View Full Version : Enviromentalism
Bolshevik Sickle
26th November 2013, 16:25
Just a quick question. Are environmentalists welcome here on RevLeft?
Stalinist Speaker
26th November 2013, 16:29
doesn't that depend if they are right or left wing? as i know they can be both.
Bolshevik Sickle
26th November 2013, 17:38
doesn't that depend if they are right or left wing? as i know they can be both.
Left-wing of course. I like to call it "Green Bolshevism".
Stalinist Speaker
26th November 2013, 18:02
Left-wing of course. I like to call it "Green Bolshevism".
in that case yes they most likely are
Vladimir Innit Lenin
26th November 2013, 20:45
Green Bolshevism?
As in, the Bolsheviks who built all those factories and nuclear weapons and space vehicles?
Comrade Jacob
26th November 2013, 21:01
Of course environmentalists are welcome, you can't build socialism if the world is uninhabitable.
hatzel
26th November 2013, 21:16
you can't build socialism if the world is uninhabitable
But...INTERSTELLAR SOCIALISM!!!
Remus Bleys
26th November 2013, 21:19
But...INTERSTELLAR SOCIALISM!!!
Comrade, do not follow the Pabloite line.
Socialism in One Planet, please.
Ele'ill
26th November 2013, 21:24
Just a quick question. Are environmentalists welcome here on RevLeft?
yes
Quail
27th November 2013, 01:47
Well, it's not hard to come to anti-capitalist conclusions from an environmental perspective. Capitalism is destroying the planet. So yes, environmentalists are welcome provided of course that they're also revolutionary leftists.
Skyhilist
27th November 2013, 04:32
Well, it's not hard to come to anti-capitalist conclusions from an environmental perspective. Capitalism is destroying the planet. So yes, environmentalists are welcome provided of course that they're also revolutionary leftists.
If they aren't revolutionary, they aren't real environmentalists because they uphold the system that's destroying the planet.
So given that I'd say all real environmentalists are welcome :)
WilliamGreen
27th November 2013, 04:49
But...INTERSTELLAR SOCIALISM!!!
Haha I spit tea all over the screen Lol
bcbm
27th November 2013, 05:16
they uphold the system that's destroying the planet.
industrialism?
Skyhilist
27th November 2013, 06:05
industrialism?
No, I don't have a problem with modern technology or industries if that's what you mean.
I mean the grow-or-die nature of capitalism that inherently leads it to destroy the environment.
Flying Purple People Eater
27th November 2013, 06:46
Environmentalism is a tool to be harnessed. Once we can free ourselves of the chains that keep us bound to this planet, we will drain it's resources and travel to new and healthier hosts.
Like a cancer, humanity will spread throughout the universe, devouring all that lie in their wake.
Dagoth Ur
27th November 2013, 10:28
Green Bolshevism?
As in, the Bolsheviks who built all those factories and nuclear weapons and space vehicles?
Because industry is dumb, nuclear power "isn't" safer for the environment than basically every other energy source, and space is for monsters who hate our dear little blue-green pearl. /eyeroll
Bolsheviks were the only group to ever come even close to ending capitalism. Unlike all the ultraleftists who bemoan them.
ÑóẊîöʼn
27th November 2013, 11:46
Green Bolshevism?
As in, the Bolsheviks who built all those factories and nuclear weapons and space vehicles?
I'm curious as to why you feel space vehicles are worth mentioning in this context given that
A) construction and deployment of space vehicles represents an insignificant proportion of industrial activity even during the height of the Space Race and
B) It is thanks to data gathered by satellites and other space vehicles that we have a clearer picture of things like climate change and deforestation, than we would have had in the absence of such things. And it's not just observations of the Earth that are valuable in this way - by gathering data from other planets in the Solar system, we can more accurately account for solar flux in climate models of the Earth. By observing various phenomena on other planets, we gain more insight into similar processes occurring on Earth.
This is aside from the fact that Soviet (later Russian) participation in the Space Race has laid the foundations for further forays into the rest of the Solar system, providing a wealth of both data and practical experience (the record (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_spaceflight_records#Ten_longest_human_spac e_flights) for the longest spaceflight is held by a Russian) that will be invaluable if we are to ever take further steps towards the stars.
Spaceflight is one of greatest achievements of the human species, up there along with vaccines and municipal sanitation. It has the potential to be greater still, and to serve the interests of the vast body of humanity as well, if we could only get our act together as a global civilisation. Which is why I consider such snide sneering to be unbecoming of anyone who wants humanity to do better than it does now.
Flying Purple People Eater
28th November 2013, 01:47
Because industry is dumb, nuclear power "isn't" safer for the environment than basically every other energy source, and space is for monsters who hate our dear little blue-green pearl. /eyeroll
Bolsheviks were the only group to ever come even close to ending capitalism. Unlike all the ultraleftists who bemoan them.
I love how people seem to start tendency wars over the slightest things on this forums.
The USSR was ridiculously environmentally destructive and that fact is undeniable. There's no 'this tendency is better than this tendency' flexing going on here.
I mean, due to historical Soviet influence, one of the world's only inland seas no longer exists (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aral_Sea).
Dagoth Ur
28th November 2013, 03:43
Every capitalist country was worse. The USSR was the closest to ending capitalist environmental destruction. And really compare USSR industrial pollution to 1890's American pollution. It's all about context.
The Garbage Disposal Unit
28th November 2013, 04:02
Every capitalist country was worse. The USSR was the closest to ending capitalist environmental destruction. And really compare USSR industrial pollution to 1890's American pollution. It's all about context.
Ah, yes, mass monocropping cotton for export, a sure strategy for smashing capitalist environmental destruction. :rolleyes:
I mean, I get the kneejerk need to defend the Soviet Union, but couldn't you have at least used something true? Like, I don't know, vacations?
Man, I wish I had Soviet-style vacations.
Dagoth Ur
28th November 2013, 04:39
The objective facts of the situation is that the USSR was the closest to abolishing capitalism, which by default makes them the most environmentalist (as the long term socialist system cannot be anything but more efficient). The capitalist countries only played enviro-friendly to win a political battle against the USSR. As soon as it exited the stage every single environmental gain in western countries has been dialed back or outright repealed.
Also it's not a kneejerk, it's a stated position. I'm a Marcyite. The USSR deserves full and uncritical support, at least until we build something better.
bcbm
29th November 2013, 15:14
haha who are these people
Vladimir Innit Lenin
30th November 2013, 08:18
The USSR deserves full and uncritical support, at least until we build something better.
You DO know it doesn't exist anymore, right? You literally want to flog a dead corpse.
Vladimir Innit Lenin
30th November 2013, 08:20
Every capitalist country was worse. The USSR was the closest to ending capitalist environmental destruction. And really compare USSR industrial pollution to 1890's American pollution. It's all about context.
Environmental pollution was far worse in the 20th century than it was at any other point in history, including the 19th century.
Wrong again, tankie.
La Comédie Noire
30th November 2013, 08:30
Socialism and Capitalism were economic systems that treated ecology as an externality. Of course, we now know this is not the case.
Welcome to Revleft.
goalkeeper
2nd December 2013, 01:17
Unfortunately, yes they are welcome.
Ceallach_the_Witch
2nd December 2013, 01:27
I'd call myself an environmentalist of one stripe or another, yes. Probably not a very good one, but I try my best.
goalkeeper
2nd December 2013, 02:09
The objective facts of the situation is that the USSR was the closest to abolishing capitalism, which by default makes them the most environmentalist (as the long term socialist system cannot be anything but more efficient). The capitalist countries only played enviro-friendly to win a political battle against the USSR. As soon as it exited the stage every single environmental gain in western countries has been dialed back or outright repealed.
Also it's not a kneejerk, it's a stated position. I'm a Marcyite. The USSR deserves full and uncritical support, at least until we build something better.
haha u stalinists sure are efficient at creating laughs. (Also death and repression, which is less fun)
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2020 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.