Log in

View Full Version : Blair better then bush?



Mclaren
15th December 2001, 08:33
I reckon that blair should go and be us presidemnt as he is far better.

Kez
15th December 2001, 11:14
Although blair has his MANY faults, we should support him for the time being while massive reforms are being placed ,against the previous thatcherite whore of a govt,
once he wins the next election, and wipes the floor with the consevatives, then we should try to change him, if he doesnt move back left, where labour belong, in the hearts of the workers and trade unionists.

unite & fight
comrade kamo

El Commandante
15th December 2001, 12:27
I thought that Bush and Blair were the seem person?? They both say exactly the same as each other, except one says it with the speech ability of three older, the other in a rather disjointed way.

But I think that Blair is better then Bush, you can see that the other government officials agree, they haven't given any of the delicate missions to Bush, it's always Blair. But Blair really does need to come back to the left, he's too right wing at the moment. Bush is a moron and daddy paid for him to win the election. He couldn't manage a childrens sports team let alone a country.

Fidel Castro Ruz
15th December 2001, 12:40
I heard Bush IQ is only 91...too bad...yankees like only stupid things like stupid films and hamburgers that make them fat :) so they've chosen stupid president...
i'm sure Putin isn't so stupid...but he is proamerican and i hate it...first he says we won't let yanks leave SNV 2,but now he says that everything is alright...dammit...what would Nikita Khrushew say on that???
Putin+Blair+Bush=glory of imperialism

MJM
15th December 2001, 22:11
LOL El commandante you do such a good Blair impression.
Bush, Blair well they're all the same really neither of them call the shots in the real world, the corporations have the power.

Drifter
16th December 2001, 04:06
putin knows which side his bread is buttered,

revolutionary spirit
16th December 2001, 13:33
why settle for some of the worst when we could of the best,if we give blair breathing room he'll have the NHS private before u know it

CommieBastard
16th December 2001, 17:49
whether blair is better than bush doesnt matter...
it's not like it's difficult..
and we could do with a hell of a lot better than either methinks....

Gestra
17th December 2001, 01:17
Bush allways seems as if some one is pulling his strings. Blair is his own devil with a slick tongue.

But overall both are terrible. Much better if neither of them were in control.

Kez
18th December 2001, 19:15
Tis the NWO, and we gotta smash it.

comrade kamo

Moskitto
18th December 2001, 19:58
The difference between Blair and Bush is.

Under Blair you feel like you live in a dictatorship (hang on we do)

Under Bush you feel like WW3 is going to start because he doesn't know what the button that says "Nuclear Launch" does.

Guest
19th December 2001, 03:53
Yes well blair is better if your a citizen of the UK; Bush is better if you are a citizen of the usa.

And hang on moskitto, cause this is gonna blow you away...ready...this is hardly a dictatorship.

RedCeltic
19th December 2001, 11:08
Quote: from Gestra on 8:17 pm on Dec. 16, 2001
Bush allways seems as if some one is pulling his strings.



Of course he does... he's just a corprate puppet, even more so than his daddy was. And.... I think you in the UK have a much better leader at the moment. It wasn't very long ago however that we had Regan and you had Thatcher.... the only diffrence between those two was that one was a man the other a woman.

Moskitto
19th December 2001, 22:45
Quote: from Guest on 4:53 am on Dec. 19, 2001
Yes well blair is better if your a citizen of the UK; Bush is better if you are a citizen of the usa.

And hang on moskitto, cause this is gonna blow you away...ready...this is hardly a dictatorship.


Labour Party = Majority in Parliament

Party Whips = Candidates Unwilling to go against the party line

Labour Party = Full Control

Full Control = Dictatorship

The only difference is, this dictatorship you can remove after a few years. But it doesn't make much difference since the people who actually pull the strings (the civil service) are still in.

Guest
20th December 2001, 12:27
First off the fact that "this dictatorship you can [be]remove[d] after a few years," is a big difference. Moreover, I find it ironic that a leftist would decry the bureaucracy, have you been reading Max Weber Cliffnotes along with Marx for dummies.

ArgueEverything
20th December 2001, 13:23
Quote: from Guest on 1:27 pm on Dec. 20, 2001
First off the fact that "this dictatorship you can [be]remove[d] after a few years," is a big difference. Moreover, I find it ironic that a leftist would decry the bureaucracy, have you been reading Max Weber Cliffnotes along with Marx for dummies.

ahem.

dicˇtaˇtorˇship (dk-ttr-shp, dkt-)
n.
The office or tenure of a dictator.
A state or government under dictatorial rule.
Absolute or despotic control or power.

^nothing about the temporal features the dictator may have.

and for your information, the greatest advocates of individualism and opponents of bureacracy have been almost solely from the left(orwell, sartre, rousseau etc).

so often CONSERVATIVES have to resort to quoting orwell to get a message through to their readers, because they can't find a popular enough conservative writer who espoused similar beliefs.