Log in

View Full Version : Communist Running for Weymouth Town Council seat



RedBen
12th September 2013, 16:14
http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/regionals/south/2013/09/11/communist-sets-his-sights-weymouth-town-council-seat/Avifohsf2UVLB0MPbGEPYJ/story.html


The contest for District 1 councilor in Weymouth is drawing some extra attention this time because of the political affiliation of one of the contenders.

Dominic Giannone III is a lot like other candidates for local office who campaign with pledges to seek positive changes for their neighborhood and city, but with one notable distinction: He is a Communist.

Giannone is registered to vote as a member of the Green/Rainbow Party, but belongs to the Communist Party USA and has long been active in promoting its causes.

The 37-year-old union boilermaker is open about his political orientation; his campaign website mentions his membership in the Communist Party and his belief that “capitalism is the root cause of the economic crisis, poverty, discrimination, war, and environmental destruction.”

Keven Harris
Keven Harris

In an interview, Giannone said he was making known his status as a Communist as a matter of “full disclosure” to voters. But he added it is also a label he is happy to proclaim.

“I like to point out that the rich people already have two parties of their own, and working people need a party of our own. The Communist Party is clearly on the side of working people,” said Giannone, who is not aware of any other Communists seeking office recently in the state.

While local elections are nonpartisan in Massachusetts, Giannone’s status as a Communist may offer one of the rare occasions when a candidate’s party affiliations become a matter of interest.

His opponents in the race for the open north Weymouth seat are Democrats Kevin Harris and Angel Montanez, and Republicans Becky Haugh and former town councilor Victor Pap III. A preliminary on Tuesday will narrow the field to two candidates.

Town Clerk Kathleen A. Deree said that Pap sought to withdraw his candidacy last month, but too late to be removed from the ballot. Pap, who could not be reached, has stated publicly that he is not actively campaigning, according to Deree.

Angel Montanez
Angel Montanez

His opponents say they are not troubled by Giannone’s status as a Communist.

“I don’t think party matters in this election,” said Harris, a pharmaceutical/biotechnology consultant. “However, Nick has gone ahead and he identified himself as a member of the Communist Party. That’s just his way of expressing what his views are. I think it’s great how he is defining himself.”

“It’s not an issue, because you have to understand what he means behind it,” said Montanez, a retired Merchant Marine captain. “His values are clear in wanting to protect unions and blue-collar workers.”

“For me, it’s not an issue,” Haugh said. “It’s a nonpartisan race. . . . I’ve talked to Nick. He seems like a nice guy. I wish him the best of luck with whatever he is aiming for.”

While he has been a member of the Communist Party for less than a year, Giannone said he has identified as a Communist for much longer.

A 1993 graduate of Weymouth High School, Giannone’s activism has included protesting on behalf of Mumia Abu-Jamal, a former Black Panther whom supporters contended was wrongfully convicted of killing a police officer. Giannone has also demonstrated against the war in Iraq.

His political activism led to several brushes with the law. In 2004, he was arrested for assault and battery of a police officer while marching outside the Democratic National Convention in Boston.

Rebecca Haugh
Rebecca Haugh

Giannone said the charges stemmed from an unfounded claim by police that he took a swing at Boston’s police superintendent during the incident, and that he was found not guilty in a 2005 trial.

In 1999, he was arrested in Weymouth on graffiti charges that he said were the result of his posting leaflets about a protest he was helping to organize at the high school in support of Abu-Jamal. Several days later, he was arrested for trespassing and disorderly conduct during the action.

Giannone said that the case was continued without a finding but that he served 10 days in jail. At the time, he was on probation for an arrest some years before for possession of two marijuana cigarettes. He said serving the jail time allowed him to have the probation dropped.

While he has not wavered in his beliefs, Giannone said he has “mellowed with age. I just don’t find myself in situations where I’m in confrontation with police much these days.”

He said he opted to seek local office because “you have to start somewhere. And I actually do care about my own community. . . . I want to represent my neighborhood, just to get the basic things we need.”

The veteran activist has a long list of ideas he promises to champion, including ordinances to require banks to meet directly with homeowners facing foreclosure before moving to evict them, and to allow the town to revoke the licenses of businesses found guilty of violating wage laws.

Haugh, who formerly served in the Marine reserves and as an active duty naval officer, is a former president of the North Weymouth Civic Association.

She said she would work to promote economic development as a way of bringing much-needed tax income to the town.

“I think we need a lot more revenue for our schools, police, and fire,” she said.

Harris is part of a community group that advocates for the reconstruction or replacement of a local seawall, and volunteers with groups that provide food for the needy in Boston.

“I bring a lot in terms of community activism. I bring a lot in terms of business experience,” he said, adding that he also offers a “new approach to politics” as someone who refuses campaign contributions and does not post campaign signs.

Montanez is a board member of the North Weymouth Civic Association and a member of the Weymouth Public Schools Safety and Security Committee, and the Fore River Watershed Association.

He said he offers his leadership background from his maritime career and civic work, and being retired, he says, “I have the time” to devote to the position.

Crux
12th September 2013, 16:20
Don't really have much time for the CPUSA usually, but yeah fair play to Nick for running. I mean when was the last time the CPUSA ran independent of the Democrats?

RedBen
12th September 2013, 16:22
Don't really have much time for the CPUSA usually, but yeah fair play to Nick for running. I mean when was the last time the CPUSA ran independent of the Democrats?
what are you doing? in materialist and concrete terms, what are you doing to change things?

Crux
12th September 2013, 16:59
what are you doing? in materialist and concrete terms, what are you doing to change things?
I have been an activist for some 6 years, some of that as a full-timer, I've been involved in the recruiting of a number of members to our organization, I've been involved in branch building and network building, I've been arrested and detained on union blockades, I've taken part in succesful blockades on deportations of refugees, I've been involved in organizing protests, I've written a number of articles, I've taken part in election campaigns, I've done the weekly grind that is everyday activism, through paper sales, campaign building and recruiting of contacts, I've held lead-offs and taken part in the internal education and discussion of our organization, I've gone abroad on behalf of the CWI both for international meetings and to help build our organization in other countries. Right now I am about to help reignite the local branch in my hometown as well as going to a meeting tomorrow to help prepare for the next year of struggle and the upcoming election. In addition to all that I also pay dues every month and on top of that have made considerable economic sacrifices over the years, considering money is not something I've ever had very much of, for the cause of socialism. That answer your question? What have you done?

RedBen
12th September 2013, 17:22
I have been an activist for some 6 years, some of that as a full-timer, I've been involved in the recruiting of a number of members to our organization, I've been involved in branch building and network building, I've been arrested and detained on union blockades, I've taken part in succesful blockades on deportations of refugees, I've been involved in organizing protests, I've written a number of articles, I've taken part in election campaigns, I've done the weekly grind that is everyday activism, through paper sales, campaign building and recruiting of contacts, I've held lead-offs and taken part in the internal education and discussion of our organization, I've gone abroad on behalf of the CWI both for international meetings and to help build our organization in other countries. Right now I am about to help reignite the local branch in my hometown as well as going to a meeting tomorrow to help prepare for the next year of struggle and the upcoming election. In addition to all that I also pay dues every month and on top of that have made considerable economic sacrifices over the years, considering money is not something I've ever had very much of, for the cause of socialism. That answer your question? What have you done?
that's good. i've been arrested protesting a wp group near SxU in chicago, two days later for fighting one, i've protested for women's rights to have free access to abortion, protested for reduction in gun violence and racism, i've been pushed out of an old job for trying to unionize and almost having my whole shift walkout, this isn't meant to be dick measuring, i asked because i don't think this is a bad thing that someone is openly claiming to be a communist and running for any office. i think this is potential progress and at least someone who reads this story will look into it. i initially i had read underlying hostility in your original response, maybe it wasn't there.

Sinister Cultural Marxist
12th September 2013, 17:25
No I think there's just a lot of justifiable suspicion of the CPUSA. Not that this candidate running is a bad thing or anything, I'm sure he's genuine.

RedBen
12th September 2013, 17:31
i don't know why i posted this. i asked for this. lets the shit slinging begin.:confused:

Ethics Gradient, Traitor For All Ages
12th September 2013, 17:51
What shitslinging? No one has said anything negative about him.

Crux
12th September 2013, 18:10
that's good. i've been arrested protesting a wp group near SxU in chicago, two days later for fighting one, i've protested for women's rights to have free access to abortion, protested for reduction in gun violence and racism, i've been pushed out of an old job for trying to unionize and almost having my whole shift walkout, this isn't meant to be dick measuring, i asked because i don't think this is a bad thing that someone is openly claiming to be a communist and running for any office. i think this is potential progress and at least someone who reads this story will look into it. i initially i had read underlying hostility in your original response, maybe it wasn't there.
Well, I'm not a fan of the CPUSA for this (http://peoplesworld.org/search/SphinxSearchForm?Search=Obama&action_results=search) and this (http://cpusa.org/search/SphinxSearchForm?Search=Obama&action_results=Search) reason, so yeah might be some hostility there. But that doesn't extend to Nick Giannone's campaign, indeed it is good to see a CPUSA member running outside of the Democrats and I support the local branch's efforts in this.

adipocere
12th September 2013, 18:38
No I think there's just a lot of justifiable suspicion of the CPUSA. Not that this candidate running is a bad thing or anything, I'm sure he's genuine.

Please elaborate...

Crux
12th September 2013, 18:48
Please elaborate...
Well, comrade-winking-Stalin-avatar, the legacy your avatar refers to would be part of my issue, then there's this (http://cpusa.org/labor-upfront-special-election-edition-obama-wins-labor-wins-/), just one of many many examples where the CPUSA manages to outdo many liberals in their shilling for Obama and does so, incredibly, under a Marxist pretense. And again, all this said, I think the campaign in Weymouth is positive. Perhaps, as a CPUSA member, you can answer the question I posed before, when was the last time the CPUSA ran independent of the Democratic Party?

adipocere
12th September 2013, 20:16
Well, comrade-winking-Stalin-avatar, the legacy your avatar refers to would be part of my issue, then there's this (http://cpusa.org/labor-upfront-special-election-edition-obama-wins-labor-wins-/), just one of many many examples where the CPUSA manages to outdo many liberals in their shilling for Obama and does so, incredibly, under a Marxist pretense. And again, all this said, I think the campaign in Weymouth is positive. Perhaps, as a CPUSA member, you can answer the question I posed before, when was the last time the CPUSA ran independent of the Democratic Party?

I wasn't asking you, actually. But, since you asked me....
As far as you referring to CPUSA's lukewarm support for Obama - I honestly don't consider that to be "outdo[ing] many liberals", and I wouldn't call that shilling (and that's a serious accusation to make), though I admit it's possible there are some within the Party who might be shills: I found one article that was posted there in 2010 about Obama that bugs me in particular. Aside from that, I think a lot of people genuinely fell for Obama's bullshit, especially in 2008.
The CPUSA has not really done anything independent on a national scale since 1984, the last time they ran Gus Hall and Angela Davis for president - after which they cited the expense of campaigning with the aim of focusing on smaller, localized politics.
It's possible that we may see a resurgence of interest in the CPUSA, that new blood can help revive and redirect the energy away from the more establishment framework. It certainly won't happen by other leftists nibbling around the edges and undermining their comrades.

Le Socialiste
12th September 2013, 21:12
As far as you referring to CPUSA's lukewarm support for Obama - I honestly don't consider that to be "outdo[ing] many liberals", and I wouldn't call that shilling (and that's a serious accusation to make)

Indeed it is, quite serious. Too bad its been substantiated already:

Obama in Land of Gandhi (http://peoplesworld.org/obama-in-land-of-gandhi/)

Obama discusses elections with student journalists (http://peoplesworld.org/obama-discusses-elections-with-student-journalists/)

Obama in Strongsville: it takes courage (http://peoplesworld.org/obama-in-strongsville-it-takes-courage/)

Obama scores high approval rating, but not in all areas (http://peoplesworld.org/obama-scores-high-approval-rating-but-not-in-all-areas/)

And let's not forget this little tidbit (http://cpusa.org/labor-upfront-special-election-edition-obama-wins-labor-wins-/) (thanks to Crux for highlighting it):


Special Election Edition

Obama Wins!

Labor Law overhaul the top priority for Americas unions


********************************


Obama Wins!
Labor wins!

Americans reject policies of greed and union busting!

By Scott Marshall

President-elect Barack Obama.

Those words ring with meaning. For organized labor they ring with pride, hope, and energy for the struggles ahead. No one feels like labors candidate won, so now we can go home and rest. Rather, as congratulation messages pour in from all parts of the labor movement, the critical subtext is, we are ready and eager to march with you for change. At the top of labors change agenda is boots-on-the-ground support for the Obama agenda of a new New Deal for economic recovery and passage of the Employee Free Choice Act.

Organized labor played an amazing role in the election Barack Obama.

Unions played an extraordinary leadership role in winning the working class for Obama.

Its been many years since labor was so totally united behind a presidential candidate.

Labor raised the struggle against racism and for class unity to a whole new level.

Unions gave vital leadership in building support for Obama on issues like the economy, workers rights to organize, protecting retirees pensions and social security, healthcare, and building green manufacturing that protects the environment and puts people back to work.

The labor movement took independent political action to spectacular new levels. Unions broke all previous records in mobilizing its rank and file for labor walks, phone banks, plant gate distributions, and member to member contact in the workplace. Labor continued to build and develop its own political apparatus and voice. Hundreds, if not thousands, of union halls became campaign central for the Obama campaign as well as for targeted Congressional contests.
As phenomenal as labors efforts were, the impact of the Obama upsurge and campaign on labor was also incredible. New coalitions were built or strengthened. A new depth was added to ties between labor and all the components of the Obama movement.

Labors role was hardly mentioned in the mainstream press. All the more reason for labor to have a big showing of celebration and support for our new President. Some in labor have begun to talk about a big mobilization for President Barack Obamas Peoples Inaugural.

What a great idea!

Does any of this read as "lukewarm" to you?


It's possible that we may see a resurgence of interest in the CPUSA, that new blood can help revive and redirect the energy away from the more establishment framework. It certainly won't happen by other leftists nibbling around the edges and undermining their comrades.

Yes, we're the reason the CPUSA has been having such a rough time of it (not like its politics have anything to do with it or anything). If we'd all just rally together and unite behind the Communist Party the left would be in a better place. :rolleyes:

This said, I have nothing against the guy running. All the more power to him, I guess.

Edit - Additionally, if the CPUSA ever managed to break with the Democratic Party, that would be an improvement. If the party ever moves in that direction, fantastic. I have a hard time believing it'll happen anytime soon though.

adipocere
12th September 2013, 21:59
Indeed it is, quite serious...
How thoroughly ironic, coming from you of all people.

RedMaterialist
12th September 2013, 22:04
That is absolutely fantastic news. I am sending a contribution right now.

#FF0000
12th September 2013, 22:32
what are you doing? in materialist and concrete terms, what are you doing to change things?

In materialist and concrete terms, what is Dominic doing?

Crux
12th September 2013, 23:51
In materialist and concrete terms, what is Dominic doing?
He's a union activist for one thing. Like I said, I think him running is great and I have nothing against him quite the opposite. On the other hand that doesn't really change how I feel about the CPUSA overall, because this campaign in Weymouth is significant precisely because that's not how the CPUSA tends to operate.

Le Socialiste
13th September 2013, 01:26
How thoroughly ironic, coming from you of all people.

Because you know when people look at me, jokester is what immediately comes to mind...

Seriously, engage with the substance of my post - that is, regarding the CPUSA's over-reliance on and kowtowing to the Democratic party - and avoid one-liners of this sort. To be quite honest, I'm somewhat perplexed by your post. I mean, I understand the dismissive aspect. But please, widen the scope of your criticism here - 'cause I'm struggling to grasp just what your point is.

Lenina Rosenweg
13th September 2013, 01:41
FWIW Nick is aware of the shitty politics of the CPUSA. He is hoping to use it it, in an entryist fashion, as a sort of leftist regroupment to attract radicalyzing youth. Whether this is a viable strategy remains to be seen. He is definitely not an Obamabot.

Its good that activists are openly running for office on expliccitly anti-capitalist, anti- Democratic Party platforms.

Paul Pott
13th September 2013, 01:49
If the left cannot bring the great mass of the working class to its side on the basis of platforms grounded in established, time tested theory, then this kind of experience is necessary for popular movements of the working class to rediscover those universal truths about the nature of the state and what organization is needed for themselves.

Red_Banner
13th September 2013, 06:51
CPUSA needs to get rid of that inept moron Sam Webb first.

Ocean Seal
13th September 2013, 07:14
Indeed it is, quite serious. Too bad its been substantiated already:

Obama in Land of Gandhi (http://peoplesworld.org/obama-in-land-of-gandhi/)

Obama discusses elections with student journalists (http://peoplesworld.org/obama-discusses-elections-with-student-journalists/)

Obama in Strongsville: it takes courage (http://peoplesworld.org/obama-in-strongsville-it-takes-courage/)

Obama scores high approval rating, but not in all areas (http://peoplesworld.org/obama-scores-high-approval-rating-but-not-in-all-areas/)

And let's not forget this little tidbit (http://cpusa.org/labor-upfront-special-election-edition-obama-wins-labor-wins-/) (thanks to Crux for highlighting it):



Does any of this read as "lukewarm" to you?



Yes, we're the reason the CPUSA has been having such a rough time of it (not like its politics have anything to do with it or anything). If we'd all just rally together and unite behind the Communist Party the left would be in a better place. :rolleyes:

This said, I have nothing against the guy running. All the more power to him, I guess.

Edit - Additionally, if the CPUSA ever managed to break with the Democratic Party, that would be an improvement. If the party ever moves in that direction, fantastic. I have a hard time believing it'll happen anytime soon though.

Honestly I probably despise the CPUSA as much as the next revlefter, but to me it doesn't seem like the articles provided anything more than lukewarm support, and catalouged his journey.

Crux
13th September 2013, 13:01
Honestly I probably despise the CPUSA as much as the next revlefter, but to me it doesn't seem like the articles provided anything more than lukewarm support, and catalouged his journey.
How is the "Obama Wins! Labor wins!"-article from the CPUSA website anything but gushing support?

SonofRage
13th September 2013, 17:38
Wouldn't the CPUSA expel him for opposing a Democrat?

Sent from my XT1060 using Tapatalk 4

TaylorS
14th September 2013, 20:26
A CPUSA guy is actually running for office rather than shill for the Democratic Party? I'm shocked!

Lenina Rosenweg
14th September 2013, 21:37
A campaign sign

https://scontent-a-iad.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc3/970466_10153225459065459_1291110575_n.jpg