MarxSchmarx
23rd October 2013, 04:31
The cuban government announced it is going to begin to phase out the distinction between the dollar-pegged exchangeable Peso and the local peso with which most workers are paid:
Cuba announced Tuesday that it would move toward ending a two-tier national currency system widely criticized for creating a privileged class with access to a special peso...Philip Peters, president of the Cuba Research Center, noted on his blog that though the economic effect of the announcement was difficult to determine, the country has "a lot to gain" by ending the dual system.http://www.latimes.com/world/la-fg-cuba-currency-20131023,0,2022279.story#axzz2iVmIWJZ4
The PRC used to have a similar system, and apparently so did the USSR in its early years and there was talk about re-introducing it during the twilight of the eastern bloc:
http://dmarionuti.blogspot.com/2010/02/dual-currencies-are-always-bad-idea.html
In 1988-89 George Soros, Wassily Leontief, Ed Hewett and Ivan Ivanov (Deputy Chairman of the State Foreign Economic Committee, GVK) launched their “Open Sector”project, with the participation of many Soviet, western and east-European economists (see Phil Hanson, "Foreign Advice", in M.Ellman and Kontorovich, The Destruction of the Soviet Economic System – An Insiders’ History, M.E. Sharpe, Armonk-New York, 1988, pp.238-255). It was a plan, initially surrounded by secrecy, for both wiping out monetary overhang and promoting foreign trade by introducing a new convertible currency inspired by the 1920s chervonets, paid to Soviet exporters and then circulating in parallel with domestic roubles. I took part in the project and went along for the ride, but never believed in it: what had happened with the chervonets would have happened with the parallel, convertible hard rouble: slow-motion stabilisation through rouble hyperinflation. Not a very effective or attractive measure, and it was shelved, like other radical plans, without being taken seriously into consideration.But all these ideas were eventually abandoned. As far as I know, a similar system is still used in places like the singapore stock exchange where some equities can be bought with Singapore or US $ (although both are hard currencies, unlike the eastern bloc examples).
I'm curious if anyone here has thought about this possibility, at least while there are capitalist states still around with which states that have committed themselves to the abolition of capitalism must trade. Are they as terrible an idea as these articles make them out to be?
Cuba announced Tuesday that it would move toward ending a two-tier national currency system widely criticized for creating a privileged class with access to a special peso...Philip Peters, president of the Cuba Research Center, noted on his blog that though the economic effect of the announcement was difficult to determine, the country has "a lot to gain" by ending the dual system.http://www.latimes.com/world/la-fg-cuba-currency-20131023,0,2022279.story#axzz2iVmIWJZ4
The PRC used to have a similar system, and apparently so did the USSR in its early years and there was talk about re-introducing it during the twilight of the eastern bloc:
http://dmarionuti.blogspot.com/2010/02/dual-currencies-are-always-bad-idea.html
In 1988-89 George Soros, Wassily Leontief, Ed Hewett and Ivan Ivanov (Deputy Chairman of the State Foreign Economic Committee, GVK) launched their “Open Sector”project, with the participation of many Soviet, western and east-European economists (see Phil Hanson, "Foreign Advice", in M.Ellman and Kontorovich, The Destruction of the Soviet Economic System – An Insiders’ History, M.E. Sharpe, Armonk-New York, 1988, pp.238-255). It was a plan, initially surrounded by secrecy, for both wiping out monetary overhang and promoting foreign trade by introducing a new convertible currency inspired by the 1920s chervonets, paid to Soviet exporters and then circulating in parallel with domestic roubles. I took part in the project and went along for the ride, but never believed in it: what had happened with the chervonets would have happened with the parallel, convertible hard rouble: slow-motion stabilisation through rouble hyperinflation. Not a very effective or attractive measure, and it was shelved, like other radical plans, without being taken seriously into consideration.But all these ideas were eventually abandoned. As far as I know, a similar system is still used in places like the singapore stock exchange where some equities can be bought with Singapore or US $ (although both are hard currencies, unlike the eastern bloc examples).
I'm curious if anyone here has thought about this possibility, at least while there are capitalist states still around with which states that have committed themselves to the abolition of capitalism must trade. Are they as terrible an idea as these articles make them out to be?