Log in

View Full Version : Expanded model of Absolute Surplus Value



bhagirathbaria
13th May 2013, 09:58
Introduction
Dear all, this post provides an Expansion of a model of Absolute surplus value given in 'Marx's Capital' by Ben Fine & Alfredo Saad-filho[4th ed., Viva Books, India]. The given model shows the possibilities of increasing Surplus value by either:
1). Lengthening of the working day &
2). Increased intensity of work during given hours.

Kindly go though it and the subsequent explanation given below. I need some suggestions and critical commentary to improve it and make it much more realistic. Diagrammatic models are easier to understand than theory and hence my effort. I am working on converting various such issues in wholesome diagrammatic models, to make them simpler to understand for new-comers and those interested in Marx's works.

NOTE: This is not a duplication of a given model, but a modification and refinement to it. If you have any doubts or need any further clarification about this, kindly feel free to comment in this thread. Also, I've already put it on my blog, and need further comments on it, hence decided to share it here on revleft.

Explanation:
This post adds a given aspect to the Absolute Surplus Value model of Ben Fine and Alfredo Saad-Filho, given in their book "Marx's Capital". Kindly note that the author of this post is only adding a particular aspect[already mentioned in the book] but not included in the given model[diagrammatic representation].

Given model[as in the said book]



http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-LI_O2KCZrS0/UYjR3iRlOeI/AAAAAAAAAao/6-S99RFo8Rg/s1600/ASV+model+Fine+and+Filho.PNG

Expanded Model:

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-a6qAtCBLnAI/UYjV9s4OWgI/AAAAAAAAAbA/7F4_vxq4vGY/s1600/EXPANDED+ASV+model+Bhagirath.jpg

Explanation of the expanded model:

Lengthening the working day or increasing the intensity of work[measurable by productivity per hour per labourer] or both results in increased surplus value[s] accrued to the firm owner/organizer/capitalist. The given model[as in 'Marx's Capital'] focuses on the working day variable while mentions in theory about the possibility of increasing thesurplus value through increased intensity of work.

"There are other ways of producing absolute surplus value. For example, if work becomes more intense during a given working day more labour would be performed in the same period, and absolute surplus value would be produced. The same result can be achieved through making work continuous without breaks either of limited duration or even for rest and refreshment."[Source: Marx's Capital, 4th ed., Fine and Filho, Page no. 41, Viva Books.]

Hence, when both the possibilities are included- 1). Lengthening of the working day and 2). Increased intensity of work during given hours; 3 possible situations may arise. Note, we are not here dealing with an Equilibrium/Disequilibrium situation. This model depicts the possible changes in order to increase the production of surplus value, and hence increase the rate of exploitation.

Three possibilities:

Point E0: The given state of working day and labour intensity. Following a change in any of the two variables- working day or labour intensity, surplus value increases.

Point E1: Labour intensity remaining constant, working day lengthens. Hence the area E0E1X1X0 represents the increased exploitation of labour by capital, hence an increase in surplus value. This increase in Working time driven.

Point E2: Working day remaining constant, Labour intensity increases. Hence, increased surplus value as depicted by the area RNE0E2. Here, some further modifications and debate is required.

Point E3: Both Working day and Labour intensity increase. Hence increase in surplus value by the sum of areas RNE0E2 + E2E0E1E3 + EOE1X1XO = RE3X1X0E0N.

The point E3 is my main concern. I believe some further refinement is needed there. The area considered as increased surplus value might be greater than what is highlighted. I hope to get comments on this issue too.

Paul Cockshott
13th June 2013, 13:52
If you increase labour intensity then the additional surplus value is
y0 y1 e2 e0 not RNE0E2

RedMaterialist
15th June 2013, 06:18
[B][U]
[COLOR=black]The point E3 is my main concern. I believe some further refinement is needed there. The area considered as increased surplus value might be greater than what is highlighted. I hope to get comments on this issue too.


These imaginary graphs are completely useless unless you do THREE things. Identify the x and y axes and the units measured for each axis. And include a data base and show how you collected the data. The marginal utility people have been using these non-scientific, pseudo-scientific, junk mathematics graphs since Alfred Marshall started with the "demand-curve" graphs.

They are total crap. IMHO.

bhagirathbaria
17th June 2013, 07:35
If you increase labour intensity then the additional surplus value is
y0 y1 e2 e0 not RNE0E2
To Paul: Yes, I thought so before, but if it is assumed that Necessary Labour time is denoted by y0 N OR OM & its assumed that Necessary labour time is constant, then it cannot be considered surplus value as it denotes Necessary labour time. Hence, I considered RNE0E2 as surplus value, because it denotes surplus labour time and hence represents surplus value. Let me know if am missing a point here.

bhagirathbaria
17th June 2013, 07:57
These imaginary graphs are completely useless unless you do THREE things. Identify the x and y axes and the units measured for each axis. And include a data base and show how you collected the data. The marginal utility people have been using these non-scientific, pseudo-scientific, junk mathematics graphs since Alfred Marshall started with the "demand-curve" graphs.

They are total crap. IMHO.
To redshifted: Thanks for the critical commentary, highly appreciated. To be very frank, I do not entertain assertions about what is valid and what is not for a particular theory or about a particular theoretical system as also whether a particular Economist initiated any use of pseudo-scientific junk, &c. Still, some of your points are helpful, and let me clarify them.

1). "Identify the x and y axes and the units measured for each axis."
-- I've already done that in this post. > For eg. "Lengthening the working day or increasing the intensity of work[measurable by productivity per hour per labourer]"
Thus, X axis- Working Days- measured by the unit of Hour
Thus, Y axis- Labour Intensity- measured by production per hour per labourer.
Now, these will need further improvements to include services too.

2). "And include a data base and show how you collected the data"
-- The question of data is something I do not comprehend here. Kindly note that these diagrammatic representations that I'll be putting up regularly are not meant to be empirical tools for real-world analysis. I've clarified this already in the post above. > For eg. "Diagrammatic models are easier to understand than theory and hence my effort. I am working on converting various such issues in wholesome diagrammatic models, to make them simpler to understand for new-comers and those interested in Marx's works."

Hence, my aim is to only clarify theoretical concepts in a novice-friendly manner. These abstract diagrams help a lot when used as a complement to theoretical expositions of basic categories of Marx's Economic work. Also, am a student of Business Economics and have to use a lot of graphs/diagrams/etc. sometimes quite abstract yet useful to understand a given issue.

Still, I can surely put up empirical data for constructing these graphs, later. That would be interesting and I'd like you and others to help me out in such a project. I'd like to undertake such a project wherein economic categories of Marx's works[primarily Capital Vol. I] are explained through real-world empirical data. Ernest Mandel did that in his 'Marxist Economic Theory', but we can use very latest data to explain important economic categories of Marx. If you are interested in such a task, do let me know.

Paul Cockshott
27th June 2013, 19:21
If the working class can survive on the original area in the bottom left - ie if that produces the real wage, all other sections are surplus.