Log in

View Full Version : Mexican teachers expand strike



Le Socialiste
19th September 2013, 21:41
Don't think I've seen very much posted here about the situation in Mexico:


Mexican teachers expand strike

September 19, 2013

AFTER MORE than a month on strike, tens of thousands of Mexican teachers were joined by university students and other unions in calling for a national work stoppage, un paro nacional, for September 19 and 20. The strike's expansion comes in response to a federal police assault on the teachers' encampment in the national plaza, el zócalo, in the center of Mexico City on September 14, which expelled the protesters.

The striking teachers are part of the National Coordination of Education Workers (CNTE), a militant caucus within the National Union of Education Workers (SNTE). The SNTE leadership traditionally supported the Party of Institutional Revolution (PRI)--which ruled Mexico as a one-party state for more than 70 years until 2000--in exchange for the PRI looking the other way as the union's leading bureaucrats enriched themselves.

Last February, Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto, elected in July 2012, imprisoned SNTE President Elba Esther Gordillo on corruption charges. Though undoubtedly guilty, Gordillo's downfall sprang from her refusal to comply with Peña Nieto's plans to implement a No Child Left Behind-type law in Mexico. The reforms amended the Constitution in order to impose mandatory high-stakes standardized testing and open the way to a wholesale attack on tenure for public school teachers.

Duly cowed, the current SNTE leadership and the supposedly left-wing Party of the Democratic Revolution (PRD), a leading opposition party in the National Assembly, have been brought in line behind Peña Nieto's attack on education.

Teachers affiliated with the CNTE are a minority in some SNTE regions, but have control of statewide regions such as Oaxaca. They have refused to submit to the new reforms without a fight.

It's difficult to tell how effective the strike is on a national level given the SNTE official leadership's opposition, but the CNTE has mobilized hundreds of thousands of teachers, students and supporters in marches in Mexico City, the strike has spread from Veracruz on the east coast to Guadalajara on the west.

On September 14, the CNTE organized the Second Popular Teachers Summit, which brought together more than 100 unions, community and student groups and political organizations to build support for the strike and organize unity with the ongoing campaign to stop Enrique Peña's campaign to privatize PEMEX, the state-owned oil company. Rather than attempt to immediately retake the zócalo, the CNTE called on the Summit to organize the two-day national strike this week.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

WHILE THE teachers remain strong, strains may be starting to show. On Wednesday, September 18, La Jornada, Mexico's leading left-leaning daily, reported that CNTE General Secretary Rubén Núñez Ginés, a leader in the Oaxacan Section 22 of the national union, was heckled off the stage at a demonstration in Tlatelolco, the location of the 1968 student massacre, to chants of "Urgente, urgente, cambiar al dirigente!" ("It's urgent, it's urgent, change the leadership!")

After Núñez left the stage, several columns of teachers and university students numbering in the hundreds attempted to march toward the zócalo before being stopped by police columns.

The September 19 and 20 strike will be followed by a Third Popular Teachers Summit on September 21 to assess the success of the mobilizations and debate next steps.

The scope of this strike and mobilization will be an important indicator of the teachers' strength as they enter the second month of their strike. Since the National Assembly has already passed the reforms, the teachers are fighting a difficult battle to get them reversed. The government's strategy clearly aims to starve the teachers back to work in the poorer southern states, while vilifying them in Mexico City as responsible for repeated disruptions.

Over the last 20 years, this strategy has proved successful--dozens of unions have been smashed, with their members' jobs liquidated in massive privatization schemes. Recently, some 40,000 workers in the Mexican Electrical Workers Union (SME) lost a fight to save the public electrical utility in Mexico City. The SME continues to fight, but the government feels confident it can now bring the teachers to heel.

The coming week will prove critical in determining if the teachers can throw a wrench into Peña Nieto's plans.

http://socialistworker.org/2013/09/19/mexican-teachers-expand-strike

Vladimir Innit Lenin
19th September 2013, 21:54
I've heard that Gordillo is an awful person, i'm not sure i'd put much trust in her. From what i've read, she puts western union bureaucrats to shame.

Vladimir Innit Lenin
19th September 2013, 22:03
Also, it pisses me off how the SWP say fuck all about what positive changes could be made to the education system in Mexico. Granted, testing of teachers is never going to be a winner, and is probably not the right way to go, and teachers need to do all they can to defend pay and conditions, but those who do so at the expense of providing a decent education for the kids are the sort of cynical assholes I lose a lot of respect for.

Teaching is something special, and a huge responsibility, and I hope that those who are striking for an extended period remember why they came into teaching in the first place, and don't end up being led astray by some no cojones gilipollas like Gordillo.

Le Socialiste
20th September 2013, 00:05
Just to clarify a couple of points here:


I've heard that Gordillo is an awful person, i'm not sure i'd put much trust in her. From what i've read, she puts western union bureaucrats to shame.

I don't think this article is necessarily defending Gordillo. In fact, the author (who I happen to know personally), makes clear how union leaderships and bureaucrats have used their positions and systemic corruption to enrich themselves at teachers' and others' expense.

But Gordillo isn't really in the picture here. The focus of the article lies largely on the dissident caucus within the SNTE, which has spearheaded the strike. The union's leadership has dragged its feet and even in some instances come out in opposition to the action, but the CNTE has continued pushing the strike in order to pressure the government to abandon its No Child Left Behind policies.


Also, it pisses me off how the SWP say fuck all about what positive changes could be made to the education system in Mexico.

The SWP didn't write this, but regardless what kind of 'positive' changes are we talking about? Surely the Mexican government's equivalent of NCLB isn't meant to reform the education system for the benefit of teachers and students? I don't think this is what you're suggesting, it just seems odd within the context of what you say below:


Granted, testing of teachers is never going to be a winner, and is probably not the right way to go, and teachers need to do all they can to defend pay and conditions, but those who do so at the expense of providing a decent education for the kids are the sort of cynical assholes I lose a lot of respect for.

The standardization of education will bring few benefits to those involved (if any). It merely places harsher restrictions and workloads on educators, limits teacher's abilities to flesh out their own curriculums, erodes tenure, and places both children and educators alike under immense stress and anxiety. It also isn't a coincidence that 'underperforming' schools are extremely underfunded as is, and are often located in minority neighborhoods (I'm talking specifically about the U.S. now). This means more school closures, more consolidations (which means larger class sizes), fewer resources, union-busting, and the continued privatization and standardization of education. It isn't that hard to believe Mexico's own NCLB laws will have similar - if not identical - effects.


Teaching is something special, and a huge responsibility, and I hope that those who are striking for an extended period remember why they came into teaching in the first place, and don't end up being led astray by some no cojones gilipollas like Gordillo.

I addressed the majority of this statement above, but just to reiterate: Gordillo isn't involved. She's explicitly come out against the strike.

Sinister Cultural Marxist
20th September 2013, 01:09
Also, it pisses me off how the SWP say fuck all about what positive changes could be made to the education system in Mexico. Granted, testing of teachers is never going to be a winner, and is probably not the right way to go, and teachers need to do all they can to defend pay and conditions, but those who do so at the expense of providing a decent education for the kids are the sort of cynical assholes I lose a lot of respect for.

Teaching is something special, and a huge responsibility, and I hope that those who are striking for an extended period remember why they came into teaching in the first place, and don't end up being led astray by some no cojones gilipollas like Gordillo.

Mexican education needs to change, but the changes being proposed are problematic. For instance, rural teachers teaching indigenous children, who have very different needs, are being judged with the same standard as urban teachers in places like Mexico City.

Agreed about the point about Gordillo, who was a dreadful union leader (she was a sort of "labour bourgeoisie" with her conspicuous consumption and lifetime leadership position, which just showed how naked corruption was during her tenure)