Unfuckingbelievable!

[Gia]

www.enslaveher.wordpress.com

This guy also has a book published on Amazon and apparently some Youtube videos where he preaches to an *audience* too.

Make a sacrifice and try and check it out, I know your stomach may feel like giving up at certain points in exploring his disgusting website, but please, bear with me... and help me understand how is this still possible in the 21th century.

I'm going to smoke a cigarette and throw up now.. maybe not in that particular order.

[International_Solidarity]

Oh my god. :(
What the fuck? I mean, I knew there were insane people, but what???

I was going to try to type a better comment with some meaning, but that's pretty much all I have to say.

[MDC5000]

I never saw something like that in my life.It would be so amusing if it weren't serious.

[kiwimac]

You are aware that man-woman power dynamics are infinitely subtle? That some women and men, for that matter, crave being controlled and dominated both sexually and socially? Why would this bother you? No one is asking you to do this and from the reading I have done it seems that no one goes into this without understanding.

[Flying Purple People Eater]

OP should put a trigger warning in the title. That shit is pretty harsh.


You are aware that man-woman power dynamics are infinitely subtle? That some women and men, for that matter, crave being controlled and dominated both sexually and socially? Why would this bother you? No one is asking you to do this and from the reading I have done it seems that no one goes into this without understanding.


If you don't see what's wrong with site like this - a site with the bloody title being "ENSLAVEHER.WORDPRESS" - then there is something really wrong with you.

I understand the whole consensual sexual thing about power relations that some people like to practice, but what you just said sounds ominously like some of the usual Victorian sexist garbage used to justify the abuse and oppression of women.

I mean seriously, "Some people crave being controlled"? Isn't that the same fucking excuse rapists used to use to justify their actions? "They begin to enjoy being used after a while"? That's so disgusting and wrong I don't even have a response at the ready.

[RedBen]

You are aware that man-woman power dynamics are infinitely subtle? That some women and men, for that matter, crave being controlled and dominated both sexually and socially? Why would this bother you? No one is asking you to do this and from the reading I have done it seems that no one goes into this without understanding.
i wish i knew how to utilize the neg rep option. domination as a fetish is no justification of this kind of oppressive attitude. to the OP, if i could make sense of or understand that patriarchal drivel, something would seriously be wrong with me. it's just misogynist garbage.

[rednordman]

All this is is just some glossed over sexual fantasy/fetish site which used words and rhetoric rather than images. It writes as if its theoretical, but for the most part is only tailored to a specific sexual preference (as in domination/submission with a sprinkling of masochism). The only way this will ever take of is if the world is full of men who are uncomfortable around women so this page is really there to be laughed at rather than get offended by.

[Thirsty Crow]

All this is is just some glossed over sexual fantasy/fetish site which used words and rhetoric rather than images. It writes as if its theoretical, but for the most part is only tailored to a specific sexual preference (as in domination/submission with a sprinkling of masochism). The only way this will ever take of is if the world is full of men who are uncomfortable around women so this page is really there to be laughed at rather than get offended by.

Let's see:


We find in western women today the unnatural tendency to subtly disrespect men with whom she is sexually involved...From combativeness to conversational insults. Public humiliation to fucking other men. Leaving clues for him. Wanting him to find out so that she me finally get fucked with him whimpering in the corner. This is the process of cuckolding that all western woman will put a man through if given the chance....The minds of western women have been infected by a mind virus. There is no middle ground. Either she will be in the process of cuckolding her man. Or the man will be in the process of enslaving her. A prospect that is much more satisfying to both parties involved.

Castration. Cuckolding. Cheating. Talking bad about intimate matters behind a man’s back. All these things are designed to eliminate all self-self respect from the male population, making them utterly weak, pathetic and controllable. This is the purpose for which the feminism mind virus was designed.This obviously has nothing to do with sexual fetishes. It's social, and political, and utterly reactionary.

[Comrade Chernov]

Jesus-nonexistent-christ, this is fucked up. Hell fucking no.

And I say that as a (learning) 'Master'.

(What? It seems like it would be fun to do in bed. ;)1 )

[Gia]

You are aware that man-woman power dynamics are infinitely subtle? That some women and men, for that matter, crave being controlled and dominated both sexually and socially? Why would this bother you? No one is asking you to do this and from the reading I have done it seems that no one goes into this without understanding.

I am perfectly aware of that, and I have nothing against people who *choose* to live, let's say, bdsm lifestyles, because as long as it's safe, sane, and most important of all, CONSENSUAL, it's none of my bussines. I know there are certain people who identify themselves as more submissive or dominanat by nature, again, that is entierly their bussines.

But to create a website in which you downright encourage men to go out there and enslave women with the excuse that "all women want it deep down", "all women are submissive" is just beyond disgusting. I know I saw somewhere in the comments there someone asking how to BUY and OWN a "slave", that he is willing to pay 5 000$... and he was, of course, granted an "enlightening" reply. Ex-fucking-cuse me.



Jesus-nonexistent-christ, this is fucked up. Hell fucking no.

And I say that as a (learning) 'Master'.

(What? It seems like it would be fun to do in bed. ;)1 )

Good for you then. What you do in your bedroom is only your concern, and as long as your partner voluntarily agrees to take part in this, no one should judge you for it. I can understand why this kind of power play may hold an appeal to some people, but again, that depends entierly on the INDIVIDUAL's nature and wishes, but shit like that puke-inducing website which sets the world back in the Middle Ages and beyond is just.. the very enemy of progress, evolution and civilization.

[Consistent.Surprise]

It's Maury. Don't take this crap as true; ideas are blown up & turned controversial to get an episode.

Anyone who knows a BDSM couple who is Master/slave or Mistress/ slave knows this isn't the case here. These are willing collarings & an urge to serve. Some do it 24/7 but most are only bedroom or events (a bubbly slave I know never asks her Master for permission to do things in public unless it pertains to another man playing with her. The other man also asks the Master. I almost see it like parents conversing about play dates).

This site is obviously just the same as the show: trying to create a shock factor of a twisted BDSM relationship. Any Dom/Domme will tell you it's about a lot of love & affection. I've realized how most Ds are very nurturing with their subs.

Edit: reading even more of this site & can't help laughing; this prick is so far off the spectrum of a Dominant, they would kick his ass. Few Masters would ever TOUCH on referring to it being a man/woman relationship instead they would state their other as a sub or slave.

I wanna research him more & see what I find through another site. See if he's there.

[rednordman]

To be fair that site is so sad, its entertaining. And the best of it is that i bet it isnt loner or nerdy types that endorse that shit, it actual confident successful men. Well its their sad little secret, i'll say that.

[Decolonize The Left]

It's Maury. Don't take this crap as true; ideas are blown up & turned controversial to get an episode.

Anyone who knows a BDSM couple who is Master/slave or Mistress/ slave knows this isn't the case here. These are willing collarings & an urge to serve. Some do it 24/7 but most are only bedroom or events (a bubbly slave I know never asks her Master for permission to do things in public unless it pertains to another man playing with her. The other man also asks the Master. I almost see it like parents conversing about play dates).

This site is obviously just the same as the show: trying to create a shock factor of a twisted BDSM relationship. Any Dom/Domme will tell you it's about a lot of love & affection. I've realized how most Ds are very nurturing with their subs.

Edit: reading even more of this site & can't help laughing; this prick is so far off the spectrum of a Dominant, they would kick his ass. Few Masters would ever TOUCH on referring to it being a man/woman relationship instead they would state their other as a sub or slave.

I wanna research him more & see what I find through another site. See if he's there.

I wish this were true but the way I'm reading it has very little to do with BDSM. This looks like some vile chauvinist twisted women-hating bullshit to me, maybe cloaked in BDSM hotwords and images.

[Brandon's Impotent Rage]

Why am I getting a Gorean vibe from this site? Because it comes off like something John Norman would write.

[Consistent.Surprise]

Misogynistic arsehole most likely taking advantage & preying on new subs.

I cannot find a trace of him in the community which makes him most likely an outcast. If he can't succeed on collarme, you really know there's something wrong with his ideas on the lifestyle; he's using it as a cover to manipulate & has most likely been called out by the community if he even bothered to associate with them. Frakking idiots.

And to an extent I can see the Gorean. Sadly, he sounds more like a frat boy than a geek who's kinky.

[Glitchcraft]

What crap. Reading an article from this website was a bigger waste of time than watching Pearl Harbour.

[Quail]

Dear Men,
Yesterday I met the director of english literature department at one of the biggest universities in the South at the Wal Mart. She had pretty eyes and average looks. We caught each others eye over a divider between small aisles. She immediately pushed her cart around the corner, and brushing past my shoulder, came to stand next to me. She picked up the same little straw woven crate I was holding, leaning over to reveal her small perky breasts. I inhaled her chest, and placed my hand on the v in her v neck, my thumb and index finger encircling her neck. She gasped, smiled, and immediately started releasing cascading waves of hormonal sexual response into her blood stream. He face was flushed, but was smiling, desperately happy to be touched. I said a few meaningless things to her, in a comforting strong voice before kissing her. I took her hand, interlaced our fingers, and told her to take me home.
She drove a white lexus. Her house smelled of creativity, baking, and clay. I pushed her onto the stairs directly behind the front door. Pulled down her pants to reveal wet panties. I talked dirty to her revealing to her my plans to make her my slave while I rubbed her soft flower from behind. I pulled of her panties, smacked her ass hard, and told her to take me to her bed. I sat on the bed, and had her kneel before me. I ordered her to kiss my feet, address me as Master, and blow me. All of which she did superbly. After I was done using her sexually, she made me earl grey tea, and served it to me naked with cookies. Once I was done I ordered her to write me a check for a 1000$. I came on her face and walked out. She has texted me six times since yesterday afternoon.

Yuck. This "success" story (which sounds like bullshit to be perfectly honest, but hey) basically encourages men to feel entitled to the women around them. How was the guy to know that the woman would be okay with him touching her? For every time a woman is okay with a random man touching her (which I don't imagine is very often) there must be a million other times when a woman feels violated by this kind of behaviour.

[rednordman]

Yuck. This "success" story (which sounds like bullshit to be perfectly honest, but hey) basically encourages men to feel entitled to the women around them. How was the guy to know that the woman would be okay with him touching her? For every time a woman is okay with a random man touching her (which I don't imagine is very often) there must be a million other times when a woman feels violated by this kind of behaviour.The story is total and complete bullshit. It's fantasy. The story is like the male version of 50 shades.

[Comrade Chernov]

Good for you then. What you do in your bedroom is only your concern, and as long as your partner voluntarily agrees to take part in this, no one should judge you for it. I can understand why this kind of power play may hold an appeal to some people, but again, that depends entierly on the INDIVIDUAL's nature and wishes, but shit like that puke-inducing website which sets the world back in the Middle Ages and beyond is just.. the very enemy of progress, evolution and civilization.


Oh yeah, totally. Consent is a must for this kind of thing. Hell, I only started actually, well, being a "Master" because of a mixture of one of my crush's kinks, as well as a friend of mine also being one, and him showing me the ropes (no pun intended). I actually kinda view myself as submissive in a way, I always try to fulfill my partner's wishes. I just happen to have had partners that want to be dommed. :D

In addition, a dom never forces their partner into anything. A good dom isn't violent (outside of their partner's wishes, and even then, that's not usually much to begin with). A good dom cares for their partner, they don't harass, demean, or belittle them (unless their partner wishes for them to during sex, and even during sex, that's a different context).

Furthermore, doms should not feel entitled to women's (or men's, depending on their sexual preference) bodies. This kind of relationship is about trust-building, compassion, and desire to make your partner feel like they are truly beautiful.

All this is probably TMI, though, so I'll stop that train of thought here and get back on topic. With what I said in mind, I don't consider women to be lesser than men whatsoever. Hell, I think most women are actually better people than most men on an individual level.

(That being said, most men aren't Leftists.)

[Consistent.Surprise]

I always try to fulfill my partner's wishes. I just happen to have had partners that want to be dommed. :D

Actually very Dom of you.


In addition, a dom never forces their partner into anything. A good dom isn't violent (outside of their partner's wishes, and even then, that's not usually much to begin with). A good dom cares for their partner, they don't harass, demean, or belittle them (unless their partner wishes for them to during sex, and even during sex, that's a different context).

A ton of communication takes place. Limits set, fetishes discussed, etc.

Maybe TMI but it sounds like you're understanding the workings of a healthy D/s relationship.

& rope is fun no matter which side you're on ;-)

[adipocere]

www.enslaveher.wordpress.com (http://www.enslaveher.wordpress.com)

This guy also has a book published on Amazon and apparently some Youtube videos where he preaches to an *audience* too.

Make a sacrifice and try and check it out, I know your stomach may feel like giving up at certain points in exploring his disgusting website, but please, bear with me... and help me understand how is this still possible in the 21th century.

I'm going to smoke a cigarette and throw up now.. maybe not in that particular order.

There doesn't seem to be much content, but what is there is vile - but this is sort of tame for the internet (which seems to have gotten a huge corporate makeover in the last few years) - I'm not sure a crappy blog that uses stock photos and an episode of Maury (mostly bullshit anyway) qualifies as 'unfuckingbelievable'

[Gia]

Yuck. This "success" story (which sounds like bullshit to be perfectly honest, but hey) basically encourages men to feel entitled to the women around them. How was the guy to know that the woman would be okay with him touching her? For every time a woman is okay with a random man touching her (which I don't imagine is very often) there must be a million other times when a woman feels violated by this kind of behaviour.

I do think that most of these "stories" are made up bullshit, but it's still disturbing. I find it insulting, specially because I am woman, to see a dipshit loud and proud assume that ALL women are subsmissive and men must treat them as such, holding some sort of sick nostalgia for the Neanderthal times... what the fuck. Personally, I'm not in the least a submissive individual, and I know of plenty of other women who also aren't. Should we be stoned, burned to the stake, called "non-women" or something? Why, this sounds like something conservative right-wingers would deem as "natural", something you'd see on FOX news with a bunch of white dudes and bleach blond haired women parroting about, which makes it even more idiotic.
Given the fact that I absolutely LOATHE when people make broad generalizations just to serve their purpose and interests, I must say that I would absolutely love to "dom" this guy around a bit (don't think of anything sexual, I would rather switch to abstinence), see how much his theory about women being inherently submissive stands then.

[Rss]

I actually thought that this was some kind of fetishist blog but then I read:


Use Bitcoin, Tor Browser, and anonymous online markets to subvert the global one world order. Only women need be slaves, while individual men opt out of the global control system and engage in true free market enterprise. Black Market Reloaded (only available with a Tor browser) has a section for sexual services. I await the day when sex slaves will be sold there and many more places.

...and then I was like what the actual fuck. It's like some kind of bitter loner guy set up virulently misogynistic blog with some kind of BDSM front operation.

As a sub, I can see that this isn't just a shock blog.

[Consistent.Surprise]

As a sub, I can see that this isn't just a shock blog.

Do you get shit for being a sub? I've had Doms try to convince me I just need a good beating & I will submit. Bull. Shit.

[Rss]

Do you get shit for being a sub? I've had Doms try to convince me I just need a good beating & I will submit. Bull. Shit.

Um, no? I submit to my dom because I want to. We communicate a lot and if I'm not ok with something, she respects it.

[Consistent.Surprise]

Um, no? I submit to my dom because I want to. We communicate a lot and if I'm not ok with something, she respects it.

I mean from male Doms. I've encountered a number that trash male subs. I never understood that.

[Hiero]

This obviously has nothing to do with sexual fetishes. It's social, and political, and utterly reactionary.

You could say that the author has a sexual desire around being controlled, humiliated, cuckold etc. Desire includes disavowal, they fact that this guy disavows something that is not really happening, women aren't on mass humiliating their partners in public, trying to convince their husbands to watch them have sex with other men, men aren't being castrated. The fact that someone focus so much on this imaginary scenario makes me think he has a fantasy around this sort of stuff in a dialectical desire/disavowal fascination. Sort of like those Christian anti-gay crusaders, who turn out to be having loads of sex with male prostitutes.

[L.A.P.]

I wish this were true but the way I'm reading it has very little to do with BDSM. This looks like some vile chauvinist twisted women-hating bullshit to me, maybe cloaked in BDSM hotwords and images.

...and apparently cloaked in some Nietzsche:blink:


http://enslaveher.wordpress.com/2013/05/04/nietzsche-and-self-creation/

http://enslaveher.wordpress.com/2013/05/04/friedrich-nietzsche-on-master-and-slave/

this blog is some creepy shit

[BIXX]

You could say that the author has a sexual desire around being controlled, humiliated, cuckold etc. Desire includes disavowal, they fact that this guy disavows something that is not really happening, women aren't on mass humiliating their partners in public, trying to convince their husbands to watch them have sex with other men, men aren't being castrated. The fact that someone focus so much on this imaginary scenario makes me think he has a fantasy around this sort of stuff in a dialectical desire/disavowal fascination. Sort of like those Christian anti-gay crusaders, who turn out to be having loads of sex with male prostitutes.

Do you think it's latent or closeted? Cause I believe the idea that it's bad to call homophobes "closeted homosexuals" applies here- it's bad to call a misogynist a "closeted submissive". It's kinda a different scenario, but it also kinda seems like the same thing.

If it's latent I think your comment makes more sense, and (at least to my understanding) is less oppressive.

[The Garbage Disposal Unit]

Yeah, this site def. isn't preaching healthy consensual sexual power-play: it's some wacky misogynist heteropatriarchal bullshit.

Or maybe that's just the feminist mind virus speaking through me. Roflmaotsetung.

That said, did anyone check out the article on "The Cuckoldress: The Exact Opposite of a Submissive Woman"? Not to fetishize/sexualize women's self-determination, but this shit is hot:

From the article in question - how could they not be stoked on this?!
http://enslaveher.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/cuckold-81.jpg?w=470

[Consistent.Surprise]

Yeah, this site def. isn't preaching healthy consensual sexual power-play: it's some wacky misogynist heteropatriarchal bullshit.

Or maybe that's just the feminist mind virus speaking through me. Roflmaotsetung.

That said, did anyone check out the article on "The Cuckoldress: The Exact Opposite of a Submissive Woman"? Not to fetishize/sexualize women's self-determination, but this shit is hot:

From the article in question - how could they not be stoked on this?!
http://enslaveher.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/cuckold-81.jpg?w=470

Ok. A taste of the female side. Plus, she's a lovely person & is almost my twin

http://www.domme-chronicles.com/

[Hiero]

If it's latent I think your comment makes more sense, and (at least to my understanding) is less oppressive.

Yeah latent would make more sense. And you are right it is wrong to call all homophobes closeted homosexual, and quite juivinile.


That said, did anyone check out the article on "The Cuckoldress: The Exact Opposite of a Submissive Woman"? Not to fetishize/sexualize women's self-determination, but this shit is hot:

Lol that is what I mean. This guy is so against this supposed subduing by women, yet he writes something so sexually charged like that.

[Flying Purple People Eater]

'Feminist Mind Virus' oh lawd.

[Decolonize The Left]

...and apparently cloaked in some Nietzsche:blink:


http://enslaveher.wordpress.com/2013/05/04/nietzsche-and-self-creation/

http://enslaveher.wordpress.com/2013/05/04/friedrich-nietzsche-on-master-and-slave/

this blog is some creepy shit

I did see that. It's quite upsetting really but very common for Nietzsche's words to be misinterpreted; I mean, his sister got folks thinking he was a Nazi. That was quite the feat given his abhorrence of the state, nationalism, etc...

[Dennis the 'Bloody Peasant']

Nothing more intelligent to add other than what a vile, pathetic streak of smelly discharge this guy is and how what he posits bears no resemblance to a healthy attitude to human sexuality, hell even to basic humanity

[human strike]

This shit is misogynist recuperation; just like in mainstream porn (or all porn?) where a radical notion of consent and the desire for fulfilling and pleasurable experience in BDSM is removed. The spectacle takes BDSM, refines it, and spits out an image as commodity fit for consumption in a patriarchal capitalist media market.