Log in

View Full Version : Global Economic Crash has become Unavoidable



ВАЛТЕР
6th October 2013, 23:40
http://nsnbc.me/2013/09/25/global-economic-crash-become-unavoidable/




Global Economic Crash has become Unavoidable



Christof Lehmann (nsnbc) ,- The realisticly pessimistic BIS report could be one of the motivating factors behind the decision of the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank to continue its unlimited flood of new banknotes as if there was no tomorrow.
Experts warn, that precisely that is likely to be the case. No tomorrow. The central banks are about to throw the towel into the ring. Experts agree, that the Federal Reserve and European Central Banks have lost control over the deluge of money and debt.
The problem with quantitative easing has been taken to such an extreme that the Deputy Governor of China´s Central Bank, Yi Gang, earlier this year (http://nsnbc.me/2013/03/03/central-bank-of-china-dep-governor-yi-gang-calls-to-avoid-currency-war-but-china-is-prepared/) warned that China would like to avoid a global currency war but that it is prepared for the eventuality. The problem with the Western economies is that the illusion of apparent liquidity only lasts until someone checks the books or calls the hand. All set, game over. Creating more debt does not create wealth nor liquidity.
It is not unlikely that Ben Bernanke and the Federal Reserve have decided to continue as if nothing could rock the boat, simply because the reality of the situation is, at least if one gives credence to the BIS report, near catastrophic.
So why worry if the sh.. paper is hitting the fan anyway ? Again, if one is to give credence to the experts at the BIS – and applies the most elementary rules of logic – speeding up the printing press and elevating the helicopter to even greater heights to spread the sh.. paper does not help a thing. Besides, the world is suffering from deforestation already.
The trouble for Ben Bernanke, the Federal Reserve, and not to forget, the European Central Bank alike is, that it is impossible to get the paste back into the tube while stepping on the tube. Reading the BIS quarterly report it becomes evident, that even the experts at the BIS have no idea how to get the paste back into the tube again, and that, even if Ben et al stopped jogging their feet on the tube.
One problem for the experts at the BIS is, that they are bound by certain house rules and regulations and understandably, like most others in their position would, they don´t really want to lose a great job and miss out on the golden handshake at the end, by really saying things as open and direct as things could and should be said. With something as un-trivial as a global economic crash being expected within 4 to 15 months, the urge to make unequivocal statements is understandable.
Therefore, in situations like the one we are in at the moment, it may be a really good idea to listen to someone who already has gotten his golden handshake from the BIS and who, so to speak, has nothing more to lose. One such expert is William White, the former BIS Chief Economist, and White announces nothing less than the arrival of the great crash. No, you don´t need to wipe your spectacles, he said … ….. ….. .
THE GREAT CRAH ! White warns, as unequivocally as only a “former” BIS chief economist can warn us, that we are headed for a Global Economic Crash. The global credit bubble is, according to White, about to burst. White points towards the fact, that the percentage of leveraged loans or extreme risk loans was at the all times high of 45 percent in the middle of 2013.
That is 10 percentage points higher than at the onset of the financial crisis in 2007, one year before the Lehmann Brothers crash. The situation now is worse than prior to the Lehmann Brothers crash, said White (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/10310598/BIS-veteran-says-global-credit-excess-worse-than-pre-Lehman.html) to the British newspaper The Telegraph. White points out that:

“All the previous imbalances are still there. Total public and private debt levels are 30pc higher as a share of GDP in the advanced economies than they were then, and we have added a whole new problem with bubbles in emerging markets that are ending in a boom-bust cycle”.
The trouble is, according to White, that the US financial policy has become unpredictable, and that it is an illusion to believe that a market under stress would retain its liquidity.
White´s statements are not only corroborated by the BIS report. They are also corroborated by the fact that we are experiencing a de facto backwardation of the gold market. Nobody really wants to speak too openly about it in order to scratch as much gold in at an already high-priced “bargain” as possible, but it has become almost impossible to buy any larger amounts of gold. That is, especially if one also wants the gold delivered. The fact that the USA denied Germany an audit of the German gold reserves in the USA (http://nsnbc.me/2013/04/18/federal-reserve-refuses-to-submit-to-an-audit-of-germanys-gold-held-in-u-s-vaults-2/)should be a pretty good indicator for how difficult it is to buy gold if one wants the commodity delivered.
Nobody wants to sell at almost any price. The moment that this situation turns permanent the, world will see the sudden end to global trade and the global economies. The crash may come, or most probably will come overnight, some time in 2014 or 2015.
And no, the City of London won´t be a safe haven. Not this time around and neither will the Central Bank of England if one gives credence to the experts of the BIS. The BIS openly criticizes the central banks insufficient measures, mentioning explicitly the Governor of the Bank of England, Mark Carney and his colleague from the European Central Bank, ECB Chief Mario Draghi.
Claudio Bori, who is responsible for Research and Development at the BIS said, that forwarding guidance as a means of defining long term interest rates for keeping national debt low is nothing but rhetoric and bound to fail. Borio stressed, that there are limits for the extent, to which good communication alone can control the markets, saying that these limits are all too obvious.
The “guidance ” of the European central Bank is the announcement to buy unending amounts of government bonds. The Federal Reserve Bank and the Bank of England have tied their “measures” to unemployment rates. How revolting and which revolt this policy may cause may be understood when one realizes, that Pope Francis deviated from his written speech to unemployed Sardinians (http://nsnbc.me/2013/09/24/global-economy-based-god-called-money-said-pope-francis/), improvised freely for 20 minutes, and said that the a global economic system could no longer be based on a god called money. Evil tongues might add that the Vatican most likely has a good stock of gold and investments in the military industrial complex. In times of crisis, war is traditionally one of the best investments, even for The Holy Sea.
It is also noteworthy that the BIS has already in 2012/2013 described the Credibility of the industrialized nations as desolate, and advised to reduce their debt as soon as possible.
In 2012 the World Bank´s Chief Economist, Kaushik Basu warned that a wall of debt is coming at us. It seems that that wall will hit the world financial markets, and that it will hit hard. Looking at the behavior of the likes of Ben Bernanke, which unless it is directly and willfully destructive, cannot be described as other than avoidant. The Newtonian laws come to mind. After all, it really does not matter whether one is hit by the wall or whether one is running straight into it with a smile on the face, like helicopter Ben Bernanke.
The Word Bank´s Chief Economist has also warned that in 2014 and 2015, one has to expect further, major tremors in the world economy and the world financial systems. Statements from World Bank insiders, like World Bank whistleblower Karen Hudes, strongly indicate that these major tremors may even come before 2014 and 2015, because a major cartel or super entity, as Hudes describes it, denies to address corruption within the Bretton Woods system and its institutions. As a consequence, confidence in the US dollar is waning (http://nsnbc.me/2013/05/02/world-bank-whistle-blower-bretton-woods-near-collapse-confidence-in-the-dollar-as-an-international-currency-is-waning/) even more than it does due to Bernanke running the dollar into the wall with a smile on his face.
Although Karen Hudes seems to have an unshakable optimism and confidence in the Bretton Woods system`s ability to right itself, a global currency war and the end of the Bretton Woods system are foreseeable for all who can see the writing on the proverbial wall of debt that will hit the world economies. The gold market (http://nsnbc.me/2013/05/15/global-currency-war-looming-corruption-at-the-world-bank-unsettles-the-gold-market/)has already been unsettled by the looming currency war.
The World Bank Chief Economist may in fact be very close to having forecast when the global financial collapse will set in, when he spoke about the major tremors which must be expected in 2014 and 2015.
The hypothesis that the world will see an end to the Bretton Woods system and the dollar as exchange currency – alongside with the unavoidable financial crash – in 2014 or 2015 - is strongly supported by a recent development that happened at the sidelines of the G20 in St. Petersburg, Russia.
During the G20, the BRICS members Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa decided to capitalize the planned BRICS Development Bank with 100 billion US dollar (http://nsnbc.me/2013/09/06/brics-development-bank-to-be-capitalized-with-100-billion/) and for the bank to begin operations already in 2014 – 2015.
When exactly the crash will happen is anybody´s guess, but the global financial collapse has, according to the majority of experts become unavoidable. One day in 2014 or 2015, and most likely close to a date when even Western mainstream media begin reporting about the BRICS Development Bank opening for operations would be a reasonable forecast.

Aleister Granger
6th October 2013, 23:45
i.e. "Capitalism causes economic crisis?"

In other news, the sun is going to rise tomorrow because we rotate on our axis, and it is going to rain soon because water condenses in the air.

ВАЛТЕР
7th October 2013, 00:06
i.e. "Capitalism causes economic crisis?"

In other news, the sun is going to rise tomorrow because we rotate on our axis, and it is going to rain soon because water condenses in the air.

Yeah, we all know this. However, I posted this story because this is a bourgeois source, openly admitting that a major economic crisis can be expected in the near future.

Aleister Granger
7th October 2013, 00:09
Yeah, we all know this. However, I posted this story because this is a bourgeois source, openly admitting that a major economic crisis can be expected in the near future.

That really doesn't need to be posted (by a bourgeois source) because that can be assumed on any given date, but good, man.

Paul Pott
7th October 2013, 00:13
Say there was another crash next month. What would the social and political ramifications be? The last few years aren't very encouraging. All the 2007-2009 crisis brought the west was Occupy. Otherwise there was the Arab Spring, which I'm pretty confident history will say ended in summer 2013.

argeiphontes
7th October 2013, 00:23
^My guess would be it would be a good day for social democrats. Ameliorative (for lack of a better word) things might get done, like finally giving up on austerity.

But the article is wrong, there is no debt crisis; there's only austerity and government closings for lack of money, not runaway placement of currency into circulation. If they'd like to save their system, they should pump some money into it like the smarter capitalists recommend.

(The ideological groundwork hasn't been laid for anything else. IMO.)

Comrade Samuel
7th October 2013, 00:50
Say there was another crash next month. What would the social and political ramifications be? The last few years aren't very encouraging. All the 2007-2009 crisis brought the west was Occupy. Otherwise there was the Arab Spring, which I'm pretty confident history will say ended in summer 2013.

I sincerely doubt history will remember occupy and the Arab spring could be more accurately summed up as rising sectarian violence slowly causing western puppet governments to disintegrate.

On the bright side NSNBC seems delightfully pessimistic today.... for a total crash to occur anywhere near a month from now I'd assume that it would start with the U.S defaulting on it's debt.

Paul Pott
7th October 2013, 02:21
The US will not default on its debt. The ruling class would take any measure to avoid that.

Aleister Granger
7th October 2013, 02:29
^ I bet they will. Just to cause more dysfunction amongst the proles and reap some more money from fear.

Popular Front of Judea
7th October 2013, 08:28
I think I am going to have to break down and post a primer on what is a credible source here. There is no major news outlet by the name of 'NSNBC'. There is MSNBC. I think it is not a coincidence that the two sound so similar.

ВАЛТЕР
7th October 2013, 08:53
I think I am going to have to break down and post a primer on what is a credible source here. There is no major news outlet by the name of 'NSNBC'. There is MSNBC. I think it is not a coincidence that the two sound so similar.


It isn't a major news source, however they've only been around since March. It is an independent online newspaper. Here's their 'about us (http://nsnbc.me/author/nsnbc/)' or whatever. I don't see any conspiracy theories or other such nonsense, so I figure they at least aren't batshit crazy.

Comrade Dracula
7th October 2013, 09:51
While the news source is questionable, it is perhaps notable that the BIS (Bank for International Settlements) report seems to come from their actual site and that the BIS is an actual organization. At least according to the Wikipedia.

argeiphontes
7th October 2013, 16:32
I'd like to add that these inflation fears are propaganda that just benefits the bourgeoisie. Inflation is bad for people collecting interest payments and other so-called "rentiers", but it's good for debtors because the debt's value declines, and the "hit" people take from fixed payments declines. Wages are more flexible than fixed-rate assets so there's some chance of making it up, but the "poor" rentier is stuck collecting low interest rates on their investment.

Furthermore, inflation is a sign of growth, and the capitalist economy needs growth to approach structural "full employment". So the propaganda is aimed at reducing government involvement in the economy, which just reduces real investment (i.e. jobs), aggregate demand, and makes things worse for proles. (The government doesn't play with stocks or sit on piles of cash, it actually buys things and hires people, which increases overall demand.)

At least that's the capitalist economics view IIRC. I get mine from Paul Krugman.

Prof. Oblivion
9th October 2013, 02:01
I read the entire article and didn't see any substance.

ckaihatsu
12th October 2013, 00:10
I'd like to add that these inflation fears are propaganda that just benefits the bourgeoisie.





Credit rating agency Standard & Poor's (S&P) downgraded its credit rating of the U.S. federal government from AAA (outstanding) to AA+ (excellent) on August 5, 2011.




http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_federal_government_credit-rating_downgrade


Agreed -- the U.S. dollar has more to fear from nascent rival currencies than from overextension through debt issuance.

From the original article:





The hypothesis that the world will see an end to the Bretton Woods system and the dollar as exchange currency – alongside with the unavoidable financial crash – in 2014 or 2015 - is strongly supported by a recent development that happened at the sidelines of the G20 in St. Petersburg, Russia.

During the G20, the BRICS members Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa decided to capitalize the planned BRICS Development Bank with 100 billion US dollar and for the bank to begin operations already in 2014 – 2015.





Inflation is bad for people collecting interest payments and other so-called "rentiers", but it's good for debtors because the debt's value declines, and the "hit" people take from fixed payments declines. Wages are more flexible than fixed-rate assets so there's some chance of making it up, but the "poor" rentier is stuck collecting low interest rates on their investment.

Furthermore, inflation is a sign of growth, and the capitalist economy needs growth to approach structural "full employment". So the propaganda is aimed at reducing government involvement in the economy, which just reduces real investment (i.e. jobs), aggregate demand, and makes things worse for proles. (The government doesn't play with stocks or sit on piles of cash, it actually buys things and hires people, which increases overall demand.)

At least that's the capitalist economics view IIRC. I get mine from Paul Krugman.


Also:





http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bretton_Woods_system#Paralysis_of_international_mo netary_management




Paralysis of international monetary management[edit]

Floating-rate system during 1968–1972[edit]

By 1968, the attempt to defend the dollar at a fixed peg of $35/ounce, the policy of the Eisenhower, Kennedy and Johnson administrations, had become increasingly untenable. Gold outflows from the U.S. accelerated, and despite gaining assurances from Germany and other nations to hold gold, the unbalanced fiscal spending of the Johnson administration had transformed the dollar shortage of the 1940s and 1950s into a dollar glut by the 1960s. In 1967, the IMF agreed in Rio de Janeiro to replace the tranche division set up in 1946. Special drawing rights (SDRs) were set as equal to one U.S. dollar, but were not usable for transactions other than between banks and the IMF. Nations were required to accept holding SDRs equal to three times their allotment, and interest would be charged, or credited, to each nation based on their SDR holding. The original interest rate was 1.5%.

The intent of the SDR system was to prevent nations from buying pegged gold and selling it at the higher free market price, and give nations a reason to hold dollars by crediting interest, at the same time setting a clear limit to the amount of dollars that could be held. The essential conflict was that the American role as military defender of the capitalist world's economic system was recognized, but not given a specific monetary value. In effect, other nations "purchased" American defense policy by taking a loss in holding dollars. They were only willing to do this as long as they supported U.S. military policy. Because of the Vietnam War and other unpopular actions, the pro-U.S. consensus began to evaporate. The SDR agreement, in effect, monetized the value of this relationship, but did not create a market for it.

The use of SDRs as paper gold seemed to offer a way to balance the system, turning the IMF, rather than the U.S., into the world's central banker. The U.S. tightened controls over foreign investment and currency, including mandatory investment controls in 1968. In 1970, U.S. President Richard Nixon lifted import quotas on oil in an attempt to reduce energy costs; instead, however, this exacerbated dollar flight, and created pressure from petro-dollars. Still, the U.S. continued to draw down reserves. In 1971 it had a reserve deficit of $56 billion; as well, it had depleted most of its non-gold reserves and had only 22% gold coverage of foreign reserves. In short, the dollar was tremendously overvalued with respect to gold.

Nixon Shock[edit]

Main article: Nixon Shock

A negative balance of payments, growing public debt incurred by the Vietnam War and Great Society programs, and monetary inflation by the Federal Reserve caused the dollar to become increasingly overvalued.[22] The drain on US gold reserves culminated with the London Gold Pool collapse in March 1968.[23] By 1970, the U.S. had seen its gold coverage deteriorate from 55% to 22%. This, in the view of neoclassical economists, represented the point where holders of the dollar had lost faith in the ability of the U.S. to cut budget and trade deficits.

In 1971 more and more dollars were being printed in Washington, then being pumped overseas, to pay for government expenditure on the military and social programs. In the first six months of 1971, assets for $22 billion fled the U.S. In response, on 15 August 1971, Nixon issued Executive Order 11615 pursuant to the Economic Stabilization Act of 1970, unilaterally imposing 90-day wage and price controls, a 10% import surcharge, and most importantly "closed the gold window", making the dollar inconvertible to gold directly, except on the open market. Unusually, this decision was made without consulting members of the international monetary system or even his own State Department, and was soon dubbed the Nixon Shock.

Smithsonian Agreement[edit]

The August shock was followed by efforts under U.S. leadership to reform the international monetary system. Throughout the fall of 1971, a series of multilateral and bilateral negotiations between the Group of Ten countries took place, seeking to redesign the exchange rate regime.
Meeting in December 1971 at the Smithsonian Institution in Washington D.C., the Group of Ten signed the Smithsonian Agreement. The US pledged to peg the dollar at $38/ounce with 2.25% trading bands, and other countries agreed to appreciate their currencies versus the dollar. The group also planned to balance the world financial system using special drawing rights alone.
The agreement failed to encourage discipline by the Federal Reserve or the United States government. The dollar price in the gold free market continued to cause pressure on its official rate; soon after a 10% devaluation was announced in February 1973, Japan and the EEC countries decided to let their currencies float. A decade later, all industrialized nations had done so.[24][25]

Bretton Woods II[edit]

Main article: Bretton Woods II

Dooley, Folkerts-Landau and Garber have referred to the monetary system of today as Bretton Woods II.[26] They argue that in the early 2000s (decade), like 40 years earlier, the international system is composed of a core issuing the dominant international currency, and a periphery. The periphery is committed to export-led growth based on the maintenance of an undervalued exchange rate. In the 1960s, the core was the United States and the periphery was Europe and Japan. This old periphery has since graduated, and the new periphery is Asia. The core remains the same, the United States. The argument is that a system of pegged currencies, in which the periphery export capital to the core that provides a financial intermediary role is both stable and desirable, although this notion is controversial.[26]