Log in

View Full Version : somalia or jemen?



Freiheit
20th December 2001, 07:28
the war on terrorism will continue.
the americans are thinking about to attack jemen or
somalia they said there would be more attack, definitively.

http://www.tagesanzeiger.ch/ta/taOnlineArt...el?ArtId=149989 (http://www.tagesanzeiger.ch/ta/taOnlineArtikel?ArtId=149989)

almost whole africa warns the usa not ot attack somalia.
but will they listen?
it is american imperialism or it is really necessary?
it is wrong or right?
what are other solutions?

ArgueEverything
20th December 2001, 07:34
my money is on somalia first.

but, from what i understand, the UN general assembly, maybe even the security council (except the US of course) is making it clear that it wont support any action outside afghanistan. the US ignores the general assembly all the time, so that wouldnt really matter, but it might have some trouble with the security council.

if the US can prove that there are terrorist cells in somalia that are a real threat to the US, then of course those cells should be eliminated. thats fair enough, i think. i would like to see the evidence myself though.

there arent many other solutions. somalia has been in chaos for several yrs now, there is no functioning government. therefore its hard to negotiate. there was always the option of negotiation in afghanistan, but in somalia the US would be talking to warlords, which doesnt look very good.

Freiheit
20th December 2001, 07:40
do they us even have any prove if there is the al-Quaida network in somalia or jemen?
and why are they so interested in attacking (imperialsim)?
you are right, probably somalia first. because it is not arabic and that is in the moment an advantage for the americans.

Moskitto
20th December 2001, 18:20
I heard the Real IRA in britain is on the list.

But I bet they won't bomb us with Daisy Cutters unlike in Afganistan.

revolutionary spirit
20th December 2001, 18:44
i think iraq will be before yemen or somalia,and watch saudi arabia fall apart

Guest
20th December 2001, 19:21
I beleive the main reason Somalia may be next is the revenge factor . With Yemen already taking action against the training camps in its country and the fact that new movie Black Hawk down is coming out in the US . I believe the propaghanda for the government is strong which will result is action against the "Terrorist" in Somalia . Quite a sad state of affairs seeing as how Somolia does have a transitional government they are already trying to work with and with the fact that the US shut down the nations bank which is stoping everyone from getting their much needed money , these people are suffering far to much . Although no , I doubt any American troops will land , they will fight another cowards wars using the Ethiopians as there proxy and bomb who they need to bomb . But a proxy would only be necessary if they encounter resistance on the ground and they probably will . But as I remeber one of the strongest warlords in the country saying "The Ethiopians are our brothers , but if they cross our border then they are no longer our borthers and all Somolis will fight them ." The US wants revenge for its 18 dead , but if they dont tread lightly and try not bully these people then they wont get anything done short of nuking the country . To be frank I say they leave the poor country alone and go onto more viable targets like say , the Dictatorship of Washington District Of Colombia , or the Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation , those are terrorist camps and they do not get any worse then that .
The Shadow Of A Bleeding Rose

revolutionary spirit
20th December 2001, 23:11
somalia did declare that they needed US help,sucking up to them,there was even talk of the US getting the ethopians to do the dirty work,lol can u imagine that,shit the etrians might take the chance and settle their old scores

Freiheit
21st December 2001, 01:37
it is really mean:
there are terrorist in the uk and in spain or also israel, but the us wouldnt even dream about to bomb one of them.

third world countries like somalia, iraq, afghanistan, jemen ... have no rights and that sucks.

Griffin
21st December 2001, 04:11
i think america dont have the balls to overrun another 3rd world country.
They only got away with it because of sept 11 and osama, without these to justify they're actions, they wont attack.
then again they're americans so who knows....

Freiheit
22nd December 2001, 07:59
why should they care what other countries say,
they are america.

revolutionary spirit
22nd December 2001, 13:37
nah they'll be knocking down someone elses door soon enough

peaccenicked
22nd December 2001, 14:09
Who is next?This a continuous economic and propaganda war against the people of the world by
a vicious ganster style imperialism. Terrorism is a tatic of
bourgeois nationalists. There effectiveness is no excuse for making pulp out of poorer countries. American imperialism is sending out the signal "we rule, be frightened"

Derar
22nd December 2001, 15:42
unless u ppl didnt hear this :

US war planes already hit a village in yemen where they thought some ppl from alqaeda were hiding , along with yemeni special forces .....
more than 12 civilians were killed in the operation .
The yemeni officials denied that these were US warplanes and said that it was their planes ......

Kez
22nd December 2001, 16:07
They wont dare attack the Iraqi's, coz the russians and french will tell the USA to fuck off, and the international coalition will disintergrate

comrade kamo

Moskitto
22nd December 2001, 16:15
They stoped a ship from Eritrea in the channel because they suspected it was being used by terrorists.

And they arrested people in Luton under terrorism prevention legislation.

Freiheit
22nd December 2001, 22:47
i am not sure but think it was platon who said that today's powers was small countries and that today's small countries were powers.
anyway, somewhen the time of the americans will end.