Log in

View Full Version : Homeland Security Forced to Release List of Keywords Used to Monitor Social Networkin



blake 3:17
1st June 2013, 07:17
Worth a thought or three... It's hard to know how "real" this release is.


Dept. of Homeland Security Forced to Release List of Keywords Used to Monitor Social Networking Sites

If you are thinking about tweeting about clouds, pork, exercise or even Mexico, think again. Doing so may result in a closer look by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

In a story appearing earlier today on the U.K’s Daily Mail website, it was reported that the DHS has been forced to release a list of keywords and phrases it uses to monitor various social networking sites. The list provides a glimpse into what DHS describes as “signs of terrorist or other threats against the U.S.”

The list was posted by the Electronic Privacy Information Center who filed a request under the Freedom of Information Act, before suing to obtain the release of the documents. The documents were part of the department’s 2011 ’Analyst’s Desktop Binder‘ used by workers at their National Operations Center which instructs workers to identify ‘media reports that reflect adversely on DHS and response activities’.

The information sheds new light on how government analysts are instructed to patrol the internet searching for domestic and external threats. The Daily Mail’s article noted the Electronic Privacy Information Center wrote a letter to the House Homeland Security Subcommittee on Counter-terrorism and Intelligence, describing it’s choice of words as ‘broad, vague and ambiguous’.

What wasn’t disclosed is how the agency actually gains access to the various search engines and social networks to monitor the specified keywords. My guess is the DHS has a “special arrangement” with companies like Google , Facebook , Microsoft , Yahoo and Twitter to gain secure direct API access. This type of access would allow it to use distributed cloud technologies to monitor the daily flow of social media and search activity in something close to real time.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/reuvencohen/2012/05/26/department-of-homeland-security-forced-to-release-list-of-keywords-used-to-monitor-social-networking-sites/

Brutus
1st June 2013, 09:04
Clouds..
Pork? These people need to get better word pickers

Rusty Shackleford
1st June 2013, 09:11
thats a weak ass list. hasnt this list been up before anyway?

Rooiakker
2nd June 2013, 08:06
Obviously fake list. Not enough technical terminology, and I seriously doubt that "Home grown" is going to catch them any terrorists.

Fake transparency is the worst kind.

Flying Purple People Eater
2nd June 2013, 08:44
Such odd terminology. Even groups like Al-Qaeda and Al-Shabaab do not do what they do in in the pursuit of 'terrorising' (although that may be an aftereffect). They are a racist, right-wing islamist faction that wants to put such draconian beliefs into practice.

I find it repulsive how the term 'terrorist' has wormed it's way into public political discourse - it's an illegitimate, charged blanket term that can essentially be used to label any organisation or individual that a certain governmental body dislikes (sort of like the ridiculous term 'illegal immigrant, except far more politically explosive). This can be observed in the comparison between armed groups in countries at odds with American foreign exploits compared to said groups in countries with strong ties to America.

E.g. the PKK are terrorists yet Syrian Islamist groups are 'freedom fighters' and 'rebels' in the media.