Log in

View Full Version : How Walmart Organizers Turned the Internet Into a Shop Floor



ckaihatsu
22nd January 2014, 00:11
[LaborTech] How Walmart Organizers Turned the Internet Into a Shop Floor Walmart workers and organizers prove ‘clicktivism’ can evolve into offline activism.


How Walmart Organizers Turned the Internet Into a Shop Floor

Walmart workers and organizers prove ‘clicktivism’ can evolve into offline activism.


http://inthesetimes.com/article/16116/how_walmart_organizers_turned_the_internet_into_a_ shop_floor/
JANUARY 16, 2014


How Walmart Organizers Turned the Internet Into a Shop Floor

Walmart workers and organizers prove ‘clicktivism’ can evolve into offline activism.

BY SARAH JAFFE

The basic tools of labor organizing haven't changed in hundreds of years. There's no substitute for face-to-face conversations about working conditions and what can be done to change them. Organizers still make home visits, and workers still talk to one another in the break room or the parking lot.

But in the new wave of low-wage worker organizing that has swept the country in the past two years, some labor groups have begun to use the Internet to facilitate the kinds of personal conversations that lead to workplace action. As unions, community organizations, workers centers and even “netroots” groups like MoveOn.org pour resources into organizing a massive, diffuse fast-food and retail workforce that had often been written off as unorganizable, the web has provided a cheap, effective tool to reach low-wage workers in ways that are both personal and lasting. In particular, the United Food and Commercial Workers-backed groups OUR Walmart and Making Change at Walmart have enthusiastically experimented with web tools in their recent efforts to make a difference at the nation’s biggest retailer.

As Jamie Way, an online organizer with Making Change at Walmart, puts it, “We're never going to match [Walmart] in terms of resources, we're never going to have an organizer or a community supporter on the ground in every one of their [more than] 4,000 Walmarts.” To combat this, the campaign has created online spaces for organizers to reach workers and for communities to support local efforts. And those online connections can, in turn, drive offline actions.

Of the estimated 1,500 Walmart protests that occurred across the country on Black Friday last year, many were planned online, organized either directly by OUR Walmart or using its templates and tools. Much of that turnout came from the kind of efforts that have become commonplace in recent years—creating Facebook event pages, for example, or posting links to event websites on Twitter.

But some of the campaign's efforts are decidedly more innovative.

During the lead-up to this past year's Black Friday actions, OUR Walmart unveiled AssociateVoices, a website where Walmart workers could post their stories about their experiences on the job and request a protest at their particular store, even if they themselves were not ready to go on strike. “The idea was to illustrate this silent majority that exists at these stores,” Way says.

“Walmart's constant refrain has been that it's a very small number of disgruntled associates and community- and labor-backed groups that are [speaking out]. AssociateVoices was intentionally designed to show that these complaints are not just made up, these are very real things that happen at Walmart,” says Raymond Suelzer, the web developer for Making Change at Walmart and the architect of AssociateVoices.

“For those of us who last worked retail 20-plus years ago (or more—or never!), reading the discussion boards is an eye-opener,” writes Kati Sipp, a longtime union organizer and creator of the future-of-labor blog HackTheUnion.org, in an email to In These Times.

Worker complaints on AssociateVoices do often get very specific. One worker in Billings, Montana suggested that management should “Quit listening to a computer to tell you how to run a store,” and “Fix the razor sharp door handles around the store”; in Virginia, a worker identifying herself as Tori writes that when she was pregnant, her manager refused to grant schedule changes that would allow her to care for her children. But there are also common threads that run throughout—the standard refrains of not enough hours and insufficient pay, and everywhere calls for respect.

AssociateVoices is just OUR Walmart’s latest effort to connect Walmart workers with each other online, however. According to Suelzer, the group has been using social media to that end for the last three years or so. Facebook's targeted advertising allows OUR Walmart to run ads directed at the thousands of users who list Walmart as their employer. Those ads send workers to OUR Walmart's page, where they are then able to connect with other Walmart associates. And then, Suelzer says, these conversations around workplace issues go offline.

“We've seen that when workers talk to one another it doesn't just stay on the Facebook page,” Suelzer says. “Those relationships become real, in that they're talking offsite. Most of our online work is worker-to-worker. We have a couple of organizers who oversee and provide feedback to workers, but so much of it really is a substantial number of online leaders who are really taking initiative and reaching out to other workers.”

That’s exactly how Lucas Handy discovered OUR Walmart. An overnight customer service manager at the Walmart in Fort Dodge, Iowa, he was complaining about his job on Facebook when he saw an ad for the organization pop up on his sidebar. Intrigued, he clicked and found himself talking with Angela Wilson, an organizer from Florida, who invited him to an OUR Walmart summit for workers in her state. Walmart had warned the workers to avoid OUR Walmart—that they'd risk being fired if they got involved with the organization—but Handy took the risk and went to the meeting.

When he returned, he remained a silent member, participating online but not taking action in his store, for a while, until another manager's homophobic slur became the last straw. “That was the icing on the cake, that made me step up and speak out,” he says. He went through the steps that his store had laid out to report the abusive behavior, but instead of that manager facing consequences, he says, Handy himself was demoted to a position as a pharmacy technician. “I lost my pay, I lost hours, I lost healthcare, I lost everything,” he says. “The day I was supposed to start [at the] pharmacy was the day I went on strike, on a two-week strike.”.

Shortly after he went on strike and then took a trip to Netroots Nation to speak about his part in the Walmart campaign, Handy was fired—the reason Walmart gave, he says, was that he’d misled management about the time he took off to attend the conference. But he still volunteers as the LGBT liaison for OUR Walmart, maintaining a closed Facebook group for LGBT Walmart workers to discuss their issues in a safe space and reaching out to other Walmart workers in other Facebook groups to which he belongs. “People are more comfortable online than they are person-to-person because of the technology we have nowadays, and so I find it more comfortable talking to somebody down in Texas or Florida that's having issues,” he says. “Management is probably not around them and other associates are probably not around them either, so the confidentiality between me and somebody else is there.”

Facebook isn't the only place to reach workers, Suelzer notes—because the social media giant is becoming less popular with people younger than 25, the campaign has had to do some “experimenting” on sites like Twitter and Instagram, which don't necessarily lend themselves to personal conversation in the same way Facebook has. And Handy sees lots of potential in getting on other sites—even MySpace, which, he notes, is making a bit of a comeback.

Workers who have seen OUR Walmart organizing, particularly around Black Friday, on Facebook and Twitter, have been motivated to join the strikes, some without even talking to organizers first. In 2012, OUR Walmart put out a “strike kit” before Black Friday, and this past fall, building on those efforts, made an effort to have more organizers available to workers who might want to take action.

Part of the reason online organizing has been slow to take off in the broader labor movement is because of the “digital divide”—the division between those who have convenient access to the Internet and those who don't. But Jamie Way points out that this gap isn't as big as is often thought by people who don't work in her field. “The real difference tends to be how [different people] access [the Web] and where they access it. A ton of the OUR Walmart activity online is from mobile devices.” A Pew Research Center [PDF] study from 2012 backs her up, noting that 88 percent of adults have a cell phone and 62 percent of adults in households that make $30,000 a year or less report using the Internet.

“It's a mistake to think workers aren't there,” says Way. “You just have to think a little bit more about where certain conversations are had and what devices are used to have them.”

Often organizing done via text message has been one-sided—a campaign can send a text blast but the ability of recipients to respond has been limited. Way seeks as many ways as possible to allow workers to provide feedback. To that end, the AssociateVoices site allows workers to text in responses to the site as well.

Getting activists out of armchairs
On the other side of the campaign, the community mobilization and solidarity effort by non-Walmart workers organized by Making Change at Walmart, the online strategy is different. Twitter, a medium that lends itself more to broadcasting than to personal connections, has been more useful in this respect. It works especially well when a relevant topic “trends” on the site, or to drive supporters to offline actions.

“Initially a lot of the stuff we were doing online was fairly traditional,” says Way of these community mobilization efforts.

Indeed, online petitions and mobilizing supporters to share things on social media have become standards of “netroots” work, and labor has jumped on the bandwagon. But this type of action has run into criticism for encouraging “clicktivism” and discouraging real-world participation—the ultimate goal of labor organizing.

So when Black Friday 2012 rolled around, the campaign sought new ways to take the online energy out into the streets.

Here, the ubiquity of Walmart worked against the company. People who wanted to be supportive by protesting the retailer often had a target right in their neighborhood. Just as OUR Walmart had a strike kit for workers, Making Change partnered with online organizing group Corporate Action Network to put out a “protest in a box,” with basic guidelines and signs people could print out. They tried to draw on movements like Occupy and the fight against the Keystone XL pipeline, allowing participants to design their own action while maintaining common elements.

“There's always, in my mind, this tension between how much support you provide and how much space for co-creativity you allow so that you're not stifling groups,” Way says. “I wanted to leave things very organic initially—I didn't want to give very much guidance to the people who would come and volunteer to do these actions.”

But after the first Black Friday, the organization found that many people actually wanted more support and direction. “For some people it wasn't the exciting experience it could've been if they had a little more preparation,” Way says.

One problem was that when protesters hit a store where OUR Walmart did not have active members, the response from the workers was not always positive. Though Making Change at Walmart tries to make it clear that they are a solidarity campaign, not an attack on Walmart, she points out that there is definitely potential for people to hold actions that are alienating to workers rather than motivating. Actions in the store, for example, where people load shopping carts and leave them around or try to pay with small change, wind up making the workers' day harder rather than leaving them feeling supported. (Though, she notes, she's been impressed overall by the restraint and concern for workers that community activists have shown.)

This year, to prevent problems like that, the campaign made a team of organizers available online and via a toll-free phone number to provide trainings for people interested in holding an action. These kinds of “online to offline” tactics help bridge the gap without requiring organizers in every town.

On this Black Friday, the organizers also used the Twitter tool Thunderclap, which coordinates a large number of people to tweet the same thing at the same time, to help drive traffic to BlackFridayProtests.org site—a site created by the campaign where, in turn, users would be directed to a protest nearby.“Walmart organized their own Thunderclap, [to promote themselves] ours had like 3 million reach and theirs had like 300,000 so we were pretty proud of that,” Suelzer notes.

Walmart takes notice
As the OUR Walmart/Making Change at Walmart campaign has heated up online, Way notes, Walmart has taken its countermeasures online as well. In addition to trying to legally shut down OUR Walmart websites by claiming copyright infringement, the company launched a site, OurWalmartFactCheck.com, to refute the organization's claims.

She also points out that the company has gotten “more aggressive” on Twitter—a recent argument between the company'sWalmartNewsroom Twitter account and celebrity Ashton Kutcher illustrates the way Walmart has stepped in to be more proactive about its image.

“They're smart, they're adapting. They see that online organizing is important for how people are able to challenge them, and so they're responding to that, trying to do their own version of grassroots organizing.” However, she says, “I don't think it's been super effective for them yet,” Way says. “It's a sign that the workers are really being effective and that they have the company's attention, no matter how much the company tries to deny it and act like this is some insignificant thing.”

It's important to Suelzer and the organization not just to dispel Walmart's claims, though, but to be more effective at creating lasting change. To achieve that, he says, organizers must have two-way conversations with workers, ultimately letting workers shape the campaign. Though Way jokes that both Making Change at Walmart and Our Walmart have run into plenty of failure, the flexibility of the Internet allows them to quickly learn from their mistakes and try something new.

“Five or six years ago, the ability to reach that many workers wouldn't have been possible,” Suelzer says. “I think that combined with the shift in thinking around inequality and economic justice, the social media and the technology has definitely put us in a unique moment that is allowing us to do things that many people would not have thought would be possible.”

ckaihatsu
13th April 2014, 00:23
[LaborTech] Now Trending: Whistleblowers in Low-Wage Jobs Turn to Social Media


Now Trending: Whistleblowers in Low-Wage Jobs Turn to Social Media
http://www.jwj.org/now-trending-whistleblowers-in-low-wage-jobs-turn-to-social-media

http://www.jwj.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/140410-Walmart_Picket_Post.png
Walmart employees picket outside of the Walmart store in Pico Rivera, California. Photo via Flickr.

In a new trend, low-wage employees at some of the most profitable companies are turning to social media to expose rampant abuses and violations of labor law.

Walmart associates could see more hours in their future through a new company program called “Access to Open Shifts.” What started as a pilot project in Texas has now been implemented at all 4,000 U.S. stores and will allow employees to sign up for available slots through the company’s internal scheduling system. This recent step in the right direction comes after years of pressure from OUR Walmart, the association of current and former Walmart employees who have demanded more hours and stable work schedules from the retailer. Most recently, OUR Walmart memberslaunched a petition on coworker.org to demand the company stop cutting hours. After nearly 20,000 signatures were collected, Walmart announced the new scheduling program.

While Walmart would never admit to being influenced by activists – even its own employees – the timing of this new program may lend credibility to a rising trend among low-wage workers: if your employer won’t listen, take your cause to the Internet.

Walmart also recently updated its pregnancy policy under pressure from several expecting mothers and women’s rights advocates. Asone Maryland mom involved in the activism explains, the women connected with each other over Facebook and formed the “Respect the Bump” campaign from there:

“Respect the Bump started with one of the five workers from California named Girshriela. She actually starting posting things [online] and wanted to know concerns about pregnant women at Wal-Mart… [We] communicated from then on out, like, ‘What could we do to change things?’ So … other pregnant women didn’t have to go through these things that I did.”

In fact, since its founding, OUR Walmart has largely depended on social media to swell its ranks. Members connect to fellow employees through Facebook, start conversations about the situation at each other’s stores, share horror stories, and eventually, many workers join the organization.

http://www.jwj.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/140410-OUR_Walmart_Scheduling_Timeline.png
OUR Walmart illustrates the events leading up to Walmart’s announcement of a new scheduling system for associates.

But Walmart employees aren’t the only ones turning to the Internet to be heard.

Across the retail sector, hourly workers and even salaried managers are reaching out to journalists through anonymous emails in order to get their stories published to a wider audience.Gawker has recently featured two different series based on emails from whistleblowers at retailers – one highlighting the familiar horror stories from employees at Walmart and another series from employees at Target experiencing nearly identical abuses. OUR Walmart even set up its own site for gathering complaints and has received messages from workers at nearly three out of every four Walmart stores in the country. Other whistleblowers, such as these two former McDonald’s managers – whose jobs are no longer at stake – granted interviews to journalists after first sharing their stories online.

These stories share a few common refrains. Most obviously, workers at these extremely profitable companies simply aren’t paid enough to make ends meet. At Walmart, the nation’s largest employer, a “full-time” associate (defined as 34 hours per week) earns an average wage of $8.81/hour (or just $15,500 per year), placing them well below the federal poverty line. With such low wages, many Walmart employees are forced to rely on taxpayer-funded programs, such as food stamps and Medicaid. One study showed a single 300-employee Walmart Supercenter in Wisconsin may cost taxpayers anywhere from $904,542 to nearly $1.75 million per year, or about $5,815 per employee.

While finding other employment opportunities remains a myth, many of these low-wage workers end up stuck – unable to quit and with no genuine opportunity to advance. As one Target employee wrote to Gawker:

I would like to go to college, but I honestly cannot afford it because I need to work as much as possible to just make ends meet.

Another recurring complaint is the abusive scheduling practices used by these employers: many workers want to work full-time but are only given part-time schedules. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, nearly eight million Americans are involuntarily working part-time, an 80 percent increase since 2006. Without adequate hours to earn a living, it’s no surprise that one in four involuntary part-time workers lives in poverty.

Moreover, many low-wage employers put workers at the whim of irregular and constantly changing schedules. In a study of 17 major corporations, only three gave more than one week’s notice of schedules. Given too few hours on too short notice, it’s next to impossible for employees to get a second job, let alone schedule medical appointments or arrange for care for their loved ones. Often, the flexibility demanded of employees is not reciprocated by the employer. One woman, who claims she was hired by Target after being assured she could leave work to take care of her family at times, said the reality was far different once the job started:

“When I did have to leave work to pick up a sick child, or miss a shift to stay home with a sick child, I was treated horribly by management.”

Why have so many people taken their case to the Internet? For one thing, there is protection in anonymity. With so many workersfacing retaliation for speaking out, it’s clear that standing up for your basic rights can put your livelihood at risk. While many workers recognize that forming a union could improve their situation, they fear the risk of retaliation from radically anti-union employers. As one assistant store manager claimed, “Target would close a store that voted in a union and reopen another one.” This could be the chilling effect of Target’s successful unionbusting efforts, but in Walmart’s case, it’s no idle threat. The NLRB has evenbrought a case against Walmart alleging illegal retaliation. Unfortunately, under our current broken labor law, toothless penalties rarely dissuade employers from unionbusting, and companies are even incentivized to violate the law with a myriad of methods to prevent workers from exercising their rights.

Perhaps the best explanation for this new trend is simpler: it works. As social media and other online platforms make it easier than ever to access information, and each other, it will be harder and harder for employers to prevent the connections and conversations that bring workers together under a shared purpose. And as more companies respond to online pressure, more workers may come forward to expose abuse and come together to demand change.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "LaborTech" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/labortech.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

ckaihatsu
15th April 2014, 23:24
Walmart owes us.


Hi There,

$6.2 Billion.

According to a report released yesterday (http://www.americansfortaxfairness.org/walmart-on-tax-day/), American taxpayers fork over an estimated $6.2 billion every year to cover the cost of Walmart workers like me who are forced onto social welfare programs because of Walmart’s low pay.

That’s one reason I started my petition calling on Walmart to follow Gap’s lead and raise wages. Next week, we’ll be delivering my petition calling Walmart’s owners, the Waltons, to publicly commit to paying workers a minimum of $25,000 a year. Can you help me spread the word by sharing it with your friends? (http://www.credomobilize.com/petitions/if-gap-ca-raise-wages-so-can-walmart)

It isn’t right that taxpayers are asked to foot the bill and workers like me struggle to get by while the Walton family lives the high life. Recently, my fellow members of Organization United for Respect at Walmart (OUR Walmart) have been winning some major victories. We stood up to get Walmart to publicly commit to provide more hours and for changes to the company’s pregnancy policy -- and Walmart was forced to listen.

Now it’s time to keep the momentum going and call on Walmart and the Waltons— the real welfare kings — to publicly commit to pay us an honest day’s pay for an honest day’s work. Can you share my petition with your friends? (http://www.credomobilize.com/petitions/if-gap-ca-raise-wages-so-can-walmart)

We’ll be delivering it tomorrow, so make sure to spread the word before then!

In Solidarity,
Richard Wilson
Walmart workers and OUR Walmart member
Chicago, Illinois


Legal Disclaimer: UFCW and OUR Walmart have the purpose of helping Wal-Mart employees as individuals or groups in their dealings with Wal-Mart over labor rights and standards and their efforts to have Wal-Mart publically commit to adhering to labor rights and standards. UFCW and OUR Walmart have no intent to have Walmart recognize or bargain with UFCW or OUR Walmart as the representative of Walmart employees.



You received this email because you signed the petition 'If Gap Can Raise Wages, So Can Walmart!'. If you don't want to receive emails from the 'If Gap Can Raise Wages, So Can Walmart!' campaign in the future, please unsubscribe.