RadioRaheem84
17th January 2013, 20:11
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2011/12/did-james-franco-get-an-nyu-prof-fired.html (http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2011/12/did-james-franco-get-an-nyu-prof-fired.html)
Stumbled upon this article and feud that went on last year regarding James Franco and former NYU professor Jose Angel Santana. According to the lawsuit Santana said that he was let go because of favoritism among the department toward Franco. Franco only showed up to 2 of the required 16 classes for a passing grade. He received a D because of a grading curve. Franco complained and began to ridicule the professor's acting abilities and questioned his integrity as a professor. Santana was told not to return to NYU the following year.
Franco's supposed academic achievements just keep getting sketchier and sketchier. I mean it started off with him taking 62 units at UCLA for undergrad. Now UCLA is under a quarter system not a regular semester system meaning the semesters are even shorter and for him to have taken 62 units either screams bullshit or he took a lot of independent study courses. Secondly how can someone be enrolled in two separate school programs without an official agreement made between the schools? He took courses at Brooklyn College while he was at Columbia, and then went down to North Carolina to take courses at a small college there and it just gets confusing from there. I doubt the normal student would get approval for all that.
On top of that completing all of these degrees while having a hectic film schedule? I mean a PhD from any school is a rigorous five year endeavor and I would not go around touting I finished a PhD in such a short amount of time. I would think the standards are not high rather than you being a savant of some sort.
This is not to single out Franco per se, but this post is more about the ridiculous nature in which the press just accepts any information from a celeb, a government official or a business owner without doing some research. One would think that all these "accomplishments" would arouse some suspicion and Franco would be under the microscope for such claims. Not saying he didn't get the degrees but that it was mostly through aides, connections, favoritism, and admin help.
Stumbled upon this article and feud that went on last year regarding James Franco and former NYU professor Jose Angel Santana. According to the lawsuit Santana said that he was let go because of favoritism among the department toward Franco. Franco only showed up to 2 of the required 16 classes for a passing grade. He received a D because of a grading curve. Franco complained and began to ridicule the professor's acting abilities and questioned his integrity as a professor. Santana was told not to return to NYU the following year.
Franco's supposed academic achievements just keep getting sketchier and sketchier. I mean it started off with him taking 62 units at UCLA for undergrad. Now UCLA is under a quarter system not a regular semester system meaning the semesters are even shorter and for him to have taken 62 units either screams bullshit or he took a lot of independent study courses. Secondly how can someone be enrolled in two separate school programs without an official agreement made between the schools? He took courses at Brooklyn College while he was at Columbia, and then went down to North Carolina to take courses at a small college there and it just gets confusing from there. I doubt the normal student would get approval for all that.
On top of that completing all of these degrees while having a hectic film schedule? I mean a PhD from any school is a rigorous five year endeavor and I would not go around touting I finished a PhD in such a short amount of time. I would think the standards are not high rather than you being a savant of some sort.
This is not to single out Franco per se, but this post is more about the ridiculous nature in which the press just accepts any information from a celeb, a government official or a business owner without doing some research. One would think that all these "accomplishments" would arouse some suspicion and Franco would be under the microscope for such claims. Not saying he didn't get the degrees but that it was mostly through aides, connections, favoritism, and admin help.