Log in

View Full Version : High Schooler Protests ‘Slut-Shaming’ Abstinence Assembly Despite Alleged Threats Fro



Sasha
18th April 2013, 22:48
High Schooler Protests ‘Slut-Shaming’ Abstinence Assembly Despite Alleged Threats From Her Principal

By Tara Culp-Ressler on Apr 17, 2013 at 2:55 pm

High school senior Katelyn Campbell

A West Virginia high school student is filing an injunction against her principal, who she claims is threatening to punish her for speaking out against a factually inaccurate abstinence assembly at her school. Katelyn Campbell, who is the student body vice president at George Washington High School, alleges her principal threatened to call the college where she’s been accepted to report that she has “bad character.”

George Washington High School recently hosted a conservative speaker, Pam Stenzel, who travels around the country to advocate an abstinence-only approach to teen sexuality. Stenzel has a long history of using inflammatory rhetoric to convince young people that they will face dire consequences for becoming sexually active. At GW’s assembly, Stenzel allegedly told students that “if you take birth control, your mother probably hates you” and “I could look at any one of you in the eyes right now and tell if you’re going to be promiscuous.” She also asserted that condoms aren’t safe, and every instance of sexual contact will lead to a sexually transmitted infection.

Campbell refused to attend the assembly, which was funded by a conservative religious organization called “Believe in West Virginia” and advertised with fliers that proclaimed “God’s plan for sexual purity.” Instead, she filed a complaint with the ACLU and began to speak out about her objections to this type of school-sponsored event. Campbell called Stenzel’s presentation “slut shaming” and said that it made many students uncomfortable.

GW Principal George Aulenbacher, on the other hand, didn’t see anything wrong with hosting Stenzel. “The only way to guarantee safety is abstinence. Sometimes, that can be a touchy topic, but I was not offended by her,” he told the West Virginia Gazette last week.

But it didn’t end with a simple difference of opinion among Campbell and her principal. The high school senior alleges that Aulenbacher threatened to call Wellesley College, where Campbell has been accepted to study in the fall, after she spoke to the press about her objections to the assembly. According to Campbell, her principal said, “How would you feel if I called your college and told them what bad character you have and what a backstabber you are?” Campbell alleges that Aulenbacher continued to berate her in his office, eventually driving her to tears. “He threatened me and my future in order to put forth his own personal agenda and make teachers and students feel they cant speak up because of fear of retaliation,” she said of the incident.

Despite being threatened, Campbell is not backing down. She hopes that filing this injunction will protect her freedom of speech to continue advocating for comprehensive sexual health resources for West Virginia’s youth. “West Virginia has the ninth highest pregnancy rate in the U.S.,” Campbell told the Gazette. “I should be able to be informed in my school what birth control is and how I can get it. With the policy at GW, under George Aulenbacher, information about birth control and sex education has been suppressed. Our nurse wasn’t allowed to talk about where you can get birth control for free in the city of Charleston.”

Campbell’s complaints about her high school reflect a problematic trend across the country. There are serious consequences when figures like Stenzel repeatedly tell young Americans that contraception isn’t safe. Partly because of the scientific misinformation that often pervades abstinence-only curricula, an estimated 60 percent of young adults are misinformed about birth control’s effectiveness —and some of those teens choose not to use it because they assume it won’t make any difference. Predictably, the states that lack adequate sex ed requirements are also the states that have the highest rates of teen pregnancy and STDs.

Some of Campbell’s fellow students at GW High School are also rallying for her cause. They plan to take up the issue at a local board of education meeting, which is scheduled for Thursday evening.

http://thinkprogress.org/health/2013/04/17/1883121/west-virginia-abstinence-assembly/?l

Danielle Ni Dhighe
18th April 2013, 23:37
Good for her. Pam Stenzel shouldn't be allowed to shove her nonsense down the throats of students, and students who protest shouldn't be threatened by school officials.

Vanilla
18th April 2013, 23:45
I'm glad that young people are standing up for this. I don't know why conservatives are so big on abstinence programs except for the religious aspect of it. In my opinion, it doesn't seem healthy for people to repress their sexuality.

homegrown terror
19th April 2013, 00:02
I'm glad that young people are standing up for this. I don't know why conservatives are so big on abstinence programs except for the religious aspect of it. In my opinion, it doesn't seem healthy for people to repress their sexuality.

it's a win-win for them. if they can get kids too scared to have sex, those kids have more time spend on activities that support the power structure (i.e. spending their parents' money at the local mall) and if they can convince kids to ignore birth control altogether, they can force whole generations into menial jobs and a lifetime of wage slavery trying to support a family at age 16 (or earlier)

Bostana
19th April 2013, 01:17
Pam Stenzel, who travels around the country to advocate an abstinence-only approach to teen sexuality
Someone should tell her that they invented condoms.

All seriousness though kudos to the girl for standing up against something so idiotic. I still can't believe they have people like this speak at high schools. They fill High schoolers head's with non-sense. And they manage to convince quite a number too. With the whole "this is what God wants" crap, christian students by into it and start spreading the bull shit themselves.

rylasasin
19th April 2013, 01:57
Why is it that those who run the schools are often the ones needing an education themselves?

Niall
22nd April 2013, 12:13
good for her

Jimmie Higgins
22nd April 2013, 13:12
I'm glad that young people are standing up for this. I don't know why conservatives are so big on abstinence programs except for the religious aspect of it. In my opinion, it doesn't seem healthy for people to repress their sexuality.It's about control partially but it's also an ideological thing. Our lives are chaotic and we have little social support as induviduals - increasingly as neoliberalism continues to privitize all social costs onto people induvidually. Advocating an absurd ideal moral behavior that humans have never adhered to means you can blame people for social problems. Some people go along with this because they buy the moral argument, but also because getting pregnant before you graduate high school is a major problem for working class people in society as it's set up. Really the getting pregnant part isn't a problem in the abstract, but it's a problem if you aren't financially independant or at least able to get a well paying job with childcare or wages that will allow you to pay for child care and so on. In the absense of a social alternative to this problem, some well-meaning teachers may think, "well the right-wing won't allow us to talk about abortion, so I guess telling kids to wait for sex is better than nothing". Of course this is rediculous and compounds people not understanding how to deal with real issues and leads to misinformation such as people thinking you can't get pregnant if you have sex at certain times or whatnot.

This principle however, does not seem like a "well-meaning" but misinformed person who feels there's no better alternative currently possible as a way to tell kids about sex in schools. He definately has an agenda.

Jimmie Higgins
22nd April 2013, 13:16
Does anyone know if that's a public school or not?


If I were that student I might have tried to call the Principle's bluff about calling the school (if I had some time to strategize) and then write a 2nd application letter to the college useing the episode to talk about how I stand up for myself and have principles - and I'd send the 2nd admission letter to all the local papers as an OP-ED so the college couldn't even think about retracting the admission.

Then again, it's easy to be a monday-morning quarterback when it's not you who's 17/18 and being attacked and berated by an authroity figure like that.

Danielle Ni Dhighe
22nd April 2013, 13:18
Does anyone know if that's a public school or not?
It is.

Flying Purple People Eater
30th April 2013, 16:25
It is.

They have religious public schools in America?

Whew.

Luís Henrique
30th April 2013, 16:35
Hooray for Katelyn Campbell.

Luís Henrique

magicshoemonkey
30th April 2013, 22:41
If I were that student I might have tried to call the Principle's bluff about calling the school (if I had some time to strategize) and then write a 2nd application letter to the college useing the episode to talk about how I stand up for myself and have principles - and I'd send the 2nd admission letter to all the local papers as an OP-ED so the college couldn't even think about retracting the admission.

Then again, it's easy to be a monday-morning quarterback when it's not you who's 17/18 and being attacked and berated by an authroity figure like that.

Actually, Wellesley responded to this incident by releasing a statement welcoming Katelyn Campbell to the school:

thinkprogress .org /health/2013/04/19/1893611/katelyn-campbell-support/

Which, kind of makes me wonder how stupid the principal actually is, considering Wellesley's reputation, to threaten to call them and tell them she had opposed a pro-abstinence rally.

homegrown terror
30th April 2013, 23:53
They have religious public schools in America?

Whew.

they're only secular in the barest, most "official" sense. rather than openly enforce christian-normative "values" they use peer pressure and parental indoctrination to force the agenda and make outcasts of children who don't go to church like all good little boys and girls should.

GREEN TEXT TO INDICATE SARCASM.

TheRedAnarchist23
1st May 2013, 00:11
they're only secular in the barest, most "official" sense. rather than openly enforce christian-normative "values" they use peer pressure and parental indoctrination to force the agenda and make outcasts of children who don't go to church like all good little boys and girls should.

GREEN TEXT TO INDICATE SARCASM.

Sounds like indoctrination to me!

ckaihatsu
3rd May 2013, 18:30
they're only secular in the barest, most "official" sense. rather than openly enforce christian-normative "values" they use peer pressure and parental indoctrination to force the agenda and make outcasts of children who don't go to church like all good little boys and girls should.

GREEN TEXT TO INDICATE SARCASM.


Political commodification.