Log in

View Full Version : 'U.S. Textile Plants Return, With Floors Largely Empty of People'



Popular Front of Judea
20th September 2013, 21:06
It's not Norma Rae's workplace anymore ...

GAFFNEY, S.C. — The old textile mills here are mostly gone now. Gaffney Manufacturing, National Textiles, Cherokee — clangorous, dusty, productive engines of the Carolinas fabric trade — fell one by one to the forces of globalization.

Just as the Carolinas benefited when manufacturing migrated first from the Cottonopolises of England to the mill towns of New England and then to here, where labor was even cheaper, they suffered in the 1990s when the textile industry mostly left the United States.

It headed to China, India, Mexico — wherever people would spool, spin and sew for a few dollars or less a day. Which is why what is happening at the old Wellstone spinning plant is so remarkable.

Drive out to the interstate, with the big peach-shaped water tower just down the highway, and you’ll find the mill up and running again. Parkdale Mills, the country’s largest buyer of raw cotton, reopened it in 2010.

Bayard Winthrop, the founder of the sweatshirt and clothing company American Giant, was at the mill one morning earlier this year to meet with his Parkdale sales representative. Just last year, Mr. Winthrop was buying fabric from a factory in India. Now, he says, it is cheaper to shop in the United States. Mr. Winthrop uses Parkdale yarn from one of its 25 American factories, and has that yarn spun into fabric about four miles from Parkdale’s Gaffney plant, at Carolina Cotton Works.

Mr. Winthrop says American manufacturing has several advantages over outsourcing. Transportation costs are a fraction of what they are overseas. Turnaround time is quicker. Most striking, labor costs — the reason all these companies fled in the first place — aren’t that much higher than overseas because the factories that survived the outsourcing wave have largely turned to automation and are employing far fewer workers.

...

[P]oliticians’ promises that American manufacturing means an abundance of new jobs is complicated — yes, it means jobs, but on nowhere near the scale there was before, because machines have replaced humans at almost every point in the production process.

Take Parkdale: The mill here produces 2.5 million pounds of yarn a week with about 140 workers. In 1980, that production level would have required more than 2,000 people.

U.S. Textile Plants Return, With Floors Largely Empty of People | New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/20/business/us-textile-factories-return.html)

adipocere
21st September 2013, 07:00
And those 140 people are probably making shit wages at part time.

It makes me wonder if walmart's slogan "low prices are just the beginning" was really an omen all along.

A Revolutionary Tool
21st September 2013, 07:49
Far fewer workers...The plant would have had to have hired thousands instead of 140 in the 1980's. This topic isn't brought up/talked about enough, while we get a barrage of anti-immigrant rhetoric saying they're "stealing jobs" and anti-globalization rhetoric about how good jobs are moving overseas, almost no one brings up new technology/innovations in industries as taking jobs away and disciplining labor even though a good majority of job losses since globalization have been from things such as what the article is saying.

Fred
21st September 2013, 13:07
Well, automation is a good thing. Except under capitalism it contributes to the immiseration of the working class. Really, having machines do tedious dangerous work is good thing. Mass unemployment, however is not.

Red_Banner
21st September 2013, 15:05
Well, automation is a good thing. Except under capitalism it contributes to the immiseration of the working class. Really, having machines do tedious dangerous work is good thing. Mass unemployment, however is not.


Which is one of the main reasons why capitalism doesn't work and is doomed.


If nobody is employed, who is left to buy their products?

A Revolutionary Tool
21st September 2013, 19:44
Yeah I don't want to seem like a Luddite, I think this is a positive argument for communism that doesn't get the light of day enough even though capitalism turns this positivity against the working class with devestating effects.

ÑóẊîöʼn
28th September 2013, 10:21
I've got a provisional driving license and am currently taking lessons with a view to passing the official test. Looking at developments (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autonomous_car#Notable_projects) in automated (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TerraMax_%28vehicle%29) vehicles (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C9ggv4I4q6g) today I wonder if in a couple of decades I'll be out of a job.