Thanatos
15th February 2014, 05:46
Must everything in life be seen in the context of evolution? Marxism itself explains everything, including capitalism, in terms of competition etc.
But I am including everything else - behavior, arts and culture, and pretty much everything.
Just an example. Love. Instead of having a sentimental or romantic notion, we see it as a result of chemicals or as a result of centuries of evolution where we try to find mates to reproduce/spread our genes. This we may call love, tentatively, but it is just a survival mechanism.
So my question really is, yes, Marxism is strictly materialistic in that even so-called spiritual or otherworldly stuff is seen in material/historical context. But I am going further to wonder whether it is specifically in the context of evolution alone (rather than vague materialism, which could mean just about anything).
But I am including everything else - behavior, arts and culture, and pretty much everything.
Just an example. Love. Instead of having a sentimental or romantic notion, we see it as a result of chemicals or as a result of centuries of evolution where we try to find mates to reproduce/spread our genes. This we may call love, tentatively, but it is just a survival mechanism.
So my question really is, yes, Marxism is strictly materialistic in that even so-called spiritual or otherworldly stuff is seen in material/historical context. But I am going further to wonder whether it is specifically in the context of evolution alone (rather than vague materialism, which could mean just about anything).