View Full Version : What is the most common term for...
Tristana
25th March 2013, 07:53
...when responding to the argument, instead of responding to the big picture, one takes a snip of that argument and responds to that incomplete though and zooms way too far into the word-by-word rather than the sentence of the whole?
Sorry, this isn't necessarily related to leftist politics, but related more towards argumentative discourse (which I guess applies indirectly)
The Idler
25th March 2013, 12:06
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Cherry_picking
Comrade #138672
25th March 2013, 18:15
It could also be a strawman.
Comrade #138672
25th March 2013, 19:03
Because cutting in the argument like that only serves to misrepresent the argument.
Clarion
25th March 2013, 20:19
Rigour.
If one clause of the argument fails then the who argument fails.
Deity
25th March 2013, 20:48
Rigour.
If one clause of the argument fails then the who argument fails.
Not at all. Taking a couple words or sentences out of context and arguing against the incomplete thought does not make the original argument a failure.
homegrown terror
26th March 2013, 02:52
nitpicking.
conmharáin
26th March 2013, 21:41
It's like when you create some sort of parable to illustrate your point and your opponent tackles the details of the parable rather than the substance of the idea.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2020 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.