Log in

View Full Version : Who is responsible for the worst human right abuse



Misodoctakleidist
13th January 2004, 18:39
Amnesty International seem to think it's the USA by quite a considerable margin. In the online documentation archive Cuba has 19 "urgent actions" whereas the USA has 454!

Cuba (http://web.amnesty.org/library/eng-cub/urgent_actions)

USA (http://web.amnesty.org/library/eng-usa/urgent_actions)

Ortega
13th January 2004, 19:00
Very interesting.

SonofRage
13th January 2004, 19:03
Well, Cuba is smaller than most US states, if you multiply Cuba's 19 by 50, you get 950 :D

Monty Cantsin
13th January 2004, 19:17
Originally posted by [email protected] 13 2004, 08:03 PM
Well, Cuba is smaller than most US states, if you multiply Cuba's 19 by 50, you get 950 :D
but if you multiply it like that cuba would have a population of 550m

the US only has around 200m i think its just abit over that.

el_profe
13th January 2004, 19:18
Originally posted by [email protected] 13 2004, 07:39 PM
Amnesty International seem to think it's the USA by quite a considerable margin. In the online documentation archive Cuba has 19 "urgent actions" whereas the USA has 454!

Cuba (http://web.amnesty.org/library/eng-cub/urgent_actions)

USA (http://web.amnesty.org/library/eng-usa/urgent_actions)
Look at the pages, this organization think its a human rights abuse to have the death penalty, they first page was full of death penalties, also anyone can see what happens in the USA, but in cuba we cant, few reporters are let in and many are not let in again if they do something that the gov. does not approve of.

Monty Cantsin
13th January 2004, 19:24
AUSTRALIA (http://URL=http://web.amnesty.org/library/eng-aus/urgent_actions)
i didnt know my governement was into breaking human rights

Deniz Gezmis
13th January 2004, 19:25
Originally posted by [email protected] 13 2004, 08:18 PM
in cuba we cant, few reporters are let in and many are not let in again if they do something that the gov. does not approve of.
WRONG. Many news agencies have many reporters in Cuba, Most notably the BBC. Which has also done a few indepth documentries on Cuban life without government restrictions.

Jesus Christ
13th January 2004, 19:26
Originally posted by el_profe+Jan 13 2004, 03:18 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (el_profe @ Jan 13 2004, 03:18 PM)
[email protected] 13 2004, 07:39 PM
Amnesty International seem to think it&#39;s the USA by quite a considerable margin. In the online documentation archive Cuba has 19 "urgent actions" whereas the USA has 454&#33;

Cuba (http://web.amnesty.org/library/eng-cub/urgent_actions)

USA (http://web.amnesty.org/library/eng-usa/urgent_actions)
Look at the pages, this organization think its a human rights abuse to have the death penalty, they first page was full of death penalties, also anyone can see what happens in the USA, but in cuba we cant, few reporters are let in and many are not let in again if they do something that the gov. does not approve of. [/b]
Thats where you are wrong
The US isnt allowed in Cuba, it is illegal
but the rest of the world is
Amnesty International --------&#62; International

Monty Cantsin
13th January 2004, 19:30
Originally posted by [email protected] 13 2004, 08:18 PM

Look at the pages, this organization think its a human rights abuse to have the death penalty, they first page was full of death penalties, also anyone can see what happens in the USA, but in cuba we cant, few reporters are let in and many are not let in again if they do something that the gov. does not approve of.
you don’t think death penalties are a abuse of human rights? i do

Did you read what was said in the US page? There was an article about the prisoners in held by the US in Cuba.

el_profe
13th January 2004, 19:33
Originally posted by Jesus Christ+Jan 13 2004, 08:26 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Jesus Christ @ Jan 13 2004, 08:26 PM)
Originally posted by [email protected] 13 2004, 03:18 PM

[email protected] 13 2004, 07:39 PM
Amnesty International seem to think it&#39;s the USA by quite a considerable margin. In the online documentation archive Cuba has 19 "urgent actions" whereas the USA has 454&#33;

Cuba (http://web.amnesty.org/library/eng-cub/urgent_actions)

USA (http://web.amnesty.org/library/eng-usa/urgent_actions)
Look at the pages, this organization think its a human rights abuse to have the death penalty, they first page was full of death penalties, also anyone can see what happens in the USA, but in cuba we cant, few reporters are let in and many are not let in again if they do something that the gov. does not approve of.
Thats where you are wrong
The US isnt allowed in Cuba, it is illegal
but the rest of the world is
Amnesty International --------&#62; International [/b]
Did you not read what i said, I was talking about reporters.

Monty Cantsin
13th January 2004, 19:35
Originally posted by el_profe+Jan 13 2004, 08:33 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (el_profe @ Jan 13 2004, 08:33 PM)
Originally posted by Jesus [email protected] 13 2004, 08:26 PM

Originally posted by [email protected] 13 2004, 03:18 PM

[email protected] 13 2004, 07:39 PM
Amnesty International seem to think it&#39;s the USA by quite a considerable margin. In the online documentation archive Cuba has 19 "urgent actions" whereas the USA has 454&#33;

Cuba (http://web.amnesty.org/library/eng-cub/urgent_actions)

USA (http://web.amnesty.org/library/eng-usa/urgent_actions)
Look at the pages, this organization think its a human rights abuse to have the death penalty, they first page was full of death penalties, also anyone can see what happens in the USA, but in cuba we cant, few reporters are let in and many are not let in again if they do something that the gov. does not approve of.
Thats where you are wrong
The US isnt allowed in Cuba, it is illegal
but the rest of the world is
Amnesty International --------&#62; International
Did you not read what i said, I was talking about reporters. [/b]
thats what he was saying everyone else is allowed into cuba just not the US.

el_profe
13th January 2004, 19:36
Originally posted by euripidies+Jan 13 2004, 08:30 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (euripidies @ Jan 13 2004, 08:30 PM)
[email protected] 13 2004, 08:18 PM

Look at the pages, this organization think its a human rights abuse to have the death penalty, they first page was full of death penalties, also anyone can see what happens in the USA, but in cuba we cant, few reporters are let in and many are not let in again if they do something that the gov. does not approve of.
you don’t think death penalties are a abuse of human rights? i do

Did you read what was said in the US page? There was an article about the prisoners in held by the US in Cuba. [/b]
No, i dont think the death penalty for murderers is a human rights violation.

I did see it, but i said most of what they had was on the death penalty.

On the reporters thing, no. I read an article abouut reportes that had their cuban visa taken away. They where not allowed back in because cuba did not agree with what they wanted to report on.

Misodoctakleidist
13th January 2004, 19:39
Originally posted by [email protected] 13 2004, 08:36 PM

No, i dont think the death penalty for murderers is a human rights violation.

The Universal Declaration of Human rights Aticle 3;


Article 3.
Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.

Monty Cantsin
13th January 2004, 19:44
Originally posted by el_profe+Jan 13 2004, 08:36 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (el_profe @ Jan 13 2004, 08:36 PM)
Originally posted by [email protected] 13 2004, 08:30 PM

[email protected] 13 2004, 08:18 PM

Look at the pages, this organization think its a human rights abuse to have the death penalty, they first page was full of death penalties, also anyone can see what happens in the USA, but in cuba we cant, few reporters are let in and many are not let in again if they do something that the gov. does not approve of.
you don’t think death penalties are a abuse of human rights? i do

Did you read what was said in the US page? There was an article about the prisoners in held by the US in Cuba.
No, i dont think the death penalty for murderers is a human rights violation.

I did see it, but i said most of what they had was on the death penalty.

On the reporters thing, no. I read an article abouut reportes that had their cuban visa taken away. They where not allowed back in because cuba did not agree with what they wanted to report on. [/b]
problem with death penalty its final, so if you get it wrong about who did it you can&#39;t go back. but also about the articles did you read some of the death penalty ones it was about a mentally ill person being put to death, now that&#39;s a abuse of human rights

and on the reporters thing what the source and what the reporter from the US and what was he/she up to?

lucid
13th January 2004, 19:44
Originally posted by Jesus Christ+Jan 13 2004, 08:26 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Jesus Christ @ Jan 13 2004, 08:26 PM)
Originally posted by [email protected] 13 2004, 03:18 PM

[email protected] 13 2004, 07:39 PM
Amnesty International seem to think it&#39;s the USA by quite a considerable margin. In the online documentation archive Cuba has 19 "urgent actions" whereas the USA has 454&#33;

Cuba (http://web.amnesty.org/library/eng-cub/urgent_actions)

USA (http://web.amnesty.org/library/eng-usa/urgent_actions)
Look at the pages, this organization think its a human rights abuse to have the death penalty, they first page was full of death penalties, also anyone can see what happens in the USA, but in cuba we cant, few reporters are let in and many are not let in again if they do something that the gov. does not approve of.
Thats where you are wrong
The US isnt allowed in Cuba, it is illegal
but the rest of the world is
Amnesty International --------&#62; International [/b]
Someone needs to tell the Cubans they have it so good. Every Cuban I have ever known has told me the conditions are terrible over there. My girlfriends mother has been to Cuba twice. She says the resort area is awesome but the places that average Cubans live is terrible. I worked with a guy in Miami that had fled to Cuba 8 years earlier. He had come here and didn&#39;t know any english and had a poor education. 8 Years later he had a job paying over 50k a year and was getting married. We spoke for many hours about his experiences in Cuba. You guys really have a distorted view of Cuba.

If you ever go to Miami you will see lots of Western Union stores all over. They always have lines of Cubans sending the maximum amounts of money allowed to their friends and relatives. Why the hell would people be lining up to send several hundred dollars a month to people that live in a supposed utopia.

Monty Cantsin
13th January 2004, 19:58
Just think about the measures taken by the Cuban government in regards to human rights because of the northern neighbour having invaded, bombe, lead terrorist attacks, embargo and many more. Then think about the measures the US takes against human rights because of a terrorist attack. I think the US is much more extreme.

MiDnIgHtMaRaUdEr
13th January 2004, 20:04
I say we need Cuban inspectors in the US to understand whats really going on....

el_profe
13th January 2004, 20:08
Originally posted by [email protected] 13 2004, 08:39 PM
The Universal Declaration of Human rights Aticle 3;

QUOTE
Article 3.
Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.


The universal declaration of human rights?? who made this, the UN?, im not saying i dont agree with them i am just asking who made them?
2. everyone has the right to life, but they dont have the right to take another persons life , when they do that , they lose their right to life.

euripidies:

problem with death penalty its final, so if you get it wrong about who did it you can&#39;t go back. but also about the articles did you read some of the death penalty ones it was about a mentally ill person being put to death, now that&#39;s a abuse of human rights

and on the reporters thing what the source and what the reporter from the US and what was he/she up to?
its final , yes , If you kill someone(unless its self defence) you lose the right to live, since you took that right from someone else. I read teh story on the mentally ill guy, they ae using the "mentally ill" dfence alot these days. that your mentally ill does not mean that you dont know the difference of right and wrong.

the reporter thing, they just mentioned it, no specific examples, but i have read about this in the past. this was on www.revistaperfiles.com.

Monty Cantsin
13th January 2004, 20:08
Originally posted by [email protected] 13 2004, 09:04 PM
I say we need Cuban inspectors in the US to understand whats really going on....
yes i would agree with that, and if they dont allow it then its off to war WMD you see.

Bolshevika
13th January 2004, 20:09
Lucid: Of course the USA looks good compared to a third world country like Cuba. It is utterly ridiculous to compare Cuba with the USA, USA is an industrialized, global, military superpower that makes trillions of dollars in foreign trade (the prince of Saudi Arabia has almost a trillion dollars invested in the American stock market for example) and wars.

To really appreciate Cuba we should compare it to other countries in its situation. Haiti for example, which is about in the same situation as Cuba, has billions of dollars dropped into it through foreign aide, and has complete and open trade with U.S. and other western capitalist countries, is a complete disaster.

If Haitians had to chose, do you think they would live in capitalist Haiti or Cuba? What about Dominicans.

Let me tell you something, the reason many Cubans here make a lot of money almost immediatly is because of the excellent education (which human rights groups call one of the best) they receive in Cuba, for free. If it weren&#39;t for that they would be living in the projects like the other immigrants who come from capitalist countries (especially Mexico and Puerto Rico).

Monty Cantsin
13th January 2004, 20:11
Originally posted by [email protected] 13 2004, 09:08 PM
its final , yes , If you kill someone(unless its self defence) you lose the right to live, since you took that right from someone else.
but you miss the point they dont always do the crime there have cases were the person put to death was not the offender.

Monty Cantsin
13th January 2004, 20:15
Originally posted by [email protected] 13 2004, 09:09 PM
Lucid: Of course the USA looks good compared to a third world country like Cuba. It is utterly ridiculous to compare Cuba with the USA, USA is an industrialized, global, military superpower that makes trillions of dollars in foreign trade (the prince of Saudi Arabia has almost a trillion dollars invested in the American stock market for example) and wars.

To really appreciate Cuba we should compare it to other countries in its situation. Haiti for example, which is about in the same situation as Cuba, has billions of dollars dropped into it through foreign aide, and has complete and open trade with U.S. and other western capitalist countries, is a complete disaster.

If Haitians had to chose, do you think they would live in capitalist Haiti or Cuba? What about Dominicans.

Let me tell you something, the reason many Cubans here make a lot of money almost immediatly is because of the excellent education (which human rights groups call one of the best) they receive in Cuba, for free. If it weren&#39;t for that they would be living in the projects like the other immigrants who come from capitalist countries (especially Mexico and Puerto Rico).
im agreeing with Bolshevika you guys are comparing a 3rd world country with the leading world superpower and on many things cuba comes out on top but you still can&#39;t give it credit.

Misodoctakleidist
13th January 2004, 20:19
Originally posted by el_profe+Jan 13 2004, 09:08 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (el_profe @ Jan 13 2004, 09:08 PM)
[email protected] 13 2004, 08:39 PM
The Universal Declaration of Human rights Aticle 3;

QUOTE
Article 3.
Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.


The universal declaration of human rights?? who made this, the UN?, im not saying i dont agree with them i am just asking who made them?


[/b]
Yes it was the UN, it was origionaly drafted by Roosevelt i believe.

el_profe
13th January 2004, 20:36
Originally posted by Bolshevi[email protected] 13 2004, 09:09 PM
Lucid: Of course the USA looks good compared to a third world country like Cuba. It is utterly ridiculous to compare Cuba with the USA, USA is an industrialized, global, military superpower that makes trillions of dollars in foreign trade (the prince of Saudi Arabia has almost a trillion dollars invested in the American stock market for example) and wars.

To really appreciate Cuba we should compare it to other countries in its situation. Haiti for example, which is about in the same situation as Cuba, has billions of dollars dropped into it through foreign aide, and has complete and open trade with U.S. and other western capitalist countries, is a complete disaster.

If Haitians had to chose, do you think they would live in capitalist Haiti or Cuba? What about Dominicans.

Let me tell you something, the reason many Cubans here make a lot of money almost immediatly is because of the excellent education (which human rights groups call one of the best) they receive in Cuba, for free. If it weren&#39;t for that they would be living in the projects like the other immigrants who come from capitalist countries (especially Mexico and Puerto Rico).
Yes, your right about comparing the USA and Cuba. Lets compare Cuba and taiwan or cuba and israel or cuba and hong kong, or cuba and ireland.
But we could compare the USA to the USSR. And the USSR failed.

Haiti is fcked up, I saw a report on the vodoo shit they do. THAT was fcked up, I saw it on the discovery channel. As far as calling haiti capitalist? do you know what type of policies they have? i doubt that they have a free market style economy. Just because a country is not caommunist does not mean they are capitalist. Most countries are "social-democratico" (i dont know what its called in english) anyway, its where the gov. regualtes the market. For example it takes 1 day to get all the paper work done in teh USA to open a bussines, i think in australia it also takes like half a day. But in places like brasil it takes like 3 months, or in my country like 3 weeks just to get the paper work done. and you have to pay all these stupid fees and taxes. that is not capitalism.

I make the same argumetn with mexic. and PR is better of than Cuba, I know a person that has been to both countries.

Many cubans here make alot of money?? some do yes, but not all, have you been to Miami?

Good education compared to public schools from latin america, but one thing about the schools in cuba(and you could make the argumetnt that this also happens in the USA) is that since the gov. controls education, they control what the cubans learn.
I know this cuban, who was told lies about world events and how things happened, it is very very very very very biased.
They are also told lies about the places they are going to, I know that doctors that are sent from cuba to my country are almost impressed when they see the city, they didnt expect to see all those cars and buildings and restaurants... . why do you think internet acces is so regulated in Cuba.,so cubans dont find out how life outside of cuba really is, why would many cubans leave if its so great? dont tell me "people leave mexico also" yes mexico also sucks, but we are talking about Cuba.

redstar2000
13th January 2004, 21:46
Every Cuban I have ever known has told me the conditions are terrible over there. My girlfriend&#39;s mother has been to Cuba twice. She says the resort area is awesome but the places that average Cubans live is terrible. I worked with a guy in Miami that had fled to Cuba 8 years earlier. He had come here and didn&#39;t know any English and had a poor education. 8 Years later he had a job paying over 50k a year and was getting married. We spoke for many hours about his experiences in Cuba. You guys really have a distorted view of Cuba.

Charming.

You are a refugee living in a country that is new and strange to you.

They ask you "what it was like where you came from". What are you going to say?

It was paradise compared to this fucking shithole&#33; Coming here was the biggest fucking mistake of my life&#33;

I don&#39;t think so.

http://anarchist-action.org/forums/images/smiles/redstar.gif

The RedStar2000 Papers (http://www.anarchist-action.org/marxists/redstar2000/)
A site about communist ideas

Commie Girl
13th January 2004, 22:19
[COLOR=blue] :angry: The rest of the world knows that the death penalty is wrong. The U&#036; is in charming company with the use of this barbaric form of "punishment". Is there any rational reason why the U&#036; will not sign the Declaration of Human Rights? I have decided to have my wedding in Cuba in March of this year&#33; I know many people who go there often and the best part of their time there is the fact that there are not any tourists from the U&#036; or any signs of the U&#036; (ie:McDonalds)

Article 37(a) of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) states:
&#39;&#39;Neither capital punishment nor life imprisonment without possibility of
release shall be imposed for offences committed by persons below eighteen years
of age&#39;&#39;. While the USA is one of only two countries (the other being Somalia),
which have not ratified this treaty (191 countries have), it has signed it. As
such, it has bound itself under international law not to do anything which
would defeat the object and purpose of the treaty, pending the decision on
whether to ratify it.

lucid
14th January 2004, 15:25
Originally posted by [email protected] 13 2004, 10:46 PM
Charming.

You are a refugee living in a country that is new and strange to you.

They ask you "what it was like where you came from". What are you going to say?

It was paradise compared to this fucking shithole&#33; Coming here was the biggest fucking mistake of my life&#33;

I don&#39;t think so.

http://anarchist-action.org/forums/images/smiles/redstar.gif

The RedStar2000 Papers (http://www.anarchist-action.org/marxists/redstar2000/)
A site about communist ideas
This guy is a dork :rolleyes:



I am reading the Communist Manifesto to try and better understand the beliefs of people on this board. I am making an attempt to meet people half way. With your attitude you will never be taken seriously. You hate the US period forget logic forget facts. US = bad end of discussion.

Thats a great way to go through life.

YKTMX
14th January 2004, 15:53
We would criticize ANY nation with a regime as right-wing as the current U.S. one. But it goes even deeper than that. Our criticisms of U.S. foreign poilcy are not because we have some anti-Us fetish, it&#39;s because of you look plainly at the FACTS, then the U.S. military has, for 50 years, been a tool of repression around the world, quashing popular goverments and movements that weren&#39;t "on message".

If the U.S. decides to step away from this position (not likely I agree) then brilliant. We will go on fighting the capitalist system as a whole.

If not, then we will continue to fight imperialism of all kind, from Tibet to Iraq, unapolgetically.

lucid
14th January 2004, 16:08
Originally posted by [email protected] 14 2004, 04:53 PM
We would criticize ANY nation with a regime as right-wing as the current U.S. one. But it goes even deeper than that. Our criticisms of U.S. foreign poilcy are not because we have some anti-Us fetish, it&#39;s because of you look plainly at the FACTS, then the U.S. military has, for 50 years, been a tool of repression around the world, quashing popular goverments and movements that weren&#39;t "on message".

If the U.S. decides to step away from this position (not likely I agree) then brilliant. We will go on fighting the capitalist system as a whole.

If not, then we will continue to fight imperialism of all kind, from Tibet to Iraq, unapolgetically.
I understand what you are saying. What I am trying to say is that the blind hatred like that guy has doesn&#39;t help your cause. It&#39;s like some of you must make the US look bad under any circumstances. Reguardless of how rediculous it looks. I mean can&#39;t he come up with something better than &#39;your friend is just lying to you&#39;. If he is lying I can find 100 other people that will say the exact same thing. I lived in Miami for 4&#39;ish years and worked with a company that had more Cubans than any other nationality. They all said the same things about Cuba. It sucks.

I have never been there so I cannot speak from personal experience. But I have known many good, honest, and hard working people that have given me their opinions.

YKTMX
14th January 2004, 20:00
Well, if you are talking about RedStar, then what he says doesn&#39;t usually represent the whole of the board anyway.

I would never like to be thought of as rabidly anti-american. I express solidarity with all ordinary people in America, as I do any other country.

el_profe
14th January 2004, 20:03
Originally posted by [email protected] 13 2004, 11:19 PM
[COLOR=blue] :angry: The rest of the world knows that the death penalty is wrong. The U&#036; is in charming company with the use of this barbaric form of "punishment". Is there any rational reason why the U&#036; will not sign the Declaration of Human Rights? I have decided to have my wedding in Cuba in March of this year&#33; I know many people who go there often and the best part of their time there is the fact that there are not any tourists from the U&#036; or any signs of the U&#036; (ie:McDonalds)

Article 37(a) of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) states:
&#39;&#39;Neither capital punishment nor life imprisonment without possibility of
release shall be imposed for offences committed by persons below eighteen years
of age&#39;&#39;. While the USA is one of only two countries (the other being Somalia),
which have not ratified this treaty (191 countries have), it has signed it. As
such, it has bound itself under international law not to do anything which
would defeat the object and purpose of the treaty, pending the decision on
whether to ratify it.
The rest of the world? not china or cuba or north korea, or the USSR (when it existed).

Your having your wedding in cuba, is that to save money :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Who made the rights of the child? their retarded? If somone who is 17, kills 10 people they shouldnt spend their life in jail or die for that? yes they should

the death penalty is not wrong, when you take the life of another person you lose the right to live.

I saw this documentary on A&E yesterday about this guy that at 18 killed 3 people, anyway after 30 years he was let go on parole, what did he do? raped and killed 5 women. His own parents told the police "you can kill him if you want". Of course in your world after he killed 5 more he would of received a 3rd chance of correcting his life, anyway the murderer got letahl injection in 1999.

Commie Girl
14th January 2004, 20:16
[QUOTE]Your having your wedding in cuba, is that to save money :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Why would it be to save money? It is still going to cost a small fortune. No, I figure it is an incredible place and we will be honoured to have such an important event in such an amzing spot in the world&#33;

[QUOTE]Who made the rights of the child? their retarded? If somone who is 17, kills 10 people they shouldnt spend their life in jail or die for that? yes they should

Yes, they should spend their lives in jail.

[QUOTE]the death penalty is not wrong, when you take the life of another person you lose the right to live.

Says who? Where does it say you lose the right to live? How bold of you.....

LuZhiming
14th January 2004, 21:02
To be fair, Amnesty International has more on the U.S. because it has easier access to U.S. Human Rights abuses. The maker of this thread is really shaming his credibility by twisting information as such.

Now on this matter, the U.S.&#39; foreign policy is worse than the rest of the world&#39;s together, let alone Cuba&#39;s alone. The U.S.&#39; treatment of its own population is in some ways better. It doesn&#39;t usually send dissidents to jail like in Cuba, but its intentions are not any better. The U.S. suppresses information, that&#39;s why they don&#39;t have to suppress people violently.

If you are a person that believes things like so called freedom of speech take time to gain, then many here aren&#39;t being fair to Cuba. It took the U.S. quite a long time to gain anything of the sort. The 60&#39;s is when it really began. The Cuban Revolution hasn&#39;t been around nearly that long, so some may believe its lack of freedoms may be understandable.

But let&#39;s be realistic, Cuba&#39;s accomplishments considering its horrendous circumstances, are incredible. For example, most health organizations that study on the issue openly claim that the embargo would lead to a catastrophe in Cuba had it not been for its excellent health system. The Cuban Revolution has even made issues such as healthcare, medical reasearch, scientific research, shelther, racism, literacy, homosexuality, much more favorable for the population. Whatever you think of Castro, someone had to get the U.S. out of Cuba, they were raping it.

I don&#39;t see why people focus so much on the matter of refugees. Is it a surprise to anyone that people would flee a Third World country that is right next to the richest country in the world? It is stupid to think otherwise. During the &#39;American&#39; Revolution, over 100,000 people fled to England, and many more fled to Latin America. Others who couldn&#39;t escape were jailed. Should someone have overthrown Washington? This arguement is a complete joke coming from anyone trying to prove a Pro-U.S. point. The sheer hypocrisy in it is laughably obvious.

And finally, I really don&#39;t know what all of these nonsensical posts about the death penalty are trying to point out. Both Cuba and the United States use it frequently, this arguement is counter-productive.(Not to mention weak)

The ignorant must have their beatings.


Yes, your right about comparing the USA and Cuba. Lets compare Cuba and taiwan or cuba and israel or cuba and hong kong, or cuba and ireland.
But we could compare the USA to the USSR. And the USSR failed.

:lol: The entire reason the U.S. hated the USSR is because it provided a successful model for modernization of a different system than the U.S.&#39; I have pointed this out numerous times, what you are implying is the opposite of the truth. The USSR imploded due to the idiocy of having a massive military budget and campaigns that it couldn&#39;t handle.


Haiti is fcked up, I saw a report on the vodoo shit they do. THAT was fcked up, I saw it on the discovery channel. As far as calling haiti capitalist? do you know what type of policies they have? i doubt that they have a free market style economy. Just because a country is not caommunist does not mean they are capitalist. Most countries are "social-democratico" (i dont know what its called in english) anyway, its where the gov. regualtes the market. For example it takes 1 day to get all the paper work done in teh USA to open a bussines, i think in australia it also takes like half a day. But in places like brasil it takes like 3 months, or in my country like 3 weeks just to get the paper work done. and you have to pay all these stupid fees and taxes. that is not capitalism.

Yeh and i like saw this report about christian in the us making racist comments about arabs and stuffs&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;1111 That comment on "vodoo shit" is utter ignorance. It is irrelivant, beside the point, and a complete joke. And Haiti is a failure largely because of what the U.S. and Europe had previously done to it. This is yet another of example of both sides of the arguement making fools out of themselves.


I make the same argumetn with mexic. and PR is better of than Cuba, I know a person that has been to both countries.

You always did have reliable sources.