Mark 13:30 (http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/index.php?version=50&search=Mark+13:30), Matthew 10:23, 16:28, 24:34 (http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/index.php?version=50&search=Matthew+10:23%2C+16:28%2C+24:34), Luke 21:32 (http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/index.php?version=50&search=Luke+21:32), etc.).
The same expectation held during the period the apostle Paul wrote his letters. In 1 Corinthians 7:29-31 (http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/index.php?version=50&search=1+Corinthians+7:29-31) Paul says that the time is so short that believers should drastically change the way that they live. But Paul had a problem - some believers had died, so what would happen to them when Jesus returned?
Paul's answer in 1 Thessalonians 4:13-18 (http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/index.php?version=50&search=1+Thessalonians+4:13-18) shows that Paul expected that at least some of those he was writing to would be alive when Jesus returned - "we who are alive, and remain..." The same passage also indicates that Paul believed that those believers who had died remained "asleep in Jesus" until he returned. However, as the delay in Jesus' return grew longer, the location of Jesus' kingdom shifted from earth to heaven and we later find Paul indicating that when believers die they will immediately "depart and be with Christ" (Philippians 1:23 (http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/index.php?version=50&search=Philippians+1:23)).
It is quite obvious that Jesus never intended to start any type of church structure since he believed he would return very shortly to rule his kingdom in person. It is also quite obvious that Jesus was wrong about when he was coming back....


As time went by without Jesus returning, the apostle Paul was forced to rethink things he had written about earlier, including the state of dead believers and the nature of the kingdom.


http://infidels.org/library/modern/paul_carlson/nt_contradictions.html

Prometeo liberado
2nd May 2014, 23:40
But Santa's still on for next winter, right??


= D

Oh no doubt! I mean c'mon, we're not morons now.
Is Santa still on...what if the kids heard you?

ckaihatsu
2nd May 2014, 23:44
Oh no doubt! I mean c'mon, we're not morons now.
Is Santa still on...what if the kids heard you?


What-if-the-kids-saw-I-was-confirming-Santa's-scheduled-flight-for-Christmas-2014--?


???!


(grin)

Prometeo liberado
2nd May 2014, 23:50
What-if-the-kids-saw-I-was-confirming-Santa's-scheduled-flight-for-Christmas-2014--?


???!


(grin)

Sweet, I'll be home soon 'hon.

ckaihatsu
2nd May 2014, 23:52
As time went by without Jesus returning, the apostle Paul was forced to rethink things he had written about earlier, including the state of dead believers and the nature of the kingdom.


Yup, haven't we all been *there* -- !


x D

ckaihatsu
2nd May 2014, 23:53
sweet, i'll be home soon 'hon.


(wtf???)

Multiaccounting
3rd May 2014, 00:22
I'm not sure if I believe this article or not, but it certainly is interesting.

BIXX
3rd May 2014, 00:35
For anyone who can't figure this shit out it's a joke and if you're pretending you think it's real stop you're scaring me cause I get afraid that you're dumb

ckaihatsu
3rd May 2014, 00:38
For anyone who can't figure this shit out it's a joke and if you're pretending you think it's real stop you're scaring me cause I get afraid that you're dumb


So that means he *is* coming back -- ??


x D

BIXX
3rd May 2014, 00:39
So that means he *is* coming back -- ??





x D


See, you get it :)

Multiaccounting
3rd May 2014, 01:24
For anyone who can't figure this shit out it's a joke and if you're pretending you think it's real stop you're scaring me cause I get afraid that you're dumb

Thank you! Now I know not to believe it. I was leaning in thy direction from the beginning but it's nice to have my instinct confirmed.

Prometeo liberado
3rd May 2014, 03:43
So that means he *is* coming back -- ??


x D

Now THAT shit is funny.

seriously though, is he or isn't he?

Prometeo liberado
3rd May 2014, 03:45
(wtf???)

Yeah, I don't know either.

Dave B
3rd May 2014, 10:32
The prequel to JC coming back will be the the planets being driven off their courses

I suspect the 'heads up' Vatican still is expecting this hence their otherwise peculiar interest in Trans Neptunian objects.

An extra or rogue planet passing through the solar system would do the trick.

Eg

16th September 2010
Brother Dr. Guy Consolmagno SJ
American research astronomer and planetary scientist at the Vatican Observatory
"Trans-Neptunian Objects"


This lecture was held at the John Dalton Building, Room E0.05, Manchester Metropolitan University


http://www.manastro.co.uk/history/syllabus/syl2010.html

That included a brief mention about the theory and possibility of a missing planet being slung shot out of the solar system after reaching an orbital resonance with its immediate neighbours; and returning.

He was a real proper astronomer and scientist by the way as well as being Jesuit; he gave the lecture in full costume as well.

Red Economist
3rd May 2014, 11:10
"Jesus not coming back by the looks of it" Says Vatican.

That's the kind of thing an Anti-Christ would say..... :glare:

[I'm joking of course].

Dave B
3rd May 2014, 11:30
Josephus (as well as Tacitus (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tacitus)), reporting on the conclusion of the Jewish war, claimed that around the time when Jerusalem and the Temple would be taken, a man from their own nation, viz. the Messiah, would become governor of the habitable earth. Josephus, dismissing these things, said that the only governor of the habitable earth was Vespasian who conquered it.[11] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vespasian#cite_note-13)[12] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vespasian#cite_note-14)




http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vespasian

I am not exactly sure I think I agree with the apparently self contradictory dismissing these things.

The implication from Josephus was that Vespasian was the prophesized messiah; probably sucking up to his patron.

The Josephus stuff was more than likely Lord Haw Haw Roman propaganda commissioned by the state; and probably updated later.

The Romans loved the Judiac material as very old magical type stuff and liked to incorporate it into their own ideology when they could.