Shouldn't this sub-forum be higher up the list?

[Angry Young Man]

I mean, being a revolutionary isn't about erudite discussions and so forth: it's about bringing people into the struggle, but the layout puts it below discussion topics. Theory is for sure important, but it should take place alongside participation.

[Ele'ill]

I mean, being a revolutionary isn't about erudite discussions and so forth: it's about bringing people into the struggle,

no it isn't




but the layout puts it below discussion topics. Theory is for sure important, but it should take place alongside participation.

mod, move this thread to theory

[Angry Young Man]

no it isn't

Eurocom ¬_¬

[blake 3:17]

Yeah, I'd agree with the OP in spirit. Not sure if I'd motivate a change. I tend to look most at the forums I find most interesting.

[Decolonize The Left]

Generally speaking, forums in the main board have more traffic than those not (other than Chit Chat and Non-Poli). This forum probably doesn't have enough activity to merit being moved.

[Angry Young Man]

Which is a problem tbh. The most important thing is to be active.

[Ace High]

Honestly I admire your enthusiasm to bring people into the struggle, but.... People who aren't in the struggle aren't going to browse around on RevLeft and look at the Practice and Propaganda forum hoping to be "brainwashed by radical leftists." These forums are more for people already enlightened or seeking enlightenment to sort of convene and talk about issues facing us. Bringing people into the struggle is more of something you have to do in the real world.

[Sentinel]

I wholeheartedly agree that Revleft should put more focus on organising, or more precisely, encouraging and helping people to get organised. This is the wrong forum to discuss board structure though.

OP, when you reach 1200 posts and are transferred to the Committed Usergroup, you can make a proposals to change policy and structure. You should perhaps propose this then.

Thread closed.