Log in

View Full Version : Why no nazis?



A Pict
10th January 2004, 17:32
Im little reluctant to continue posting here, after seeing the member pics (your all fucking children)...


But why aren' t nazis allowed to post, even in the Opposing Idealogies Forum?


What makes them so much worse then you? And i don't give a shit about intentions. I won't ever be able to know the "true" intentions of communists- just as i won't even be able to know the "true" intentions of nazis.

Bolshevika
10th January 2004, 17:36
They've all been sent to the gulags and will never return. You saw nothing.

monkeydust
10th January 2004, 17:38
Unlike capitalism, which certainly has a strong argument going for it, Nazism...well doesn't.

Nazism can be proved to be 'wrong' and irrational, the arguments of supporters boil down to 'becuase it is'
Why are Jews worse than you? 'because they are'
Why are blacks inferior 'Because they are' etc etc.

Nazism is simply not a credible ideology, it is one of the few things most of us can say for sure is wrong. It's certainly illogical but it is dangerous, many weak minded people will follow Nazi thetoric.


Besides, the majority of Nazi posts on here are just spam.

Y2A
10th January 2004, 17:40
Of course Nazi's are banned. Imagine how mad they get when I, a leftist moderate, debate with them. Can you imagine a Nazi or Fascist debating with them. There heads would explode.

Pete
10th January 2004, 17:45
The board is hosting in Germany. Germany has strong anti-racist anti-Nazi laws. To keep the maintainer of this board out of trouble with the German authorities he complies with the laws of his jurisdiction. It is as simple as that.

JustSoul
10th January 2004, 17:46
I do not agree with nazis at all. Majority of them are stupid and arrogant people but they do have an explanation why blacks for example are worse in some areas then whites.

Including Iq test researches and violent crime statistics.

A Pict
10th January 2004, 17:47
'because they are'


I guess you haven't run into any real nazis then (TTR-style for those from UP).


They usually use historic "evidence" (about as objectable as marx's) for the jews, and stastical evidence for the blacks.


Nazism is simply not a credible ideology, it is one of the few things most of us can say for sure is wrong. It's certainly illogical but it is dangerous, many weak minded people will follow Nazi thetoric.

And children buy into the communist crap-o-la, and they are just as dangerous. Listen to you crackpots talking enslavement of the bourgerie, etc.

monkeydust
10th January 2004, 18:15
Originally posted by A [email protected] 10 2004, 06:47 PM

'because they are'


I guess you haven't run into any real nazis then (TTR-style for those from UP).


They usually use historic "evidence" (about as objectable as marx's) for the jews, and stastical evidence for the blacks.


Nazism is simply not a credible ideology, it is one of the few things most of us can say for sure is wrong. It's certainly illogical but it is dangerous, many weak minded people will follow Nazi thetoric.

And children buy into the communist crap-o-la, and they are just as dangerous. Listen to you crackpots talking enslavement of the bourgerie, etc.
No I havn't run into a large number of Nazi's in my time. Either way how can you call their evidence objective when it was nearly all collected in Nazi Germany. Imagine the conversation.

Hitler 'Can you get me some evidence to why blacks are inferior'

Scientist: 'Yeah no worries' (Theres actually no evidence but never mind I don't wanna get my head kicked in'

Scientist: 'Here's your evidence mate (he won't realise its bollocks'

Hitler: 'Cheers mate (I was right all along)'

I'm not being literal by the way.


My point is. It has been proven beyond any doubt that Blacks are not inferior to whites, and neither are Jews in a biological sense. Though the Jews may have caused problems at the time (and now) it's not all a product of their genes.

How can you rationally argue that wipig out so many races (slavs, Jews, Blacks, Asians etc.) is beneficial to mankind? It simply isn't, I'd gladly like to see you try.


when did I ever say anything about enslaving the bourgeoise? These people (who don't know a lot) are in the minority.

kylie
10th January 2004, 18:28
Originally posted by [email protected] 10 2004, 07:46 PM
I do not agree with nazis at all. Majority of them are stupid and arrogant people but they do have an explanation why blacks for example are worse in some areas then whites.

Including Iq test researches and violent crime statistics.
IQ tests are unreliable and biased, as i've explained before.
IQ tests have proven to be completely unreliable in terms of giving a standard measure of intelligence.
Seeing as how anyone can claim have created an online proper IQ test, the results from this kind cannot really be taken seriously at all. Plus there is many variables that canot be controlled in this type, such as time taken, the surrounding environment of the participant, how the person views the test(though this can apply to real-world IQ tests too), etc. All these will vary from person to person, affect how the person performs in the test, but are ignored by the test itself.
IQ tests taken phsyically, so not online ones, too are unreliable and give results as such give little insight into the 'intelligence' of a person. Factors such as culture, social class and gender affecting results. Some cultures may for example place less priority on speed, unlike how we do in western society. As such they will be less likely to be able to finish tests within the time limits(as shown by Klineberg). These differences reveal the bias in IQ tests towards western society, and within that towards those from a higher income or middle class culture(the language of these tests as with all tests related to education being strictly of the formal elaborated code, which it has been shown is linked to household income.)
There has also been shown to be little link between IQ and educational achievement. It was found that when a sample of people with average IQs were taken, inside this there would be a big range of qualifications(Bowles and Gintis).

Violent crime can be explained if it is true that blacks or other non-white ethnicities participate in it more, as an effect of other things, such as the higher chance of being working class.

canikickit
10th January 2004, 18:31
What makes them so much worse then you?

I don't think there's any reason for you to post here.

Believe it or not, not every member posted their picture in the picture thread.
It's quite silly that you discount someone's opinion entirely due to their age.

Hampton
10th January 2004, 18:53
Originally posted by [email protected] 10 2004, 01:46 PM
Majority of them are stupid and arrogant people but they do have an explanation why blacks for example are worse in some areas then whites.

Including Iq test researches and violent crime statistics.
Whooo, it goes both fucking ways. Whoo de doo, let's throw a party!

Pedro Alonso Lopez
10th January 2004, 19:47
I'm 104.

JustSoul
10th January 2004, 19:58
IQ tests have proven to be completely unreliable in terms of giving a standard measure of intelligence.
Seeing as how anyone can claim have created an online proper IQ test, the results from this kind cannot really be taken seriously at all. Plus there is many variables that canot be controlled in this type, such as time taken, the surrounding environment of the participant, how the person views the test(though this can apply to real-world IQ tests too), etc. All these will vary from person to person, affect how the person performs in the test, but are ignored by the test itself.
IQ tests taken phsyically, so not online ones, too are unreliable and give results as such give little insight into the 'intelligence' of a person. Factors such as culture, social class and gender affecting results. Some cultures may for example place less priority on speed, unlike how we do in western society. As such they will be less likely to be able to finish tests within the time limits(as shown by Klineberg). These differences reveal the bias in IQ tests towards western society, and within that towards those from a higher income or middle class culture(the language of these tests as with all tests related to education being strictly of the formal elaborated code, which it has been shown is linked to household income.)
There has also been shown to be little link between IQ and educational achievement. It was found that when a sample of people with average IQs were taken, inside this there would be a big range of qualifications(Bowles and Gintis).

Bullshit. IQ tests are not the 100% proof of course but they are more reliable then you think. And of course no amount of intelligence will save you if you have no working ethics. So someone with lower iq can be a lot more sucessfull but that doesn't mean iq tests suck.

Misodoctakleidist
10th January 2004, 20:00
I thought nazi's believed that 'aryans' came from a different planet and came to earth on a mtereorite or something stupid like that.

The Feral Underclass
10th January 2004, 21:34
Why should we debate with people who condone and advocate this....we have nothing to say to them....

The Feral Underclass
10th January 2004, 21:36
We will not compromise with them....

John Galt
10th January 2004, 21:36
Is that a nazi death camp or a communist gulag?

The Feral Underclass
10th January 2004, 21:38
We will not listen to them....this is what they believe!

commie kg
10th January 2004, 21:40
Originally posted by [email protected] 10 2004, 01:00 PM
I thought nazi's believed that 'aryans' came from a different planet and came to earth on a mtereorite or something stupid like that.
I believe Hitler thought that "Aryans" came from the center of the Earth. He believed that the Earth was hollow, and Aryans lived inside it. Much of Nazism was deeply rooted in the occult.

Ortega
10th January 2004, 21:41
Originally posted by [email protected] 10 2004, 01:46 PM
I do not agree with nazis at all. Majority of them are stupid and arrogant people but they do have an explanation why blacks for example are worse in some areas then whites.

Including Iq test researches and violent crime statistics.
I thought we banned racists.

The reason that violent crime is up among blacks is because of America's constant discrimination against them. Blacks are oppressed and still refused jobs in some places. In the 1920s and 30s, when all of white America was moving to the suburbs, the black Americans were left in the inner city. At that time, it was completely fair to refuse blacks jobs, and refuse to treat them normally because of their skin color. Such discrimination led to poverty, meaning that the blacks of America couldn't leave the inner cities. In the inner cities, there is violence. And a large percentage of African-Americans are still in the cities, still very much discriminated against, sadly. Thus, violent crime statistics are up among blacks. If more whites lived in the inner cities, violence among whites would be just as high. It's not about the skin color, its about where the people that the statistics represent live.

And as for the IQ test results - it's the same thing. How do you expect someone with a substandard, inner city education to get an amazing score on an IQ test?? IQ tests measure nothing but how well you know the things youve learned in school, anyway.

So basically, large percentages of people, white or black, in any city tend to be violent and do substandardly on IQ test. It just happens to be that a large percentage of the people living in the inner city are black. If the tables were turned, if the inner city was mostly white, and the suburbs were mostly black, I can guarantee you that the white people of America would be just as violent, and score just as badly on tests.

If that makes any sense...

The Feral Underclass
10th January 2004, 21:42
This is what they want....why should they be given a voice?

Ortega
10th January 2004, 21:43
Originally posted by commie kg+Jan 10 2004, 05:40 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (commie kg @ Jan 10 2004, 05:40 PM)
[email protected] 10 2004, 01:00 PM
I thought nazi&#39;s believed that &#39;aryans&#39; came from a different planet and came to earth on a mtereorite or something stupid like that.
I believe Hitler thought that "Aryans" came from the center of the Earth. He believed that the Earth was hollow, and Aryans lived inside it. Much of Nazism was deeply rooted in the occult. [/b]
Wow. I never knew that... :huh:

The Feral Underclass
10th January 2004, 21:44
Nazism ís evil.....

John Galt
10th January 2004, 21:45
Originally posted by [email protected] 10 2004, 10:41 PM
It just happens to be that a large percentage of the people living in the inner city are black.
They can put up a faintly credible argument that black people live their because they are inferior and cant get jobs because white people are better than them in every way.

John Galt
10th January 2004, 21:47
Originally posted by Ortega+Jan 10 2004, 10:43 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Ortega @ Jan 10 2004, 10:43 PM)
Originally posted by commie [email protected] 10 2004, 05:40 PM

[email protected] 10 2004, 01:00 PM
I thought nazi&#39;s believed that &#39;aryans&#39; came from a different planet and came to earth on a mtereorite or something stupid like that.
I believe Hitler thought that "Aryans" came from the center of the Earth. He believed that the Earth was hollow, and Aryans lived inside it. Much of Nazism was deeply rooted in the occult.
Wow. I never knew that... :huh: [/b]
Im not too sure of that "they came from the centre of the earth" business, but hitler was a member of some anti-jewish mystical cult. The name was something like opera.

monkeydust
10th January 2004, 21:54
Hitler didn&#39;t believe that Aryans came to earth on a meteorite.

He thought that that a race of giant aryans living under the Earth was a possibility (a small one though some of hos deputies notably Himmler thought it more likely and sent people to Tibet to investigate it)

Hitler also believed that Jews were trying to take over the world through communism.

Soviet power supreme
10th January 2004, 21:55
Universal Declaration of Human Rights Article 19.

Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.

Seems that you guys are breaking the UN article. :D

Ortega
10th January 2004, 22:04
Originally posted by John Galt+Jan 10 2004, 05:45 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (John Galt @ Jan 10 2004, 05:45 PM)
[email protected] 10 2004, 10:41 PM
It just happens to be that a large percentage of the people living in the inner city are black.
They can put up a faintly credible argument that black people live their because they are inferior and cant get jobs because white people are better than them in every way. [/b]
Are you a cappie or not? You&#39;re confusing me Johnny. Well if you are a cappie, you&#39;re not a bad one.

Maybe they could put up an argument, but only a faint one. The blacks are quite obviously living in the inner cities today because they were exploited by greedy, capitalist, plantation owners back in the early 1800s. If Slavery had never occured in North America, things would be quite different.

canikickit
10th January 2004, 22:07
Originally posted by Soviet power [email protected] 10 2004, 10:55 PM
Universal Declaration of Human Rights Article 19.

Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.

Seems that you guys are breaking the UN article. :D
Horseshit my friend.
There rights are not being restricted, they are just not being provided a platform to do so here. Why should they be?

John Galt
10th January 2004, 22:11
Originally posted by Ortega+Jan 10 2004, 11:04 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Ortega @ Jan 10 2004, 11:04 PM)
Originally posted by John [email protected] 10 2004, 05:45 PM

[email protected] 10 2004, 10:41 PM
It just happens to be that a large percentage of the people living in the inner city are black.
They can put up a faintly credible argument that black people live their because they are inferior and cant get jobs because white people are better than them in every way.
Are you a cappie or not? You&#39;re confusing me Johnny. Well if you are a cappie, you&#39;re not a bad one.

Maybe they could put up an argument, but only a faint one. The blacks are quite obviously living in the inner cities today because they were exploited by greedy, capitalist, plantation owners back in the early 1800s. If Slavery had never occured in North America, things would be quite different. [/b]
Jesus Christ&#33; Someone needs to read more. I thought it would be fairly obvious what side Im on.

(Hint Hint, I appear in an Ayn Rand book)


Their argument is credible on the surface, as its supported by science. That science however is unreliable.

Ortega
10th January 2004, 22:11
Originally posted by canikickit+Jan 10 2004, 06:07 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (canikickit @ Jan 10 2004, 06:07 PM)
Soviet power [email protected] 10 2004, 10:55 PM
Universal Declaration of Human Rights Article 19.

Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.

Seems that you guys are breaking the UN article. :D
Horseshit my friend.
There rights are not being restricted, they are just not being provided a platform to do so here. Why should they be? [/b]
It is a leftist forum after all.

There are forums much better suited for these cappies (http://www.***************/forum/), after all.

Ortega
10th January 2004, 22:13
Originally posted by John Galt+Jan 10 2004, 06:11 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (John Galt @ Jan 10 2004, 06:11 PM)
Originally posted by [email protected] 10 2004, 11:04 PM

Originally posted by John [email protected] 10 2004, 05:45 PM

[email protected] 10 2004, 10:41 PM
It just happens to be that a large percentage of the people living in the inner city are black.
They can put up a faintly credible argument that black people live their because they are inferior and cant get jobs because white people are better than them in every way.
Are you a cappie or not? You&#39;re confusing me Johnny. Well if you are a cappie, you&#39;re not a bad one.

Maybe they could put up an argument, but only a faint one. The blacks are quite obviously living in the inner cities today because they were exploited by greedy, capitalist, plantation owners back in the early 1800s. If Slavery had never occured in North America, things would be quite different.
Jesus Christ&#33; Someone needs to read more. I thought it would be fairly obvious what side Im on.

(Hint Hint, I appear in an Ayn Rand book)


Their argument is credible on the surface, as its supported by science. That science however is unreliable. [/b]
I knew that you were a cappie. I don&#39;t read Ayn Rand, but your posts make it pretty obvious. It&#39;s just not often that I come across a cappie willing to do anything but whine and rant about how much he/she/it loves Bush.

A Pict
11th January 2004, 04:27
So, a picture of starving children. Communists starved children. STFU on USSR not being communist---They were the means, as advocated by fucking Marx, your god damn hero, to achieve your end. Dictatorship of the proletarite.

The nazis didn&#39;t do anything so despeciable that the communists couldn&#39;t match. Although, the comunists did kill statstically more.

Hampton
11th January 2004, 05:25
Originally posted by A [email protected] 11 2004, 12:27 AM
The nazis didn&#39;t do anything so despeciable that the communists couldn&#39;t match. Although, the comunists did kill statstically more.
Yea, like those six million Jews that Stalin murdered right? What the fuck are you talking about?

John Galt
11th January 2004, 05:38
Originally posted by Hampton+Jan 11 2004, 06:25 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Hampton @ Jan 11 2004, 06:25 AM)
A [email protected] 11 2004, 12:27 AM
The nazis didn&#39;t do anything so despeciable that the communists couldn&#39;t match. Although, the comunists did kill statstically more.
Yea, like those six million Jews that Stalin murdered right? What the fuck are you talking about? [/b]
More like the 20 million he murdered

moncadista
11th January 2004, 06:18
to dispell the aryan under the earth rumour, the nazis, like many aryan-supremacists, believed that the aryans originated from atlantis. they were that effing stupid. in fact. upon hitlers rise to power, he created a hybrid religion of extreme christianity and anglo-nordic rune history. that is where the ss symbol and swastika originated. the ss being the double seig rune, seig being german for victory i believe. and the swastika being a altered version of another rune (cant remember the name.) one of hitlers confidantes claimed to have been shown a ancient version of the runic futhark alphabet in his sleep that suposedly originated in atlantis. needless to say, those nazis were a bunch of nutters. not only were the racist, murdering scumbags, but they thought they were from atlantis&#33;

A Pict
11th January 2004, 06:22
While communists are only classist murdering scumbags.

FistFullOfSteel
11th January 2004, 06:31
garbage

moncadista
11th January 2004, 06:34
you are being a moron. you cant elaborate a little morethan petty mudslinging. if you are going to be a fascist, at least be able to justify it. also, you are such a attention seeker. comming on a leftist board so you can try and piss us off.

if it was you who said some thing about the universal declaration of human rights, the UDHR is not a legal document. it is just a bunch of unenforcable guidelines for countries to aspire too. it also cant override hatespeach laws. as someone already metioned, some of these boards are hosted in germany, which has strict hate speach laws. therefore, you can be held acountable under german law, no matter what the UDHR says. if you want to prove a point, quote a document that has bearing on the issue at hand, not some flimsy piece of paper asking everyone to get along, yet does nothing about it.

moncadista
11th January 2004, 06:48
By the way.. being a communist dosen&#39;t mean excusing what Stalin did. i think that many of the things that happened during that period were despicable. but then think of the people who die by the hand of your capitalist regimes. the nearly one million childeren who starved to death in Iraq due to the sanctions imposed on that country between the first and second oil wars. the people who died in the CIA backed coup in chile that ushered in agausto pinochet (spelling?) or the people who died due to the contras, bloody CIA trained/funded guerillas who killed thousands trying to stop the sandanista government from freeing Nicaragua from the Samoza regime. im a communist, but that doesn&#39;t mean i support all the actions of communist governments.

synthesis
11th January 2004, 07:16
So discrimination against the rich is as morally wrong as discrimination against the Jews?

JustSoul
11th January 2004, 07:33
Originally posted by Ortega+Jan 10 2004, 10:41 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Ortega @ Jan 10 2004, 10:41 PM)
[email protected] 10 2004, 01:46 PM
I do not agree with nazis at all. Majority of them are stupid and arrogant people but they do have an explanation why blacks for example are worse in some areas then whites.

Including Iq test researches and violent crime statistics.
I thought we banned racists.

The reason that violent crime is up among blacks is because of America&#39;s constant discrimination against them. Blacks are oppressed and still refused jobs in some places. In the 1920s and 30s, when all of white America was moving to the suburbs, the black Americans were left in the inner city. At that time, it was completely fair to refuse blacks jobs, and refuse to treat them normally because of their skin color. Such discrimination led to poverty, meaning that the blacks of America couldn&#39;t leave the inner cities. In the inner cities, there is violence. And a large percentage of African-Americans are still in the cities, still very much discriminated against, sadly. Thus, violent crime statistics are up among blacks. If more whites lived in the inner cities, violence among whites would be just as high. It&#39;s not about the skin color, its about where the people that the statistics represent live.

And as for the IQ test results - it&#39;s the same thing. How do you expect someone with a substandard, inner city education to get an amazing score on an IQ test?? IQ tests measure nothing but how well you know the things youve learned in school, anyway.

So basically, large percentages of people, white or black, in any city tend to be violent and do substandardly on IQ test. It just happens to be that a large percentage of the people living in the inner city are black. If the tables were turned, if the inner city was mostly white, and the suburbs were mostly black, I can guarantee you that the white people of America would be just as violent, and score just as badly on tests.

If that makes any sense... [/b]
Let&#39;s not argue about violence statistics , because it can&#39;t be really proved.

But about iq tests i can prove your wrong. People doing the study were not dumb,no not at all. 50 or so middle class white families have taken black , mixed and white children at the age of 1. Some of the families that thought they took black had mixed child. So they were all taking iq tests through out school. In the end average black result was lower then average mixed and whites came on top. Also those mixed kids that thought they are black have scored higher then blacks.

The Feral Underclass
11th January 2004, 08:02
So, a picture of starving children. Communists starved children. STFU on USSR not being communist---They were the means, as advocated by fucking Marx, your god damn hero, to achieve your end. Dictatorship of the proletarite.

The nazis didn&#39;t do anything so despeciable that the communists couldn&#39;t match. Although, the comunists did kill statstically more.

The USSR etc were not communist...stalin was not a communist&#33;&#33;&#33;

redstar2000
11th January 2004, 11:44
So, a picture of starving children. Communists starved children. STFU on USSR not being communist---They were the means, as advocated by fucking Marx, your god damn hero, to achieve your end. Dictatorship of the proletariat.

STFU?

"fucking Marx"?

"your god damn hero"?

And these are the kind of people who have come to this board seeking "intelligent discussion"? Who say they believe in "logic" and "evidence"?

The mask has slipped a little, don&#39;t you think?

http://anarchist-action.org/forums/images/smiles/redstar.gif

The RedStar2000 Papers (http://www.anarchist-action.org/marxists/redstar2000/)
A site about communist ideas

revolutionindia
11th January 2004, 12:25
Nazis=mentally retarded children

Che-lives is not a online asylum

Soviet power supreme
11th January 2004, 13:02
I looked that Ortega&#39;s link
http://www.***************/forum/

Damn Nazis outnumbers us by more than 4 times.Who told that we when revolution comes we outnumber them.

synthesis
11th January 2004, 20:14
I doubt it. Stormfront had an entire HBO special devoted to them, and while it is true that the entire thing was designed to put it in a bad light (not very hard), it still raises quite a bit of curiosity.

I wouldn&#39;t mistake forum populations for actual demographics, Soviet Power Supreme.

A Pict
11th January 2004, 20:30
So discrimination against the rich is as morally wrong as discrimination against the Jews?

Why wouldn&#39;t it be? They are both irrational prejudices.



And these are the kind of people who have come to this board seeking "intelligent discussion"? Who say they believe in "logic" and "evidence"?

The mask has slipped a little, don&#39;t you think?

What mask? (also of note, that was not a refutation. :) )


Nazis=mentally retarded children

Che-lives is not a online asylum


I thought this was espcially amusing considering the age demographic of this board... hehe.

synthesis
11th January 2004, 20:47
Why wouldn&#39;t it be? They are both irrational prejudices.

But you can change the fact that you&#39;re rich. Give up your wealth and join the ranks of the common people.

You can never, ever change your race. That&#39;s the scary part - if your name ends with a Stein, or a Berg, or a Baum, you&#39;re slated for death. And there&#39;s no way out of that.

monkeydust
11th January 2004, 20:55
I thought this was espcially amusing considering the age demographic of this board... hehe.


How old are you?..............5? maybe 7? I&#39;m not sure.


I love the way the cappies always moan at us calling them Nazi&#39;s and now they happen to be defending Nazism claiming it is logical and then just saying discrimination against jews is an illogical prejudice.

Vinny Rafarino
11th January 2004, 21:04
Stalin was also responsible for the hit on Carmine Galante, pet rocks, Hootie and the Blowfish, Laser Discs, the Macarena, Plan Nine From Outer Space, Hypercolour T-shirts and even Stevie Wonder&#39;s song "I just called to say I love You".


What a fucking bastard.

New Tolerance
11th January 2004, 21:04
Why wouldn&#39;t it be? They are both irrational prejudices.


I do not view the rich as our enemies. (If that&#39;s what you think) They just human beings after all. We are just trying to improve the lives all of those around them.

A Pict
11th January 2004, 22:56
How old are you?..............5? maybe 7? I&#39;m not sure.


I love the way the cappies always moan at us calling them Nazi&#39;s and now they happen to be defending Nazism claiming it is logical and then just saying discrimination against jews is an illogical prejudice.


Yes, I am 5 years old. You found me out, you clever bastard.



Stalin was also responsible for the hit on Carmine Galante, pet rocks, Hootie and the Blowfish, Laser Discs, the Macarena, Plan Nine From Outer Space, Hypercolour T-shirts and even Stevie Wonder&#39;s song "I just called to say I love You".


spam.



But you can change the fact that you&#39;re rich. Give up your wealth and join the ranks of the common people.


And that hits the head of what really upsets you about capitalism. Not that some people are poor, but rather that some people are rich.


I do not view the rich as our enemies

If you think running into the homes of people, stealing their things, making them work for the lives of others, and forcing them not to leave is the proper way to treat a friend, i certinaly don&#39;t want to be one of your enemies&#33;

monkeydust
11th January 2004, 23:00
Pict I think you should realise that when people here say they are against &#39;the rich&#39; they do not necessarily mean &#39;The rich&#39; as in the people themselves but rather &#39;the rich&#39; as an abstract concept.

In this way you can get rid of the concept of &#39;the rich&#39; and perhaps more importantly &#39;the poor&#39;. And I fail to see how this is quite as bad as gassing Jews, and making soap and lampshades out of thier bodies for &#39;humanity&#39;.

synthesis
11th January 2004, 23:05
And that hits the head of what really upsets you about capitalism. Not that some people are poor, but rather that some people are rich.

I must say, you evaded my question quite superbly. Did you really think I wouldn&#39;t notice?

New Tolerance
11th January 2004, 23:10
If you think running into the homes of people, stealing their things, making them work for the lives of others, and forcing them not to leave is the proper way to treat a friend, i certinaly don&#39;t want to be one of your enemies&#33;

I do not support those things you have listed.

MiDnIgHtMaRaUdEr
11th January 2004, 23:49
Originally posted by Soviet power [email protected] 11 2004, 10:02 AM
I looked that Ortega&#39;s link
http://www.***************/forum/

Damn Nazis outnumbers us by more than 4 times.Who told that we when revolution comes we outnumber them.
Every racist piece of trash knows of that site, and so do most other people, but it took me a good long while to find this site.