Log in

View Full Version : Britsh Airways 'discriminated' against Christian worker - Euro court



Dennis the 'Bloody Peasant'
15th January 2013, 11:35
Thoughts fellow revlefters?

A British Airways employee suffered discrimination at work over her Christian beliefs, the European Court of Human Rights has ruled.
Judges ruled Nadia Eweida's rights had been violated under Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
She took her case to the European Court of Human Rights after BA made her stop wearing a cross visibly.
Judges ruled that the rights of three other Christians had not been violated by their employers.
They brought cases against the government for not protecting their rights but ministers, who contested the claims, argued that the rights of the employees were only protected in private.
British Airways said: "Our own uniform policy was changed in 2007 to allow Miss Eweida and others to wear symbols of faith and she and other employees have been working under these arrangements for the last six years.
"Miss Eweida has worked continuously for British Airways for 13 years."
Following the rulings, Prime Minister David Cameron said he was "delighted" that the "principle of wearing religious symbols at work has been upheld", adding that people "shouldn't suffer discrimination due to religious beliefs".
And the Archbishop of York said Christians and those of other faiths "should be free to wear the symbols of their own religion without discrimination".
The other cases involved nurse Shirley Chaplin, 57, whose employer also stopped her wearing necklaces with a cross, Gary McFarlane, 51 - a marriage counsellor fired after saying he might object to giving sex therapy advice to gay couples - and registrar Lillian Ladele, who was disciplined after she refused to conduct same-sex civil partnership ceremonies.

(More at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-21025332 (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-21025332))

Anti-Traditional
15th January 2013, 12:36
Well in the cases of the 'cross people', then yeah they should be allowed, it's not doing any harm.

McFarlane is a bit more complicated, if he only said he might object to giving sex therapy then it is a bit harsh. If he refused to do so, well then he isnt really doing his job and cant really complain.

Ladele deserved what she got, basically refusing to do her job.

Yugo45
15th January 2013, 13:46
I wonder how would the court rule it if it was a worker with a hammer and sickle necklace or something. Would it also be discrimination at work? Political discrimination?

Flying Purple People Eater
15th January 2013, 15:00
Wasn't there a thread on this same article months ago?

Also fuck the bigot who refused therapy to gay couples. I don't give a rat's ass whether he gets fired or not.

Dennis the 'Bloody Peasant'
16th January 2013, 12:18
Wasn't there a thread on this same article months ago?

Also fuck the bigot who refused therapy to gay couples. I don't give a rat's ass whether he gets fired or not.

Probably at the time of the initial complaint or it first going to court.

Agreed on the bigot losing their job.