View Full Version : what should a socialist work?
Alain
24th May 2013, 21:52
Since I believe most of us live in capitalist countries, I ask of you: what do you do for a living? what should I do for a living("I" in this case being a law student for my sins)? I mean, what can a socialist(or communist, either way) actually work without encouraging the capitalist state in which he lives?
I think this is the best place to post this one because it's essentially putting ideas to practice. Moderators should feel free to move it to another section if I'm wrong.
Quail
24th May 2013, 22:17
Unfortunately you can't really "drop out" of capitalist society. A socialist can simply do the best they can (within reason) to survive. Obviously a socialist shouldn't become a cop or anything, but really whatever you choose to do you're still part of the capitalist system.
I'd kind of like to be a teacher myself, inspire kids to be as interested in maths as I am. I think it would be socially useful so I'd at least feel like I was doing something more worthwhile than making someone else rich.
Bardo
25th May 2013, 06:17
I'm a sociology student. I don't have any particular job or career I'm hoping to follow, I just love the field I'm studying.
Unfortunately, as Quail pointed out, anything you do you will be doing within the constructs of capitalist society, whether you're a teacher or a baker, an accountant or a plumber.
The lifestylism in choosing a "more socialist" or "less capitalist" job doesn't really matter. I'd say don't become a venture capitalist or the owner of a chain of franchises :P
Fawkes
25th May 2013, 06:55
A socialist should find a job the same way any other person would: by trying to get a good balance of "something I enjoy" and "something that will pay my rent".
I currently work two jobs, one at a restaurant and one as a freelance sound editor. I'm still in college for another 6 months or so, but hopefully once I graduate I'll have built up enough contacts/credibility to support myself full time as a sound designer. Basically just try to find something you like and get fulfillment out of and hope that it pays enough, that's really the best one can hope for.
Let's Get Free
25th May 2013, 07:46
I think it's important to get on living without worrying about having anti-capitalist purity.
Revenant
25th May 2013, 08:04
I agree with the general points made by Fawkes and LGF so I just enjoy being unemployed, having my rent paid and studying independently.
I think the answer someone gives to this is based on their political perspectives and orientation actually.
Ideally it would be the case, for socialists as for ordinary people as Fawkes says, to find a balance between something you enjoy and what pays the bills. Or between something that you feel you're making a difference in - social care, teaching etc - and bills.
But there is also a question about how you see society developing, what is the role of socialists, what is your own roll, what are the key sectors of society. In that sense, working in something that you enjoy might be personally enriching but working as a docker is far better in a political sense. And can be just as personally enriching even if a sacrifice needs to be made. And honestly, if you're not making some sort of a sacrifice as a socialist, you're probably not much of one.
Alain
26th May 2013, 23:16
And honestly, if you're not making some sort of a sacrifice as a socialist, you're probably not much of one.
That's kind of where I'm coming from. I mean, I can't live a plentiful life out of wage slavery and oppressing the working class and feel good about myself. And, frankly, more and more jobs seem to be oppressive in some way or another, even teaching, as it generally includes at least some indoctrination(in the humanities, I mean).
Pawn Power
27th May 2013, 21:20
As a side point because few folks mentioned being students. Students are workers too. Capitalism has outsourced training and education to the state (public schools/universities) and, increasingly to the individual, through private institutions.
The training and education students receive is essential for increased production and it is something that corporations cannot pay for.
Secondly, students are actually producing, especially graduate students, through teaching as adjuncts or through research.
I understand the original question to be, "Where is the most strategic place for radicals to work?" I don't think there is a clear answer. There are key places of production (Foxcon), distribution (ports), and consumption (Walmart), that should all be trenches of struggle.
The question you should ask yourself is, how can you agitate in the place you work? How can you build relationship with people and engage in struggle at your workplace where you are building power?
Zukunftsmusik
27th May 2013, 21:39
And honestly, if you're not making some sort of a sacrifice as a socialist, you're probably not much of one.
But such a sacrifice doesn't have to be through your work life - you can engage politically or more directly socially too.
Eniac
27th May 2013, 22:11
I would say something " proleterian ", but I also have to agree with what has been said - you cannot escape the system, so I feel it's way more important not to enslave people or get yourself enslaved, so definitely don't be a banker, and don't take no goddamn loans or credits. I'd rather live with my parents or some roommates than with a loan.
Personally I'd like to be a journalist, and generally devote my life to revolution as much as possible.
Craig_J
27th May 2013, 22:12
No, unfortunaely no matter what we do we're workin for capitalism. If you think about it even if you're kind hearted enough to be a full time voluntary worker you're just helping to fix what capitalism causes rather than treating the cause.
I've also noticed how clever the sytem has been designed. If you work under capitalism but you're a socalist everyone labels you 'HYPOCRITE!'.
If you don't work under a capitalist system and you're a socalist everyone labels you 'LAZY!' and assumes you want to be entitled to everything for free....
I'm doin A level politics, sociology and meida studies then in september I'll be at uni studying sociology.
I work as a casual worker behind the bar at Newmarket Racecourse. Unfortunately work is only on between april and october so the rest of the year I'm skint. Also, I broke my arm last year and because we don't get any EMA for going to college anymore, and as a casdual worker I couldn't claim sick pay, and my mother couldnt relly afford to fed me I had to go hungry quite a lot.... Only added to my resentment of capitalism even more...
But such a sacrifice doesn't have to be through your work life - you can engage politically or more directly socially too.
Of course. I didn't mean to imply that it did. I meant more that if you're not willing to sacrifice the comforts of work if it is necessary then you're probably not much of a socialist.
Jimmie Higgins
28th May 2013, 09:53
Yeah, get the best deal you can for yourself - however that works out for you personally (balance of pleasantness - or at least minimal unpleasantness - and enough money to live... and more if you can swing it).
I've been working for about half my life now - mostly service work. I wouldn't turn down a cushy job at Google or something for moral reasons alone at all. There's nothing noble about wage work.
The real question that comes up, in my view, is could one's job be a site of struggle or mearly the money to help you then participate in struggle more easily with more free-time and resources. So, for example, if someone is a teacher, of course they will probably naturally want to be helpful in their job and try and help their students, but to see that induvidual professional work as a means of social change (as many teachers do with all sinceriy) is a dead-end in my opinion. They should teach to help their students induvidually, but the real site of struggle and the real way to ultimately help their students (and future students) would be to organize other teachers to try and gain more "work-site" (and district/state/so on) power and influence over the conditions of teaching/learning. If you can organize to resist "teaching to the test" or cutbacks in services or cutbacks on teachers, then there is a better chance of being able to give students more chances to actually learn. Not trying to fight for more worker-influence but just trying to, on your own, teach despite the system and the requirements made on teachers leads to a sort of self-sacrificing moralism (in this case teachers spending way more unpaid time, to actually accomplish "teaching" and doing right by their students) that doesn't challenge the trajectory of public education and becomes a losing battle which leads many teachers towards cynacism in regards to change and even students themselves.
The same can be applied for other work - especially professions. Capital P professions like being a lawyer probably don't have workplace organizing opportunities and so options would be going into "Labor Law" or something, but generally this would also not provide much ability to make much of a difference as an induvidual. Most likely someone who is Leftist and not independantly wealthy who goes into law, would just have to try and have their profession on the one hand and do what's required of it, and then on the other do community-type organizing. If they had some sucess, they could use their legal knowledge and skills to do some volunteer work in regards to movements and activists who are being repressed, but it would be hard to do that solely IMO - not to mention it would be a lot of work without much financial payoff.
Revenant
28th May 2013, 11:04
If you don't work under a capitalist system and you're a socalist everyone labels you 'LAZY!' and assumes you want to be entitled to everything for free..Though this is undoubtably true I can't say it has ever bothered me, after all I am fairly lazy, also I do think that everyone should be entitled to the basic instruments of life (food, clothing, shelter) for free.;)1
Dennis the 'Bloody Peasant'
28th May 2013, 11:45
As others have said, 'opting out' of the system itself is pretty hard to do without sacrificing a lot / going without. Occupation-wise, I know I'm not engaged in an industry that does anything to directly oppose or fight the system, I'm just making the wage to pay for what I and my family needs and wants.
Not sure what vocation, other than 'full-time revolutionary', would be the most suitable to a communist, maybe it can't exist so long as capitalism exists.
helot
28th May 2013, 13:17
The only thing i can say is to not work in a role where your responsibility is to discipline the workforce as your work would be about undermining class struggle.
The Garbage Disposal Unit
28th May 2013, 19:39
Yeah, probably not so much about what you do for a living as what you're doing to undermine labour discipline, organize isolated acts of rebellion into a common strategy, etc.
Pawn Power
31st May 2013, 05:02
Yeah, probably not so much about what you do for a living as what you're doing to undermine labour discipline, organize isolated acts of rebellion into a common strategy, etc.
Except don't be a cop.
Deity
31st May 2013, 06:06
At the risk of sounding stupid I'll ask my question: is it hypocritical to have success in capitalism? If I make a lot of money in capitalism, counting anything from a doctor to a professional athlete, does that make any communist belief I have almost worthless?
I'm not however including bankers, business owners, or politicians. Nothing that is an enemy of socialism, just unrelated high paying professions.
ChiefTiburon
12th June 2013, 04:31
I believe a job in which you can help your community would be ideal. For examplr, i work in ice distribution, but i distribute ice to local charity events for free. The ice comes out of my pocket, so i like to believe that it balances out the capitalistic gain of the stores i distribute to. That may just be self delusion.
Klaatu
12th June 2013, 04:39
Unfortunately you can't really "drop out" of capitalist society. A socialist can simply do the best they can (within reason) to survive. Obviously a socialist shouldn't become a cop or anything, but really whatever you choose to do you're still part of the capitalist system.
I'd kind of like to be a teacher myself, inspire kids to be as interested in maths as I am. I think it would be socially useful so I'd at least feel like I was doing something more worthwhile than making someone else rich.
Yes, teaching is a public service, and can be considered to be a Socialist ideal. But if you are a lawyer, how about becoming a Public Defender or one of those lawyers that sues the piss out of big corporations.
grad student and software engineer here
CriticalJames
12th June 2013, 19:19
Independent journalism is always a good route to go down, especially if you want to maintain a really left-wing profile. Surprisingly enough, stories involving abuse and corruption within the current system tend to be quite popular, meaning that not all journalists are forced to take part in the general corporate-funded garbage.
Ethics Gradient, Traitor For All Ages
13th June 2013, 15:07
At the risk of sounding stupid I'll ask my question: is it hypocritical to have success in capitalism? If I make a lot of money in capitalism, counting anything from a doctor to a professional athlete, does that make any communist belief I have almost worthless?
I'm not however including bankers, business owners, or politicians. Nothing that is an enemy of socialism, just unrelated high paying professions.
You should get as much money as you can while performing the least amount of labor that you can get away with. You're not a monk, you're a wage laborer, take everything thats not bolted down.
Ravachol
15th June 2013, 00:08
as little as possible
G4b3n
25th June 2013, 21:01
At the risk of sounding stupid I'll ask my question: is it hypocritical to have success in capitalism? If I make a lot of money in capitalism, counting anything from a doctor to a professional athlete, does that make any communist belief I have almost worthless?
I'm not however including bankers, business owners, or politicians. Nothing that is an enemy of socialism, just unrelated high paying professions.
I don't believe socialists should go around all day making decisions based on how pro-capitalist or anti-capitalist they are. I used to do this constantly, all I found is that it generates stress and is usually counter-productive. What we must accept is that we live within the system, we can work to change or destroy it, but either way you must not let the your opposition to the system dominate your life. The same could be said for large decisions such as your profession. Though I don't believe any legitimate socialist would pursue a profession that contradicts his own values.
Ocean Seal
25th June 2013, 21:13
The most socialist thing one can do with regards to work is to not do it. However, sometimes this does not present itself as an option. I am personally a research assistant.
G4b3n
25th June 2013, 21:32
The most socialist thing one can do with regards to work is to not do it. However, sometimes this does not present itself as an option. I am personally a research assistant.
That depends on what you mean by "work".
Certainly you are not advising people to sit at home all day reading Capital are you? Capitalist or socialist, workers are the foundation of any society and deserve all recognition for societal accomplishments.
I would argue that one of the most non socialistic approaches a leftist could take would be to simply not work at all. Right below the petty bourgeois exploitation of other workers.
dsaly1969
3rd July 2013, 01:08
I work in the field of social work with disenfranchised and disadvantaged populations. The good thing is while many of these social welfare policies are based on practices of institutional racism and class oppression - it is not unexpected for social workers - in terms of social justice and advocacy - to loudly denounce these structures and help empower the clients to find ways around such barriers. There is also some chance (not much, but some) of advocating for positive change from within. Tragedies which cause civil outrage and unrest actually help to uncover much of the problems and outright abuses that occur in the system.
a huge deal of my life decisions is already geared towards making money, why would actually being really good at it be hypocritical? no seriously, i'd love to be rich, and that's why i fill out my lottery tickets. unfortunately thats basically my only option because i dont want to make a career out of being a shithead towards other people, even if i had a chance to do that
Ceallach_the_Witch
8th July 2013, 13:13
There's nothing wrong with having money or being well-off, really. Even if you're a doctor (or to some extent an athlete) you still have to work for a living.
I imagine that as socialists if we did come into wealth we wouldn't threat it in the same way as perhaps someone thoroughly convinced of capitalism would. I sincerely doubt we'd be building investment portfolios or buying status symbols with our hypothetical wealth.
LuÃs Henrique
8th July 2013, 13:43
A socialist should find a job the same way any other person would: by trying to get a good balance of "something I enjoy" and "something that will pay my rent".
That, and "something that allows me some free time".
Luís Henrique
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2020 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.