Log in

View Full Version : ‘Initiative 1000’ – An ambitious move on the Greek Left



Crux
31st December 2012, 13:34
‘Initiative 1000’ – An ambitious move on the Greek Left

31/12/2012
Build a united front of Left forces on a programme to end capitalist crisis!

Andros Payiatsos, Xekinima (CWI Greece)

http://www.socialistworld.net/img/20121227Grafik4288939346298553776.jpg
Xekinima (CWI Greece) plays a central role in an initiative to bring together different forces from the Greek Left to fight for a united front, based primarily around SYRIZA, (radical left coalition party) the highest polling opposition Left party, on a programme that decisively breaks with capitalism.

The initiative is known as ‘Initiative 1000’ due to the number of individuals who signed the original ‘Declaration of the initiative’.

The ‘Initiative’ had its first public meeting on 29 November 2012 in Athens. Despite heavy rain, 600 people attended the very successful launch. Meetings have taken place in many other areas in Greece to set up local committees of the Initiative.

What follows is an edited translation of an article by Andros Payiatsos, from Xekinima (CWI Greece), published soon after a press conference at which the Initiative 1000 was formally launched in November.

Socialistworld.net

On Monday 5 November 2012, members of different Greek Left organisations and independent activists launched ‘Initiative 1000’ which takes its name from the 1000 or so individuals signed an initial declaration.

This ambitious launch comes at a time of unprecedented attacks on the standard of living and rights and lives of millions of Greeks, who are driven to despair by the policies of the ruling elite and the Troika [EU, IMF and IMF]. With society in a state of flux, rapid turns and changes, the Left is confronted with huge tasks and challenges.

Workers and youth openly public about the extent to which the Greek Left provides adequate answers to the crisis. The Initiative 1000 is set to intervene in this debate, not like “another party” just trying to recruit members in competition with the rest of the Left (SYRIZA, KKE, ANTARSYA, etc) and leading to further fragmentation of the Left. The Initiative calls for cooperation on the basis of a programme that provides a way out of the catastrophic crisis, a programme based on the need to defend the interests of the working class and the oppressed.

Initiative 1000 - The fundamental points

As the Declaration of the Initiative 1000 states, the fundamental points of agreement are summed up as follows:

All the undersigned:

· Believe that any solution to the social and economic implosion taking place in Greece in this period can only be found on the basis of breaking with the present capitalist system.
· Such a solution can only be found on the basis of a united front of Left forces and on the basis of a programme that calls for the ending of crisis engulfing the working masses and for the overthrow of the present capitalist regime.

· The crisis is international and European-wide. We fight for a revolutionary change in Greece that can act as a trigger to similar /processes internationally. Thus we strive for the widest possible coordination and common struggle of the mass movements that develop internationally.

· We support the greatest possible cooperation and unity in action of all the Greek Left, on the basis of such a radical political programme, but also in the common daily struggle for the people’s survival and for solidarity actions for those most severely hit by the crisis.

· We support the prospect of a government of the Left (in the present conditions identified mainly with SYRIZA) knowing however that such a development is not the “end of the road”, but the beginning of mass struggles.

· The Left must seek the widest possible cooperation of its forces in the fight against the Memoranda, the Troika and the Greek ruling class, starting from the demand of ‘No Sacrifices for the Euro!’

· We appeal to all Left forces and fighters (including non-party individuals) who agree with the ideas represented by this Initiative, independently of which party (or political trend) they may belong, to support and widely campaign for the above aims and tasks.

Unity

A central feature of the Initiative 1000 is that it aims for unity, transcending the divisive ‘Chinese Wall’ of the various political parties that historically have become, particularly in Greece, an almost insurmountable obstacle for the different forces of the Left to effectively communicate.

This Initiative has been made by:

· Aristeri Paremvasi, ARAN (a tendency inside ARAN – Left Renewal and ANTARSYA, the Anti-capitalist Alliance)

· Kommunistiki Ananeosi (Communist Refoundation – one of the constituent organisations making up ANTARSYA)

· Paremvasi (a new Left organisation set up by those expelled from KOE, a Maoist organisation working inside SYRIZA, in the beginning of 2012 and who participate in MAA, the formation created by the ex-leader of SYRIZA, Alekos Alavanos)

· and Xekinima (CWI section in Greece)

Very soon after its initiation, a large number of ‘independents’ (I.e. not belonging to any Left party) expressed their support for the Initiative and signed its Declaration.

The agreement of so many comrades from different Left political trajectories on the basis of such an advanced common framework – both political and tactical – is something that we have never seen before!

This certainly creates some difficulties, as well as doubts about its prospects. But the dominant issue for all those who are involved in the Initiative 1000 is the common understanding of the historical tasks confronting the Left in Greece

The programme

Some of the key points of the political programme that Initiative 1000 is fighting for are the following (excerpts from the founding text of the Initiative).

. Non-recognition of the debt and immediate cessation of its payment

· Abolition of all Memoranda and all implementation legislation

· Abrogation of all neo-colonial loan contracts/agreements

· Nationalisation of the banking system

· Drastic debt relief for all working class households, small businesses, small to medium-sized working farmers and for all those who have been hit by the crisis

· Heavy taxation on capital, the end of bank secrecy for big depositors and a massive reduction of arms expenditures

· Nationalisation of all the strategic economic sectors and strategic enterprises

· Real democracy, with the institutionalisation of social and workers’ control and management, across the entire spectrum of economic activity

· The creation, on the above basis, of a progressive plan to reconstruct the economy for the benefit and in the interest of the working masses and the people

Only through such a programme can Greek society avert the economic and social disaster in which we are lead by the Greek ruling class, the EU and the IMF. Only in this way can workers’ salaries, pensions, and social welfare gains, like free Health and Education, and industrial relations and basic democratic rights, be rescued.

Initiative 1000 and the rest of the Left

The advanced political programme, defended by Initiative 1000 and referred to in brief above, distinguishes the Initiative from the policies expressed by the majority inside the leadership of SYRIZA(radical left coalition party).

Raising the need of co-operation of the Left and for a ‘United Front’ distinguishes the Initiative from the sectarianism and isolationism of the KKE (the Greek communist party ) and ANTARSYA (the Anti-capitalist Alliance).

The Initiative 1000 does not raise its programme in competition with the existing forces of the Left in the sense of trying to recruit members away from the present parties, but attempts to intervene and influence the intense political debates that are already taking place in the ranks of the Left and throughout the whole of the Left.

It wants to assist and join forces with individuals and currents of ideas, inside the present parties and formations of the Left, who are fighting for ideas similar to those of the Initiative.

The Initiative 1000 has already gained many supporters but, also, quite a number of ‘enemies‘. The ideas of the Initiative are already being attacked inside SYRIZA, inside ANTARSYA (where expulsions have already been threatened to scare people away from signing the Initiative’s Declaration) and elsewhere.

We are asking all those comrades who are have rushed to attack the Initiative to try to keep an open mind and to allow the free expression and exchange of ideas among party members so that they can make up their own mind about the issues. They must show trust and confidence to the ability of ordinary members and cadres of organizations and parties of the Left to be able to judge for themselves. Even more, they should show confidence to the ability of ordinary workers to judge what is right and what is wrong, particularly as the “common people” are what the Left is supposed to be fighting for. The Left must have confidence in the class instincts of the oppressed and their freedom to choose what they think is the right course. This should be a core value for the Left. Without this, the Left has already lost the war before the first battle. Viewed from this perspective, Initiative 1000 should be welcomed by all the forces of the Left.

Need for co-ordination and action

The Initiative 1000 does not seek to limit itself only at the level of ideas and debate. Discussions through blogs, websites and other social media are necessary and important but also have serious limitations: they do not engage large sections of the oppressed and are restricted to (cadre and leaders) on the Left who have the ability, time, etc, to participate.

The Initiative 1000 needs the life-blood of the real movements. That is why it is important to set the goal of establishing local committees of groups of friends or supporters of the Initiative 1000, and to take initiatives, whether at a local level, in workplaces or within the Left party they belong to.

Xekinima (CWI Greece) participates actively in this initiative precisely because we believe that only a Left policy can provide a way out of the crisis and challenge the power of capital (national and multinational) on the basis of the socialist reconstruction of the economy and a socialist society.

The present economic crisis is an international crisis which begun in the US, in 2007, and will not end anytime soon. Imploding capitalism now leads entire societies into barbarism, including societies that thought they belonged in the “developed” world. The socialist perspective is the only practical and realistic solution to the crisis for Greek society, the European South, Europe, and the entire world.

All parts of the Left that agree with these views have to get together, communicate and coordinate their activities, beyond organisational and party divisions. This is the only way that the workers’ movement and the oppressed can face the future with optimism, confident we can win the battles ahead.

Members of Xekinima have already signed the Declaration of the Initiative 1000 and we are discussing what it the best way forward, how to reach a wider audience, etc. We are asking all our friends and readers of our website to do the same.

Sasha
31st December 2012, 14:41
I don't see how any of that has anything to do with "a programme that decisively breaks with capitalism", if anything its the ultimate lifeline thrown to capitalism in a "take this, or we are going down together" way. Buy hey, I'm not that against reformism at all all the time. We shouldn't pretent its revolutionary anti-capitalist though.

Crux
31st December 2012, 14:45
I don't see how any of that has anything to do with "a programme that decisively breaks with capitalism", if anything its the ultimate lifeline thrown to capitalism in a "take this, or we are going down together" way. Buy hey, I'm not that against reformism at all all the time. We shouldn't pretent its revolutionary anti-capitalist though.

"· Real democracy, with the institutionalisation of social and workers’ control and management, across the entire spectrum of economic activity

· The creation, on the above basis, of a progressive plan to reconstruct the economy for the benefit and in the interest of the working masses and the people"
Could perhaps have been sharper, but I think it's to the point.
I do think the most exciting part is the cross- and beyond-party unity being built.

Tim Cornelis
1st January 2013, 15:33
"· Real democracy, with the institutionalisation of social and workers’ control and management, across the entire spectrum of economic activity

· The creation, on the above basis, of a progressive plan to reconstruct the economy for the benefit and in the interest of the working masses and the people"
Could perhaps have been sharper, but I think it's to the point.
I do think the most exciting part is the cross- and beyond-party unity being built.

What's the point of unity for the sake of unity?

Taxation? Small businesses? Debt? Capital? How can a system based around capital be post-capitalistic.

The programme, albeit an improvement of the current capitalist system, reeks of a Yugoslav-styled economy. It is not a communistic programme.

Delenda Carthago
5th January 2013, 13:14
What does the "Initiative" think about Red-Green Allience and AKEL?:rolleyes:

Ravachol
5th January 2013, 16:52
"· Real democracy, with the institutionalisation of social and workers’ control and management, across the entire spectrum of economic activity


This is so vague, so nebulous that it can mean anything from workers' stock ownership to works councils (NOT workers councils, mind you) to fascist vertical syndicates to plain old corporatism to third-way distributism to state capitalism. Whatever the flavor, the self-management of capital and fantasies about "workers' control over the economy" have little to nothing to do with communism.



· The creation, on the above basis, of a progressive plan to reconstruct the economy for the benefit and in the interest of the working masses and the people"

Again, so nebulous as to be utterly hollow. Its simple sloganeering that seeks to achieve 'critical mass' somehow to make a final push to implement 'one last go at programmatism'.



Faced with the generalisation of the absence of future in the progress of the current crisis and the intensification of the dynamics of the restructuring, protesters cannot practically imagine any way out, any concrete way in which their lives could be different, so they put forward a mere form, real democracy, which however much it can represent all their aspirations for a better life, remains an empty form

piet11111
5th January 2013, 19:08
· Nationalisation of all the strategic economic sectors and strategic enterprises

I would sign for that.

And if party's like Syriza are threatening expulsions over this i cant help but get hopeful over this.

Q
6th January 2013, 13:59
I would sign for that.

And if party's like Syriza are threatening expulsions over this i cant help but get hopeful over this.

Why would they do that? They have the same demand in their 40-point programme?

DDR
6th January 2013, 14:35
So this initiative doesn't plead for the exit of the EU and NATO? If that's the case, what's the main difference between this and syriza?

Q
6th January 2013, 14:41
So this initiative doesn't plead for the exit of the EU and NATO? If that's the case, what's the main difference between this and syriza?

Syriza does actually plead to leave NATO, as per their 40 point programme.

Delenda Carthago
6th January 2013, 14:42
So this initiative doesn't plead for the exit of the EU and NATO? If that's the case, what's the main difference between this and syriza?
Thats a damn good question.:rolleyes:

piet11111
6th January 2013, 15:41
Why would they do that? They have the same demand in their 40-point programme?

Having it in the programme and acting on it are 2 different things entirely.


The ideas of the Initiative are already being attacked inside SYRIZA, inside ANTARSYA (where expulsions have already been threatened to scare people away from signing the Initiative’s Declaration) and elsewhere.


Seems expulsions where only threatened in ANTARSYA my mistake.

Q
6th January 2013, 16:22
Having it in the programme and acting on it are 2 different things entirely.

Be that as it may be, what expulsions are you talking about?

Aurora
6th January 2013, 18:17
No mention of Golden Dawn or the need to create an organisation to combat them, i would think that a common anti-fascist organisation would form an essential part of a united front, no?

We support the prospect of a government of the Left (in the present conditions identified mainly with SYRIZA) knowing however that such a development is not the “end of the road”, but the beginning of mass struggles.
Very glad there is that qualifier at the end, a qualifier which is missing from a lot of the CWI talk about a 'left government'. By all means get the capitalists out of government but no illusions that SYRIZA can bring change, they need to be exposed in front of the masses, the struggle intensified and as always no participation of communists in bourgeois government.

Why would they do that? They have the same demand in their 40-point programme?
Actually SYRIZA's program only says nationalisation of strategic ex-public industries while this makes no such distinction.

Q
6th January 2013, 18:42
Very glad there is that qualifier at the end, a qualifier which is missing from a lot of the CWI talk about a 'left government'. By all means get the capitalists out of government but no illusions that SYRIZA can bring change, they need to be exposed in front of the masses, the struggle intensified and as always no participation of communists in bourgeois government.
I agree with what you're saying here, although I note a possible contradiction in the boldened bit: Such formulations were also used in the Liverpool saga (I could quote the relevant bits from Liverpool: a city that dared to fight if required), but there of course the CWI (via the Labour Party) did take up government responsibility. Knowing that, and knowing how "Liverpool" lives on in the CWI (it is cited at pretty much all conventions), why would the quoted bit be an oppositional statement per se?


Actually SYRIZA's program only says nationalisation of strategic ex-public industries while this makes no such distinction.
You make it sound like there is a big difference here, while there isn't.
- First of all, as far as I know, the Greek economy had a pretty big nationalised sector in the past (besides, Syriza also explicitly calls for nationalising the banks for example).
- Second, nationalisation in and by itself is no measure of socialist politics. In fact, it could run contrary to working class politics as it might very well mean splitting up multinational corporations along national lines. Nationalising more or less is not that relevant by itself in communist politics.

Yet_Another_Boring_Marxist
6th January 2013, 18:53
Well it's progress. Class struggle is unending, hopefully once these guys overthrow the Troika they'll get overthrown by the KKE

DDR
6th January 2013, 21:15
Syriza does actually plead to leave NATO, as per their 40 point programme.

Then Syriza is more revolutionary than this guys. An european party that doesn't plead for leaving NATO and EU isn't revolutionary, and I would add that not even leftist.

Q
6th January 2013, 22:12
Then Syriza is more revolutionary than this guys. An european party that doesn't plead for leaving NATO and EU isn't revolutionary, and I would add that not even leftist.

Positions like leaving the EU all too often leads to nationalistic garbage. The Dutch SP (while not, in any sense, claiming to be a revolutionary party) has exactly this attitude. As if Dutch capitalism is so much better than European capitalism.

And then there are of course the varieties of Marxist-Leninist parties, such as the CPB, with their "Britain's road to socialism".

And this is not to speak about the very need to organise on a continental level, at the very least, in order to put forward any positive alternatives to capitalism.

DDR
6th January 2013, 22:59
Then tell me how a country can implement socialism without the control of the economy? Because there's no more national banks, only the ECB, so leaving the EU is a must.

Q
6th January 2013, 23:06
Then tell me how a country can implement socialism ...

And this is exactly where your reasoning goes off the rails. It can't. You need to think on at least a continental scale, in the case of Europe, to even start posing a society beyond capitalism.

Crux
6th January 2013, 23:09
This is so vague, so nebulous that it can mean anything from workers' stock ownership to works councils (NOT workers councils, mind you) to fascist vertical syndicates to plain old corporatism to third-way distributism to state capitalism. Whatever the flavor, the self-management of capital and fantasies about "workers' control over the economy" have little to nothing to do with communism.



Again, so nebulous as to be utterly hollow. Its simple sloganeering that seeks to achieve 'critical mass' somehow to make a final push to implement 'one last go at programmatism'.

Yes clearly this is a program for fascist syndicates. Onward to pedantism! Worker's conyrol over the economy has little to do with communism? Fair enough what marx caöle the higher stage of communism would mean the working class would already be abolished as a class.