Conservapedia proves it understands women!

[TheWannabeAnarchist]

Hi guys,

Conservapedia's my favorite source of laughs, although I feel bad for the indoctrinated, sheltered homeschool kids who actually believe the bullshit it spreads.

Check out their article on women. According to Conservapedia:


Women are the female of the human species, with the biological role of bearing offspring (pregnancy and childbirth). In preparation for this role, women's breasts begin to grow at puberty, forming the most obvious physical difference between women and men other than the reproductive organs. Other differences include a layer of subcutaneous fat under the skin which hides the underlying musculature, and a wider pelvis to facilitate carrying the baby and allowing it to be born. Women also have a greater proportion of fine vellus hair over certain areas of their skin (such as their face and legs) than the coarse terminal hair which appears on men.[Citation Needed]

Men have typically two times more upper body strength than women, and around 50% more leg strength.

Yep. If you're a woman, according to these kindly Christians, you are sort of like a man, except you're weak and a walking incubator.

Lovely.:)

[TheWannabeAnarchist]

This is, btw, the first two paragraphs of the article. Not one section among many, it's their opening statement. Just lovely!

[Marshal of the People]

They said the Lion King was a conservative movie.

A main message of the movie is honoring thy father, and the power-hungry main antagonist, once he becomes ruler, favors big government, pushes liberal values and destroys their territory.

And that is just one of the many movies they have listed.

Source: http://www.conservapedia.com/Essay:Greatest_Conservative_Movies

[Sinister Intents]

I don't understand why anyone would want to go to conservapedia, to me its like going to scumfront. It's pointless and highly frustrating to me to go to websites like this. I used to go to conservapedia and scumfront to try to learn about the opposition, but it became more irritating and disgusting to go to these sites because of the reactionary shit contained within.

[Marshal of the People]

I don't understand why anyone would want to go to conservapedia, to me its like going to scumfront. It's pointless and highly frustrating to me to go to websites like this. I used to go to conservapedia and scumfront to try to learn about the opposition, but it became more irritating and disgusting to go to these sites because of the reactionary shit contained within.
For laughs of course.

[Sinister Intents]

For laughs of course.

Indeed, it does make me laugh at times, but then it gets unbearably frustrating and disgusting to see sexist and racist shit.

[consuming negativity]

I don't understand why anyone would want to go to conservapedia, to me its like going to scumfront. It's pointless and highly frustrating to me to go to websites like this. I used to go to conservapedia and scumfront to try to learn about the opposition, but it became more irritating and disgusting to go to these sites because of the reactionary shit contained within.

For me, it's kind of like being like David Attenborough and viewing the animals in their natural habitat. Sure, what you're actually looking at is a violent scene where one animal is being torn limb-from-limb by another, but in a certain way it's an ugly kind of beautiful.

[Marshal of the People]

For me, it's kind of like being like David Attenborough and viewing the animals in their natural habitat. Sure, what you're actually looking at is a violent scene where one animal is being torn limb-from-limb by another, but in a certain way it's an ugly kind of beautiful.
How is the death of an animal (humans are animals) beautiful, I personally find it disgusting.

[Sinister Intents]

For me, it's kind of like being like David Attenborough and viewing the animals in their natural habitat. Sure, what you're actually looking at is a violent scene where one animal is being torn limb-from-limb by another, but in a certain way it's an ugly kind of beautiful.

I wouldn't want to witness an animal or human get torn apart... That would fuck with my mind deeply... I may like it in some metal, but not when its violent against women or mysoginistic or disturbingly racist like some bands make music.

[Marshal of the People]

I wouldn't want to witness an animal or human get torn apart... That would fuck with my mind deeply... I may like it in some metal, but not when its violent against women or mysoginistic or disturbingly racist like some bands make music.
I wouldn't enjoy it either because I don't really like large amounts of blood.

[Sinister Intents]

I wouldn't enjoy it either because I don't really like large amounts of blood.

Indeed, and I recomend to everyone not to go to those reactionary websites, its not really worth it, lest you actually find something 'educational' but overall those sites are useless.

[Marshal of the People]

Indeed, and I recomend to everyone not to go to those reactionary websites, its not really worth it, lest you actually find something 'educational' but overall those sites are useless.
I doubt there would be anything educational on conservapedia even if they tried. But I still find it funny, though I haven't been on it for a few months (apart from about a minute today).

[Sinister Intents]

I doubt there would be anything educational on conservapedia even if they tried. But I still find it funny, though I haven't been on it for a few months (apart from about a minute today).

Indeed, the best you're gonna learn from it is from the perspective of the indoctrinated and the reactionary trolls that roam the Internet. At times it is funny, but I would have to say go visit www.rense.com (http://www.rense.com) for a bunch more reactionary bullshit to hurt your brain with if you think its worth trying to learn from there. The best sources of education seem to often come from left sources or from older philosophical, political, historical, et cetera.

[TheWannabeAnarchist]

Eww. What an ugly website. It's more advertising than actual content:laugh:

[Sinister Intents]

Eww. What an ugly website. It's more advertising than actual content:laugh:

Indeed! It's also full of things from many sources, mostly reactionary sources also I'm pretty sure scumfront has something to do with the shitty rense program and all its advertising and marketing garbage. I used to read on their a lot when I was a sexist, white pride asshole nationalist, but that was years ago and I was rather young

[Tenka]

I don't understand how the "sort of like a man" part is objectionable though. Human sexual dimorphism is actually relatively minor. How it babbles about "biological role" and there being an a priori purpose to having large hips (rather than said mutation just happening to facilitate child-bearing), on the other hand, is patriarchal creationist tripe.

[Red Commissar]

Lot of Conservapedia has been overrun by trolls, so it's often a matter of Poe's Law there- is this for real or someone parodying them?

You can find some creepy wikis though, like the fash shitmetapedia.

[Marshal of the People]

Lot of Conservapedia has been overrun by trolls, so it's often a matter of Poe's Law there- is this for real or someone parodying them?

You can find some creepy wikis though, like the fash shitmetapedia.
They have an article on us: http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/RevLeft

[Sinister Intents]

They have an article on us: http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/RevLeft

The shit people post on the internet....

[Marshal of the People]

The shit people post on the internet....
Wouldn't expect anything better from fascists.

[Red Commissar]

Wouldn't expect anything better from fascists. Well, since we're on the topic of conservapedia here, I should bring up one of their arch-rivals, "Rationalwiki". It was itself originally founded as a response to the virulently anti-scientific standpoints, but since then has spread out to other areas to debunk crank and authoritarianism, but this generally means a more liberal viewpoint of a "pox on both your houses" regarding the far-left and far-right. To be fair though, Rational wiki is a good place to read up on some of the bizarre shit going around on the internet that wikipedia ignores because of its commitment to npov and equal coverage to viewpoints.

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/RevLeft

Though admittedly that article reads as a pastiche of the usual Rationalwiki editor along with some angry former users who've been banned or ragequit.

... but this is already going off-topic as it is.

[Quail]

Moved to Non-Political.

This thread has been pretty much derailed, but I don't think it had a lot of potential for discussion anyway. We kind of know that conservatives have terrible views on women, but I don't think posting conservapedia articles is going to help us to analyse that.

[Trap Queen Voxxy]

So, later today, when I am bored and done with homework, I have half a mind to go on there and push the idea that 'cavemen' rode dinosaurs which facilitated greater hunting success and also that the world is flat and this spherical conspiracy is the result of the insane mutterings of the Satanic homosexual Galileo. I want to see how long these claims remain up and how the staff will respond. I think it'd be hilarious if despite expectations they agree with me. Will update later.

[Rugged Collectivist]

Rationalwiki is more obnoxious than conservapedia.

[Marshal of the People]

Rationalwiki is more obnoxious than conservapedia.Though not all of it is serious, some of it is designed to be amusing.