Log in

View Full Version : Fathers' Sexism May Curb Daughters' Work Ambitions, Research Suggests



Quail
29th January 2013, 13:24
http://i.huffpost.com/gen/950955/thumbs/s-DAD-DAUGHTER-large.jpg?6 New research shows that dads with more egalitarian ideas about gender may have daughters with greater ambitions for work.



By: Stephanie Pappas, LiveScience Senior Writer
Published: 01/18/2013 06:33 PM EST on LiveScience
NEW ORLEANS — Dads who have egalitarian ideas about gender — and who walk the talk by doing household chores themselves — have daughters with higher workplace ambitions than less egalitarian fathers do, new research finds.
The research is correlational, so it doesn't prove that fathers' attitudes are the cause their young daughters' work aspirations (http://www.livescience.com/7349-top-5-myths-girls-math-science.html). But the research may suggest that girls look to their fathers for examples of what is expected of women. Dads' attitudes also predict what kind of play their daughters enjoy.
"Dads who are more balanced have girls who are just as likely to play with Transformers as Barbie dolls," study researcher Toni Schmader, a psychologist at the University of British Columbia said here Friday (Jan. 18) at the annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology.
Male and female role models
Schmader and her colleagues were interested in how gender stereotypes develop at a young age. To find out, they gave questionnaires to 196 elementary-school-age boys, 167 elementary-school-age girls and at least one parent of each asking about gender stereotypes (http://www.livescience.com/6621-kids-learn-gender-stereotypes-home.html), gendered behavior and, for parents, division of household labor.
They found that women, even those who work outside the home, shouldered more of the housework burden (http://www.livescience.com/10318-women-clean-men-home.html) than men. This pattern has been seen in numerous sociology and psychology studies and is so prevalent that is has a name: "the second shift," meaning that women essentially put in a full day at work and then another on top of it at home.
The researchers also found that women influence their kids about gender stereotypes. A mom's attitude about the proper roles of men and women is almost always echoed by their kids.
But in the realm of actual behavior, dads are key. The fewer gender stereotypes dad holds, the more likely his daughter is to say she wants to work outside the home as an adult. The daughters of egalitarian men are also more likely to have broader, less gendered interests — they're less hemmed in by stereotypes that say girls should only play house or dress in pink. They're equally likely to play with "boy" toys versus "girl" toys, Schmader said.
Dads' behavior mattered too. The more equally dad and mom divided household work, the less stereotypically girly their daughter's behavior.
[B]Parents and stereotypes
The researchers aren't sure why boys didn't respond in the same way as girls to their fathers' attitudes. It's possible that boys just don't see enough variation in stereotypically masculine behavior, or that their own behavior doesn't waver from stereotypes enough to register statistically, Schmader said.
Nor is it entirely clear why dads seem to hold so much sway over their daughters' gendered behaviors and aspirations while moms aren't as influential. The reason could be that dads still are seen as having a higher status in the household, so girls weigh their opinions more heavily, Schmader told LiveScience. It's also possible that girls see dad as a sort of role model (http://www.livescience.com/20997-science-fatherhood-fathers-day.html) for the type of partner they may end up with one day.
"Not role models for who they can be, but role models for who they could be with," she said. Thus, girls may learn what's expected of a woman in a relationship from their father.
Schmader warned that more work is needed to prove that the fathers' attitudes cause their daughter's actions. It's possible, she said, that having a girl who defies gender stereotypes alters dad's perceptions of proper gender roles rather than the other way around.


Source (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/21/fathers-sexism-daughters-work-ambitions_n_2515906.html)

Narcissus
29th January 2013, 13:40
Work ambitions. This presumably means the ambition to be the one with the keys as opposed to the one behind the bars. I want any kids of mine to want to be the ones with the saw, regardless of their gender.

Quail
29th January 2013, 14:09
I don't agree with the idea that girls growing up with higher work ambitions mean that they are more liberated. In fact I don't think that "having it all" with a full-time job and a family to look after is liberation at all. The article came from a mainstream website, so I wouldn't expect it to contain any revolutionary ideas about the nature of work or give anything but a liberal feminist perspective.

That's not really why I posted the article though.


The fewer gender stereotypes dad holds, the more likely his daughter is to say she wants to work outside the home as an adult. The daughters of egalitarian men are also more likely to have broader, less gendered interests — they're less hemmed in by stereotypes that say girls should only play house or dress in pink. They're equally likely to play with "boy" toys versus "girl" toys, Schmader said.
Dads' behavior mattered too. The more equally dad and mom divided household work, the less stereotypically girly their daughter's behavior.

I thought it was interesting (although not entirely unexpected) that girls from more egalitarian families were less likely to conform to stereotypical gender roles. It suggest that as parents we should challenge our own behaviour (not just our beliefs) and lead by example so that we don't pass the wrong values on to our children. The behaviour of the children was linked not to the mother's opinion on gender equality, but how it actually played out in the division of domestic labour.

Narcissus
29th January 2013, 14:35
Yeah, that bit I thought was by far the most interesting also. I also think there is a great amount of importance in not only the division of domestic work, but the process of the division of domestic labour. The way in which each parent is assigned to each task - and the abolition of gender specific duties.

It's all very well to say that both genders are equal, but if mum is cooking, and dad is fixing the drainpipes for the 100th time in a row - the kids are still gonna be stuck with these gender roles.

I hope I can teach any kids of mine as early possible that people are people, and not men and women.

brigadista
29th January 2013, 16:03
surely education and opportunities make a difference therefore race and class also -

Monkeyboy
31st January 2013, 18:24
I don't agree with the idea that girls growing up with higher work ambitions mean that they are more liberated. In fact I don't think that "having it all" with a full-time job and a family to look after is liberation at all. The article came from a mainstream website, so I wouldn't expect it to contain any revolutionary ideas about the nature of work or give anything but a liberal feminist perspective.

I'm curious, why do you think "having it all" is not liberating? Because I think I agree.


I thought it was interesting (although not entirely unexpected) that girls from more egalitarian families were less likely to conform to stereotypical gender roles. It suggest that as parents we should challenge our own behaviour (not just our beliefs) and lead by example so that we don't pass the wrong values on to our children. The behaviour of the children was linked not to the mother's opinion on gender equality, but how it actually played out in the division of domestic labour.

As I said in another thread, this is difference in sexes caused by nurture what I believe we should try to abolish.

Quail
31st January 2013, 20:05
I'm curious, why do you think "having it all" is not liberating? Because I think I agree.
Because for many women, a career is something they end up doing on top of the housework and childcare, so it gives us an unrealistic "superwoman" ideal to live up to, which I think is just as problematic. I think that there should be decent enough childcare for both parents to work if they want to, but also both parents should have the opportunity to spend time at home with young children so neither of them has to miss out and/or has to do all the childcare. Domestic chores should be split equally so that both partners get to enjoy a similar amount of free time. In practice though, men tend to have on average more free time and spend much less time doing domestic chores.

Besides, as an anarcha-feminist, I don't think that the "freedom" to be equally exploited under capitalism is really freedom at all.

goalkeeper
31st January 2013, 23:43
This is kind of obvious. We shouldn't, however, underestimate the capacity of girls or women bought up in Sexist households to challenge it as they grow up.

l'Enfermé
31st January 2013, 23:51
Wait they actually had to put effort into a research to prove this?