Log in

View Full Version : Where did this idea of "White Genocide" come from?



Professor Paradox
17th May 2013, 04:18
All over the internet i'm seeing white nationalists and white supremacists claiming that there is an alleged ongoing genocide against the white race. Where did this idea come from?

BAMslam15
17th May 2013, 06:31
Just some voodoo redneck gibberish they came up to justify their racism :laugh:

Comrade #138672
17th May 2013, 07:05
They want to divert the attention from them being racist by accusing the people they are discriminating of "reverse racism".

BAMslam15
17th May 2013, 07:09
They want to divert the attention from them being racist by accusing the people they are discriminating of "reverse racism".

Note* if you ever want to see their crackpot arguments in failure, go to any video on youtube concerning race. They do this thing called a "BUGs Swarm" where they spam random videos (i.e. Macklemore's "Thrift Shop") with their little "mantra" courstesy of Bob Whitaker

Tjis
17th May 2013, 07:21
There's two reasons for this 'white genocide' thing.
One is affirmative action, and other regulations to reduce white privilege. White supremacists see the state actively involved in lowering their social position while raising that of non-whites, and conclude that the government must be out to get whitey.

The second one is the white supremacist's disgust with race mixing. One-drop rule says that even one non-white ancestor means a person isn't white, therefore a non-white couple destroys an opportunity for the propagation of the white race. Few governments still encourage race segregation and interracial couples aren't frowned upon as much anymore. However, to the white supremacist, racial segregation is the natural state of things, and the logical conclusion is that the current state of affairs must be the result of a conscious effort (by the state/jewish conspiracy/whatever) to make people go against their natural inclinations.

In both cases the belief is not so much that some entity is actively rounding up whites and sending them to death camps, but that some entity (government, jews, etc) are actively involved in a campaign to destroy the white race through insidious methods.

Minyerva
19th May 2013, 16:24
When we have: Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, White Countries for Everybody, what do we have overtime?

We have more and more non-whites in White countries since the right of Whites to exclusive territory is denied them and deemed 'racist'.

We have fewer and fewer White people.

When we mix more non-whites and fewer Whites in the same living space, what do we get?

In time, White extinction. Its called White genocide because this does not happen by chance. It is being forced upon Whites just like a rapist does not take no for an answer.

How is this not so? How is this not White genocide?

Anti-racist IS a code word for anti-white.

:)

ВАЛТЕР
19th May 2013, 16:33
So me having a black/hispanic/asian/etc. girlfriend is being forced on me? Before we ban you for being an obvious racist, please explain how this is being "forced" on anyone. I'm truly intrigued as to how the brain of a racist/white nationalist functions.

BIXX
19th May 2013, 16:36
I thought he was joking... Apparently this isn't the case?

Brutus
19th May 2013, 16:41
I thought he was joking... Apparently this isn't the case?

Same. I thought they were showing us inside the mind of a racist.

ВАЛТЕР
19th May 2013, 16:41
If he/she is joking, then they could at least put a "lol" or some shit. :P

Something tells me they aren't though, I have a sixth sense for detecting bigots.

Igor
19th May 2013, 16:41
i've always found the white genocide types up here in finland the best

like literally around 97% or so of finland is ethnically either finnish or swedish and two of our biggest immigrant groups, russians and estonians are p damn white

in the other hand we could be losing white finland any day now

Igor
19th May 2013, 16:42
If he/she is joking, then they could at least put a "lol" or some shit. :P

Something tells me they aren't though, I have a sixth sense for detecting bigots.

it's probably some stormfronter or something and the best course of action is to just let the mods take care of the shitstain asap instead of even trying to argue them

ВАЛТЕР
19th May 2013, 16:45
it's probably some stormfronter or something and the best course of action is to just let the mods take care of the shitstain asap instead of even trying to argue them


Yeah, you're right. Banned he is!

And with the flick of my magical mod wand, he shall now disappear forever. :lol:

BAMslam15
21st May 2013, 00:08
Silly fascists! RevLeft is for people with brains ;)1

Skyhilist
21st May 2013, 00:18
This is what they're bitc♄ing about. Since white people are more likely to live in developed countries, they're tending to choose to have less kids compared to other "races" who on the average are less likely to live in developed countries and as a result tend to have, on the average, more kids. This combined with the fact that more Caucasians are now choosing to have kids with non-whites will supposedly make there be a slightly smaller percentage of white people, or as they would call it "white genocide" (a real travesty, isn't it?). Their for some reason prided race has to deal with the consequences of living in developed countries and being able to have kids with whoever they choose... boo fucking hoo. And seriously, any rational person can see that the amount of Caucasians isn't going to get anywhere close to zero any time soon. It's all a load of shit, really.
http://l.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/qz6Ow_v6pOIupaVMClirOg--/YXBwaWQ9eW5ld3M7cT04NTt3PTYzMA--/http://media.zenfs.com/en/blogs/thelookout/white.png

Craig_J
21st May 2013, 00:19
When we have: Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, White Countries for Everybody, what do we have overtime?

We have more and more non-whites in White countries since the right of Whites to exclusive territory is denied them and deemed 'racist'.

We have fewer and fewer White people.

When we mix more non-whites and fewer Whites in the same living space, what do we get?

In time, White extinction. Its called White genocide because this does not happen by chance. It is being forced upon Whites just like a rapist does not take no for an answer.

How is this not so? How is this not White genocide?

Anti-racist IS a code word for anti-white.

:)

I completely agree with you. As a white guy myself I FIRMLY believe the mixing will eventually lead to the white race dieing out.

It's white genocide.

It's also black genocide.

It's also hispanic genocide.

And It's also asian genocide.

And guess what? I LOVE IT. The whole thought of us being one race is why I REALLY REALLY hope that raical intermixing carrys on. Every migrant that I see move to another country assures me that eventually we'll become one beautiful diverse mix of cultures and races and racist biogts like you will be obliterated from the face of this earth! This is exactly why I oppose any attempt to halt or slow down immirgration.

I really can't wait till this 'genocide' is completed and the world becomes a more vibrant, tolerant and peaceful place.

Call me a 'race traitor' if you will but the only race is belong to is the HUMAN RACE.

Zealot
21st May 2013, 01:22
I'm not exactly sure where this myth originated at first but it was a common fear during the American civil war where whites had been told that the emancipation of slaves would lead the black majority to rape white women and undermine the dominance of the white race in general. But as Craig said, let us usher in the white genocide. I myself am mixed and plan to continue the white genocide :laugh:

Fourth Internationalist
21st May 2013, 02:23
Even if all the races were to mix and create one race (which isnt going to happen), evolution would naturally separate these people into various new races again, similar to the current ones.

melvin
21st May 2013, 02:40
there is an insanely ridiculous idea among the far right that multiculturalism is the beginning of a gradual genocide against whites. that's pretty much it. where it "comes from" is basically nowhere.

evermilion
21st May 2013, 02:42
Well, see, the way it goes is this:

If you're not allowed to discriminate against non-whites, then whites must be being oppressed, if and especially when they don't have any idea what you're talking about.

Craig_J
21st May 2013, 02:54
Even if all the races were to mix and create one race (which isnt going to happen), evolution would naturally separate these people into various new races again, similar to the current ones.

I think it will do and if it does happen there may be some variation over the years but it will not be as big as it is now and globilisation is so big that evoloution won't have as much of an effect as it did when humans were isolated to a particular area and segregated from one another.

Let's Get Free
21st May 2013, 03:05
A gigantic persecution complex.

Zealot
21st May 2013, 11:31
Even if all the races were to mix and create one race (which isnt going to happen), evolution would naturally separate these people into various new races again, similar to the current ones.

True but the increasing networked world that is evolving will change all of that. People are no longer confined to the area where they were born anymore and as technological advances continue in transport (and possibly teleportation at some point :cool:) and communication, the world comes one step further to becoming a global village. This is obviously a long way off but it has certainly already begun. In the hypothetical scenario that one could travel from Toronto to Beijing within minutes for an evening meal, what do you suppose that would do to the gene pool? Now I'm no scientist and this is all just speculation but it seems to be a very real possibility. This is assuming that people are no longer bigots, have an internationalist spirit, and aren't afraid of accidentally contributing to a white genocide. Therefore, it would probably be more likely to take place under world socialism, assuming that we achieve it.

In short, you have to make a few assumptions and hypotheticals but still....it's possible

Sidagma
21st May 2013, 11:49
The thing is that white people aren't some kind of ontological fact. They're a rhetorical convenience meant to justify a system of domination over the rest of society. As in, the ability to exploit, discriminate against, dominate, disenfranchise, etc non-white people is a crucial part of the white identity. Without that, there's no such thing as white people and they're forced to understand themselves in a more equilateral framework.

For what it's worth, the legal definition of genocide (which I think is a pretty good one, nobody has to agree with me here) requires an element of harm being brought to members of a group, whether physically, mentally, or involving the transferrance of children. So while the goals of several anti-racist movements in the west, and of a number of anti-colonial movements worldwide, does involve the destruction of whiteness, I personally take serious issue calling that a "genocide", because what's being targeted isn't an ethnicity, it's a system of domination, and the tactics being advocated almost never involve harm being brought to white people.

As for the assertion that everyone is going to become a caramel monolith, I'd say that's neither plausible nor desirable. There are parts of the world that already boast a huge amount of cultural and ethnic diversity but within them people don't just go "oh i'm HUMAN" and that's the end of it. They're, we're, still proud of our individual backgrounds (ethnic, religious, family, geographical, SOMETHING) which continue to inform us culturally, and I think that's great. The existing Americentric race classification system can't die fast enough, but it has to be based on a non-toxic understanding of ourselves as people, not just a callous dismissal of the whole thing.

Per Levy
21st May 2013, 12:37
And guess what? I LOVE IT. The whole thought of us being one race is why I REALLY REALLY hope that raical intermixing carrys on.

the problem with this quote is that we allready are one race all of us, not matter what skin tone someone has. in that way there is no racial mixing, just humans coming together.


In time, White extinction. Its called White genocide because this does not happen by chance. It is being forced upon Whites just like a rapist does not take no for an answer.

i love this "argument", seriously is there a gouverment agent somewhere in your house and is forcing you, at gunpoint, to fuck other people for so the "white race" dies out? anyway, no one forced my finace of me, we found each other and fell in love, what humans tend to do, if they arnt complete and utter raceist assholes.

Palmares
21st May 2013, 12:47
Even if all the races were to mix and create one race (which isnt going to happen), evolution would naturally separate these people into various new races again, similar to the current ones.

I actually don't think that's necessarily the case. The time of which people evolved in their different communities came from extremely long periods habitating given bioregions.

And given the state of globalisation (and specifically, the movement of people globally), peoples who have evolved from certain bioregions are continually moving around (to differing degrees), and so the specific evolution of people of a given bioregion is no longer so clear from the diversity of backgrounds of thus people.

This of course is more so the case in developed countries, where many are trying to migrate to.

But of course the long term evolutionary states reached by different peoples will remain to different degrees, especially where there is less immigration, or those with closer relationships to the earth.

And this last bit of course, the very question of what is the state of human evolution in a context where we are so comfortable - our evolutionary "niche".

But I digress...


And check this strange thing I found...:



White Genocide (Armenian (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armenian_language): Ճերմակ ջարդ Djermag chart or սպիտակ ջարդ Spitak jart) is the term used by Armenians (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armenians) use to describe assimilation (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_assimilation) in the West.[1] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Genocide#cite_note-1) Armenians were forcibly deported and massacred from their historical homelands during the Armenian Genocide (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armenian_Genocide) in 1915-1923.[2] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Genocide#cite_note-2)[3] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Genocide#cite_note-3)
Western Armenians consider Armenians who assimilate within the local population of the country where they were eventually forced to emigrate (such as United States (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States), France (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/France), Argentina (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argentina), Canada (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canada) etc.) as lost to their nation due to the continuing exile after the actual genocide (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocide) itself, and thus consider that lost Armenian to be another victim of the genocidal attempt to eliminate the Armenians.[4] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Genocide#cite_note-4)[5] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Genocide#cite_note-5) The term "White Genocide" was also used for northwestern Azerbaijan and Nakhijevan (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nakhichivan_Autonomous_Republic) where Armenians were forcibly deported and cleansed from the regions.[6] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Genocide#cite_note-6)[7] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Genocide#cite_note-7)[8] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Genocide#cite_note-8)[9] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Genocide#cite_note-9)
“ The Diaspora is referred to by many in Armenia and in the diaspora as the "white genocide". As one of my informants said, “What the Turks did not do, we are doing to ourselves by fleeing the homeland.” [10] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Genocide#cite_note-10)

Rugged Collectivist
21st May 2013, 13:13
The "destruction" of the "white race" would also mean the destruction of the white supremacist movement. This is reason enough for me to "support" it (by which I mean not giving a shit about miscegenation or immigration and opposing laws that put limits on either).

Craig_J
22nd May 2013, 01:15
The "destruction" of the "white race" would also mean the destruction of the white supremacist movement. This is reason enough for me to "support" it (by which I mean not giving a shit about miscegenation or immigration and opposing laws that put limits on either).

Whta makes me life is the vast majority of these people think it's OK for them to go abraod and visit other nations, or maybe even life there, but when it;s the over way round they're up in arms.

Comrade Jacob
4th August 2013, 23:57
I believe it came from a piece of shit called Bob's mantra. It is where all the b.s comes from; things like:
"Anti-Racist is code-word for anti-white"
"flooding none whites into only white countries is genocide"
"white-geNOcide"
You get the idea.

Brotto Rühle
5th August 2013, 00:06
All over the internet i'm seeing white nationalists and white supremacists claiming that there is an alleged ongoing genocide against the white race. Where did this idea come from?

Their ass.

D-A-C
5th August 2013, 00:26
I think the idea is coming from two places:

1. In terms of global population percentage, those defined as 'White' are decreasing due to large increases in populations with non-white ethnic make-ups and much lower birth rates amongst White populations (usually around an average of 1.3 children instead of 2 to maintain numbers or more to increase them.)

2. It has become increasingly accepted to have sexual relations/marry/have children with people of other ethnicities.

If you combine the two, a supposedly shrinking population and the increased readiness to reproduce with someone from another ethinic background (and thus in right-wing extremists eyes destroy your blood forever) you have an ethnic genocide.

They seem to have it in their heads that the non-white races are invading the first world due to mass immigration, and because of the increased readiness of people to accept having relations with people who are of a different ethnicity that this is actually a genocide against white people.

(At least I think that's what they mean by that term).

Sorry if any language or terms/concepts were offensive, I was just trying to descripe what I think they mean by 'White Genocide'.

Goblin
5th August 2013, 01:05
Stupid conspiracy theories started by nationalists following the immigration act of 1965.

It has resulted in some lulz though.

vzlwSQSSTCQ9dpeMuUQQkc[http://cdn01.dailycaller.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/white-history-month-float-WTVD-photo.jpg

DOOM
5th August 2013, 16:40
typical victim blaming.
Just ignore these idiots.
By using fake charts and statistics white racists won't prove anything

Drowzy_Shooter
5th August 2013, 17:09
As a highschooler surrounded by strong racists and downright bigots without a cause. It seems from the debates I've had with most that they believe (like a comrade previously mentioned earlier) that there is some sort of "insurrection" going on against the white race. Mainly from jewish people and "race traitors". Honestly it's not worth putting much thought in it's really just a pile of bullshit and asking which part smells because of what reasons.

Sea
5th August 2013, 18:34
They see brown people getting screwed over by capitalism and blaming it on whites. Flip this around and you have a very convenient way to vindicate yourself as a white person, justify the oppression of minorities at home (majorities really, whites are the minority on a world scale), justify the plundering of Africa, the Middle East, etc (can't let those brown countries get strong or they'll take us over!!!) not to mention that the theory gives moral support by making their cause seem noble.

When white workers notice that they're getting screwed over too, if they already have strong reactionary leanings, they just might see the "white genocide" theory as the greatest thing since Robert E. Lee.