Clarksist
23rd May 2013, 18:10
Many people here have probably read The Quotations of Mao Tse-Tung, and there is probably a fairly wide range of reactions to it.
I find the text itself to be a wonderful read. Taking out any logical argument and just selecting the conclusions leads to a very "eastern" and "axiomatic" experience.
It is one of the only communist books I recommend to people who aren't communists, and it isn't even really to make them think about communism. I feel like a lot of the terms can be swapped out for more general ones, and when depoliticized the book becomes a good way to live in the world generally. The values of self sacrifice, self criticism, honest intercourse with the people of the world, and struggle against oppression are good to live by regardless of your political beliefs.
Has anyone else found The Quotations of Mao Tse-Tung moving on a personal level?
Also, if we could keep the realities of Mao's leadership to the side and consider the book from a literary standpoint for the thread? I just think that it could start derailing side arguments that are best left to History of Theory. Thanks!
I find the text itself to be a wonderful read. Taking out any logical argument and just selecting the conclusions leads to a very "eastern" and "axiomatic" experience.
It is one of the only communist books I recommend to people who aren't communists, and it isn't even really to make them think about communism. I feel like a lot of the terms can be swapped out for more general ones, and when depoliticized the book becomes a good way to live in the world generally. The values of self sacrifice, self criticism, honest intercourse with the people of the world, and struggle against oppression are good to live by regardless of your political beliefs.
Has anyone else found The Quotations of Mao Tse-Tung moving on a personal level?
Also, if we could keep the realities of Mao's leadership to the side and consider the book from a literary standpoint for the thread? I just think that it could start derailing side arguments that are best left to History of Theory. Thanks!