Log in

View Full Version : Communist Party Wins Mayoral Election in Russia's 3rd Largest City



AmilcarCabral
9th April 2014, 06:22
Ukrainian Communist Party Wins Mayoral Election in Russia's 3rd Largest City

By Steven Argue

http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2014/04/07/18753708.php

In a surprise victory, the Communist Party of the Russian Federation (KPRF) has defeated the pro-Putin United Russia party in the Siberian city of Novosibirs. Winning the election was Anatoly Lokot with 43.75 per cent of the vote. Anatoly Lokot defeated acting mayor and supporter of Putin's ruling central government, Vladimir Znatkov, who garnered 39.57 per cent of the vote.

A major campaign promise of Anatoly Lokot is to expand public transportation in Novosibirs. Such moves should be supported and advocated everywhere as a means of curbing global warming and expanding needed services that particularly help the working class.

The Russian Communist Party also supported Crimea's right to self-determination as the United States and EU carried out a coup against Ukraine's central government. This was also the correct position. That coup government is filled with neo-Nazis in top posts and full of hatred towards all of the national minorities of Ukraine, including Russians. The Crimean people, in their vast majority, rightly saw that coup government as a deadly threat to Crimea's Russian and Tatar minorities.

The Ukrainian coup government is also a tool of the IMF. In fact, it has now agreed to IMF demands of austerity that include a 50% increase in the price of heating fuel. That cost increase will cause poor Ukrainians to freeze to death. It was the opposition by Ukraine's elected president, Viktor Yanukovych, to this kind of austerity that caused the United States to intervene to overthrow him. The current IMF austerity imposed on Ukraine adds to other injuries of capitalism that include massive unemployment (where there was none) and big cuts in pay.

In addition, the fascists mobilized by the western imperialists to carry out the coup in Ukraine have carried out massive attacks against free speech and democracy, using brute force against the media and opposition political parties, including the Ukrainian Communist Party. The imperialists surely hope that these fascist mobilizations will help them to impose the unacceptable conditions of austerity, privatization, and other neo-liberal restructuring demanded by the western imperialists.

The Russian Communist Party was correct in supporting Crimea's right to national self-determination which was to join Russia after the coup in Kiev. Trotskyists like myself also support this right. There are, however, a number of fake Trotskyist groups that have supported U.S. and European imperialism in Crimea. Among these are Peter Taafe's Committee for a Workers International (CWI) who claimed, “what is happening now will not lead to genuine self-determination; it will only mean that Crimea becomes a Russia protectorate.” Actually, true self-determination is the right to decide, and the vote was 96.5% of the people voting for Crimea to rejoin Russia. In fact, 82% of the population participated. Those who participated were 60% Russian, 25% Ukrainian, and 12% Tatars. The reason why 40% of the Tatars participated was because the Crimean parliament extended a number of rights to Taters and the fascists of the Kiev government want to take those rights away. The CWI, which includes Socialist Alternative in the United States, opposed this right of the Crimean people to vote on their future.

Actual Trotskyists like the Revolutionary Tendency and a few others are in direct opposition to the pro-imperialist stands taken by groups like the CWI.

As Boris Yeltsin carried out the capitalist counterrevolution in the 1990s, he banned the Communist Party in 1991. Under that capitalist counterrevolution, the socialist planned economy was destroyed and the standard of living in Russia dropped by every measurable standard. The Communist Party of the Russian Federation (KPRF) was established in 1993 and is now the second largest party in Russia. Their broad support comes in part from being seen as the continuation of the former ruling Communist Party. Their program includes immediate goals of the nationalization of natural resources, agriculture, and large industries. This, however, is not the program of Lenin. Instead of calling for a sweeping revolution to bring back the socialist planned economy, they instead call for a mixed economy.

As opposed to the program of the KPRF, Leninist-Trotskyists call for the total overthrow of capitalism in Russia on the program of permanent revolution. It was this program that changed the USSR from being one of the poorest countries in the world to becoming an industrial power house, capable of defeating two major imperialist invasions, including Nazi Germany, and rebuilding to guarantee everyone a job, education, and health care. As capitalism has brought back all of these problems solved under socialism, what is needed is bringing back the socialist planned economy established by Lenin and Trotsky, not the half-way measures of the mixed economy advocated by the KPRF.

An additional key concern of Leninist-Trotskyists is the lack of authentic workers democracy under the Stalinist systems. True workers democracy is an essential component of maintaining the health of any socialist system. The KPRF instead comes from a tradition that has opposed many of the most elementary elements of workers democracy.

In addition, the October 1917 Russian Revolution, led by Lenin and Trotsky, was truly revolutionary on many other levels, including the fact that it ended state persecution of gays and lesbians. After Lenin's death, Stalin, however, once again made homosexuality illegal. The KPRF continues to have this Stalinist homophobic position and both backs the homophobia of the Putin regime and has physically attacked protesters for gay rights. Leninist-Trotskyists instead call for building a revolutionary communist party that acts as a tribune of the people, standing up for all of the most oppressed in society, including homosexuals.

While the election of Anatoly Lokot may represent a step forward over the ruling capitalist Russian Unity Party, what is truly needed in Russia is the rebuilding of a Leninist-Trotskyist party with the goal of leading a new October Revolution.
.

Sinister Cultural Marxist
9th April 2014, 07:21
What a laughable critique of the CWI's position. I don't know their stance on Crimea, but this article is just a huge stinking straw man


The reason why 40% of the Tatars participated was because the Crimean parliament extended a number of rights to Taters and the fascists of the Kiev government want to take those rights away.

Why are the Tatars so excited over extending rights to potatoes? :rolleyes:

maoist70
9th April 2014, 08:45
Trotsky had nothing to do with the transformation of the USSR - Stalin carried on the work of Lenin and transformed it from a horse drawn backwater to a nuclear superpower. Trotsky had nothing to do with it and in fact was dead for most if the struggle


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

KurtFF8
9th April 2014, 13:41
I didn't know that the Ukrainian Communist Party ran for elections in Russia.

The Garbage Disposal Unit
9th April 2014, 14:23
Yeah, the KPRF are pretty bogus - the party is headed up by Nationalist asshats who seem to think class struggle has been superseded by some sort of clash-of-civilizations type bullshit.
As far as I'm concerned, the fact that they call for a "mixed economy" is only the tip of the iceberg in terms of how terrible their politics are. To be perfectly honest, I think a real hard look at the KPRF would make the "fake Trotskyists" the author refers to look great.

hashem
10th April 2014, 09:12
Ukrainian and Russian "communist" parties are servants of Russian imperialist bloc. they hold bourgeois position about internal and foreign policies.

true communists have stayed independent of them.

here is an internationalist position about the conflict:

http://www.icor.info/icor-resolution-ukraine-acute-threat-of-war-calls-for-active-resistance-against-imperialist-aggressors-1

PhoenixAsh
10th April 2014, 12:42
The article is about the KPRF. Which is Russian and not Ukrainian. This should be changed in the thread title.

Red Commissar
10th April 2014, 16:44
I don't understand the logic of the article- how does one exactly see the victory of the KPRF as conductive to Trotskyists? If anything the KPRF would be pretty hostile to Trotsky in light of their reverence of Stalin as the builder of modern Russia. I mean it's not like the KPRF is some fringe party, they're the second largest party behind United Russia so this can't be seen in the sense of an opening for parties further to the left.

GerrardWinstanley
10th April 2014, 19:09
I don't have any strong opinions about the KPRF and can't say I'm a huge fan of entryism either, but if they have the ability to animate sood leftists in faraway countries (apparently allergic to success of any kind, anywhere in the world) into vitriolic seizures merely by winning a local election, then I'll be damned if they're not doing something right.

Anglo-Saxon Philistine
10th April 2014, 19:16
I don't have any strong opinions about the KPRF and can't say I'm a huge fan of entryism either, but if they have the ability to animate sood leftists in faraway countries (apparently allergic to success of any kind, anywhere in the world) into vitriolic seizures merely by winning a local election, then I'll be damned if they're not doing something right.

They're "doing something right" (in the electoral sense) by appealing to Great-Russian chauvinism, particularly anti-Semitism and chauvinism against Caucasians, homophobia and misogyny, in addition to a broadly populist economic programme.


I don't understand the logic of the article- how does one exactly see the victory of the KPRF as conductive to Trotskyists? If anything the KPRF would be pretty hostile to Trotsky in light of their reverence of Stalin as the builder of modern Russia. I mean it's not like the KPRF is some fringe party, they're the second largest party behind United Russia so this can't be seen in the sense of an opening for parties further to the left.

I don't think the author endorses the KPRF, or considers their victory positive - at best, they're saying that they might enact some meaningful short-term reforms (I think this is a hilariously short-sighted prediction that doesn't take the reality of Russia into account at all).

GerrardWinstanley
10th April 2014, 21:49
They're "doing something right" (in the electoral sense) by appealing to Great-Russian chauvinism, particularly anti-Semitism and chauvinism against Caucasians, homophobia and misogyny, in addition to a broadly populist economic programme.Obviously their homophobia is wrong and I dislike the way they accommodate the Russian Orthodox Church (which sponsors fascists) —not that I've seen any evidence of an anti-Semitic or anti-Muslim stance— but I don't think there are any grounds for arguing these policies are the underlying reason for their mass appeal, which is their support of social programs and their defence of Russia's interests, not to mention discontent with neoliberal domestic policy.
What a laughable critique of the CWI's position. I don't know their stance on Crimea, but this article is just a huge stinking straw manYou might have noticed it cites the CWI's views with a direct quote [“what is happening now will not lead to genuine self-determination; it will only mean that Crimea becomes a Russia (sic) protectorate.”] had you read a little bit more of that paragraph in the original post than you did, by your own admission, on the CWI's stance on Crimea while alleging it was being misrepresented. What kind of straw man reproduces the point it's attacking word for word?

Sinister Cultural Marxist
11th April 2014, 03:38
You might have noticed it cites the CWI's views with a direct quote [“what is happening now will not lead to genuine self-determination; it will only mean that Crimea becomes a Russia (sic) protectorate.”] had you read a little bit more of that paragraph in the original post than you did, by your own admission, on the CWI's stance on Crimea while alleging it was being misrepresented. What kind of straw man reproduces the point it's attacking word for word?

Come on ... the best way to strawman someone is to take their quotes out of context. The point is, you cannot possibly conclude from the quote you mention that the CWI does the following:


There are, however, a number of fake Trotskyist groups that have supported U.S. and European imperialism in Crimea.

How are they supporting American and EU imperialism in that quote? They aren't doing that at all. One can critique a claim of "self-determination" without supporting "imperialism".

PhoenixAsh
11th April 2014, 22:57
The CWI is right on this issue.

Also this:

http://www.socialistworld.net/doc/6679


The Russian regime’s military intervention is no more motivated by concern for the well-being of ethnic Russian workers than the western powers’ cynical manoeuvres are intended to aid the Ukrainian-speaking working class. The Kremlin is taking military action out of grave concerns that a pro-western, pro-Nato regime is now in place in Kiev, on Russia’s western borders, threatening Russian imperialism’s vital geo-strategic and economic interests. Putin’s intervention into Crimea aims to shore up Russia’s vital ‘near abroad’ and is in keeping with his ambition to try to restore the power and influence of the Russian elite who, after the collapse of the former Soviet Union, transformed themselves into capitalists.

In response, the EU and US threatens economic sanctions and Nato sabre rattles. The Western-backed Ukrainian regime has ordered full mobilisation to counter the intervention. The working people of Ukraine will pay dearly for any escalation of the conflict.


and more important...the full quote:



But what is happening now will not lead to genuine self-determination; it will only mean that Crimea becomes a Russian protectorate, like South Ossetia, or, even worse, an occupied region with a dictatorial ruler, like Chechnya’s Kadyrov. The experience of Kosovo and South Ossetia demonstrate that neither Russian nor Western imperialism can provide either economic security or the unity between different ethnic groups.

Rurkel
12th April 2014, 12:44
The CPRF aren't particularly anti-Muslim. Of course, they're against "mass illegal immigration" which steals the local population's jobs, etc. etc.