Log in

View Full Version : PETA has killed nearly 30,000 animals over the last 11 years - article



Drosophila
5th April 2013, 04:38
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nathan-j-winograd/peta-kills-puppies-kittens_b_2979220.html


People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) is an organization that publicly claims to represent the best interest of animals -- indeed their "ethical treatment." Yet approximately 2,000 animals pass through PETA's front door every year and very few make it out alive. The vast majority -- 96 percent in 2011 -- exit the facility out the back door after they have been killed, when Pet Cremation Services of Tidewater stops by on their regular visits to pick up their remains. Between these visits, the bodies are stored in the giant walk-in freezer PETA installed for this very purpose. It is a freezer that cost $9,370 and, like the company which incinerates the bodies of PETA's victims, was paid for with the donations of animal lovers who could never have imagined that the money they donated to help animals would be used to end their lives instead. In fact, in the last 11 years, PETA has killed 29,426 dogs, cats, rabbits, and other domestic animals. (http://www.nathanwinograd.com/?p=11830)

[..]

The PETA headquarters is on the aptly named Front Street. While claiming to be an animal rights organization, PETA does not believe animals have a right to live. Instead, it believes that people have a right to kill them, as long as the killing is done "humanely," which PETA interprets to mean poisoning them with an overdose of barbiturates, even if the animals are not suffering (http://www.nathanwinograd.com/?p=8765). In 2012 (http://www.vi.virginia.gov/vdacs_ar/cgi-bin/Vdacs_search.cgi?link_select=facility&form=fac_select&fac_num=157&year=2012), 733 dogs entered this building. They killed 602 of them. Only 12 were adopted. Also in 2012, they impounded 1,110 cats. 1,045 were put to death. Seven of them were adopted. They also took in 34 other companion animals, such as rabbits, of which 28 were put to death. Only four were adopted. The PETA headquarters is on the aptly named Front Street. While claiming to be an animal rights organization, PETA does not believe animals have a right to live. Instead, it believes that people have a right to kill them, as long as the killing is done "humanely," which PETA interprets to mean poisoning them with an overdose of barbiturates, even if the animals are not suffering (http://www.nathanwinograd.com/?p=8765). In 2012 (http://www.vi.virginia.gov/vdacs_ar/cgi-bin/Vdacs_search.cgi?link_select=facility&form=fac_select&fac_num=157&year=2012), 733 dogs entered this building. They killed 602 of them. Only 12 were adopted. Also in 2012, they impounded 1,110 cats. 1,045 were put to death. Seven of them were adopted. They also took in 34 other companion animals, such as rabbits, of which 28 were put to death. Only four were adopted.

Zostrianos
5th April 2013, 04:45
Ugh...hypocrites. Disgusting

Geiseric
5th April 2013, 05:18
Wow that's fucked on a few levels.

Tenka
5th April 2013, 05:43
Euthenasia with a needle is not as "humane" as they'd like to think, either. Just thinking of them handling one of those healthy, unsuspecting animals, who has probably grown to trust them, and then giving it a lethal injection, is totally fucking repugnant.

Unwanted, stray cats and dogs, when they become pests or seriously threaten local wildlife, should be culled out in the open, not secretly and deceptively in the edifices of "animal rights" organisations.

Prometeo liberado
5th April 2013, 06:03
I used to not give a crap about PETA. Now I dont know who I fear more, PETA or the Hell's Angels.

Sinister Intents
5th April 2013, 06:33
My girlfriend is highly for PETA.

Rusty Shackleford
5th April 2013, 06:38
People Euthanizing Tame Animals.

Sinister Intents
5th April 2013, 06:45
I used to think they were good.....

Raúl Duke
5th April 2013, 07:01
I personally thought, after hearing some stuff along the lines of this, that since PETA are a bunch of hypocrites they're perhaps more accurately a bunch of IRL trolls using the cause of animal welfare to troll people.

Blake's Baby
5th April 2013, 19:20
Have y'all gone down and rescued some animals from the shelters?

Or, alternatively, have you given massive amounts of cash to PETA so they could keep these animals alive a bit longer?

If you haven't, but still want to complain about it, then you're being as hypocritical as PETA are. Pets aren't free. If nobody wants to look after them what is PETA (or any other 'animal rights' charity) to do? There are always more animals to be rescued than there is money to pay people to look after them, feed them, pay their vets bills etc.

Raúl Duke
5th April 2013, 20:04
Or, alternatively, have you given massive amounts of cash to PETA so they could keep these animals alive a bit longer?

Maybe they could've...IDK...used the money they use for celebrity-studded ad campaigns to keep the animals alive?

There are better organizations out there than PETA, whose only purpose apparently is to put up racy ads for vegetarianism and do pranks.

Yet_Another_Boring_Marxist
5th April 2013, 20:09
First of all, we have to ask ourselves, where did this information come from? Obviously there are vested interests that are threatened by PETA's agenda so a smear campaign like this is the best way to terminate the opposition. How did these people get their information, and more importantly how do they explain why PETA is engaging in these activities? Because the only explanation that I've gotten so far from their website is that PETA is an evil cult, but then we need to ask ourselves how did an evil cult get 30 million dollars? There's more to this story and if we get past our contempt for PETA then I'm sure we can find it

Luís Henrique
5th April 2013, 20:54
I have absolutely no problem with PETA's euthanasia of animals; I have a problem with their ridiculous rhetoric, that would make such euthanasia look as evil.

Luís Henrique

PS. I wonder how long until someone claims "euthanASIA" is bigoted and should be replaced by "euthaneurope" or "euthanamerica"?

Luís Henrique

Fourth Internationalist
5th April 2013, 20:57
Euthanasia is a far better solution than having 30,000 domesticated animals living on the streets and starving.

Luís Henrique
5th April 2013, 20:58
First of all, we have to ask ourselves, where did this information come from? Obviously there are vested interests that are threatened by PETA's agenda so a smear campaign like this is the best way to terminate the opposition. How did these people get their information, and more importantly how do they explain why PETA is engaging in these activities? Because the only explanation that I've gotten so far from their website is that PETA is an evil cult, but then we need to ask ourselves how did an evil cult get 30 million dollars? There's more to this story and if we get past our contempt for PETA then I'm sure we can find it

From their own site (http://www.peta.org/about/why-peta/euthanasia.aspx):


Dogs, cats, and other companion animals need much more than food, water, and a cage or pen. They also need lots of loving care, regular and sustained companionship, respect for their individuality, and the opportunity to run and play. As difficult as it may be for us to accept, euthanasia (when carried out by veterinarians or trained animal shelter professionals with a painless intravenous injection of sodium pentobarbital) is often the most compassionate and dignified way for unwanted animals to leave a world that has no place for them.

Luís Henrique

Blake's Baby
5th April 2013, 23:00
Maybe they could've...IDK...used the money they use for celebrity-studded ad campaigns to keep the animals alive?

There are better organizations out there than PETA, whose only purpose apparently is to put up racy ads for vegetarianism and do pranks.

I'm not waving a flag for PETA here, honestly I have no axe to grind one way or the other. But if animal charities are supposed to be looking after animals then they need long-term funding to do so. So, people who believe that animal welfare is worthwhile need to stump up cash to make sure that happens, or take in the pets themselves. Or both.