Log in

View Full Version : Rand Paul’s team has another white supremacist



Sasha
10th July 2013, 00:58
Rand Paul’s team has another white supremacist (http://www.salon.com/2013/07/09/rand_pauls_team_has_another_white_supremacist/)

A top staffer is exposed as a pro-secessionist radical, but it's not the first neo-Confederate on staff

By Alex Seitz-Wald (http://www.salon.com/writer/alex_seitz_wald/)http://media.salon.com/2013/05/rand_paul6-620x412.jpg (http://media.salon.com/2013/05/rand_paul6.jpg)Rand Paul (Credit: Jeff Malet, maletphoto.com)
Jack Hunter, who co-authored Rand Paul’s 2011 book and now directs new media for the Kentucky senator, has a past alter ego as the “Southern Avenger,” a provocative radio personality known for wearing a luchador mask (http://s3.freebeacon.com/up/2013/07/1Photo.png) emblazoned with the Confederate flag and for making outrageous comments about race and Southern secession, Alana Goodman of the Washington Free Beacon reveals today (http://freebeacon.com/rebel-yell/).
As the arguably white nationalist Southern Avenger, Hunter praised the assassination of Abraham Lincoln, saying he “raise[s] a personal toast every May 10 to celebrate John Wilkes Booth’s birthday,” compared Lincoln to Saddam Hussein, and suggested the great American president would have had a homosexual relationship with Adolf Hitler, had the two ever met. He also advocated against Hispanic immigration and in favor of white pride, warning that a “non-white majority America would simply cease to be America.”
Prior to that, Hunter was a prominent neo-Confederate and pro-secession activist, serving as a chairman in the League of the South, which, according to its website (http://dixienet.org/rights/corebeliefs.shtml), “advocates the secession and subsequent independence of the Southern states from this forced union and the formation of a Southern republic.”
Many have called the League implicitly racist, but Hunter denied this in an interview with the Free Beacon, and disavowed many of his earlier statements, chalking it up to the naiveté of youth. “I was a young person, it was a fairly radical group — the same way a person on the left might be attracted in college to some left-wing radical groups.” (He said in 2009, when he was in mid-30s, that he still believed much of it — “In fact, I might be getting worse” — and he continued to produce the radio show until 2012, when Paul hired him full-time.)
And the worst part for Paul-land is that it’s hardly the first time something like this has come up. In late 2009, Rand Paul’s campaign spokesperson was forced to resign (http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/05/flashback_paul_spokesman_resigned_over_racist_mysp .php) after Kentucky blogger Joe Sonka discovered the MySpace page for Chris Hightower’s heavy metal band, which was a fan of KKK gear and wishing people a “HAPPY N***ER DAY!!!” on Martin Luther King Day (that post was accompanied by a photo of a lynching). There was also, of course, Paul’s momentary opposition (http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/rand-pauls-rewriting-of-his-own-remarks-on-the-civil-rights-act/2013/04/10/5b8d91c4-a235-11e2-82bc-511538ae90a4_blog.html) to the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
As Dave Weigel pointed out (https://twitter.com/daveweigel/status/354612487146061824) on Twitter, “Jack Hunter was the Ron Paul 2012 campaign’s main blogger. Not like he appeared out of nowhere.” And the elder Paul has seen his own problems here, after a trove of dozens of racist newsletters (http://www.salon.com/2011/12/22/ron_paul_and_his_racist_newsletters/) sent under his name emerged two years ago. Paul denied writing them, saying they were ghostwritten and he didn’t read them closely enough before giving approval to attach his name. And here’s a video (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xEC68vTQwP8) of Ron Paul last year in front of a giant Confederate flag giving a speech essentially saying the South was right in the Civil War (but not about the slavery part). Paul has also invited neo-Confederate activists to testify (http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2011/02/09/ron-paul-invites-witness-with-neo-confederate-ties-to-testify-in-congress/) before Congress. And then there’s the cast of characters on the advisory board (http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/ron_paul_casts_lot_with_extremists_conspiracy_theo rists_partner/) of Paul’s new post-retirement political organization.
It’d be bad for any politician, but Rand Paul has tried to build a brand that sets him apart from the rest of the GOP and to make himself more appealing to non-typical Republican voters, like minorities, so the damage could be especially severe. An interesting side note is the fact that the FreeBeacon, a conservative publication, broke the story. The website has staunchly pro-Israel views and tends to side with the muscular foreign policy wing of the movement, which is often at odds with Paul’s anti-interventionist views.
UPDATE: In September of 2010, Paul’s Democratic opponent called on him (http://video.msnbc.msn.com/hardball/39407980) to return $1,200 in donations from three “white separatists,” Virginia Abernethy, William Johnson and Carl Ford. Paul refused, with a spokesperson telling (http://www.barefootandprogressive.com/2010/09/rand-paul-keeping-white-power-money-but-its-ok-because-he-has-black-friends.html) the Louisville Courier-Journal: “Dr. Paul condemns hatred and discrimination, and if the white separatists who donated to his campaign think he shares their views they are badly mistaken and would be in for a rude awakening when they see that 20% of his campaign staff is made up of African-Americans.” The state chairman of the League of the South was also involved (http://www.barefootandprogressive.com/2010/05/why-does-rand-pauls-new-campaign-manager-work-with-a-white-supremacist.html) in a Paul-affiliated organization.

(http://www.salon.com/2013/07/09/rand_pauls_team_has_another_white_supremacist/)
http://media.salon.com/2012/03/AlexSeitzWaldBio-75x75.png (http://www.salon.com/writer/alex_seitz_wald/) Alex Seitz-Wald is Salon's political reporter. Email him at [email protected], and follow him on Twitter @aseitzwald (http://www.twitter.com/aseitzwald). More Alex Seitz-Wald. (http://www.salon.com/writer/alex_seitz_wald/)



source: http://www.salon.com/2013/07/09/rand_pauls_team_has_another_white_supremacist/

MarxArchist
10th July 2013, 01:41
Free market racism. The new fascism.

Klaatu
10th July 2013, 01:52
Free market racism. The new fascism.

History repeats, don't you know.

Sasha
11th July 2013, 13:02
TPM Editor’s Blog (http://editors.talkingpointsmemo.com/)

Keeping It Real on ‘neo-Confederate Libertarians’

http://static.talkingpointsmemo.com/images/social_facebook.png?c=51 (http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php)
Share this story on Facebook

Tweet this story
http://static.talkingpointsmemo.com/images/social_email.png?c=51 (?subject=Keeping%20It%20Real%20on%20%E2%80%98neo-Confederate%20Libertarians%E2%80%99&body=Check%20out%20this%20article%20on%20TPM:%20ht tp://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2013/07/keeping_it_real_on_neo-confederate_libertarians.php)
Email this story to a friend
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/assets_c/2012/07/Stars-And-Bars-Belt-Buckle-cropped-proto-custom_28.jpg Josh Marshall (http://talkingpointsmemo.com/josh_marshall.php) July 10, 2013, 11:34 PM Why do the Pauls have such a problem again and again getting tied up with neo-Confederates and borderline white supremacists? It’s not just a prime example of that classic Onion headline (http://www.theonion.com/articles/why-do-all-these-homosexuals-keep-sucking-my-cock,10861/?ref=auto) “Why Do All These Homosexuals Keep Sucking My C$#k?” It goes to the heart of what contemporary libertarianism is - or to put it more precisely, how there are very different movements and political agendas operating under that one label.
This whole subject has come up again because of the latest Rand Paul ghostwriter/aide brouhaha (http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/sen-paul-aide-says-his-old-racist-secessionist). And one-time TPMer Rachel Weiner has a excellent reported piece (http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/07/10/the-libertarian-war-over-the-civil-war/) in the Post getting libertarians’ view on the stark division between the ‘neo-Confederate’ wing of their movement and what they call “cosmotarians.” It’s a good piece and she talks to various academics and activists within the libertarian movement.
But let me call a polite time out on this whole debate. The idea that there is a ideological divide or set of philosophical questions or priorities that makes some libertarians embrace the Confederacy and secession and despise Abraham Lincoln while others do not is, to put it generously, nonsense. Neo-Conderates, pro-secessionists, whatever else you want to call them are varying hues of white supremacists or to put it even more simply, racists. That’s not an accusation. It’s simply identifying them as a distinct political strain in American politics.
They may not be violent or actively call for legal discrimination against blacks or other non-whites. It’s also not wholly bound up with the racial polarity of whites and blacks. It also feeds off related but not identical nativist traditions in US politics, which adds an additional dose of conspiracy thinking and paranoia about the government being in the hands of sinister alien forces. But let’s not kid ourselves. That is what neo-Confederacy and all the rest of it are about, a vision of white supremacy expressed through a retrospective embrace of the Confederacy and the racial mores of the Jim Crow era. No one familiar with this phenomenon can question this.
Now I’m not saying that people who do Civil War reenactments or even people who are just really into Confederate history and nostalgia are like the folks I’m describing. Being a bit too much into Confederate nostalgia may be a sign of some questionable politics. But we’re talking here about a very specific neo-Confederate political movement in the United States, with a group of known voices, magazines and institutions, which has somehow managed to get itself listed as ‘libertarian’.
Let me also say that I don’t think this has anything to do with the people at the Cato Institute or Reason magazine or most of the other people tied to the libertarian movement or Libertarian party going back forty years or so. It’s not a movement I agree with on many things. But it’s philosophically consistent, isn’t basically about race but is a form or what I’d call hyper-individualism. Not my cup of tea but a perfectly legitimate political movement.
Part of the confusion, of course, if we can call it that, is that libertarians and ‘neo-Confederates’ do meet up on opposition to certain exertions of state power. Libertarians on principle; neo-Confederates because that’s been the main vehicle for vindicating the rights of non-whites. More deeply though there’s something about how the rhetoric of ‘freedom’ and ‘liberty’ appeals to the ‘neo-Confederate’ mindset which is paradoxical and considerably more toxic and corrosive than the ways many of us think about those terms. Freedom can also mean freedom from any check on my actions. My freedom. My group’s freedom. A warlord who totally dominates his followers has a sort of perfect liberty and freedom. Just not quite the sort we think of in a civic context. It’s the same authoritarian mindset of Stormfront and the militia crazies, just through this looking glass where it twists into ‘freedom’ and ‘liberty’.
It’s not for me to referee the intramural disputes within the libertarian movement. I’m sure they have no desire for me to try. But the neo-Confederates, the Lew Rockwells and that whole crew are fundamentally about white supremacy and nativism. And the Paul clan has been thick as thieves with those folks forever.
Who knows what’s in their hearts and frankly who cares? But none of this latest stuff should surprise us. And I don’t know why real libertarians waste any time making any sort of common cause with these folks. ‘Neo-Confederacy’ isn’t some outgrowth of or logical deduction from libertarianism. You’re a neo-Confederate because you believe in white supremacy. People who just can’t figure why good upstanding libertarians keep ending up finding themselves connected up with people who really don’t seem to like black people or Hispanics and believe in weird conspiracy theories about black helicopters stealing your lawn furniture really need to reread that Onion article (http://www.theonion.com/articles/why-do-all-these-homosexuals-keep-sucking-my-cock,10861/?ref=auto).


source: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2013/07/keeping_it_real_on_neo-confederate_libertarians.php