Log in

View Full Version : Banning Captialist



Kez
1st December 2001, 09:40
Hey comrades,

this guy is a fucking idiot, he cant string up a sentence for an argument, and he's just doing my head in.
He called us [socialists] the live of the american sytem and i am quite offendedby that.
Lets put it to the vote to ban him.

comrade kamo

psycho chicken
1st December 2001, 12:10
yeah well u gotta have nerve to come here with that name.
vote

RedCeltic
1st December 2001, 12:10
who are you talking about? someone's named Capitalist? On this board? I haven't been here too much lately...

(Edited by RedCeltic at 7:12 am on Dec. 1, 2001)

RedCeltic
1st December 2001, 12:42
I haven't been here in awile... can someone point out what this troll has done that warents banning? Just being a "Capitalist" and a poor speller isn't reason enough to ban him.

Besides.. .you people want someone to fight right?

Chameleon102
1st December 2001, 13:08
Having read over the last few posts (not been here in a while), I agree heartily with the conclusion that Capitalist is a twat.

Let me ask you this...how can you justify a system where poverty has to exist in order to prop up the system? Someone somewhere is starving so you can have a computer......think about it.

Kez
1st December 2001, 13:48
I really wouldnt mind if he proved his points, but he's full of shit and i really dont wanna see his useless threads and posts, where some1 with a brain could post.

Malte if your reading this, then ban capitalist

on behalf of board members

Freiheit
1st December 2001, 13:59
if someone in this forum has a different opinion, that is ok.
but, it is obviously that Capitalist only wanna make fun
of us.
he should prove his arguments.

Terminal Frost
1st December 2001, 13:59
I want him to stay. I enjoy crushing every argument he throws at me, countering every statistic he uses with one so much more horrific. He's a stereotypical voice of an uneducated, mindless capitalist. He's an example to us all of what we must fight against.

And he's downright funny to laugh at :)

Keep him. What harm can he possibly do. We have the truth on our side. He merely allies with hypocricy.

RedCeltic
1st December 2001, 14:01
No... I'm against banning anyone simply because they are a useless tool. It's not Capitalist's fault he's been brainwashed by the system. If he sticks around long enough he may just see that he's wrong.

Moskitto
1st December 2001, 16:10
I think i'd have to say no as well, He's not like Fantomas, Fantomas was all mouth no brain, Capitalist makes the effort to make conversation (although the reasoning is off sometimes and can easily be bebutted).

Nickademus
1st December 2001, 16:14
as malte is aware of i am completely banning for any reason

Kez
1st December 2001, 16:20
we'll just wait till he offends everyone of you, then we shall see he gets banned.

comrade kamo

Kez
1st December 2001, 17:00
maybe you are correct comrade,
by debating against this poopman we will defeat him and make him eat his/her words

Fuck Capitalism
comrade kamo

Son of Scargill
1st December 2001, 17:49
I say don't ban anyone,unless their posts become just foul mouthed offensive rants.In which case I don't see any point in having them here.

El Commandante
1st December 2001, 19:32
Leave him for a bit longer, but if it gets worse then I say ban him, but let him have his say for it, must of it is rubbish but freedom of speech should prevail and when he steps out of line and insults someone directly then kick him out.

Anonymous
1st December 2001, 21:27
the dude sabotaged my dalai lama post! ban him now! :0)

just joking, seriously though since iv bin here (almost 6 months now) i`ve only seen one person banned and that was fantomas. i agreed with that but this is different, fantomas spamed posts and new threads all over the place in a clear effort to disrupt the normal order of bisness around here. Dont ban capitalist, either ignore him or if you have the patience explain to him the why you are whatever you are and why you think capitalism is criminal etc etc. He might listen he might not but he should not be banned for not sharing our beliefs. And besides you have the commie club dont you? well then.

Derar
2nd December 2001, 02:55
why giving him all this attention from the first place ?!!

thats exactly what he was looking for !

RedCeltic
2nd December 2001, 03:05
He also said that we should be "jumping for joy" at the distruction of the WTC... which insults me beyond belief.. not only because I'm a humaniterian... but because I know of almost 20 people in my town who died in that bulding that day. I have more of a right to mourn their loss than he does... I still say let him stay... but he better be on his toes... because any racist, sexist, or general bigoted remarks from him and I'll turn coat and side with Kamo in a heartbeat.

Nickademus
2nd December 2001, 05:17
Quote: from TavareeshKamo on 5:20 pm on Dec. 1, 2001
we'll just wait till he offends everyone of you, then we shall see he gets banned.

comrade kamo


lol that just shows me how little you pay attention. do you remember fantamos? he personally insulted me numerous times. and yet i was against banning him.

Kez
2nd December 2001, 08:52
wtf?
stfu, idiot, if you read the next post youd understand ,
whats the point in you posting that comment anyway?
none

comrade kamo

Nickademus
2nd December 2001, 19:41
look, this is an equal forum, everyone is equal. and i am getting very annoyed with your insults. simply because you don't understand something doesn't make me an idiot.

and i read your second post but it doesn't change the fact that you were trying to make me look hyporcritical. The response i wrote had a purpose, to show you i'm not hypocritical like yourself.

if you want to continue this debate fine, but don't resort to slanders.

Capitalist
3rd December 2001, 16:38
I agree with Freiheit & Moskitto.

I will quit the name calling.

I promiss no more name calling or saying the word "ignorant". However you communists should be willing to put your revolution and communist theory to the test.

Nickademus
3rd December 2001, 17:33
Quote: from Capitalist on 5:38 pm on Dec. 3, 2001
I agree with Freiheit & Moskitto.

I will quit the name calling.

I promiss no more name calling or saying the word "ignorant". However you communists should be willing to put your revolution and communist theory to the test.

i was actually referring my comment to tavareesh kamo but i'm glad you're going to stop. and many of us are very willing to argue with anyone who disagrees with us. please don't assume that kamo is representative of all of us

Kez
3rd December 2001, 17:40
Hold up all,

i can see that some of you are easily offended,
i am prepared to hold out the olive branch and bring peace within the whole commie community.
i know that maybe freiheit and nick are are not well with me, and if they wanna carry on being mard arses then so be it,
but its my belief that divided we will never get anywhere

i cant remember when i pissed you off nick, but hey

heres a toast:
"TO THE UNTITED LEFT
AND GLORY TO THE REVOLUTION"

Workers of all countries unite
hey nick and all mt different opioned comrades

comrade kamo :)

CommieBastard
3rd December 2001, 17:43
we shouldnt ban capitalist, if he becomes unbearable we always have the refuge of the commie club...

RedCeltic
3rd December 2001, 17:47
Yes exactly comrade, that's what it's there for.

Anonymous
3rd December 2001, 18:20
I agree with Freiheit & Moskitto.

I will quit the name calling.

I promiss no more name calling or saying the word "ignorant". However you communists should be willing to put your revolution and communist theory to the test.

im glad to hear it. The nest thing you should do is realise that not every one here is comunist. I assume that what you define as comunism is the one party state as described by lenin, and yes some here believe in that type or interpretation of comunism. others are comunist of a different type and other other things. i could go on and on but im not going to, why should i? if you want to know learn like i did.

But of course your not here to learn are you? nah you all ready know everything about us commies and the "free market". So go ahead make your arguments are rest assured someone here will ripe them apart like so many before you. The only condiction in all this is civility. Civilized debate and discution with no insults (or to an execptable minimum), and another nice thing would be constructive critisism, something i have yet to see any of you right-wing-know-it-all critics do.

MadMarx
3rd December 2001, 18:35
Comrades, don't you see the sarcasm? It's the name "Capitalist" who is against the capitalism...I think, but when he's no leftist: BAN HIM!

Freiheit
4th December 2001, 04:37
Quote: from TavareeshKamo on 11:40 am on Dec. 3, 2001
Hold up all,

i can see that some of you are easily offended,
i am prepared to hold out the olive branch and bring peace within the whole commie community.
i know that maybe freiheit and nick are are not well with me, and if they wanna carry on being mard arses then so be it,
but its my belief that divided we will never get anywhere

i cant remember when i pissed you off nick, but hey

heres a toast:
"TO THE UNTITED LEFT
AND GLORY TO THE REVOLUTION"

Workers of all countries unite
hey nick and all mt different opioned comrades

comrade kamo :)


i actually have nothing against you, we have a different opinion about stalin, but that its.