Log in

View Full Version : Siege of Leningrad



Bolshevik Sickle
26th December 2013, 04:17
Siege of Leningrad

The Siege of Leningrad is remembered as one of the longest and most destructive in human history, and and overwhelmingly the most costly in terms of casualties. While the Red Army (led by the Bolsheviks and utmost particularly Leon Trotsky) managed to overthrow the Tsar, and fend of hordes of Capitalist invaders, it was almost nothing in comparison to the wickedness imposed on them by the Axis nations (most notably being the Third Reich). Luckily, thanks to the bravery and might of the Red Army, and the skill of generals such as Markian Popov, they were able to come out on top. However, the counter-offense against the German forces did not begin until after the Battle of Stalingrad.

http://84d1f3.medialib.glogster.com/media/de/dedec84a0474edee2229be47617955f18ab8ad6ce5e6304d5b 25dd0bafcd87fa/siege-of-leningrad-001.jpghttp://www.worldmag.com/media/images/content/leningrad.jpg
Video Documentary on the Siege of Leningrad:
Ej94on6nSUo
Further reading:
http://www.theatlantic.com/video/index/245254/wwii-siege-of-leningrad/ (http://www.theatlantic.com/video/index/245254/wwii-siege-of-leningrad/)
http://www.saint-petersburg.com/history/siege.asp (http://www.saint-petersburg.com/history/siege.asp)
Films based on the Siege of Leningrad:
Attack on Leningrad (2009) (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0432314/)

http://c9geonaturalhazards.wikispaces.com/file/view/fancy-line-1.gif/151315885/fancy-line-1.gif
On a side note, I have a personal question for my fellow RevLefters.
Should the USSR had been supported while it was defending itself from Nazi Germany?

I personally think it was necessary and completely justified to defend themselves. Even though the USSR ended up becoming highly nationalistic and "bourgeois", what were they suppose to do? Just roll over and submit to the forces of fascism (Ultra-Capitalism)?
F**CK THAT
https://network23.org/antifaaberdeen/files/2012/07/antifa-red-and-black.png

The Feral Underclass
26th December 2013, 04:20
What is this? What is happening here?

Sinister Intents
26th December 2013, 05:45
Hasn't this been discussed before in another thread?

Sinister Intents
26th December 2013, 17:34
Should the USSR had been supported while it was defending itself from Nazi Germany?


http://www.revleft.com/vb/should-ussr-have-t184104/index.html

Comrade Jacob
26th December 2013, 17:38
http://www.revleft.com/vb/should-ussr-have-t184104/index.html

Oh, fuck, don't try and resurrect that thread.
Anyway nice thread-design...I don't know what's going on exactly.

Sinister Intents
26th December 2013, 17:51
Oh, fuck, don't try and resurrect that thread.
Anyway nice thread-design...I don't know what's going on exactly.

Why not? I've only just started reading it.
edit: alright I see why.

Per Levy
26th December 2013, 18:48
On a side note, I have a personal question for my fellow RevLefters.
Should the USSR had been supported while it was defending itself from Nazi Germany?

I personally think it was necessary and completely justified to defend themselves. Even though the USSR ended up becoming highly nationalistic and "bourgeois", what were they suppose to do? Just roll over and submit to the forces of fascism (Quasi-Capitalism)?

this little part is really confused, you ask if the SU should've been supportet while going on about that the SU was justified defending itsself, these are two completly different things.

also fascism isnt "quasi-capitalism"(where do you get all these confused terms from anyway?), it was capitalism plain and simple.