Ret
15th January 2013, 01:17
As quoted above;
The party should mainly take two crucial decisions. Firstly, the party should sketch a clear roadmap of the revolution to ensure that the Nepali people would not be victimized by betrayal of the leadership. Secondly, the party should do away with nepotism, and the feudal and bureaucratic culture in the party. The leaders should work for the interests of the masses rather than themselves.Interesting to see that even within Baidya's new Party there is still rank'n'file concern about privileges enjoyed by the Party elite. These have usually manifested as capitalist behaviour - ie a personal and collective accumulation of great wealth.
The Telegraph's satirical political commentator notes below that, even as Baidya & co talk of " defeating imperialists and expansionists" and "Indian expansionism", they boast of fraternal greetings from the Chinese CP and are happy to have a member of the Chinese ruling class - the Ambassador - as honoured guest sharing their platform. Gone seemingly are the definition of 'revisionist counter-revolutionary capitalist-roaders' that Maoists have long used for the present Chinese CP; Baidya's Party is now cultivating ever-closer links with them. (Even as Chinese capital penetrates ever-deeper into, eg, Africa, to exploit its proletariat*.)
http://www.telegraphnepal.com/headline/2013-01-10/nepal-note:-china-good-india-evil-ncp-maoist-leaders-claim
10 Jan 2013
Nepal note: China good, India evil, NCP-Maoist leaders claim
Telegraph Nepal
Whereas China respects Nepal’s sovereignty unconditionally, India on the other hand, has set an evil eye on Nepal. The northern neighbor has respect for us but the Indian ruling elites have always looked towards us with mal-intent. India’s evil eye towards Nepal must come to an end.
Addressing the inaugural session of the sixth general assembly of the party, Chairman Mohan Baidya Kiran of Nepal Communist Party-Maoist, made these fiery remarks in Tudikhel in Kathmandu, January 9, 2013.
Chinese Ambassador Yang Houlan was also present on the occasion. This has immense meaning.
Vice Chairman C.P. Gajurel informed the crowd that the party has received a congratulatory message from the Communist Party of China.
“The Indian expansionism is the major obstacle towards successful completion of our revolt,” Baidya continued.
“We do not want to criticize India for nothing. We want friendly relations with the people of India and we also want good relations to exist between the two countries. There exist several unequal treaties between the two countries. The Indian ruling elites continue to treat us unequally and they have set an evil eye on our country. There lay threat to our sovereignty from the South.”
In his high voltage speech, Chairman Baidya also said that his party was ready to take the charge of the nation.
But only if awarded. But who will begin this charitable work?
“We will come with new policies, plans and objectives. We will focus our discussion on defeating imperialists and expansionists. We will bring our plan of action to successfully complete the revolt that began a decade back. We are ready to take the country forward in the direction traced by our party.”
“It has become wide and clear that the parliamentary parties have become a failure. They are outdated. There is however, the need for alliance between real communists, republicans and nationalists. We do not want to maintain our relations with the parliamentary parties.”
Seated beside the firebrand leader Netra Bikram Chan Biplav was the Chinese ambassador followed by the Ambassador from North Korea.
Biplav, as per the media reports, has been secretly meeting PM Bhattarai upon his return from China.
The party leaders Dev Gurung, Ram Bahadur Thapa ‘Badal’, Netra Bikram Chand Biplav, C.P. Gajurel, Manik Lal Shrestha were also present on the dais.
Spokeswoman, Pampha Bhusal told the reporters that none representing the parliamentary parties including the Unified Maoists Party were invited to take part in the inaugural session.
Societal boycott?
“Our objective is to fight against the parliamentary system. It would have been unsuitable to have brought them to the dais”.
...But Chinese bureaucrats are fine to have on the platform.
*On Chinese economic 'imperialism and expansionism';
"Why would the Chinese government push some of its labor- and energy-intensive industries to move to special economic zones in Africa, even as the U.S. Congress bans the U.S. Agency for International Development from financing any activities that could relocate the jobs of Americans overseas? Because Chinese planners want industrialists at home to move up the value chain. Polluting industries such as leather tanneries and metal smelters are no longer tolerated in many Chinese cities. And as the world economy recovers from the recent economic recession, wages and benefits will resume rising in China's coastal belt, as they had been before the crisis. Some factories will move further inland, but others will go offshore, closer to both the sources of and the markets for raw materials.
The early stages of industrialization might bring pollution, low wages, and long workdays, especially if the Chinese zones are successful. But like China's resource-backed loans, the planned economic zones promise to provide African countries with some things they very much want: employment opportunities, new technologies, and badly needed infrastructure. This is an opportunity for African states to ride into the global economy on China's shirttails rather than remain natural-resource suppliers to the world." (D. Brautigam - Jan 2010; http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/65916/deborah-brautigam/africa%E2%80%99s-eastern-promise
The party should mainly take two crucial decisions. Firstly, the party should sketch a clear roadmap of the revolution to ensure that the Nepali people would not be victimized by betrayal of the leadership. Secondly, the party should do away with nepotism, and the feudal and bureaucratic culture in the party. The leaders should work for the interests of the masses rather than themselves.Interesting to see that even within Baidya's new Party there is still rank'n'file concern about privileges enjoyed by the Party elite. These have usually manifested as capitalist behaviour - ie a personal and collective accumulation of great wealth.
The Telegraph's satirical political commentator notes below that, even as Baidya & co talk of " defeating imperialists and expansionists" and "Indian expansionism", they boast of fraternal greetings from the Chinese CP and are happy to have a member of the Chinese ruling class - the Ambassador - as honoured guest sharing their platform. Gone seemingly are the definition of 'revisionist counter-revolutionary capitalist-roaders' that Maoists have long used for the present Chinese CP; Baidya's Party is now cultivating ever-closer links with them. (Even as Chinese capital penetrates ever-deeper into, eg, Africa, to exploit its proletariat*.)
http://www.telegraphnepal.com/headline/2013-01-10/nepal-note:-china-good-india-evil-ncp-maoist-leaders-claim
10 Jan 2013
Nepal note: China good, India evil, NCP-Maoist leaders claim
Telegraph Nepal
Whereas China respects Nepal’s sovereignty unconditionally, India on the other hand, has set an evil eye on Nepal. The northern neighbor has respect for us but the Indian ruling elites have always looked towards us with mal-intent. India’s evil eye towards Nepal must come to an end.
Addressing the inaugural session of the sixth general assembly of the party, Chairman Mohan Baidya Kiran of Nepal Communist Party-Maoist, made these fiery remarks in Tudikhel in Kathmandu, January 9, 2013.
Chinese Ambassador Yang Houlan was also present on the occasion. This has immense meaning.
Vice Chairman C.P. Gajurel informed the crowd that the party has received a congratulatory message from the Communist Party of China.
“The Indian expansionism is the major obstacle towards successful completion of our revolt,” Baidya continued.
“We do not want to criticize India for nothing. We want friendly relations with the people of India and we also want good relations to exist between the two countries. There exist several unequal treaties between the two countries. The Indian ruling elites continue to treat us unequally and they have set an evil eye on our country. There lay threat to our sovereignty from the South.”
In his high voltage speech, Chairman Baidya also said that his party was ready to take the charge of the nation.
But only if awarded. But who will begin this charitable work?
“We will come with new policies, plans and objectives. We will focus our discussion on defeating imperialists and expansionists. We will bring our plan of action to successfully complete the revolt that began a decade back. We are ready to take the country forward in the direction traced by our party.”
“It has become wide and clear that the parliamentary parties have become a failure. They are outdated. There is however, the need for alliance between real communists, republicans and nationalists. We do not want to maintain our relations with the parliamentary parties.”
Seated beside the firebrand leader Netra Bikram Chan Biplav was the Chinese ambassador followed by the Ambassador from North Korea.
Biplav, as per the media reports, has been secretly meeting PM Bhattarai upon his return from China.
The party leaders Dev Gurung, Ram Bahadur Thapa ‘Badal’, Netra Bikram Chand Biplav, C.P. Gajurel, Manik Lal Shrestha were also present on the dais.
Spokeswoman, Pampha Bhusal told the reporters that none representing the parliamentary parties including the Unified Maoists Party were invited to take part in the inaugural session.
Societal boycott?
“Our objective is to fight against the parliamentary system. It would have been unsuitable to have brought them to the dais”.
...But Chinese bureaucrats are fine to have on the platform.
*On Chinese economic 'imperialism and expansionism';
"Why would the Chinese government push some of its labor- and energy-intensive industries to move to special economic zones in Africa, even as the U.S. Congress bans the U.S. Agency for International Development from financing any activities that could relocate the jobs of Americans overseas? Because Chinese planners want industrialists at home to move up the value chain. Polluting industries such as leather tanneries and metal smelters are no longer tolerated in many Chinese cities. And as the world economy recovers from the recent economic recession, wages and benefits will resume rising in China's coastal belt, as they had been before the crisis. Some factories will move further inland, but others will go offshore, closer to both the sources of and the markets for raw materials.
The early stages of industrialization might bring pollution, low wages, and long workdays, especially if the Chinese zones are successful. But like China's resource-backed loans, the planned economic zones promise to provide African countries with some things they very much want: employment opportunities, new technologies, and badly needed infrastructure. This is an opportunity for African states to ride into the global economy on China's shirttails rather than remain natural-resource suppliers to the world." (D. Brautigam - Jan 2010; http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/65916/deborah-brautigam/africa%E2%80%99s-eastern-promise